[02:05] <Logan> are we still not uploading stuff because of GCC 5?
[05:01] <Logan> jk, I see the followup email
[13:12] <xnox> publisher is so slow.
[13:13] <xnox> i'm so used to per-build publisher we are running in koji.
[19:34] <slangasek> well, it took a bit for ben to finish running, but there are transition trackers up now for each of the gcc5-induced package name changes that seb128 prepped last week. http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/
[19:36] <doko> slangasek, icu is missing
[19:36] <slangasek> hmm checking
[19:37] <slangasek> doko: icu had no package name change in landing-039
[19:37] <doko> libicu52 -> libicu55
[19:37] <slangasek> sure
[19:37] <doko> already had that in landing-019
[19:37] <slangasek> so I haven't tried to capture those yet
[19:37] <doko> or 16
[19:38] <doko> icu: libicu52 -> libicu55. Only partial rebuilds for now
[19:38] <doko> boost1.58: 1.55 -> 1.58, only partial rebuilds for now
[19:38] <doko> apt: libapt-pkg4.12 -> libapt-pkg4.16. only partial rebuilds for now
[19:38] <doko> process-cpp: libprocess-cpp2 -> libprocess-cpp3
[19:38] <doko> net-cpp: libnet-cpp1 -> libnet-cpp2
[19:38] <doko> dbus-cpp: libdbus-cpp4 -> libdbus-cpp5
[19:38] <doko> libphonenumber: libphonenumber6 -> libphonenumber7
[19:38] <doko> trust-store: libtrust-store1 -> libtrust-store2
[19:38] <doko> unity-scopes-api: libunity-scopes3 -> libunity-scopes1.0
[19:38] <doko> these were the ones already done in 16
[19:39] <slangasek> yes.  there are a lot more library transitions that still need to be tracked besides the v5 ones
[19:39] <slangasek> I'm saying that the v5 ones have transition trackers up - so people can start claiming those and working through them
[19:40] <doko> ok
[19:42] <slangasek> I'm also working through what's wrong with qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-ui-extras0.2 still, so we can get test images build against -proposed for touch
[19:43] <slangasek> (needs to be done today, to let the testing happen on schedule)
[19:44] <doko> what do you see?
[19:45] <slangasek> right now I just get a build failure from apt saying ' ubuntu-touch : Depends: qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-ui-extras0.2 but it is not going'
[19:45] <slangasek> 'to be installed'
[19:45] <doko> ahh, libexiv2-13v5,
[19:45] <doko> reuploading
[19:45] <slangasek> ?
[19:45] <slangasek> don't
[19:45] <slangasek> I already did that once
[19:45] <doko> ohh
[19:46] <slangasek> doko: I can investigate this one, I was meaning to let people know I was doing so
[19:47] <doko> slangasek, it's hard-coded dependency :-/
[19:47] <slangasek> yes, I started to suspect this
[19:47] <slangasek> I already fixed one of those last night
[19:49] <doko> why don't they use shlibs:Depends?
[19:50] <doko> anyway, I'm fixing it, and filing a bug report
[19:50] <slangasek> they do use shlibs:Depends; I'm just about to dput
[19:50] <slangasek> you can go work on another corner ;)
[19:51] <doko> ok, fine =)
[19:51] <slangasek> I see that some of the libraries with v5 name changes already have complete transitions, they're "only" blocked by gcc-5 now, which is pretty nice
[19:52] <slangasek> what are the prerequisites for dropping the blocker bug for gcc-5?
[19:52] <slangasek> 1) positive results from phone testing
[19:52] <slangasek> 2) batch uploads of the remaining library package name changes?
[19:53] <doko> not sure about 2. at some point, we probably don't care anymore about the renaming?
[20:01] <slangasek> doko: I'm intending to batch upload the remaining libraries this week
[20:02] <slangasek> I don't know if seb128 has any scripts that I should leverage, but if not I'll script something up.  should only take a couple of hours for the scripting and a couple of days for the uploads ;)
[20:02] <doko> slangasek, can you avoid to rename those where debian decided not to rename? or else we'll carry a delta forever
[20:03] <doko> I don't think he finished the script
[20:03] <slangasek> doko: well, I think I pointed out that the rename can be reverted and the delta can be dropped immediately after the wily release
[20:04] <doko> ok
[20:04] <slangasek> doko: if you have a list of source packages that I should blacklist because we know Debian won't change the name, that would certainly simplify
[20:04] <slangasek> but I expect this to be a small minority of packages
[20:05] <slangasek> ubunt-ui-extras published, reattempting test image
[20:06] <doko> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=libstdc%2B%2B-cxx11;users=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
[20:06] <slangasek> there's still an x86-specific issue regarding qtmir-android et al if anyone wanted to look at that; otherwise I'll look later
[20:06] <doko> would need looking at the closed issues
[20:07] <slangasek> doko: if you can give me a list of source packages to blacklist, I'll take it.  But I'm not going to sift through the closed bugs right now to figure out which ones were closed without name change
[20:07] <doko> ok, I'll do that tomorrow
[21:16] <xnox> slangasek: i'm not sure if i did cgal mygui & console-bridge
[21:17] <xnox> i rebuild them v5-less at first, then with proper v5 in place, but it might be too early one.
[21:17] <xnox> see last commits on transition tracker and/or new queue