| bschaefer | RAOF, alright, merged trunk and fixed some minor things | 01:03 |
|---|---|---|
| bschaefer | i think its ready... but you never know :) | 01:03 |
| bschaefer | passing locally for me | 01:03 |
| RAOF | SHIP IT! | 01:04 |
| RAOF | Or at least run CI against it :) | 01:05 |
| bschaefer | RAOF, :) | 01:08 |
| * bschaefer wonders how that wasnt caught | 02:02 | |
| duflu | bschaefer: If you mean that CI failure... it only fails sometimes. And even then only in CI. Never when you run it manually :/ | 02:15 |
| duflu | Annoyingly difficult to fix | 02:15 |
| duflu | Something about our CI machines is very different to the team's own machines | 02:15 |
| bschaefer | duflu, well i guess it compiled somehow on my end | 02:17 |
| bschaefer | but shouldnt have :) | 02:17 |
| * bschaefer started getting errors | 02:17 | |
| bschaefer | and idk how it happened haha | 02:17 |
| duflu | bschaefer: Yeah it compiles and passes tests for everyone. Except sometimes fails that test only in CI | 02:18 |
| bschaefer | duflu, haha... well i think this case it was my fault :) | 02:18 |
| * bschaefer would not like that | 02:19 | |
| duflu | OK, different topic then | 02:19 |
| bschaefer | yeah | 02:19 |
| bschaefer | duflu, but i've seen that | 02:19 |
| duflu | Heh. If you want something to land quickly just get me to not like it. Then a large number of people will argue the opposite and your branch gets rapid approval | 02:59 |
| duflu | Works every time | 02:59 |
| * bschaefer wonders why CI seems to hate me | 03:41 | |
| bschaefer | i think it just blew up... | 03:41 |
| duflu | bschaefer: I only just fixed that failure you reported. Any CI jobs started in the past few hours will fail with that error that's already fixed. Try again. | 03:48 |
| bschaefer | duflu, Well it failed by saying the nodes went off line :( | 03:48 |
| bschaefer | https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/mir-mediumtests-builder-vivid-armhf/3569/console | 03:48 |
| duflu | Woo. No that's not me | 03:48 |
| * bschaefer hasnt ever seen that | 03:48 | |
| bschaefer | haha | 03:48 |
| * bschaefer hopes it turns back on | 03:48 | |
| duflu | bschaefer: The universe is telling you to EOD | 03:51 |
| bschaefer | haha | 03:51 |
| bschaefer | duflu, just wanted to see the SUCCESS | 03:51 |
| bschaefer | before i headed off | 03:51 |
| duflu | I know. It's a trap. But having the self control to log off is a good way to stay sane | 03:52 |
| bschaefer | true, just watching tv and checking my email every now and then | 03:53 |
| bschaefer | not much working going on :) | 03:53 |
| duflu | Such is the way in this always connected world. | 03:57 |
| bschaefer | true, hard to log off irc | 03:58 |
| duflu | bschaefer: Yeah other branches are dying in CI too. Not something likely to be fixed quickly | 03:58 |
| bschaefer | yeah o well, its all passing locally now (double checked) soo | 03:59 |
| bschaefer | im like 99% sure its done | 03:59 |
| RAOF | Yeeeeeeeeeees! | 05:03 |
| RAOF | Finally CI passes! | 05:03 |
| duflu | greyback: Are you aware of any touch test case that has stretchy resize still? | 08:56 |
| duflu | Or is it only desktop? | 08:56 |
| duflu | Never mind. Found one bug at least | 08:59 |
| greyback | duflu: it's all qml/qtmir's fault, where they don't wait for a resized buffer before drawing it at the new size. | 09:00 |
| duflu | greyback: Yeah I know what to fix, just wanted a manual test case | 09:01 |
| duflu | Found them | 09:01 |
| duflu | Crap. Except I lost my phone build environment and may not have enough time to rebuild it this week | 09:08 |
| greyback | duflu: hey, will you have that early buffer release in qtmir work ready to propose any time soon? | 09:20 |
| duflu | greyback: It's painfully slow. The Mir fix landed yesterday and then I had to revert it today. Now waiting on CI to get fixed again so I can find out why it fails only in CI | 09:21 |
| greyback | duflu: ah ok. I noticed your fix landed, didn't see it had to be reverted. | 09:22 |
| duflu | So I'm now donating my Friday evening to an unrelated QtMir fix | 09:22 |
| greyback | the stretched frames issue? | 09:22 |
| duflu | greyback: Yeah generally "never stretch" | 09:23 |
| greyback | duflu: ok. Your thoughts are welcome | 09:23 |
| greyback | mainly shell needs to not animate towards a resized-frame, until a frame with that size has been swapped by the client | 09:24 |
| greyback | right now we fire resize, do our animation on the previous frame, then hope the resized frame is ready at the end of the animation | 09:25 |
| duflu | greyback: Happy Friday. I'm off to make dinner... https://code.launchpad.net/~vanvugt/qtmir/unstretch/+merge/268724 | 10:08 |
| * alan_g discovers the diagnostics from connection failures get eaten in the client callstack. | 10:34 | |
| alan_g | Actually, they don't even reach the client | 10:59 |
| kgunn | is it worse to be lost or eaten | 11:19 |
| === marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson | ||
| Mirv | I finally got archive admin approval, meaning Mir 0.15 is now in wily | 11:24 |
| Mirv | (-proposed) | 11:24 |
| Mirv | AlbertA: ^ | 11:25 |
| kgunn | mmm | 11:27 |
| alan_g | kgunn: the reporting is misleading and confused me. (And I have touched most of this code.) Going to MP a small cleanup. | 11:27 |
| kgunn | alf: just in case, so you know, silo 9 where you delivered that hot fix for the emulator - is a dual landing, since mir15 landed....i'm gonna pull it out of there | 11:29 |
| kgunn | and land that thing in isolation to vivid+ | 11:29 |
| kgunn | does that make sense | 11:30 |
| alf | kgunn: ok, so we will eventually need to include the fix in 0.15.x (or 0.16 if we get to it) | 11:34 |
| kgunn | alf: +1 we should just have 2 silos, one for vivid+o hotfix to 14, then wily for 15 | 11:35 |
| kgunn | i can take care of "paperwork" | 11:36 |
| kgunn | just wanted you to know | 11:36 |
| alf | kgunn: ack, thanks | 11:36 |
| kgunn | alf: but thanks for the reminder it wasn't naturally in 15 ;) | 11:36 |
| kgunn | i forgot | 11:36 |
| kgunn | we haven't taken a cut off for 16 yet have we ? | 11:37 |
| kgunn | and is this change already on trunk ? | 11:37 |
| alf | kgunn: we haven't cut off for 16, change is in trunk | 11:38 |
| kgunn | cool | 11:47 |
| AlbertA | Mirv: ummm I acutally parked that because | 14:12 |
| AlbertA | we wanted 0.14.1 to land first.... | 14:12 |
| AlbertA | oh gosh....what a mess | 14:13 |
| AlbertA | Mirv: can we revert mir 0.15 from wily-proposed? | 14:16 |
| Mirv | AlbertA: oh, I parsed your message wrongly in that case. but it was FF yesterday, if you'd cancel 0.15 now you wouldn't get it in without FFe. isn't it easier to do a maintenance release of 0.15 with 0.14.1 changes added on top of it? | 14:26 |
| AlbertA | Mirv: the problem is sync to vivid+overlay.... but we'll figure it out thanks | 14:26 |
| Mirv | AlbertA: yes it was already discussed a bit so that silo 9 would be vivid+overlay only and you'd sort it out | 14:27 |
| Mirv | since silo 9 also has a small mir fix | 14:27 |
| alan_g | camako: did you intend to approve https://code.launchpad.net/~alan-griffiths/mir/simplify-connect-code/+merge/268740? | 15:49 |
| camako | alan_g, yes... reapproved | 15:50 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOW | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!