[01:57] <kenvandine> fginther, no joy...
[01:57] <kenvandine> EnvironmentError: Device either not connected, doesn't have adb enabled or the property system cannot be accessed. Make sure the device is booted into the operating system and that adb is working correctly.
[02:19] <fginther> kenvandine, sorry about that. One of the devices was still stuck. Trying again.
[04:25] <kenvandine> fginther, cool, thx
[05:23] <Mirv> (trying to get published but train is funky)
[05:36] <Mirv> ah, right, it's a train bug since there's a "-" in the upstream version number
[06:47] <Mirv> ^ OTA-6 fix
[07:11] <oSoMoN> ubuntu-qa: good morning! I’ve got two silos awaiting validation (16 and 26, although I haven’t marked 26 ready for QA yet but it is indeed ready), 16 was there before but 26 is much more urgent (fix for HERE maps not starting), can 26 get priority for verification once I mark it ready?
[08:05] <ogra_> jdstrand, go for it at any time :)
[08:36] <dbarth_> o/ hey any citrain guru out there?
[08:36] <dbarth_> can you confirm if adding the overaly ppa as a ppa dependency affects "desktop builds"
[08:39] <ogra_> dbarth_, with overlay means you have a mix of wily and vivid, without your vivd is plain ... if your build uses any dependency from the ppa you will get different results indeed
[08:42] <ogra_> (there are also phone specific config tweaks that could have influence if you have the respective packages installed (by accident, from a dependency or on purpose)
[08:42] <ogra_> )
[08:43] <dbarth_> hmm, so i think we need to have vivid /phone/ builds only go via citrain then
[08:43] <dbarth_> that will be safer
[08:52] <dbarth_> o/ trainguards, can i have a source upload in silo 032 please? see the comment in the silo request
[09:01] <jibel> oSoMoN, 26 approved. It also fixes problems with other apps like ureadit
[09:01] <oSoMoN> jibel, thanks! Yes, potentially all apps using an Ubuntu WebView and redefining the context menu actions were broken without that fix
[09:02] <oSoMoN> jibel, once merged I’ll rebuild silo 16
[09:02]  * sil2100 loves projects that can still dual-land
[09:02] <sil2100> This makes life so much less complicated
[09:03] <pstolowski> trainguards hello, can i get a silo for request 161?
[09:03] <sil2100> dbarth, pstolowski: on your requests now
[09:03] <sil2100> Are we low on silos?
[09:04] <pstolowski> sil2100, ah, ok, cool, i couldn't see a notification on this channel
[09:04] <sil2100> pstolowski: assigning your request, btw. do you have a wily silo for the changes as well? Or did that land already?
[09:06] <sil2100> dbarth: copying
[09:06] <sil2100> dbarth: btw. you sure a source copy is needed?
[09:07] <sil2100> You need it rebuilt against the overlay?
[09:10] <pstolowski> sil2100, i've MPs ready for wily as well, but we need to regenrate symbols for g++5, and also scopes api currently has issues at least in CI because of a boost problem
[09:10] <pstolowski> sil2100, so at the moment we have a couple of changes that will need to be landed in wily to catch up with vivid, they are not forgotten but not fully ready to land
[09:16] <abeato> sil2100, hi, I'd like to add a new package to touch image in rc-proposed
[09:16] <abeato> sil2100, the new package gets created from source package pulseaudio in silo 30
[09:17] <abeato> sil2100, which would be the procedure?
[09:23] <sil2100> pstolowski: could you later at least request a silo for the wily ones? Doesn't have to be built even
[09:23] <sil2100> We just want it as a silo at least :)
[09:24] <pstolowski> sil2100, ok, will do
[09:24] <sil2100> Thanks!
[09:25] <sil2100> dbarth: re-stating the question - you sure a source copy is required, not a binary one? Need to know since making a source copy involves me re-writing the version ;)
[09:33] <pete-woods> cihelp: hi folks. is it reasonable to enable the GCC5 PPA for jenkins builds, like it is for CI train wily builds?
[09:33] <pete-woods> at the minute it
[09:33] <pete-woods> can be impossible, depending on what you're building to get jenkins to pass your MRs because of this
[09:43] <Mirv> pete-woods: GCC5 PPA is not anymore just a PPA, it's almost all in wily archives already
[09:45] <pete-woods> Mirv: even so. this is currently hurting those who are using a "devel" branch (fortunately not myself in this instance)
[09:45] <pete-woods> as they aren't able to get verification of their MRs before merging
[09:46] <Mirv> ok, let's wait for answer then
[10:02] <sil2100> Mirv: ^ you publishing that? I don't know if I should publish your own silo ;)
[10:05] <sil2100> wgrant: hey! Since all translations seem to have been copied into place, could I request a full export from the 15.04 series?
[10:05] <dbarth> sil2100: a source copy please, yes; i want to make sure we pick up the media-hub 3.1 library, where there is a binary interface change
[10:05] <sil2100> dbarth: ACK! On it then
[10:25] <psivaa> pete-woods: (regarding the GCC5 PPA query), i'm not sure what's involved. I'd need to talk to fginther about it. Will come back to you once he's online
[10:30] <pete-woods1> psivaa: thanks :)
[10:32] <Mirv> sil2100: sure, I tend to handle those :) plus packaging changes need an ack I can do because of PPU rights
[10:33] <sil2100> :)
[10:55]  * sil2100 off for lunch and quick shopping
[10:55] <sil2100> o/
[11:12] <oSoMoN> jibel, I rebuilt and validated again silo 16, it’s ready for QA
[11:42] <jibel> oSoMoN, great, on it
[11:47] <oSoMoN> jibel, thanks!
[12:08] <jibel> oSoMoN, how do you reproduce bug 1477308 ? I cannot with the steps in the description
[12:25] <oSoMoN> jibel, it’s on desktop only: you need to e.g. watch a youtube video fullscreen, then press the media keys on your keyboard to increase/decrease the volume: this shows the volume update in a notify-osd bubble, and has the undesired side effect of leaving fullscreen mode
[12:26] <jibel> oSoMoN, yeah, sorry, I figured that out after re-reading the first sentence of the bug report
[12:32] <jibel> oSoMoN, 16 approved. Is it all for OTA6?
[12:33] <oSoMoN> jibel, would be good to have for OTA-6, yes, particularly since it contains the fix for find-in-page which is new in OTA6
[12:33] <jibel> oSoMoN, I meant after silo 16 is there anything left for OTA6? webbrowser wise
[12:34] <oSoMoN> jibel, ah, sorry, I misread you :) in theory that’s all, nothing more for OTA6
[12:34] <jibel> thanks
[12:35] <pedronis> trainguards: hi, Pat marked https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-push/+bug/1451510 for OTA-6 and we got a community fix... the package is a bit in maintainer limbo atm,  I reviewed the code and made landing MPs, but I'm not really setup anymore for landings, can you help preparing the landings
[12:40] <Mirv> pedronis: ok, 1. who'd be the lander (tester) of it, 2. what's the exact MP to land, 3. does ubuntu-push have only one trunk, ie this could be dual landed to overlay + wily?
[12:41] <pedronis> Mirv: I made two trunks, I have two MPs one for vivid-overlay and one for wily, I can give you the URLs in a sec
[12:42] <pedronis> Mirv: vivid-overlay: https://code.launchpad.net/~pedronis/ubuntu-push/vivid-fixes/+merge/268066
[12:43] <pedronis> Mirv: wily: https://code.launchpad.net/~pedronis/ubuntu-push/fixes-to-wily/+merge/268067
[12:45] <pedronis> Mirv: tester: mainly the author of the patch: https://launchpad.net/~nikwen  nikwen here on freenode, email:   nikwen.developer@gmail.com  and put me in as second, when/if we have packages I'll ping him
[12:49] <Mirv> pedronis: ok both are now building https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/dashboard.html#?q=nikwen - obviously wily will be probably impossible to test, so focus on vivid
[12:49] <pedronis> Mirv: yup, thanks
[13:04] <tvoss> sil2100, you around?
[13:31] <sil2100> tvoss: yeah, what's up?
[13:32] <sil2100> wgrant, cjwatson: hey, can anyone of you guys request a LP pack export for ubuntu-rtm/15.04?
[13:33] <wgrant> sil2100: Sure
[13:34] <sil2100> Thank you :)
[13:34] <sil2100> I would like pitti to run langpack-o-matic once today still to see if everything works for next week
[13:43] <abeato> sil2100, I get a failure when trying to build ubuntu-touch session in silo 30
[13:43] <abeato> sil2100, silo 30 was originally a sync silo from57
[13:43] <abeato> (from silo 57)
[13:44] <abeato> sil2100, silo 57 contains ubuntu-touch-session
[13:44] <abeato> sil2100, and building it in silo 30 used to work: it took the sources for there
[13:44] <abeato> sil2100, but now silo 30 contains also a MP for trust-store
[13:45] <sil2100> abeato: ok, I don't see it in the list of packages for silo 30 - you'll have to include it there
[13:45] <abeato> sil2100, is that the cause of the failure?
[13:45] <abeato> sil2100, but can I sync it?
[13:45] <abeato> from silo 57
[13:46] <sil2100> abeato: yes, we just need to include it in the Manual Source list in the landing entry, let me do that - for syncs to work if you have multiple different packages in the silo, you need to give the explicit list of packages you might want to sync from the source silo
[13:47] <abeato> sil2100, ok, I have just reconfigured
[13:47] <sil2100> abeato: yeah, I see it appeared now :) Did you press 'Assign' again to reconfigure?
[13:47] <abeato> sil2100, yep :)
[13:47] <sil2100> Once you fully reconfigure the silo, try building ubuntu-touch-session in the build job - it should try syncing it from the source silo
[13:48] <abeato> ok, thanks
[13:48] <sil2100> (a normal build with ubuntu-touch-session as the package to rebuild)
[13:49] <abeato> yeah, it is working now :)
[13:50] <sil2100> \p/
[15:01] <greyback> trainguards: could someone please remove ubuntu-touch-session from silo0
[15:17] <sil2100> greyback_: on it in a minute!
[15:31]  * ogra_ sees sil2100 in the news
[15:32] <awe_> sil2100, can you checkout my landing request ( 170 ) when you get a chance.  This is my first request for thenew train, and I wasn't sure if I need to do anything to trigger the build, or it will just come in time?
[15:46] <sil2100> oSoMoN: again something bad..?
[15:46] <sil2100> I mean, ogra_: ^
[15:46] <sil2100> oSoMoN: sorry, bad auto-complete in irssi ;)
[15:46] <sil2100> greyback_: silo 0, right?
[15:47] <greyback_> sil2100: right
[15:47] <oSoMoN> sil2100, no worries :)
[15:50] <bfiller> sil2100: where would I find debug packages for packages in overlay ppa? (I hope they exist)
[15:50] <greyback_> bfiller: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ci-train-ppa-service/stable-phone-overlay/ubuntu vivid main/debug
[15:50] <bfiller> greyback_: great, ty!
[15:51] <greyback_> np
[15:51] <sil2100> bfiller: yeah, they're in the overlay itself :)
[16:00] <popey> sil2100:  is there a landing call today?
[16:00] <sil2100> popey: there was one in the morning :)
[16:01] <popey> heh okay
[16:01] <sil2100> We only do one in the morning and yesterday in teh evening
[16:01] <popey> ok
[16:01] <sil2100> popey: anything you wanted to bring up?
[16:01] <popey> no
[16:01] <sil2100> LP timeouts for me a bit, hm
[16:02] <sil2100> ogra_: what did you mean by me in the news again? Did I screw up something?
[16:02] <popey> heh, no
[16:06] <sil2100> wgrant: hey! Do you know if the LP exports are running for 15.04? :)
[16:09] <ogra_> sil2100, http://news.softpedia.com/news/canonical-is-not-moving-ubuntu-touch-to-ubuntu-15-10-any-time-soon-489291.shtml
[16:09] <ogra_> you are getting famous !
[16:13] <sil2100> Damn, why is this suddenly such a big news? Mark and Olli mentioned that on the last vUDS
[16:13] <sil2100> And I mentioned that already a few times in the past more or less
[16:21] <greyback_> sil2100: don't worry, this won't happen to you: http://arstechnica.co.uk/gaming/2015/08/nintendo-allegedly-fires-employee-for-revealing-game-localisation-secrets/
[16:22] <sil2100> Oh crap
[16:22] <sil2100> If things like this happened here, I would get fired already for my strong language regarding the gcc-5 transition
[16:23] <sil2100> Correction:
[16:23] <greyback_> heck most of us would be looking for a job
[16:23] <sil2100> For my strong language regarding the touch gcc-5 transition
[16:23] <sil2100> ;)
[16:24] <sil2100> Since seriously there was nothing wrong with how the transition was handled, but more like with how we handled touch components - but that's to be expected with everyone working in preparation for the next OTA
[16:50] <robru> Mirv: can you file a bug for that android version number? we have a lot of test cases surrounding that and I thought we fixed "upstream version has hyphen in it" already
[17:00] <robru> whoever is actually releasing these custom tarballs should be sure to set the requests to 'Landed' once they're done
[17:05] <sil2100> dbarth: hey, so the oxide-qt in silo 32 is still building... will you give it a spin once it finishes?
[17:45] <renatu> cihelp, Guys do you know if is possible to disable willy-proposed repositories while building a project in the ppa?
[17:45] <renatu> since the proposed repository is broken I can not test my packages on the device
[17:51] <psivaa> renatu: I assume you're asking about it generally and not specific to any jobs in CI?
[17:51] <psivaa> not sure if you intended to ask trainguards?
[17:51] <psivaa> (if not sorry for the alert :))
[17:52] <robru> renatu: yes this is possible but generally not advised. what issues are you having?
[17:53] <renatu> robru, I wat to test silo 34. but it is building against some libraries from proposed universe (libphonenumber) and enabling this repository on the device crash the device
[17:53] <renatu> crash the device = install some core libraries that cause the device to not boot anymore
[17:54] <robru> renatu: from what I understand, wily is sort of in a bad state anyway with the gcc5 transition being kind of in but not really. I'm not really sure that "not building against proposed" is a sane thing to do, you'll end up with binaries built against wrong libs anyway and it won't be releasable
[17:55] <robru> renatu: I was under the impression that wily images are just outright broken even without silos
[17:55] <renatu> robru, I am using a old version
[17:56] <renatu> just for development and tests
[17:56] <robru> renatu: ok well I'll disable it for now, but I don't think we can publish the silo that way
[17:57] <renatu> robru, nice, I do not intend to release it until we can test with the new wily image
[17:57] <robru> renatu: ok, it's disabled, you can try a new build
[17:59] <renatu> robru, thanks
[17:59] <robru> renatu: you're welcome
[18:00] <dobey> you really should test against proposed
[18:00] <awe_> robru,  wondering what needs to happen to get train req #170 to build packages?  This is my first new train landing...
[18:00] <dobey> building without proposed if you have c++ code, is going to result in a failed build most likely
[18:01] <dobey> awe_: after the silo has been assigned, it's the same process as previously
[18:01] <robru> awe_: yeah you just run the build job as usual
[18:01] <awe_> ah, ok
[18:01] <awe_> thanks
[18:02] <robru> awe_: there's no new train, only the spreadsheet was replaced. the new web interface is just a dumb data store, it knows nothing about building packages, just like the spreadsheet was a dumb data store that knew nothing about anything
[18:02] <dobey> (i agree it would be nice if the build/etc… links appeared on the requests page, rather than having to go to the dashboard, though)
[18:02] <awe_> robru, ack
[18:03] <robru> dobey: yes the requests page and the dashboard have a remarkable amount of overlap, I would consider merging them into one page but I'd have to consider the UX of that, could get quite cluttered quite quickly
[18:03] <dobey> yeah. it's already quite cluttered as it is :)
[18:05] <dobey> cihelp: can we possibly get the jenkins build instances to have -proposed enabled? it only makes sense, as the silo PPAs build against -proposed, and things must go through -proposed first anyway
[18:11] <renatu> robru, did not work, you can revert the changes. Now I got missing symbols on libphonumber probably because of gcc version
[18:12] <renatu> I will need to wait until the guys fix the image to continue the tests
[18:12] <renatu> thanks for your help
[18:13] <robru> renatu: you're welcome, thanks for letting me know
[18:13] <dobey> renatu: i'm surprised you have a phone booting with a current wily image on it :)
[18:14] <renatu> dobey, I am using a previous version
[18:15] <robru> heh, mixing old wily image, packages built with current wily release pocket, sounds like a world of hurt ;-)
[18:15] <dobey> renatu: i think you can probably try devel-proposed-g++5 channel instead
[18:15] <dobey> renatu: iirc, it's built with -proposed
[18:15] <renatu> let me try that
[18:15] <renatu> thanks
[18:16] <kenvandine> renatu, if you do that, you'll need the ppa reconfigured to use -proposed again
[18:17] <dobey> kenvandine: he just asked for that :)
[18:17] <robru> kenvandine: I got it
[18:17] <kenvandine> ah, i missed that part
[18:17] <kenvandine> i thought he had just had it reconfigured to not use -proposed
[18:18] <renatu> kenvandine, I tried without proposed but it fails
[18:19] <dobey> as expected :)
[18:19] <renatu> dobey, is that channel hidden? It does not appear on the list: query --device=krillin --list-channels
[18:19] <dobey> renatu: maybe
[18:19] <dobey> renatu: https://system-image.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/devel-proposed-g++5/ubuntu/
[18:20] <dobey> it's in the .json too
[18:20] <dobey> so maybe you just missed it, or it's a bug
[18:21] <dobey> i just --switch-ed my mako to it
[18:22] <renatu> or the image is not available for krillin
[18:23] <renatu> dobey, I am getting this error: Channel ubuntu-touch/devel-proposed-g++5 not found on server https://system-image.ubuntu.com
[18:24] <renatu> dobey, I am flashing with: "ubuntu-device-flash touch --channel=ubuntu-touch/devel-proposed-g++5 --wipe"
[18:26] <nikwen> trainguards, silo 23 should be ready for QA now. I tested it on my mako on ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/bq-aquaris.en and everything seems to work fine. :)
[18:27] <dobey> renatu: ubuntu-touch/devel-proposed-g++/ubuntu
[18:27] <dobey> is the full channel name
[18:27] <renatu> dobey, worked, thanks
[18:28] <dobey> hmm
[18:28] <dobey> it doesn't seem to want to boot now though
[18:29] <dobey> it installed ok, got the big ubuntu logo while it installed, but now it just keeps rebooting at the google logo for me :-/
[18:35] <renatu> dobey, yes, I got same result as the proposed image, it get suck on "bq" screen
[18:44] <nikwen> trainguards, did you see my message above?
[18:53] <robru> nikwen: hi, was on lunch, just reading now
[18:54] <nikwen> robru, don't worry. It's just the first time I've been assigned to a landing, so I wasn't sure how fast to expect a reply. ;)
[18:54] <robru> nikwen: ok I marked it as ready for qa
[18:55] <nikwen> robru: Thanks. :)
[18:55] <robru> nikwen: you're welcome
[19:03] <fginther> dobey, hi. we could try enabling -proposed on a case by case basis. Is there a branch that's giving you special grief at this time (and I'm aware that most c/c++ projects are having build issues right now)
[19:05] <dobey> fginther: not me personally. i have just seen several people complaining about it as a result of the gcc5 transition being somewhat incomplete still, and wondering why the jenkins builds aren't building against proposed, since as soon as a silo is created, they will be building against it anyway in there.
[19:21] <fginther> dobey, ah, I see. One other dev did bring it up today so it's a little higher up the radar today.
[19:23] <dobey> yeah, i saw michi e-mailed you. and he was still on complaining about it when i got on this morning :)
[19:23] <dobey> fginther: i didn't see if anyone else asked specifically to have it enabled (rather than just complaining about it being broken), so i thought i'd follow up and ask to have it enabled
[19:26] <fginther> dobey, sure, I just wanted to make sure I had the right details before going in the wrong direction :-)
[19:26] <dobey> of course :)
[21:04] <pedronis> ubuntu-qa: I now top approved the MP in https://trello.com/c/e44QrPq2/2179-168-ubuntu-landing-023-ubuntu-push-nikwen-pedronis
[21:06] <alesage> pedronis, ack