[04:48] <Mirv> good morning
[06:54] <jgdx> fginther, thanks! It actually ran the tests, or was the report wrong?
[08:19] <anpok> cihelp: lastweek mako-08 was broken now mako-12 shows a similar symptom in the mir testrunner jenkins job: unable to upgrade/install packages:
[08:19] <anpok> cihelp: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/mir-mediumtests-runner-mako/6483/console
[08:26] <psivaa> anpok: will take a look
[09:08] <Saviq> Mirv, hey, is https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-014 dual-landing correctly? I mean it says target is primary archive, will it, in fact, publish to the overlay ppa for vivid?
[09:12] <Mirv> Saviq: when it's 'dual', the vivid part of the dual is always the PPA, so no problem
[09:12] <Saviq> Mirv, thanks, that's what I thought but wanted to make sure
[09:12] <Mirv> Saviq: welcome back, too :)
[09:13] <Saviq> thanks
[09:59] <Saviq> robru, when you're around, it's my first time using Bileto, the Assign link is misleading, it should say "(Re)configure" or something
[09:59] <Saviq> robru, was scared to press it when I needed to reconf a silo
[10:03] <Saviq> robru, just noticed "Merge & Clean" to abandon is a bit scary, too
[10:04] <psivaa> mandel:  http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/mir-android-vivid-i386-build/ is passing now that i've added  libboost-python-dev to the vivid chroot
[10:04] <psivaa> mandel: unping
[10:04] <mandel> psivaa, I was gonna say, shit I get in trouble even when I have no idea about mir ;)
[10:07] <psivaa> mandel: heh, sorry was intended for alf_.
[10:07] <psivaa> mandel: i'll deal with  https://code.launchpad.net/~mandel/ubuntu-download-manager/wily-add-appid-metadata/+merge/269364 now
[10:08] <mandel> psivaa, nice, so that guy has an small issue, is aiming for wily (as the name says) yet is being built on vivid, and you know gcc 5
[10:08] <mandel> psivaa, fun times!
[10:14] <Mirv> Saviq: there's also https://bugs.launchpad.net/bileto/
[10:20] <psivaa> mandel: fginther asked for some clarifications about this job last night:
[10:20] <psivaa> 23:24 <fginther> mandel, what's the story on ubuntu-download-manager? That project was never moved to wily. Should it be?
[10:21] <mandel> psivaa, it is in wily, it was dual landed
[10:21] <psivaa> mandel: ack, thanks
[10:21] <mandel> psivaa, AFAIK trunk is in wily or should be in wily, the symbols files were updated and was landed in wily with that bit gcc 5 silo
[10:22] <mandel> psivaa, so, unless I'm wrong we should have the same in vivid and in wily but with diff symbol files
[10:23] <Saviq> Mirv, oh, good
[10:31] <alf_> psivaa: Looking at the latest runs it seems that the mir-android-vivid-i386-build is now fixed. Thanks!
[10:32] <alf_> psivaa: What was the problem after all?
[10:41] <psivaa> alf_: i just had to install libboost-python-dev manually inside chroot env
[10:42] <alf_> psivaa: hmm, that's strange, why couldn't it be downloaded normally like the other packages?
[10:58] <psivaa> alf_: yea, its confusing. i dont have a vivid machine right now. i just noticed that libboost-python-dev and libboost-all-dev are in different archive pockets for trusty
[10:58] <psivaa> one is universe and the other is in main
[11:01] <alf_> psivaa: ok, thanks
[11:29] <alf_> trainguards: Hi! powerd in proposed is failing boottest. This is a known issue, we need to work around it manually (see https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/wily-boottest-powerd/lastBuild/console).
[11:48] <Mirv> alf_: you will want to alert cihelp to running/workarounding it properly
[11:51] <alf_> Mirv: ack, thanks
[11:51] <alf_> cihelp: Hi! powerd in proposed is failing boottest. This is a known issue, we need to work around it manually (see  https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/wily-boottest-powerd/lastBuild/console).
[12:25] <psivaa> alf_: i'll add this to the list of 'TODO' of ours, hopefully be able to get to it soon
[12:26] <alf_> psivaa: thanks
[12:39] <Laney> O_O
[12:39] <Laney> how come unity-control-center got uploaded?
[12:48] <rvr> popey: Approving music-app update
[12:52] <popey> rvr: SWEEET!
[12:52] <popey> rvr: thanks
[12:54] <Mirv> popey: clock getting custom ringtones, will that later bring also then the possibility of having actual ringtones (for calls)? many people seem to request that.
[12:54] <Mirv> anyway, very sweet
[12:54] <popey> Mirv: dunno what controls that
[12:54] <Mirv> Laney: it was marked as ready to publish
[12:55] <Laney> how does that happen?
[12:55] <Mirv> Laney: it was marked "Publish without QA" == please publish.
[12:55] <Mirv> that might be worthy of a bug report, people confused that with the initial "No QA needed" state
[12:55] <Laney> that means "publish instantly"?
[12:56] <Laney> how do you know I have checked the package myself?
[12:57] <Mirv> Laney: yes, it means. the initial state should be "No QA Needed". like I said, those are confusing and should be renamed to more clearly state what is the initial state and what is the "please publish" state.
[12:57] <rvr> popey: One question. Are custom sounds deleted at some point, if not used?
[12:57] <Mirv> I'm filing a bileto bug about that now
[12:58] <rvr> Or there exists any option to delete them
[12:59] <Laney> ty
[12:59] <ahayzen> Mirv, if system-settings implement a chooser via content-hub then yes we can have custom ringtones :-)
[12:59] <ahayzen> rvr, deleting custom sounds is at the clock end, IIRC if you swipe delete them it then removes them
[13:00] <rvr> ahayzen: Ah, nice
[13:01] <rvr> Indeed, tested.
[13:01]  * rvr feels better.
[13:02] <Mirv> ahayzen: thanks! I updated bug #1490399 I filed accordingly
[13:03] <ahayzen> Mirv, thanks :-)
[13:04] <kenvandine> ahayzen, seb128 started hacking on the custom ringtone stuff last week
[13:04] <kenvandine> but he's on holiday for a couple weeks now
[13:04] <kenvandine> but it's something he's anxious for, i'm sure we'll see it soon :)
[13:05] <Mirv> kenvandine: oh, great!
[13:14] <Mirv> if someone's brain works better, feel free to suggest bether 6 new names bug #1491838
[13:17] <morphis> Mirv: who can approve https://code.launchpad.net/~morphis/lxc-android-config/add-citrain-support/+merge/269859?
[13:17] <morphis> even if you approved it still says "Needs review"
[13:18] <Mirv> morphis: top-approved now!
[13:18] <morphis> thanks!
[13:18] <Mirv> np
[13:19] <morphis> Mirv: still says "Needs review" ...
[13:19] <morphis> ah
[13:19] <morphis> now its fine
[13:20] <Mirv> ogra_: if you're around, could you review https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-021-2-publish/87/artifact/appmenu-qt5_packaging_changes.diff - it's an annoying bit coming from our private header usage. if you're ok with it, please publish it via https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-021-2-publish/build?delay=0sec since now since yesterday we can't publish main components even if we ge
[13:20] <Mirv> t a verbal 'ack'
[13:24] <Mirv> kenvandine: if you're familiar with seed updates, https://code.launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu-touch.wily_remove_friends/+merge/267648 would be now ready to publish to wily
[13:26] <Laney> Mirv: how did you manage to publish u-c-c then?
[13:28] <Mirv> Laney: there weren't packaging changes, those can still be published
[14:43] <popey> Mirv: are you sil2100 today? clock and music clicks updated in the store, so I guess will enter the next image built.
[14:55] <ogra_> Mirv, ACK (sorry for the delay)
[14:58] <robru> uh
[15:50]  * ogra_ wonders if there is a landing meeting today 
[15:50]  * ogra_ has nothing to bring up  
[15:50] <jibel> me neither.
[15:51] <jibel> ogra_, canceling the meeting looks like a good option
[15:51] <jibel> robru, ^
[15:51] <ogra_> yeah
[15:51] <jibel> rvr, ^
[15:51] <ogra_> wow, my phone just went in a deadlock
[15:52] <rvr> Oki
[15:52] <josepht> alf_: powerd has been passed through proposed-migration
[15:52] <ogra_> screen is on ... i cant turn it off or on anymore and it doesnt take any input
[15:52] <alf_> josepht: great, thank you
[15:52] <ogra_> led blinking with the notification for the meetin
[15:52] <ogra_> g
[15:52] <josepht> alf_: no problem
[15:53] <robru> jibel: sounds good thanks
[15:54] <jibel> ogra_, similar to bug 1491566 ?
[15:54] <ogra_> jibel, apart from the last line there, yeah
[15:55] <ogra_> (i didnt get a second message)
[15:55]  * ogra_ "me too's"
[15:57] <rvr> abeato: ping
[15:59] <jibel> Saviq, ^ ogra_ is having the same problem than pmcgowan yesterday. What info do you need?
[15:59] <jibel> or similar at least
[15:59] <ogra_> jibel, sorry i rebooted ...
[15:59] <jibel> ogra_, maybe there are useful traces in the logs
[16:00] <ogra_> yeah
[16:00] <ogra_> just saying ... nothing to debug directly anymore
[16:00] <robru> Saviq: no, I'm working towards eliminating the need to reconfigure. "Assign" if the correct name for that link.
[16:01] <pmcgowan> Saviq, ^^
[16:01] <pmcgowan> oh already pung
[16:01] <Saviq> and in a stakeholder mtg...
[16:08] <Mirv> ogra_: can you please also run https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-021-2-publish/build with ACK. as mentioned starting today non-coredev trainguards can't run the job anymore for main packages with pkg changes.
[16:09] <robru> ogra_: yes this was requested by slangasek, infinity, and DMB. now only people with proper upload rights can run the publish job when packaging changes are present.
[16:09] <ogra_> done
[16:09] <robru> ogra_: thanks
[16:09] <ogra_> bah, or not
[16:09] <Mirv> popey: I'm the poorer version of sil2100 for this and next week, with no image building rights. but yes those should be then in tomorrow's build.
[16:09]  * ogra_ looks for a 2fa device 
[16:09] <ogra_> :/
[16:09] <robru> popey: oh I have image building rights. you want I should build an image?
[16:10] <Mirv> robru: it might popey is just used to reporting such changes to sil2100.. not sure if there's a real need for extra builds
[16:10] <robru> Mirv: ok no worries, but I can if it's desired.
[16:10] <ogra_> done
[16:11] <abeato> rvr, pong
[16:12] <popey> Mirv: yeah, no desire for an image, just passing on info
[16:12] <psivaa> mandel: hi, https://code.launchpad.net/~mandel/ubuntu-download-manager/wily-add-appid-metadata/+merge/269364 is now happy
[16:13] <pmcgowan> ogra_, do you have any thoughts on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/1480785
[16:14] <Mirv> popey: information received and happily noted ✔
[16:15] <ogra_> pmcgowan, i think abeato asked me about it before ... not sure what to do with that, that needs someone who knows the internals of initctl/upstart ... probably stracing it would reveal more
[16:17] <mandel> psivaa, bien bien
[16:43] <Saviq> ogra_, sorry, back now, your arale still no input
[16:43] <Saviq> ?
[16:44] <ogra_> Saviq, i needed it for a call so i hard-rebooted it
[16:44] <Saviq> ogra_, ok thanks
[17:13] <robru> lawl
[17:13] <robru> kenvandine: mterry: can I get somebody for a packaging ACK? https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-016-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/autopilot_packaging_changes.diff/*view*/ this one's easy
[17:23] <mterry> robru, sure...  though I don't generally *like* the idea of disabling tests
[17:23] <mterry> robru, but approved
[17:23] <robru> mterry: thanks
[17:23] <robru> mterry: I need you to run the publish job
[17:23] <mterry> robru, oh that's new
[17:24] <robru> mterry: due to some recent changes that prevent me from spoofing your approval on the honor system
[17:24] <robru> yes ;-)
[17:24] <mterry> robru, hah
[17:24] <robru> mterry: it's this one: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-016-2-publish/build and check ACK
[17:25] <mterry> robru, and only that one? then do a build?
[17:26] <robru> mterry: don't "do a build" but do "click the button labelled Build on the publish job"
[17:26] <robru> grumble grumble jenkins
[17:26] <mterry> robru, sure... I think I did that right
[17:26] <robru> mterry: looks right
[17:27] <robru> mterry: oh my, the silo dirty logic got very noisy recently ;-)
[17:28] <robru> mterry: great, much success, thanks
[17:28] <mterry> \o/
[21:14] <pmcgowan> where s the silo pae now
[21:14] <pmcgowan> page
[21:23] <brendand> pmcgowan, https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/
[21:27] <pmcgowan> its all different, I hate change :)
[21:32] <brendand> pmcgowan, but it's better!