[05:34] <didrocks> good morning
[05:44] <pitti> bonjour didrocks, ça va ?
[05:44] <didrocks> bonjour pitti ! ça va bien, et toi ?
[05:45] <pitti> didrocks: ça va bien aussi ! hier deux amis nous avons visité, c'était bien
[05:46] <didrocks> pitti: ah, sympa, vous ne vous êtes pas couchés trop tardivement ?
[05:49] <pitti> didrocks: non, nous avons dormir à 22h, comme d'habitude
[05:50] <pitti> didrocks: nous avons joué badminton, et avons eu le diner au notre restaurant italien
[05:51] <didrocks> ah, d'accord ;)
[05:51] <pitti> didrocks: ils vivent au Munich, pas loin :)
[05:54] <didrocks> pitti: ah oui, donc assez facile de faire l'aller-retour j'imagine
[05:54] <pitti> oui, seulement une heure
[05:55] <pitti> didrocks: ce soir je vais avoir l'interview pour le course français !
[05:55] <pitti> (alors, lequel niveau je commence)
[06:03] <didrocks> pitti: ah, super ! Tu me tiendras au courant ;)
[07:58] <willcooke> Morning all
[07:59] <didrocks> happy morning willcooke
[08:03] <Laney> ahoy hoy
[08:07] <didrocks> hey Laney ;)
[08:08] <didrocks> let's see if software-center will start to build with this…
[08:09]  * didrocks wonders if tarmac for trunk is broken though
[08:09] <didrocks> dobey: I guess software-center's tarmac was under your control, do you mind checking if it's still running?
[08:10] <Laney> hey didrocks, what's up?
[08:10] <Laney> I kind of remember being told to just upload s-c before :/
[08:11] <didrocks> Laney: seems that most of people did distro-patch it, yeah
[08:11] <didrocks> as last release was 2 years ago
[08:11] <didrocks> (btw, one of your patch isn't in the ubuntu package but in trunk, I'm backporting it as well)
[08:12] <didrocks> the worst is that seb128 didn't pushed his patches to trunk…
[08:12] <didrocks> push*
[08:13] <didrocks> my new shiny refurnished sbuild fails…
[08:14] <Laney> maybe fix up trunk to reflect the right thing and do a new release...
[08:15] <didrocks> Laney: seems quite risky, 2 years of no release, it means it's a complete day for this
[08:15] <didrocks> and I didn't budget it
[08:15] <didrocks> (and again paying for other lazyness… well…)
[08:15] <Laney> why's that?
[08:15] <Laney> you can diff it and see that it's just the expected changes
[08:16] <didrocks> right, and seeing the current diff, it's really large
[08:16] <didrocks> (already done that as that was my first intent)
[08:17] <Laney> what is missing?
[08:17] <Laney> maybe we can ask dobey to do this ...
[08:17] <didrocks> but seems no michael, Dimitri or seb128 took the risk of doing it. I'm ok if this is oked if it's acked that we maintain this (and seeing the current discussion of removing it nearly, I'm unsure)
[08:17] <didrocks> yeah
[08:18] <didrocks> I'm also unsure about the release process, they did run some more advanced tests IIRC
[08:18] <didrocks> so, let's backport for this sponsoring batch
[08:18] <didrocks> and see if dobey can then have a look
[08:19] <didrocks> I'm backporting your changes, I guess we fixed the transparent header in 15.04 in another way?
[08:19] <didrocks> (you added some hook to style it)
[08:22] <Laney> it's not the header, some banner thing
[08:23] <Laney> not sure, maybe it is just missing, should be backported
[08:23] <didrocks> it's not transparent
[08:23] <didrocks> but yeah, I still backported it and I'm trying with it
[08:24] <Laney> the show technical items item I think
[08:25] <didrocks> Laney: oh, while I'm at it, do you know what's the sbuild config to tell "this arch == -A"
[08:25] <Laney> e.g. search for 'firefox' and look at the bottom
[08:25] <didrocks> $build_arch_all = 1; I guess
[08:25] <didrocks> ok, trying
[08:26] <Laney> that's for all arches but yeah
[08:27] <didrocks> for some reason, I thought without that option that sbuild was looking in the chroot for some distro parameter
[08:27] <didrocks> as we set amd64 == arch_all
[08:27] <didrocks> but that's probably just a builder option
[08:28] <Laney> launchpad config indeed
[08:28] <didrocks> Laney: confirming, the technical info is black
[08:28] <didrocks> but at least, now it's themeable, and will just wait on larsu :)
[08:28] <didrocks> (not transparent, just black)
[08:31]  * didrocks likes the lighter stipple with this fix
[08:35] <didrocks> yeah, no tarmac merge in an hour
[08:35] <didrocks> so I guess it's down, let's keep them approved and keep the tab opened to poke ;)
[08:43] <didrocks> ricotz: hey, on bug #1491698, the changelog doesn't say if there are new features in those new releases or if they are bug fixes only
[08:44] <didrocks> ricotz: mind expanding this in the bug report a little bit? :)
[08:45]  * didrocks sees a timezone related fix, I wonder if I should hand that over to Laney as he's in context :p
[08:45] <didrocks> (ok, it's in java, but you are flexible, aren't you? ;))
[08:46] <Laney> funny guy
[08:46] <Laney> :P
[09:02] <ricotz> didrocks, commented
[09:04] <willcooke> Hrm.  I have managed to disable the left mouse button with xinput set-prop
[09:04] <willcooke> which is what I wanted to do
[09:04] <willcooke> long story
[09:05] <willcooke> but it won't let me re-enable it now
[09:05]  * willcooke restarts session
[09:08] <didrocks> ricotz: syncing
[09:27] <ricotz> didrocks, thanks
[09:28] <didrocks> ricotz: thanks to you :)
[09:33] <larsu> internet!
[09:33] <larsu> morning :)
[09:33] <willcooke> \o/
[09:33] <willcooke> The cat pictures drought is OVER!
[09:34] <pitti> qengho: hey Chad! can you please have a look at the chromium-browser test regression? (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/c/chromium-browser/wily/amd64/ but affects all arches)
[09:34] <pitti> [error] Can't run this Sikuli script: /tmp/adt-run.VtJhtL/build.Cz8/chromium-browser-44.0.2403.89/debian/tests/testdata/9-search-credit.sikuli
[09:34] <pitti> SyntaxError: mismatched input '<EOF>' expecting DEDENT
[09:34] <pitti> qengho: looks like some badly formatted script? (might have changed with a newer util-linux version perhaps, but not sure what kind of "script" that is)
[09:35] <willcooke> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser/vivid-working/view/head:/debian/tests/testdata/9-search-credit.sikuli/9-search-credit.py
[09:36] <larsu> Laney, doesn't software center have it's own css?
[09:36] <Laney> hi larsu ;)
[09:36] <larsu> dunno if it makes sense to add it to the theme
[09:37] <larsu> Laney, morning :)
[09:37] <Laney> yeah I didn't try adding it there
[09:37] <didrocks> hey larsu!
[09:37] <Laney> because I knew I could just re-merge from the old commit :)
[09:37] <larsu> hi didrocks
[09:38] <willcooke> ooohhhhh, looks like all the tests are broken for Sikuli
[09:41] <Laney> funny that
[09:41] <larsu> Laney, ah, this was in there at some point?
[09:41] <larsu> fine with me in any case
[09:41] <larsu> should I test it as well?
[09:41] <Laney> larsu: yeah but we thought it was for o-s back then
[09:41] <Laney> so it got culled
[09:42] <larsu> ooh, probably my mistake then, sorry
[09:42] <Laney> not really
[09:42] <Laney> it had a comment that said /* overlay-scrollbars */ :P
[09:43] <larsu> heh
[09:44]  * larsu can't top approve
[09:44] <Laney> man
[09:44] <Laney> you need on this team
[09:45] <Laney> ohhhhh
[09:46] <Laney> willcooke / didrocks: can you add larsu to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-art-pkg maybe please?
[09:46]  * willcooke tries
[09:46] <willcooke> done
[09:46] <willcooke> larsu, ^
[09:46] <Laney> you are in the pspmteam
[09:46] <Laney> so have the p0w3rz
[09:46] <willcooke> \m/
[09:47] <Laney> thanks!
[09:47] <pitti> hm, isn't it a bit weird that https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-art-pkg/+members only has one admin (who I've never heard of..)
[09:47] <Laney> the 'owner' can add people too
[09:47] <Laney> I guess that guy was involved back in 2006
[09:48] <larsu> willcooke, thanks :)
[09:49]  * larsu approves all the things
[09:49] <larsu> Laney, who can land this?
[09:49] <Laney> now get CI train powers
[09:49] <didrocks> pitti: yeah, unknown to me as well
[09:49] <Laney> so you can do it ALL
[09:49] <larsu> haha
[09:49] <larsu> while we're at it, I'm still not in ~ubuntu-desktop *cough*
[09:50] <Laney> haha
[09:50] <Laney> that is an uploading team
[09:50] <larsu> I know ;)
[09:56] <larsu> MacSlow, hi! Do you still have some time to look at notify-osd patches? I've added hidpi support yesterday
[09:56] <larsu> would like that to land soon so that people can test it
[09:56]  * larsu expects some issues with weird apps or so
[10:04] <MacSlow> larsu, I saw it yesterday and will review it today before EOD
[10:08] <larsu> MacSlow, cool thanks!
[10:11]  * Laney sucks at hitting checkboxes with his new trackball
[10:11] <larsu> keyboard!
[10:23] <pitti> larsu: what happened to your mouse?
[10:23] <pitti> err, Laney
[10:24] <larsu> Laney, one of us has to switch nick
[10:24] <Laney> the scrollwheel stopped working, so I bought a trackball
[10:24] <larsu> I propose lkney
[10:25] <Laney> NEVER! THE WORLD NEEDS TO CHANGE!
[10:25] <larsu> desrt?
[10:25] <larsu> I mean deney
[10:25] <Laney> we could all start to use a shared IRC client
[10:25] <didrocks> from the stats, it's 100% of weechat users :p
[10:25] <Laney> then there will be no nick collisions
[10:25] <larsu> heh
[10:26] <didrocks> \o/ <- not alone
[10:26]  * larsu remembers the nick changing spree Copenhagen
[10:26] <larsu> *in
[10:33] <larsu> wow, why does indicator-datetime need 3 mins to compile?!
[10:33] <pitti> larsu: oh, we did? I just remember Viking helmets
[10:33] <larsu> oh, c++
[10:33] <pitti> CFLAGS="-O0" sbuild... :)
[10:33] <larsu> pitti, haha those were fun as well
[10:34] <larsu> ya...
[10:40] <larsu> Laney, do datetime tests fail for you as well? (master, not your branch)
[10:44] <Laney> let me try
[10:44] <Laney> why do you ask?
[10:45] <larsu> because I just noticed it :)
[10:45] <Laney> dear-reader-the-next-test-takes-60-seconds
[10:45] <Laney> arhghghg
[10:46] <Laney> works
[10:46] <larsu> hm, it's only eds tests for me
[10:46] <larsu> maybe I'm missing something?
[10:46]  * larsu searches for the test log
[10:48] <larsu> woah, there's assertion failures all over the place
[10:50] <Laney> ruh roh
[11:03] <ricotz> Laney, you can copy bino if you like -- https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/staging/+packages
[11:04] <Laney> ricotz: busy, maybe add it to the sponsor queue with the remaining actions and I might get to look later
[11:04] <qengho> pitti: Will do. Thanks!
[11:04] <didrocks> ogra_: would be nice if you check before talking dude
[11:04] <didrocks> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-make
[11:05] <didrocks> it's clearly in the archive
[11:05] <ogra_> oh
[11:05] <didrocks> (not the first time you are doing that :/)
[11:05] <ogra_> please correct me then ...  i tried ubuntu make last week and the instructions told me to use a PPA
[11:05] <didrocks> ogra_: just sent an email
[11:05] <ogra_> thanks
[11:05] <didrocks> ogra_: for LTS yeah, I don't backport new features per SRU policy
[11:05] <didrocks> and IIRC, you are on LTS
[11:06] <ogra_> yes, indeed, who would run production systems on non LTS :)
[11:06] <didrocks> ogra_: and I started working on Ubuntu Make a year ago, so post-LTS ;)
[11:06] <ogra_> ah
[11:06] <didrocks> I don't think snapcraft isn't either in the LTS or did you get an exception?
[11:06] <ogra_> sorry for the confusion then ... i just judged by own experience
[11:07] <didrocks> it's exactly the same than writing "you can't apt-get install snapcraft on the lts" :p
[11:07] <ogra_> yeah, it might not be backported, not sure though
[11:12] <ricotz> Laney, ok
[11:46] <larsu> Laney, sorry, got a bit sidetracked on fixing tests for this project. Will review your branch after lunch
[11:46] <Laney> no rush
[11:46] <larsu> damn, I broke more tests now
[11:46]  * larsu makes them fail when emitting warnings now
[12:17] <pitti> qengho: cheers
[14:38] <larsu> Laney, are we not running timedated on desktop yet?
[14:40] <Laney> sure we are, why?
[14:41] <larsu> d-feet was not showing it to me
[14:41] <larsu> and your branch fails because it doesn't see it either
[14:41] <Laney> is it installed...
[14:42] <Laney> should probably add a dependency
[14:42] <larsu> nope
[14:42] <Laney> how can you not have systemd installed?
[14:43] <larsu> oh wait, it's in the systemd package?
[14:43] <larsu> I thought it might be split maybe
[14:43] <Laney> ya
[14:43] <larsu> ah, it's installed but doesn't get activated for some reason
[14:44] <larsu> weird... it works if I start it manually
[14:45] <Laney> does it get activated if you call it from something else?
[14:45] <larsu> no
[14:45] <larsu> yes
[14:45] <larsu> gdbus works
[14:46] <larsu> oh, my mistake, sorry
[14:54] <Laney> oh?
[15:04] <Laney> why did those tests fail?!?!?!
[15:04] <larsu> wait, what?
[15:05] <larsu> I'm about to repush that branch
[15:06] <Laney> oh I got that in a chroot too
[15:06] <Laney> but not on my system
[15:06] <Laney> weird shit
[15:11] <larsu> Laney, commented (sorry about making you redo some of this again :/ )
[15:11] <dgadomski> hey guys, do you know why libosmesa6 is commented out of mesa-lts-{utopic,vivid}/debian/control?
[15:11] <Laney> oh right, now you fail on this warning
[15:11] <Laney> guess we need a test bus somewhere
[15:12] <larsu> doesn't this run under ted's test-runner thing?
[15:13] <Laney> nein
[15:13] <Laney> man
[15:13] <Laney> I don't really want to work on this shit again I'm afraid
[15:13] <Laney> at least not now
[15:14] <desrt> :(
[15:14] <desrt> GDBusProxy sucks :(
[15:14] <desrt> sorry dude
[15:14] <Laney> I look in the documentation for anything about handling properties
[15:14] <Laney> and it talks about this stuff I used
[15:14] <Laney> so I think oh well that's probably the right way to deal with them
[15:14] <larsu> fair enough - this is kinda underdocumented
[15:15] <larsu> well, the fact that you shouldn't use it most of the time is underdocumented
[15:15] <larsu> but it would be a bit weird... "GDBusProxy is this thing that does stuff. Don't use it."
[15:15] <larsu> Laney, mind if I take over?
[15:16] <Laney> if you want
[15:16] <Laney> or you could spend the same time fixing the docs :)
[15:16] <larsu> I feel bad for making you look at this again
[15:16] <larsu> he, not sure desrt would like that
[15:16]  * larsu would deprecate the proxy
[15:17] <willcooke> dgadomski, robert_ancell will probably know, but he's out sick.  Maybe drop him an email?
[15:17] <dgadomski> willcooke: thanks, I will do that
[15:22] <Laney> I don't understand from reading the docs of signal_subscribe how you just listen for PropertiesChanged of one property
[15:22] <Laney> so you might as well do it
[15:22] <larsu> dbus allows matching on the first argument
[15:23] <larsu> you pass the name of the property to arg0
[15:23] <larsu> oh wow, that doesn't work you're right
[15:23] <larsu> we do need to listen to all the things. That's messed up!
[15:24] <Laney> so just add DO_NOT_LOAD_PROPERTIES and delete that bit of code if you don't like the fetch at start bit
[15:24] <larsu> I also don't like the watching...
[15:25] <Laney> ok
[15:43] <flexiondotorg> mterry, Thank you for sponsoring some MATE syncs from Debian unstable. Most grateful!
[15:43] <mterry> flexiondotorg, my pleasure; glad it won't be as much of a frankenstein release  :)
[15:44] <mterry> (in the sense of having mismatched versions)
[15:44] <flexiondotorg> mterry, Indeed! :-)
[16:10] <larsu> Laney, done
[16:10] <larsu> Laney, so next step is to get a test bus in there so that the tests are actually exeuted :)
[16:10] <larsu> *executed
[16:10] <Laney> maybe you want to move it up from the timedate mock to the glib one
[16:11] <larsu> hm? What do you mean?
[16:11] <Laney> the test which fails is using GlibFixture
[16:12] <Laney> the ones which work are using TimedatedFixture
[16:12] <Laney> which is inherited from GlibFixture
[16:14] <larsu> Laney, do you mean TimezoneFixture?
[16:15] <larsu> that's not making any dbus calls, is it?
[16:16] <Laney> the one that does the fake SetTimezone stuff
[16:17] <larsu> oh yeah that one uses GTestBus
[16:17] <larsu> cool
[16:17] <larsu> thanks for the hint!
[16:18] <larsu> hm I guess we need to move that to a new class or so
[16:18] <larsu> so that they can share
[16:19] <Laney> that's what moving it to GlibFixture would achieve
[16:19] <larsu> we also need the mock, no?
[16:19] <Laney> but this would bring in a test bus in more places than it's needed
[16:19] <Laney> nah
[16:19] <larsu> how do we get timedate1 on the test bus otherwise?
[16:21] <larsu> and why isn't this just using dbusmock?
[16:22] <Laney> oh for the test menus
[16:22] <larsu> yeah and your new stuff as well
[16:23] <larsu> it's not tested currently, is it?
[16:23] <Laney> yes?
[16:23] <larsu> including the signal?
[16:23] <Laney> test-timezone-timedated.cpp
[16:23] <larsu> oops wrong branch :)
[16:24] <Laney> so maybe you can get away with making this one which needs timedated use the TimedateFixture
[16:26] <larsu> this doesn't exist in my other branch yet, though
[16:26] <larsu> I'll do this tomorrow :)
[16:27] <Laney> didn't you base it on mine?
[16:28] <Laney> yeah this works
[16:28] <Laney> tests/state-fixture.h s/Glib/Timedate/ or so
[16:29] <larsu> cool thanks
[16:29] <larsu> gotta leave this place now though
[16:30] <larsu> see you tomorrow
[16:30] <Laney> bye
[20:18] <willcooke> gnight all