[08:03] <boiko> hi, can anyone please check what is going on with telepathy-ofono in the excuses page? the boot test is listed as a regression
[09:29] <pitti> boiko -- ah, disappeared
[18:12] <coreycb> hi, can someone on the release team please take a look at the following FFEs?  this will help unblock most of the openstack packages.  bug 1488094 and bug 1489096.
[18:36] <coreycb> bdmurray, the python-neutronclient sru is ready for review
[18:40] <bdmurray> coreycb: Okay, I'll have a look shortly.
[18:40] <coreycb> bdmurray, thanks
[22:28] <robru> stgraber: thanks
[22:40] <doko> skipped: gcc-5 (1 <- 92)
[22:40] <doko>     got: 252+0: a-71:a-44:a-35:i-36:p-35:p-31
[22:40] <doko>     * amd64: libboost-date-time1.55-dev, libboost-date-time1.55.0, libboost-log1.55-dev, libboost-thread1.55-dev, libboost1.55-all-dev
[22:40] <doko> slangasek, could that be forced in? it's an unconditional breaks
[23:01] <slangasek> doko: it breaks libboost-date-time1.55.0 but there are no other reverse-dependencies of this in wily?
[23:01] <doko> slangasek, http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/boost1.58.html
[23:02] <doko> down to 20 (from 85 this morning)
[23:02] <doko> I mean, I can remove that breaks again, if that's easier
[23:02] <slangasek> doko: right, that tells me the state of the transition as a whole; I'm just looking to confirm whether this breaks any revdeps of libboost-date-time1.55.0
[23:03] <slangasek> and the answer, based on update_output, is 'no'
[23:03] <slangasek> so yes I'm happy to force this
[23:03] <doko> ok, thanks
[23:03] <slangasek> if I can remember the britney syntax ;)
[23:04] <slangasek> doko: N.B. as an archive admin you could actually satisfy britney's requirements by removing those binaries from wily
[23:06] <doko> slangasek, yes, already doing for some leaf packages
[23:07] <slangasek> doko: you've been doing binary removals for this?
[23:07] <doko> slangasek, iirc, one on armhf, and one on powerpc.
[23:07] <doko> one even
[23:09] <slangasek> ok