[03:01] <pitti> Good morning
[06:40] <Gui1524> Hey guys, is anybody on, if so, is this the place to share ideas for ubuntu?
[07:32] <willcooke> morning
[07:51] <tjaalton> robert_ancell: hey, the latest xserver upload seems to be in proposed still, do you know what's blocking it?
[07:52] <tjaalton> I have a pending commit to push, disabling optimus rotation again
[07:56] <robert_ancell> tjaalton, no, I'm not sure what's blocking it sorry
[07:57] <robert_ancell> kenvandine, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1471998
[07:57] <kenvandine> robert_ancell, thx
[07:57] <tjaalton> robert_ancell: ok, I'll try to find out
[09:02] <larsu> hi!
[09:06] <kenvandine> hey larsu!
[09:06] <larsu> hi kenvandine! You in London as well?
[09:07] <kenvandine> yup
[09:08] <larsu> cool. How is it?
[09:08] <kenvandine> good, it was a bit rainy
[09:08] <kenvandine> but a great sprint
[09:08]  * kenvandine loves sprints with lots of hacking and not many meetings :)
[09:08] <larsu> hehe everybody does ;)
[10:49] <ndg> Will the mobile/touch layout double as a big picture mode for large displays and TVs in unity8?
[12:03] <Laney> tjaalton: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#xorg-server that test in progress
[12:04] <tjaalton> Laney: uh, why is fglrx tests run on arch that doesn't have it
[12:05] <Laney> If it always fails then it won't hold back the package
[12:05] <Laney> Maybe it's stuck in Test in progress for some reason, like a bug
[12:06] <tjaalton> yes, all the attempts have failed
[12:11] <Laney> tjaalton: probably file a bug on lp:auto-package-testing
[12:12] <Laney> we could skip this but then would lose the state for debugging
[12:12] <Laney> and with that, I'm going (off today)
[12:12] <Laney> see you!
[12:23] <pitti> tjaalton, Laney: we currently trigger dkms packages on all architectures; indeed teh "always failed" on the unsupported arches are a bit of a wart, but they won't hold back anything
[12:23] <pitti> but I do need to sort out the version mismatch, looks like a missing apt source in the armhf containers
[12:23] <tjaalton> ok
[12:34] <pitti> hm, the apt sources do look fine
[12:34] <pitti> Get:14 http://ports.ubuntu.com wily-proposed/restricted Sources [28 B]
[12:34] <pitti> (except for being empty)
[12:35] <pitti> http://ports.ubuntu.com/dists/wily-proposed/restricted/binary-armhf/ is still empty, which is weird -- the -proposed source should surely be published everywhere?
[12:35] <pitti> err, I mean http://ports.ubuntu.com/dists/wily-proposed/restricted/source/
[12:35]  * pitti blames a mirror glitch and just re-runs it
[13:35] <pitti> tjaalton: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#xorg-server cleared up
[13:36] <tjaalton> pitti: sweet, thanks
[13:44] <kenvandine> robert_ancell, bug 1489891
[15:48] <Laney> pitti: Yeah, I was referring to it being 'in progress' forever