=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== jhodapp is now known as jhodapp|sick | ||
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
anon212244567 | Just wondering, are there any rules as to age when you are contributing to Ubuntu? I am a teen and I would like to do some QA test cases, but I don't know if I could... | 16:47 |
---|---|---|
anon212244567 | Can anyone confirm? | 16:47 |
anon212244567 | balloons | 16:48 |
balloons | There are no rules on age specific to Ubuntu | 16:57 |
svij | teens these days are impatient… | 17:00 |
* svij feels old now :) | 17:01 | |
flocculant | now? | 17:19 |
flocculant | I've felt old (physically) for years :) | 17:19 |
svij | I'm actually not that old :D | 17:22 |
flocculant | neither am I (mentally) ... | 17:25 |
balloons | Hello :) | 18:06 |
balloons | So i realize now i didn't remind folks about the meeting | 18:07 |
svij | yup | 18:08 |
balloons | So today we can basically answer all the questions we had i think. | 18:12 |
balloons | Did DanChapman put together the readme i wonder? | 18:13 |
balloons | I guess i shouldn't start talking before it's time :) | 18:13 |
DanChapman | balloons: mostly complete now :-) I'll push it to lp this evening | 18:14 |
svij | balloons: now you can talk ;) | 19:02 |
dkessel | hey there. nearly forgot this | 19:03 |
svij | I think we should wait for balloons ? | 19:07 |
balloons | Hey :) | 19:14 |
svij | oh there he is :) | 19:14 |
balloons | OK so we just need to go through our actions from last time and see where we are at | 19:14 |
balloons | svij care to relay your findings to start? | 19:15 |
svij | sure | 19:15 |
balloons | Hey dkessel :) | 19:15 |
svij | so, we can run the iso tests on a ec2 instance, which we could fire up for a new tests, shouldn't be too expensive as I see for now, but the tests doesn't run for todays/yesterdays wily image because of some weird ssl/bzr error | 19:16 |
flocculant | well - depending on what you tried it with - at least one image didn't build | 19:17 |
flocculant | and there is a dead server apparently | 19:17 |
svij | dead server? | 19:17 |
flocculant | hang on - just getting info | 19:17 |
flocculant | ssh: connect to host goldenapple.canonical.com port 22: Connection timed out | 19:17 |
flocculant | and | 19:17 |
flocculant | <davmor2> flocculant: goldenapple appears to be dead so if you get that one it times out IS is informed so hopefully this will go away soonish | 19:18 |
svij | so we can run the tests there? | 19:18 |
svij | s/can/could/ | 19:18 |
flocculant | that said - what weird ssl/bzr issue are you talking about :) | 19:19 |
svij | huh, I'm confused | 19:19 |
balloons | Me too | 19:20 |
balloons | Does it have to be ec2. Can it be digital ocean | 19:20 |
svij | didn't check digitalocean yet | 19:20 |
balloons | I think flocculant was trying to say the images are bad | 19:21 |
flocculant | yea | 19:21 |
svij | ah | 19:21 |
svij | yea, the vivid images were better, but they still hang somewhere, I didn't check further details though | 19:21 |
svij | any more questions regarding running the tests in the cloud? | 19:24 |
flocculant | I thought someone had looked at digitalocean | 19:24 |
balloons | If we're confident then we can let everyone know we won't need the hardware | 19:25 |
svij | I could check that quickly if it fails at the beginning… | 19:25 |
svij | oh wait, my digitalocean instance is too small (ram) | 19:25 |
svij | anyway, does it really matter if it's ec2 or digital ocean? | 19:25 |
svij | balloons: yep | 19:25 |
balloons | It doesn't matter really. DO is cheaper is all | 19:26 |
svij | hm, not 100% true… do is 40$/mo for a 4GB instance (which we need) amazon is cheaper in this case | 19:27 |
balloons | The only other thing we needed to settle was the doc from DanChapman | 19:28 |
balloons | For autopilot. And of course to fix the tests | 19:28 |
balloons | svij, interesting | 19:28 |
DanChapman | nearly done :-) just finishing it off atm and will get it pushed up to lp this evening. | 19:29 |
svij | aws with 4gb (but paid for a year) is 26$/mo | 19:29 |
balloons | So 2 instances on ec2 or just one svij? 1 always running the other on demand to test? | 19:29 |
svij | I think two instances are cheaper… one smaller one for jenkins master and one on demand | 19:30 |
balloons | K | 19:30 |
balloons | So we should go ahead and setup things on ec2. Probably worth starting off monthly before buying a year at once | 19:32 |
balloons | And with the readme complete, we can solicit for help in the tests | 19:33 |
balloons | Is there anything else? | 19:33 |
DanChapman | hmmm looking at yesterdays vivid run. irqbalance crashed :-/. Does ec2 use xen? | 19:33 |
balloons | My brain is shot atm from planning for travel | 19:34 |
dkessel | i guess i should un-assign me from the blocking bug. i really don't have time to fix it soon. and time is running.... | 19:34 |
svij | DanChapman: yes | 19:34 |
dkessel | so we need someone else to have a look | 19:34 |
svij | is xen a problem? | 19:35 |
DanChapman | xen's not a problem, i've just heard about issues with irqbalance in VM's. IIRC fedora vms require it turned off. Let me see if I can find mmore info | 19:38 |
svij | oh | 19:38 |
DanChapman | svij was it a single core instance? | 19:40 |
svij | DanChapman: nope | 19:40 |
svij | dual core | 19:40 |
svij | DanChapman: wait, do you mean my ec2 instance or the vm inside the ec2 instance, which bootet the iso? | 19:44 |
DanChapman | the vm that booted the iso. I can't remember what the runner set's it up with. | 19:46 |
svij | yes, that was dual core | 19:47 |
DanChapman | ok thanks. I'm just concerned as the test didn't actually run according to that log file. It looks like it crashed pretty quickly after ubiquity launched | 19:49 |
svij | that's also what I was seeing (with my less knowledge about autopilot) | 19:51 |
DanChapman | so the "Autopilot GTK interface loaded. Wire protocol version is 1.4" appears when the launcher "run_ubiquity" is triggered, the test will wait for ubiquity to come up before the test starts and you should see "I: Running autopilot run ubiquity_autopilot_*" | 19:53 |
DanChapman | so it's either a problem with the runner/test-environment or an issue with running in the cloud | 19:54 |
svij | hhmm… | 19:55 |
svij | I'll do some more investigations on the weekend about this issue | 19:55 |
svij | someone needs to fix the tests anyway, beside of my problems ;) | 19:55 |
DanChapman | I'll get them running again. Seems a couple of large bugs have been dropped off my backlog for OTA-6 so I will squeeze this in :-) | 19:59 |
balloons | Hehe nice | 19:59 |
balloons | Brb | 20:00 |
svij | nice! | 20:00 |
dkessel | done. bug 1479064 is unassigned now. | 20:02 |
ubot5 | bug 1479064 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Autopilot test "EnglishDefaultInstallTestCase" fails with Xubuntu i386 Wily daily ISO" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1479064 | 20:02 |
DanChapman | ok cool assigned to me. I should have them running again by next meeting. Are we back to friday next week? or you still away then balloons? | 20:09 |
balloons | Yes I'm away again | 20:15 |
balloons | Um hmm | 20:16 |
balloons | Meet without me perhaps? | 20:16 |
svij | Should be fine for me | 20:23 |
svij | I'm going to bed now... Next week Friday sane time is fine for me | 20:24 |
knome | sane times are ok, insane times, nope | 20:25 |
knome | (good evening!) | 20:25 |
balloons | K. Sounds good | 20:25 |
balloons | Thanks everyone! | 20:25 |
balloons | Hey knome | 20:25 |
balloons | Work that I'm off as well | 20:25 |
balloons | *with | 20:26 |
knome | heh | 20:26 |
knome | have fun | 20:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!