=== rangerpb is now known as rangerpbzzzz
openstackgerritMerged stackforge/cloud-init: Fix running cloud-init with no arguments on Python 3.  https://review.openstack.org/21038100:37
Odd_Blokeclaudiupopa: Is your data source API stuff ready for a re-review?09:41
Odd_Bloke(I might not get to it this morning/today anyway)09:42
claudiupopaYep, it should be finished.09:44
Odd_BlokeOK, cool, I'll see if I can give it another look today.09:49
=== rangerpbzzzz is now known as rangerpb
=== zz_natorious is now known as natorious
gamenamehi guys.  I think my cloud-init on an AMI is not working.  What should I look for in the system log(s) to indicate cloud-init worked, or at least executed?17:11
Odd_Blokegamename: You should be able to look at /var/log/cloud-init.log, or search for 'cloud-init' in the syslog.18:24
smoserin almost all cases, cloud-init writes WARN to that log if something is wrong.18:25
gamenamesmoser: Thanks18:51
gamenameOdd_Bloke: Thanks18:51
harlowjasmoser btw, http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20150615-stackforge-retirement.html19:01
harlowjai'm unsure what we want to do there due to that :-/19:01
harlowjaback to launchpad :-/19:01
harlowjalaunchpad + git?19:01
harlowjahttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/192016/ did merge recently (the goverance blah blah)19:02
harlowja* http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2015/tc.2015-07-28-20.03.log.html#l-1119:02
smoserso the only change really is s,stackforge,openstack,19:03
smoserright ?19:03
harlowjaand http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2015/tc.2015-07-21-20.01.log.html#l-29 (more of the logs of that)19:03
harlowjasmoser seems like it, so far, yes19:03
* harlowja personally i don't know why they are doing this, but whatever, lol19:04
smosergotta do something. they're not paying people to sit on their hands. (only harlowja is so lucky)19:07
harlowjapush the hay in that pile, no now move it to that pile, noooo now move it to that pile19:08
smoserwe can't all get by on our good looks.19:09
smoserso the annoucment there... doesn't seem to make any negative implications for "non openstack openstack projects"19:09
smoserbut the discussion on 07-21 does19:09
harlowjayup, that was my take on it to19:10
harlowja'<dhellmann> jeblair: fwiw, both pecan and wsme will likely move back to github, not because of contempt, but because they're not solely used by openstack' ...19:11
harlowjaso ya, it confused me to19:11
harlowjasomething changed after 7-21 that i haven't quite figured out lol19:12
harlowjacause http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2015/tc.2015-07-28-20.03.log.html#l-11 was like no discussion, ha19:12
=== natorious is now known as zz_natorious
=== zz_natorious is now known as natorious
=== natorious is now known as zz_natorious
harlowjasmoser and how timely, http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-August/071816.html21:17

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!