[01:16] Wow, I applied to the ubuntu -us-georgia loco, way back in 2011 or early 2012, and just now was approved for membership. [01:17] I'd forgotten I had even attempted to join [01:18] are locos still a thing? I tried getting one going in Maine, but time and distance made it hard [01:19] * claydoh would really rather have a kubuntu or kde local group [07:52] Good morning. [08:09] it is so much easier to transfer files to Android devices using KDE Connect than using Ubuntu Phone as seen here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AU5KMyJrWxU === sebas_ is now known as sebas [09:14] Riddell, santa_: how's the kde stack with GCC 5? [09:17] hi ho [09:19] Hayyyyyy! [09:19] hiho sick_rimmit [09:19] hiho vip [09:19] soee: Hello my friend :-) [09:20] soee: any news about fresh debs for vivid with kde? [09:20] vip: well did you tested 5.3.2 ? :) [09:20] Hey vip, sick_rimmit, soee, Riddell. How are all of you doing? [09:21] lordievader: doing good :) [09:21] lordievader: Yeah, really good thanks, you ? [09:21] Doing pretty good myself, got ipv6 forwarding to work :D [09:22] soee: i don't know, those new versioning system completely messes me up [09:22] soee: but I didn't download those month old debs for sure [09:23] vip: What version of plasma are you running? [09:24] but i think they are the one to test [09:24] lordievader: who knows... is there any kde --versions command? [09:24] vip: Open ksysinfocenter. [09:24] (for all these versions of kde) [09:25] lordievader: kinfocenter? [09:25] Err, yes. That one ;) [09:26] kde plama ver 5.3.1 [09:28] Right, so backports ;) 5.3.2 is still in testing. [09:32] lordievader: 4:5.3.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu15.04~ppa1 Scarlett Clark (2015-07-06) [09:32] packages month old [09:33] and still testing? [09:34] oh i see, plasma (whatever it is) 5.3.2, kde frameworks (whatever it is) 5.12.0 (wow, such number), and kde applications 15.08 [09:38] hi doko, I will me moving today from one house to another. tomorrow and next days I will try to finish the patchset for kde apps as soon as possible [09:38] and ... I have reasons to think we won't have grave runtime problems during the transition === tazz_ is now known as tazz [10:39] lordievader: works [10:40] (almost) [10:40] vip: Sorry, what does? [10:40] 5.3.2 [10:41] Plasma 5.3.2, from staging repo [10:42] oh, it does not.. plasmashell PID: 2932Sygnał: Segmentation fault (11) [10:42] after reboot > [10:42] ? [10:42] yup [10:42] but i've got problems with plasmashell 5.3.1 too [10:42] vip: Vivid or Wily? [10:43] vivid [10:47] Hmm, works fine here. [10:52] i'll add dbg packages, maybe === rdieter_ is now known as rdieter_work [11:46] I seem to get a plasma crash when I try to reboot/shutdown [11:46] good to know I'm not the only one [11:47] though I'm on wily [11:47] soooo slooow [11:47] when typing [11:47] and things :( [11:47] was working fine at akademy [11:48] wily too, on vivid I'm still on 5.3.1 [11:48] I don't think it happens there [11:50] I'm beginning to think it has to do with chromium [11:55] I do use chrome, so I'll try to check that in the evening [12:04] doko: I guess I'll try and upload kde frameworks 5.12 today to wily [12:07] Riddell, please no big batch uploads [12:09] frameworks only comes like that [12:09] doko: how would you like it done? [12:10] doko: it's these packages http://qa.kubuntu.co.uk/ppa-status/frameworks/build_status_5.12.0_wily.html [12:10] which are built against gcc 5 so we can be pretty confident they all work [12:11] Riddell, are there any libs which shold go first= [12:11] ? [12:11] doko: frameworks has a list of tier1 that have no internal dependencies only qt [12:11] well, then upload those, buildds are not that busy atm [12:14] sitter: I'm going to pause KCI for that [12:39] Hey folks [15:43] hi there [15:44] hello Tonio_ [15:44] got a little question.... === Marqin_ is now known as Marqin [15:45] I haven't been there for a long time, but as an ex core-dev I used to have a @ubuntu.com email address which seems to have been removed from launchpad backoffice [15:45] it doesn't work anymore.... problem is I still use it ;) [15:45] who may I ask about that ? [15:45] Riddell, you there maybe ? [15:46] hi ahoneybun ;) [15:47] maybe #ubuntu-rmb [15:47] I don't about that channel... what does it stand for ? [15:47] Tonio_: did you renew your ubuntu membership? [15:48] I think so ;) [15:48] that's weird [15:48] I'm still a member of motu but not ubuntu [15:48] shouldn't be possible theorically [15:48] rmb is the membership board [15:48] Tonio_: that's the reason why then [15:49] ah..... [15:50] I used to renew all my memberships for a long time but I started to be "honnest" recently, and let it go ;) [15:50] beeing noticed as a core-dev without uploading a package for like 4 years was a bit lying ;) [15:50] haha [15:51] indeed I forgot about the standard ubuntu membership... [15:51] I'm gona ask there [15:53] thanks davmor2 I'm asking.... we'll see !: [15:54] feel strange and lovelly to type in here again ;) [15:57] heh [15:57] Tonio_: *hugs* [15:59] hey ;) [16:01] how are you doing shadeslayer ? [16:02] good [16:02] had a crazy weekend [16:04] ;) [16:04] I guess I could say it's the same for me [16:04] even though from now on it's not IT stuff ;) [16:20] Tonio_: it wasn't IT stuff for me too ;) [16:22] Riddell, ScottK: could you have a look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791253 and eventually merge that ? [16:22] Debian bug 791253 in src:qca2 "qca2: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default" [Important,Open] [16:27] doko: tier 1 frameworks uploading now [16:27] 22 of them [16:28] ta [16:28] can you look at qca2? [16:31] doko: we have been just looking at it on debian, it is *probably* not needed on ubuntu, definitely not in debian [16:31] the difference being that qca2 in ubuntu is not hiding symbols [16:32] right, I was asking Riddell to look at merging the packaging changes [16:32] Ubuntu package doesn't pass -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden [16:32] and I changed it, because I saw ftbfs [16:32] cool :) [16:33] by the way, you should really consider passing those flags to most of (if not all of) your libraries [16:34] you will get missing symbols in the first run, but those are 99.9% private ones [16:35] Riddell, ^^^ [16:49] doko: sorry I just moved country and am mostly busy unpacking today, back to normalish tomorrow [16:50] Riddell, just make a note please [16:51] gotcha [16:53] Riddell: we did not do a group hug === Guest2640 is now known as Mamarok [17:45] Noskcaj, qqwing accepted in -proposed [17:49] Riddell: where have you moved to? [19:27] sgclark: are you around? [19:30] ahoneybun: ping [19:31] ovidiu-florin: pong [19:31] you're into packaging [19:31] perhaps you can help me [19:32] I see the most recent digikam release is 4.12, a week ago, previously 4.11, 4.10 up to 2 months ago [19:32] yet in kubuntu packages I find the latest to be 4.9 [19:33] I'm a yellow belt lol [19:33] can you confirm that no one has packaged a newer version? [19:33] I've seen someone trying [19:33] https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/backports/+packages?field.name_filter=digikam&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter= shows not [19:33] wether it is on LP is a different story [19:33] sorry, this link: https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/backports/+builds?build_text=digikam&build_state=all [19:34] might be on someone's own ppa [19:34] ok [19:34] please make me understand [19:34] I think Riddell and clivejo were working on it [19:34] ahoneybun ovidiu-florin: for wily [19:34] for vivid [19:34] but also wily [19:34] yea plus it is a BIG package [19:35] Ive only been working on wily [19:36] ovidiu-florin: Scarlett is traveling home :) see last comment here https://plus.google.com/+DanasAnis/posts/MWwtzSF4r9h [19:37] last digikam I did was 4.11 [19:37] I might try 4.12 [19:38] ovidiu-florin: ATM clivejo has more packaging knowledge then me tbh [19:38] I dont have a clue [19:39] I still trying to figure out how to add a dependancy to the muon updater [19:39] I just know a bit of fixing some errors [19:40] I know I have to edit the control file, but do I edit it in the package rep or the main archive (how do I add to the main archive) [19:40] so many questions! [19:41] access to the main archive is pretty high [19:42] clivejo: do you have your work in a ppa? [19:42] I been deleting it as I been running out of room [19:43] calligra and digikam are monsters [19:43] yea.. [19:44] Riddell: hopefully will be back in full swing tomoorrow [19:44] where is he moving? [19:45] no clue I thought he meant coming back from akademy [19:46] so digikam is on kde4 still... [19:46] he said earier hes moving country? [19:48] i think hes moved from Spain to Scotland [19:48] so unpacking stuff now etc. [19:48] I kinda got that impression too [19:49] man hes gonna be in foul mood [19:49] digikam 5 is in beta 1 [19:49] the weather here is mental [19:50] clivejo: In Scotland? [19:50] I guess he is used to Scotland's weather ;) [19:50] yeah [19:50] we have gale force winds and rain [19:51] A tad (or more than a tad) worse than Dutch weather, right? [19:51] I have never experienced Dutch weather [19:52] clivejo: Lots of rain, and then some more. You haven't missed anything ;) [19:53] systemd 224 in updates, we just had 223 so version jumping quick [19:54] latest digikam I see is 4.10 in wily [19:54] clivejo: where is that 4.11 you're talking about? [19:54] yes [19:54] it's already outdated [19:55] 4.12 is the latest. but that's a week ago [20:02] yofel: missed you at akademy [20:02] missed you guys too, at least looked at some of the pictures ^^ [21:18] ahoneybun ovidiu-florin yofel soee: can any of you help me with this - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/213500634/buildlog_ubuntu-wily-amd64.digikam_4%3A4.12.0-0ubuntu1~ubuntu15.10~ppa1_BUILDING.txt.gz [21:20] that doesn't tell much except that there's a dependency problem [21:20] I would try that in pbuilder to get the aptitude output [21:21] it is building on my own machine [21:21] and cant figure out why it wont build on LP [21:21] you have wily-proposed enabled on your machine? [21:21] dont think so [21:21] well, the PPA has it [21:22] probably some fallout from the current gcc5 mess [21:22] can I disable it? [21:23] yes, if you go to "edit dependencies" on your ppa page [21:23] don't forget to enable it again later though if you want your PPA to match the archive builders [21:27] where did my 386 build go? [21:28] ah found it [21:29] looks like it starting to build [21:29] fingers crossed [22:14] ahoneybun: would you test digikam 4.12 in my PPA?