[00:48] <slangasek> infinity: how did your no-commit britney test go?
[01:07] <slangasek> sigh; why does libmecab-java not show up on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/mecab-g++5.html ? (libmecab-jni, depends libmecab2 (>= 0.996-1))
[01:22] <doko> infinity, slangasek: any update on icu?
[01:28] <infinity> doko: I'm going to play with it in a bit.  Was trying not to lose context on other things before I did.
[01:28] <infinity> Since I also need to hack around and remind myself how to make britney not promote things.
[01:31] <infinity> Ahh, I can just no-op lp_import
[01:31] <infinity> doko: Okay, will get to icu shortly.
[01:31] <infinity> If it breaks the world, I'll have to revert.  We'll see.
[02:46] <infinity> slangasek: You around?
[03:00] <slangasek> infinity: hi
[03:00] <infinity> slangasek: Hey.  I decided it didn't look TOO broken, but if you could spot-check snakefruit:/home/ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/var/data-b2/output/wily/HeidiResultDelta for sanity?
[03:01] <infinity> slangasek: Ignore the "reomvals", they're informational, but all the other lines are packages it wants to promote after the manual icu move.
[03:02] <infinity> slangasek: Most of it looked vaguely reasonable, though I didn't realize this was also unsticking a mess of haskell in the process.  If it's not meant to, we'be broken something. :P
[03:03] <slangasek> infinity: I don't know the syntax of this file.  bare package+version is new thing promoted?  - is an NBS binary that's dropped?
[03:03] <slangasek> infinity: haskell getting in is an ok outcome
[03:03] <slangasek> it was known to be tied up with icu
[03:03] <infinity> slangasek: Yeah, lines starting with '-' can be ignored.
[03:03] <infinity> It's what britney would try to remove if it knew how, but we don't let it. :P
[03:03] <slangasek> ok.  so yeah, that looks reasonable and small
[03:03] <infinity> Kay.
[03:03] <infinity> Letting her loose, then.
[03:04] <infinity> In other news, tbb is a flaming mess.
[03:04] <slangasek> infinity: btw, what's the convention for expiring off "finished" transitions from the tracker? 'cuz we're accumulating a few
[03:05] <infinity> slangasek: Moving them to the finished directory, I believe.  Or deleting.  Whatever you prefer.
[03:05] <slangasek> infinity: right, so 'finished' all is still on the report
[03:05] <slangasek> which makes that page a bit scrolly :)
[03:05] <infinity> slangasek: Ahh, I see what you mean.  Yeah, deleting is fine too, when it's actually finished.
[03:06] <infinity> slangasek: The reason for them being there is the (almost) part, I imagine.
[03:06] <slangasek> hopefully having them marked 'finished' at least saves processing time
[03:06] <infinity> Or just the Debian authors who hate deleting things.
[03:06] <infinity> I suspect finished is still processed.
[03:06] <infinity> Maybe.
[03:06] <infinity> This is so not my code. :)
[03:07] <infinity> Anyhow, when you're sure a transition is actually 100% done, deleting is totally fine, IMO.  History is not even remotely interesting here.
[03:08] <slangasek> except perhaps for the part where nobody running the tracker remembered that the regexps needed to be explicitly word bounded because they were cargo culting from bad examples? ;)
[03:08] <slangasek> but yeah
[03:12] <slangasek> and then we have trackers that are failing to find any packages. http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/vpb-driver-g++5.html
[03:18] <infinity> slangasek: Well, cargo-culting can happen from VCS history, the files don't need to live on for that.
[03:20] <infinity> slangasek: So, big britney run happening now.  Should be fun.
[15:23] <tseliot> can an admin please blacklist nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-340xx so that we don't sync it from Debian?
[15:39] <infinity> tseliot: Done.
[15:40] <infinity> tseliot: And needs removing from -proposed, looks like.
[15:53] <tseliot> infinity: thanks. Also, please approve 352 when you can
[16:58] <slangasek> who wrote "jack transition" on http://pad.ubuntu.com/gcc-5-transition for asterisk? pitti?
[21:18] <slangasek> hmm has anyone been tinkering with the transition tracker scripts again?
[21:18] <slangasek> (Laney)
[21:19] <slangasek> I shunted med-fichier off because it was 100% done; now it's less done again
[21:20] <slangasek> maybe ben is getting confused after things transition to wily, hmm
[23:53] <darkxst> can I get gnome-online-accounts 3.16 removed from wily-proposed, doesnt look like we can get around webkit2 requirements