[03:04] <mandy_> ?
[07:01] <nik90> zbenjamin, bzoltan_ : Hey I upgraded to wily and got qtcreator 3.5 as part of the upgrade. However I noticed that I am missing the API and a couple of tabs that are shown in the left panel. Known issue?
[07:47] <zbenjamin> nik90: no by design , they are gone
[07:47] <zbenjamin> nik90: the API is part of the help as any other Qt docs
[07:48] <zbenjamin> nik90: we had to drop webkit support and by that all the web based tabs
[07:48] <zbenjamin> nik90: if you have any problems/bugs/breakages with the qtcreator ping me , its still pretty new
[07:49] <nik90> zbenjamin: oh ok. I tried searching in the general Help docs, but couldn't find the SDK docs listed there.
[07:49] <nik90> although if I press F1 over a component it shows that component's help page
[07:50] <zbenjamin> nik90: hmm its not in the index? wth
[07:51] <nik90> zbenjamin: ah i see it now in index. I couldn't find it under Contents.
[07:51] <zbenjamin> nik90: ah yeah, thats probably a bug
[07:52] <zbenjamin> zsombi_: ^  do you know how we can get the UITK docs into the content listing of the Qt docs?
[07:52] <nik90> zbenjamin: I will start reporting bugs that I find over at lp:qtcreator-ubuntu-plugin
[07:52] <nik90> I thought my wily upgrade went bad or something
[07:52] <zsombi_> zbenjamin: wasn't those taken from the chroots?
[07:52] <zbenjamin> nik90: yeah , thats probably more a uitk docs bug though if you can not find it in assistant as well
[07:53] <zbenjamin> zsombi_: from the currently selected target, desktop/chroot... I just checked on desktop and i cannot see it there as well
[07:53] <zbenjamin> zsombi_: right, assistant also does not show them
[07:53] <zbenjamin> nik90: ^
[07:53] <zsombi_> zbenjamin: then we've a bug
[07:54]  * zsombi_ relocates, back in ~10-15 mins
[07:54] <nik90> not sure which assistant you're referring to
[07:54] <zbenjamin> nik90: just type "assistant" in your cmd
[07:54] <zbenjamin> nik90: then you'll see
[07:54] <nik90> oooh that's new
[07:54] <zbenjamin> nik90: no its old
[07:55] <zbenjamin> nik90: its coming with the upstream Qt since forever :D
[07:55] <nik90> no I meant new to me...never used it before ;)
[07:55] <zbenjamin> aa , yeah its the default Qt help viewer, if you do not hack in QtCreator thats the tool you would use to read the docs
[07:56] <nik90> anyway nice to see us integrating more deeply with qtcreator :)
[07:56] <zbenjamin> nik90: could you file a bug against uitk with "Docs are not shown in Contents view in assistant and qtcreator" or so
[07:56]  * nik90 is on it
[08:00] <zbenjamin> nik90: yeah removing those tabs was very welcomed by the QtC guys
[08:01] <nik90> bug 1489322
[08:14] <nik90> zbenjamin: bug 1489331
[08:22] <zbenjamin> nik90: thanks i'll check it out. Did you try to switch runconfigs? Maybe the wrong one is selected
[08:24] <nik90> zbenjamin: in the Projects tab, I looked at the run configuration of the desktop, and it builds at the correct directory, makes .. and that's about it.
[08:24] <nik90> sry was looking at the build configuration
[08:25] <nik90> the run-configuration doesn't show any executable ... it points at a "Custom Executable" which is empty. It is set to deploy locally.
[08:25] <zbenjamin> nik90: the combobox only contains "Custom Executable" nothing else?
[08:26] <nik90> zbenjamin: yup. Nothing else
[08:26] <zbenjamin> damn
[08:26] <nik90> also everytime I "run cmake", it invokes a separate dialog from which I run cmake..instead of it just running it right away.
[08:27] <zbenjamin> nik90: yes thats the default upstream cmake project behaviour
[08:27] <nik90> oh
[08:27] <zbenjamin> nik90: that will stay. I was not able to upstream the changes
[08:27] <zbenjamin> nik90: so i had to revert them
[08:27] <nik90> oke
[08:27] <zbenjamin> nik90: change to qmake :D
[08:27] <nik90> haha :P
[08:28] <nik90> I spent a good amount of time switching from qmlproject to cmake..and I just got comfy with cmake.
[08:28] <nik90> now u ask me to switch to qmake :D
[08:28] <DanChapman> that cmake dialog drives me nuts! I just want to hit run and be done with it
[08:28] <nik90> DanChapman: yup indeed
[08:34] <zbenjamin> DanChapman: nik90: yeah thats why we initially removed it, but it _should_ only pop up if you change cmake files
[08:34] <zbenjamin> DanChapman:nik90: however QtC upstream changes to many stuff and it was just not possible for only me to maintain a patch that big
[08:35] <nik90> zbenjamin: I understand. It is okay since it *only* pops up on cmake file changes. We're recommending people to switch to qmake. And lastly being closer to upstream allows us to focus on downstream stuff that's important to us.
[08:36] <DanChapman> zbenjamin: for me it seems to pop up every time cmake is run, even when there have been no changes.
[08:36] <nik90> DanChapman: but why do you run cmake if there were no cmake changes?
[08:36] <nik90> or is it part of your build script?
[08:43] <DanChapman> nik90: I mean no changes to the cmake files. But changing any c++ in Dekko means cmake needs to be re-run, well that's with the sdk kits anyway. Rarely can I just hit run without having to run cmake first.
[08:44] <nik90> ah oke, that can get annoying
[08:53] <DanChapman> zbenjamin: why does the sdk kits force me to do *alot* of full rebuilds?
[08:54] <DanChapman> On desktop I don't get it, so i'm wondering if there is some limitation with using click chroots?
[08:54] <zbenjamin> DanChapman: hm, nothing should force you to do rebuilds. At least nothing that is hardcoded there
[08:55] <zbenjamin> DanChapman: but its of course possible that with the click chroots something goes wrong
[08:55] <zbenjamin> DanChapman: nik90: tbh the cmake integration in QtC is not the best part of the IDE
[08:56] <zbenjamin> DanChapman: nik90: it was done by someone and then just maintained all the time, no improvements except what we introduced and was taken upstream
[08:56] <zbenjamin> or almost no improvements
[09:13] <kenvandine> rpadovani, i proposed a branch fixing the apparmor policygroup to allow you to keep the screen on
[09:16] <kenvandine> rpadovani, also, if the game pauses for any reason (like it loses focus) you should make it stay paused until the play button is pressed
[09:16] <kenvandine> rpadovani, i might try to do a branch for that at some point too :)
[09:19] <sturmflut2> rpadovani: Argh, that game is going to be so horrible on the phone :P
[10:04] <kalikiana> t1mp: I just noticed, if you drag a page in a certain way the header doesn't hide. if you touch it only very briefly it shifts up and down again, that way you can scroll without hiding the header. can you check that?
[10:12] <t1mp> kalikiana: what do you mean?
[10:12] <t1mp> kalikiana: if you scroll up to hide less than half the header, it will show when you release
[10:14] <kalikiana> t1mp: you mean if you scroll down?
[10:18] <t1mp> kalikiana: yes
[10:22] <kalikiana> t1mp: so that is intentional? it just seems so weird. I don't see what the purpose would be - it would make a lot more sense if I could move upwards slightly to reveal the header instead
[10:23] <t1mp> kalikiana: with scrolling down I thought you mean pressing and then moving your finger up
[10:23] <t1mp> and if you pull your finger down you will show the header
[10:35] <kalikiana> t1mp: yes. and the finger up/ scroll down case is what seems weird. it's very hard to make sure of and I only discovered it by accident
[10:35] <t1mp> kalikiana: I don't really understand the problem
[10:36] <t1mp> kalikiana: the rule is simple, if you release, and the header is more than half visible, it will open completely, otherwise it will hide
[10:36] <t1mp> kalikiana: except if you are very close to the top of the page, then it will open anyway because you cannot pull down more afterwards to show it
[10:39] <kalikiana> t1mp: the problem is that the rule makes no sense and I would never intentionally try to scroll in a way that retains the header...
[10:40] <kalikiana> it's arguably not the biggest problem but at the least it's confusing to see the header when you'd expect it to hide
[10:46] <t1mp> kalikiana: discuss it with design :)
[11:04] <zbenjamin> nik90: its lp:ubuntu-clock-app that fails?
[11:05] <nik90> zbenjamin: ?
[11:05] <zbenjamin> nik90: running the cmake project
[11:05] <nik90> zbenjamin: I don't see a reason why it should fail when it was working just yesterday. Also running cmake and make via the cmd works nicely
[11:06] <zbenjamin> talking about #1489331
[11:06] <zbenjamin> 1489331
[11:06] <zbenjamin> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu/+bug/1489331
[11:07] <nik90> zbenjamin: the cmake files are in the same format you helped us build a long time ago. Not sure why it is unable to find the custom executable. I could try other projects.
[11:08] <nik90> zbenjamin: same results with lp:ubuntu-calendar-app as well
[11:08] <zbenjamin> nik90: well there were loooots of changes in qtc and the plugin
[11:09] <zbenjamin> nik90: i might have missed some stuff
[11:10] <nik90> zbenjamin: I swear I had this working with Qtcreator 3.4 yesterday nite before the upgrade to wily.
[11:10] <nik90> ;)
[11:11] <popey> mzanetti: what's left to do on https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/reminders-app/fix-writeback-issue/+merge/263848 ?
[11:11] <mzanetti> popey, approving :D
[11:11] <mzanetti> popey, well, not exactly sure what mterry's comment means. I know there's another issue with the checkboxes, but that's an issue in the browser code
[11:12] <mzanetti> popey, I'll try to get oSoMoN to that next week when he's back from the sprint
[11:12] <popey> okay
[11:12]  * popey looks at oSoMoN across the desk
[11:13]  * oSoMoN hides
[11:13] <popey> oSoMoN hides badly
[11:13] <mzanetti> :D
[11:26] <zbenjamin> nik90: i can reproduce , no probs :D
[11:26] <nik90> zbenjamin: :D
[11:30] <zbenjamin> nik90: hm wenn i press "Add" in the runconfigs at least for desktop i can create one. However no idea yet why it does not work initially
[11:31] <zbenjamin> nik90: as well as for the device
[11:31] <zbenjamin> nik90: so its not autocreated but you can add it
[11:32]  * nik90 tries
[11:33] <nik90> zbenjamin: yes you're right...I can live with that for now.
[11:33] <nik90> zbenjamin: btw I noticed this for sometime now, that when I run on the phone, the app logs are not shown in qtc. (I hope I didnt ask this earlier). Is that intentional?
[11:34] <nik90> I need to look at .cache/upstart...which is not hard, but it doesn't refresh automatically and at the moment the sdk is spewing deprecation warnings all over my logs making it difficult to spot actual warnings&errors as a whole.
[11:36] <zzarr>  hello! if I compile a project based on QtQuick for a Ubuntu kit, where's the executable located (on my Ubuntu Phone in this case)?
[12:07] <bzoltan_> didrocks: mzanetti: please test the QtC plugin release candidate from the ppa:ubuntu-sdk-team/tools-development This release fixes few of the bugs you pointed out - https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-team/+archive/ubuntu/tools-development/+sourcepub/5330419/+listing-archive-extra
[12:15] <didrocks> bzoltan_: as told to zbenjamin, I will only be able to do that next week (off tomorrow)
[12:16] <bzoltan_> didrocks: no problem :) I am doing regression tests anyway during the weekend. thanks for tetsing :)
[12:16] <didrocks> bzoltan_: will tell you on Monday then :)
[13:10] <popey> DanChapman: have you had anyone from canonical complain that they can't get mail using dekko ?
[13:10] <popey> DanChapman: specifically people who use our own internal mail server - not google
[13:16] <DanChapman> popey: Saviq & ogra_ hit issues quite a while back with the internal mailserver with QRESYNC being busted. But it was like dovecot 1.x so pretty old. But lucid EOL'd so i presume it's been upgraded since then
[13:16]  * Saviq checks
[13:16]  * Saviq doesn't wanna answer
[13:17] <DanChapman> popey: why's that?  you having problems?
[13:17] <Saviq> popey, known issue, and it's ours (IS's), not dekko
[13:17] <popey> ah
[13:17] <popey> ted: ^
[13:18] <Saviq> we just need to upgrade at some point...
[13:18] <popey> DanChapman: I'm not, ted is
[13:18] <ted> Ah, okay. I'll complain :-)
[13:18] <ogra_> DanChapman, yeah. i upgraded the server to trusty by now, all fine here
[13:18] <Saviq> ted, clearing cache helps, until it doesn't again
[13:20] <DanChapman> ted, You just need to disable Dekko using QRESYNC, so either go to Settings -> account name -> Incoming server -> Server capabilities and disable QRESYNC you will need to restart Dekko for it to take effect or you can add imap.extension.blacklist=QRESYNC to the dekko.dekkoproject.conf file for the affected account and also restart
[13:21] <popey> nice!
[13:21] <ted> DanChapman, Cool, I have rebuild my caches now too :-)
[15:14] <ted> Still not working, ogra_ or Saviq, can you pastebin your config? (remove password please :-)
[15:30] <DanChapman> ted are you getting any errors pop up?
[15:31] <DanChapman> also the imap logs might give some clues as to what's happening, you'll find them under ~/.cache/dekko.dekkoproject/logs/IMAP
[15:34] <mzanetti> popey, rpadovani, hangout?
[15:35] <popey> hey!
[15:37] <ted> DanChapman, Yeah, ti seems to be timeouts. Guessing one of the IMAP features isn't loved.
[15:37] <popey> mzanetti: -> #ubuntu-touch-meeting ?
[15:37] <mzanetti> popey, ok... so what's the news? :D
[15:37] <ted> DanChapman, Hoping I can crib the answer :-)
[15:37] <mzanetti> ack
[16:45] <balloons> mzanetti, can you fix the conflicts in https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/reminders-app/qmltest2/+merge/253598?
[16:45] <balloons> I listed them
[16:48] <mzanetti> balloons, ack
[17:03] <mzanetti> balloons, hey, I've merged and it should at least compile again
[17:03] <mzanetti> balloons, I've tried fixing the tests but that'll take me a bit longer
[17:03] <mzanetti> balloons, so if you manage to run it so that it prints 3 test failures, then you're good and it's my turn again
[17:03] <balloons> ok, I'll try and get that far
[17:04] <mzanetti> balloons, obviously I've written those tests before completely reworking the EditNoteView... shouldn't be too hard to fix them again, but I need to run for dinner now
[17:07] <ahayzen> t1mp, can we programatically set the width of the left and right sides of the adaptivepagelayout yet?
[17:42] <nik90> ahayzen: I doubt it. I remember zsombor saying the properties to adjust the column width are being currently worked on
[17:42] <ahayzen> nik90, ah ok :-)
[17:43] <nik90> but I am saying from what I heard. You might want to branch his branch and check the API docs
[17:43] <ahayzen> i can see some private stuff in here http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-team/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/trunk/view/head:/src/Ubuntu/Components/1.3/AdaptivePageLayout.qml
[17:49] <mzanetti> balloons, hmmm: http://91.189.93.70:8080/job/reminders-app-vivid-amd64-ci/198/console
[17:49] <mzanetti> it says uitk is too old
[17:50] <balloons> mzanetti, ahh I see that. So at least they will run
[17:51] <mzanetti> balloons, yeah, it is too old. it installs: 15.04.20150422
[17:52] <mzanetti> balloons, also, I believe once this is fixed we'll be running into issues that it can't run xvfb
[17:52] <mzanetti> unless something has changed in the setup
[17:54] <balloons> mzanetti, yes. we should be able to run these on the device itself now. I assume that will fix it eh?
[18:07] <mzanetti> balloons, yes, that should do
[18:56] <t1mp> ahayzen, nik90: zsombi finished the configurable width of the columns
[18:56] <t1mp> it is in UITK staging since r1609
[18:56] <t1mp> not yet in trunk
[18:56] <nik90> t1mp: ah ok..thnx
[18:56] <nik90> ahayzen: then you can just test using a local build of the staging branch.
[18:57] <t1mp> ahayzen: yes, 'make docs' in staging and then check documentation/html/qml-ubuntu-components-adaptivepagelayout.html
[19:09] <ahayzen> t1mp, nik90 ah cool thanks guys :-)
[19:09]  * ahayzen continues hacking and adding edgy animations to things hehe :-)
[19:12] <nik90> ahayzen: u got me curious, what cool edgy animations are you adding?
[19:12] <nik90> ;)
[19:12] <ahayzen> nik90, so far... sliding in/out of the sidebar and sliding in/out of the toolbar
[19:12] <ahayzen> and ofc my cardview is nicely animated :-)
[19:12] <ahayzen> gotta get it past Victor as well though ;-)
[19:12] <ahayzen> and its all in async loaders :-D
[19:13] <nik90> ah ok :D
[19:15] <ahayzen> t1mp, i noticed that if you have many head sections in the left side of a adaptivepagelayout they 'leak' into the right side (note my right side is blank) ? is that known ?
[19:36] <Dramatic6> hi
[19:36] <Dramatic6> can anyone help me with edubuntu
[19:59] <t1mp> ahayzen: no, I didn't know that
[19:59] <t1mp> ahayzen: can you report a bug for that?
[19:59] <ahayzen> t1mp, yup will do, let me create a mini example as well :-)
[20:00] <t1mp> ahayzen: there will be some more work done for the sections, to make them scrollable when they don't fit
[20:00] <t1mp> but first I have to finish all the other header stuff that we discussed yesterday
[20:00] <ahayzen> t1mp, and what is the reason for it being recommended to only 3? as we'll need at least 6 .. is it just the fact that scrolling is still WIP ?
[20:00] <ahayzen> (it being the head sections)
[20:00] <t1mp> ahayzen: yes, that recommendation will go away when the scrolling is done
[20:00] <ahayzen> "It is not YET recommended or supported to use more than three sections." ;-)
[20:00] <ahayzen> cool
[20:01] <t1mp> yeah :)
[20:07] <ahayzen> t1mp, bug 1489591
[20:08] <t1mp> ahayzen: right, confirmed.
[20:09] <ahayzen> thanks :-)
[20:09] <t1mp> ahayzen: there is a branch for scrolling in the sections https://code.launchpad.net/~faenil/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/WIP_BROKEN_scrollableSectionsStyle/+merge/264616
[20:10] <t1mp> ahayzen: I didn't have time to check it out yet, but it still has stuff that needs to be fixed
[20:10] <t1mp> but it will be a while before I have time for it :(
[20:11] <ahayzen> dekko has scrollable head sections? or is it just some situations like this that don't work ?
[20:12] <t1mp> I don't know. Installing it now.
[20:12] <ahayzen> maybe they have a component that looks like a head section  aha
[20:13] <t1mp> yeah our Sections don't have scrolling yet
[20:16] <DanChapman> ahayzen: yeah it's just a simple horizontal listeview in dekko for the sections.
[20:16] <DanChapman> *listview
[20:16] <ahayzen> DanChapman, ah cool thanks :-)
[20:18] <t1mp> oh wow, it looks quite nice :)
[20:19] <t1mp> I understood from faenil that there were some issues with the Sections component using a ListView
[20:19] <t1mp> I like the bottom edge in dekko :)
[20:19] <ahayzen> DanChapman, i've just starting using dekko primarily now after google account integration was added, now the main things i'm missing from the gmail webapp is thread view and being able to filter by the gmail sections (eg primary, social, promotions etc)
[20:19] <t1mp> I mean the reply/forward/reply all thing :)
[20:20] <ahayzen> i see there is a bug for threaded view, but is there one for the gmail sections ? or a way of showing them ?
[20:20] <ahayzen> yeah the bottom edge is nice :-)
[20:21] <t1mp> I also like the horizontal swiping on e-mails
[20:22] <t1mp> actually I suggested this behavior but I think the designers didn't want to make that a common pattern
[20:22] <t1mp> oh shit
[20:22] <t1mp> is there an undo? ;)
[20:22] <t1mp> I unstarred some stuff and I don't know what it was
[20:24] <t1mp> oh well, if it was important it will show up again one day ;)
[20:24] <t1mp> oh I like the navigation panel too
[20:24] <t1mp> DanChapman: awesome app :) lots of great stuff in it
[20:28] <DanChapman> ahayzen: well thread view is in progress at the moment. And will most likely be in the next update but gmail categories aren't provided with IMAP so that probably won't happen
[20:29] <ahayzen> DanChapman, ah damn oh yeah even TB can't see them either, must be something they have at their end :-/ .. well the threaded views will help alot anyway :-)
[20:29] <nik90> DanChapman: wow ... thread view is close to being done? That's awesome!
[20:29] <nik90> that's the only thing I miss now in Dekko
[20:30] <nik90> and also the wrapping of subject lines in the phone <------- I get emails with long subjects...please make it happen :D
[20:32] <DanChapman> nik90 there's actually a hidden thread view in the latest release, cookie to whoever finds it :-) it's really only a placeholder for the singlethreadmodel but it works, it's just slow if the server doesn't support threading so we have to do it client side sorting. BUt that will be quicker with the coming incremental sort changes
[20:35] <nik90> ooh ... looks around for it
[20:35] <DanChapman> t1mp heh undo actions would probably be quite nice to have. Not sure if we have a bug for that
[20:36] <t1mp> DanChapman: I'll report one
[20:38] <t1mp> DanChapman: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dekko/+bug/1489604
[20:39] <DanChapman> nik90: well the subject is going to be moving back to the header https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwhxYaiA7z1qTGI0eWJQb1FsYWhxbjd6U1pwaVVXN2dUSWZz/view?usp=sharing so i'm sure we will have plenty of room to wrap it.
[20:41] <ahayzen> t1mp, if i've been using .push(pageUrl, properties) with the pagestack before and now i want to use the adpativepagelayout, how would you recommend creating the page? I tried creating a method like this http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/12209037/ but then some PageWrapper stuff breaks ?
[20:41] <DanChapman> t1mp: super, thanks!
[20:47] <t1mp> ahayzen: interesting :) we were discussing exactly this today
[20:48] <ahayzen> :-)
[20:48] <t1mp> ahayzen: zsombi_ will implement what you are doing to be the default :)
[20:48] <t1mp> ahayzen: so if you push your component, an incubator will be returned
[20:48] <t1mp> and the page created
[20:48] <t1mp> asynchronously
[20:48] <ahayzen> hehe :-) and that'll be pushed to the right ?
[20:49] <t1mp> ahayzen: yes. We only return the incubator in case you need to get a notification when the page is loaded
[20:49] <ahayzen> cool, is there any code i can use to test that yet?
[20:50] <t1mp> ahayzen: no, we were discussing it only today. I think zsombi_ will work on it next week
[20:50] <t1mp> ahayzen: here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bSoEynFzD3VAB8kLJW4lcVgtlEzwEF5_RicNQTIA-RY/edit# at the bottom there is an example how you could use it
[20:50] <ahayzen> ah damn, hmm i'll have to figure out a way of doing it myself for now then :-)
[20:51] <ahayzen> t1mp, i don't have permission to that :-/
[20:52] <t1mp> ahayzen: try again https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bSoEynFzD3VAB8kLJW4lcVgtlEzwEF5_RicNQTIA-RY/edit?usp=sharing
[20:52] <ahayzen> t1mp, there we go thanks :-)
[20:53] <ahayzen> oo the layouts: [ ... ] stuff looks cool :-)
[20:55] <ahayzen> t1mp, that example doesn't show passing properties though :-/
[20:56] <t1mp> ahayzen: right, but you can do that already now
[20:56] <t1mp> ahayzen: if you have a use case, please add a comment there, it will help us to make sure the API covers all the cases
[20:57] <t1mp> ahayzen: yeah, the layouts are in lp:ubuntu-ui-toolkit/staging already :)
[20:57] <ahayzen> i use case? as in the need for passing properties ?
[20:57] <t1mp> ahayzen: yes, or just ask for an example where the properties are passed, to make sure that zsombi tests that as well :)
[20:58] <ahayzen> like we have views for albums/songs and we give it the album details via the properties thing currently.. and loads of other info
[21:01] <ahayzen> t1mp, something like that comment ?
[21:02] <t1mp> ahayzen: yes, but add "can you extend the example to show how to pass properties to the new Page"
[21:03] <ahayzen> done :-)
[21:05] <t1mp> ahayzen: great, thanks :)
[21:07] <t1mp> Kaleo: I pushed a fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1488922
[21:07] <t1mp> Kaleo: feel free to test/review the MR, or ask boiko if you see him tomorrow
[21:07] <t1mp> took me a while to find the bug, but the fix is one line :)
[21:13] <ahayzen> t1mp, hehe my slightly hacky solution for now http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/12209492/
[21:14] <t1mp> ahayzen: you can already add the properties as the third parameter for addPageTo{Next,Current}Column
[21:14] <ahayzen> can you?
[21:14] <t1mp> ahayzen: yes, just in the examples for the incubator it is missing
[21:14] <ahayzen> oh yeah!
[21:14] <t1mp> :)
[21:14] <ahayzen> you blog post didn't say that IIRC ;-)
[21:15] <t1mp> ahayzen: right, it doesn't. I wanted to show that the basic stuff is simple and to get people experimenting with it :)
[21:15] <t1mp> the blog post doesn't replace the full docs
[21:15] <ahayzen> :-)
[21:16] <t1mp> hmm
[21:16] <t1mp> I could have easily added a property to set the background color of the new page
[21:28] <ahayzen> t1mp, there is the primaryPage property to get the rootpage but nothing to get the right most or others in the 'stack'/layout ?
[21:33] <t1mp> ahayzen: no, we started with a minimal API
[21:33] <t1mp> ahayzen: but if you can report a bug with a use case, we will probably add it
[21:33] <ahayzen> i could track it myself.. if i knew when pages were being popped
[21:35] <t1mp> ahayzen: when you have the pages that you added, you can check when they are 'active'
[21:35] <ahayzen> yeah i was just thinking something along those lines thanks :-)
[21:35] <t1mp> but we were thinking that maybe you should not be tracking which page is in which column, because that can change at any time (for example when the user resizes the window)
[21:36] <ahayzen> but we show/hide things depending which page you are on when not in the wider mode
[21:45] <t1mp> ahayzen: which things?
[21:45] <t1mp> ahayzen: perhaps you can control that from the page that is hidden/visible?
[21:45] <ahayzen> loads of things! haha like we don't show the toolbar when your on the now playing page
[21:46] <ahayzen> we had *alot* of things that were bound to PageStack.currentPage.title
[21:46] <t1mp> which toolbar? you mean the actions in the header?
[21:46] <ahayzen> we have our own toolbar at the bottom ;-)
[21:47] <t1mp> we should have another sprint with app developers to work out those things :)
[21:47] <ahayzen> :-)
[21:54] <ahayzen> seem to have found a sortof solution :-)
[22:03]  * t1mp off