[15:01] <barry> mumble seems unhappy
[15:01] <infinity> I was just going to say.
[15:01] <slangasek> alas
[15:01]  * slangasek waves
[15:01] <bdmurray> works for me
[15:01]  * barry renames it grumble
[15:01] <slangasek> yeah, it's working here
[15:01] <cyphermox> works here
[15:01] <barry> bdmurray: rejects password
[15:02] <infinity> Yeah, reject for me too.
[15:02] <caribou> barry: here too
[15:02] <tdaitx> not working here, bad password it says
[15:02] <slangasek> hmm
[15:02] <infinity> Oh, SSO is down.
[15:02] <tdaitx> yeah
[15:02] <slangasek> oh?
[15:02] <barry> i guess it only hates some of us
[15:02] <cyphermox> then it just went down
[15:03] <slangasek> or some of us already had valid tokens?  because I connected after barry said it wasn't working
[15:03] <barry> slangasek: that could be
[15:03] <slangasek> I guess if it's an SSO problem, other chat solutions are also out at the moment ;)
[15:03] <barry> i'm connecting on a different box
[15:04] <slangasek> well, first thing's first
[15:04] <slangasek> #startmeeting
[15:04] <meetingology> Meeting started Thu Sep  3 15:04:03 2015 UTC.  The chair is slangasek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[15:04] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[15:04] <slangasek> [TOPIC] Lightning round
[15:04] <slangasek> $ echo $(shuf -e barry doko bdmurray slangasek caribou infinity sil2100 robru cyphermox pitti tdaitx)
[15:04] <slangasek> tdaitx doko infinity slangasek robru sil2100 caribou barry pitti bdmurray cyphermox
[15:04] <tdaitx> hurray!
[15:04] <tdaitx> Current
[15:04] <tdaitx> - Fixed FTBFS in bluez-tools (LP: #1489661, Debian #797128); forwarded fix upstream (accepted)
[15:04] <tdaitx> - Fixed FTBFS in bluez-tools (LP: #1490204, Debian #797356); fowarded fix upstream (accepted)
[15:04] <tdaitx> - Fixed FTBFS in opencsg (LP: #1490091); no debian backport, debian does not use opengles2 for qt4-x11
[15:04] <tdaitx> - Fixed FTBFS in jruby (LP: #1490323)
[15:04] <tdaitx> - Fixed FTBFS in openscad (LP: #1489992)
[15:04] <tdaitx> - Updated libjoda-time-java from 2.7 to 2.8.2 (LP: #1491530, Debian #797842)
[15:04] <tdaitx> - Investigating JRuby FTBFS due to failing spec tests (LP: #1491526); seems like many are due to build environment setup (eg. non-existing $HOME); local chroot has 2 failures and 2 errors, lp build has 21 failures and 13 errors
[15:04] <tdaitx> - Investigating openscad FTBFS on armhf (LP: #1491553, Debian #797816); there are lots of failures in LP and Debian due to conflicting declaration between GL and ES2 (search for "khronos_ssize_t gl3.h"); any reason not to define "khronos_ssize_t" as "ptrdiff_t" instead of "signed long int"?
[15:04] <tdaitx> - Setting up JCK 7 to run localy for trusty
[15:04] <tdaitx> Next week
[15:05] <tdaitx> - Guarantee that local JCK 7 tests are running fine for trusty, then move those to canonistack
[15:05] <tdaitx> - Additional tests for JDK6 TLS 1.1 and JDK7 TLS 1.2 backports, need to reproduce user report as I might have a regression in JDK 7 (LP: #1482924)
[15:05] <tdaitx> - Setup and use umt schroots, check if that setup is closer to
[15:05] <tdaitx> Waiting/On hold
[15:05] <tdaitx> - Reviews by OpenJDK project of the TLS backports for JDK6 and JDK 7 still requires OCA clearance
[15:05] <tdaitx> (done)
[15:05] <doko> - GCC: build for POWER8, two backports for regressions on ARM32 and ppc64el, branch updates, package libstdc++fs.a
[15:05] <doko> - openjdk-7 update
[15:05] <doko> - gdal & friends transition
[15:05] <doko> - boost1.58 transition, removed boost1.55, and old icu
[15:05] <doko> - again, helped kubuntu with transitions. now all migrated
[15:05] <doko> - cleared NBS
[15:05] <doko> - almost cleared update_output.txt
[15:05] <doko> - tracked down cyclicy dependencies in java packages (gradle, groovy2, stringtemplate4, one more) and asked for manual builds
[15:05] <doko> - updated java related, which were behind in debian
[15:05] <doko> - llvm-3.7 final, still ftbfs on i386 and powerpc
[15:05] <doko> - some python3.5 related fixes
[15:05] <doko> - integrated some pending openjdk-8 patches
[15:05] <doko> (done)
[15:05] <infinity> [ Short week, due to illness ]
[15:05] <infinity> - Kernel SRU work
[15:05] <infinity> - NEW reviews
[15:05] <infinity> - General SRU/AA work
[15:05] <infinity> - Infrastructure work
[15:05] <infinity> - Discussions and planning for s390x bootstrap
[15:05] <infinity> - More glibc 2.22 work, expect upload Fri/Mon
[15:06] <infinity> (done)
[15:06] <slangasek>  * follow through on g++5 transitions, mostly reverting library name changes that Debian has opted not to take
[15:06] <slangasek>  * code review of ci-train code for new jenkins job security model
[15:06] <slangasek>  * ramping up for the s390x port
[15:06] <slangasek>  * working with dannf on getting edk2 buildable for arm64 with gcc5
[15:06] <slangasek> (done)
[15:06] <slangasek> robru:
[15:06] <robru> lp:cupstream2distro
[15:06] <robru>  - set PPA description to show silo configuration
[15:06] <robru>  - include tests in code coverage report, revealing some unused test helpers I've now deleted
[15:06] <robru>  - Define an 'install' target in the makefile which installs needed deps, so that they're no longer defined in 3 different places (s-jenkins -ci and -autolanding jobs, plus charm)
[15:06] <robru>  - Eliminate honor system allowing trainguards to spoof core devs during silo publication
[15:06] <robru>  - better error messages for some failure conditions
[15:06] <robru>  - workaround some lazr/lplib bugs
[15:06] <robru>  - instead of using bot name in debian/changelog, use request creator's name
[15:06] <robru> lp:bileto
[15:06] <robru>  - add some new API endpoints to ease common use cases
[15:06] <robru>  - merge dashboard into requests page, dropping a ton of redundancy
[15:06] <robru>  - Unify 3 disparate dependency definitions into one central location in the Makefile in trunk.
[15:06] <robru>  - redirect to the newly created request when creating new requests, and dim the submit button when submitting, should alleviate users creating lots of duplicate records
[15:06] <robru>  - initial db migrations, adding some columns and changing some column types as necessary
[15:06] <robru>  - fix URL linkifier regex to not break when URL ends with punctuation
[15:07] <robru> lp:canonical-mojo-specs
[15:07] <robru>  - new upgrade spec dramatically simplifying production rollout procedure
[15:07] <robru> Mad Max game
[15:07] <robru>  - Cleared Chumbucket's territory
[15:07] <robru>  - cleared a decent area of Jeet's territory
[15:07] <robru> (fin)
[15:07] <barry> robru: was that last bit just to see if we're paying attention? :)
[15:07] <robru> barry: ;-)
[15:08] <tdaitx> well, it did get my attention
[15:08] <caribou> sil2100 doesn't seem here
[15:08] <robru> vacation
[15:08] <caribou> k then my turn
[15:08] <slangasek> tdaitx: package builds shouldn't rely on $HOME being set fwiw; if something wants to write to $HOME during the build, create a scratch directory inside the package build tree and set the env var to point there
[15:08] <caribou> Bugfix:
[15:09] <caribou>  - lucid -> precise -> trusty upgrade issue
[15:09] <caribou>    * Unbootable system after upgrade (LP: #1491894)
[15:09] <caribou> Merges:
[15:09] <caribou>  - rsyslog merge : spent most of the time on merging 8.12
[15:09] <caribou>    then fixing FTBS. rsyslog 8.12.0-1 is now available
[15:09] <caribou> Investigate Core Dev application
[15:09] <caribou> ☑Done
[15:09] <barry> py35 transition ongoing
[15:09] <barry> dh-python syncpackage testing (pyqt5, mock, mako);
[15:09] <barry> main+flavor ftbfs analysis (see ppa-status script);
[15:09] <slangasek> sil2100 is on vacation yes
[15:09] <barry> filing bugs, fixing bugs where possible, detailed ftbfs analysis (sometimes due to deps several levels deep), contacting upstreams, status reports.
[15:09] <barry> python-pykmip w/o python3-enum34 (removed from archive).  python-zeroconf 0.17.2-1.  deja-dup 34.0-1ubuntu3 (succeeds in archive, fails in ppa due to libunity ftbfs).  chatting w/zyga re: checkbox ftbfs.  LP: #1491162.  autopilot ftbfs (succeeds in archive, fails in ppa due to testtools).  six 1.9.0-5.
[15:09] <barry> will be sending detailed summary to ubuntu-devel later today
[15:09] <barry> --done--
[15:10] <slangasek> pitti has a conflict this afternoon but sent me his status
[15:10] <slangasek> apport:
[15:10] <tdaitx> slangasek, do you recall any package that does that? I would like to take a look and replicate it
[15:10] <slangasek> - several bug fixes/optimizations requested by bdmurray (#1487174, #1485773, etc.)
[15:10] <slangasek> - stop requiring apt lists to make origin check work with system-images (#1489410)
[15:10] <slangasek> autopkgtest:
[15:10] <slangasek> - Spent way too much time trying to find a non-hackish solution to detect and clean up leaked background processes which cause eternal hangs (hello deja-dup tests!) (#1488359)
[15:10] <slangasek> - various bug fixes and stabilization from daily test watching
[15:11] <slangasek> - enable britney/cloud testing for precise (mostly for kernel/dkms)
[15:11] <slangasek> - Implement autopkgtest/worker/britney changes for running DKMS tests against multiple kernels
[15:11] <slangasek> - Finish documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration/AutopkgtestInfrastructure
[15:11] <slangasek> systemd:
[15:11] <slangasek>  - resumed working on networkd integration, have if-up.d/if-post-down.d/ support working now (in review)
[15:11] <slangasek>  - package 225, various bug fixes
[15:11] <slangasek> misc:
[15:11] <slangasek>  - fix various package test regressions to unblock stuff in -proposed
[15:11] <slangasek>  - clean up and generalize SRU policy for new LTS features, send proposals to TB
[15:11] <slangasek>  - big catch-up on bug triage
[15:11] <slangasek> (done)
[15:11] <infinity> tdaitx: If a testsuite actually relies on $HOME in a way that's a pain to patch out, you can just mkdir foo && HOME=foo ./testsuite
[15:11] <barry> tdaitx: tox used to but doesn't need to any more.  you might find a solution in its older vcs history
[15:11] <infinity> tdaitx: But I generally view that as an upstream bug worth fixing.
[15:11] <slangasek> tdaitx: not offhand no, but what infinity said
[15:12] <slangasek> being sure to also remove foo/ in the clean target then
[15:12] <bdmurray> investigation into gtk+3.0 trusty crash rate increase and bucket not updating
[15:12] <bdmurray> found and resolved an issue with how crash reports that have previous failures to retrace are bucketed
[15:12] <bdmurray> wrote code to bucket unbucketed OOPSes
[15:12] <bdmurray> submitted RT regarding allocating retracers to the failed queues
[15:12] <bdmurray> modification of daisy-retracer charm to support retracing the failed queue
[15:12] <bdmurray> worked with webops to sort out status of retracer for the failed queue
[15:12] <bdmurray> review list of core files currently in swift so we can remove Utopic crashes
[15:12] <bdmurray> rebuilt test crashes for current package versions
[15:12] <bdmurray> uploaded fix for ubiquity package hook in apport to W
[15:12] <bdmurray> talked to pitti about LP: #1485787 and LP: #1485773
[15:12] <bdmurray> investigation into apport not adding origin information to foreign packages
[15:12] <bdmurray> fixed an issue with the bug bot OOPSing when tagging ubiquity bugs
[15:12] <bdmurray> SRU review of python-neutronclient fixing a regression in V -updates
[15:12] <bdmurray> SRU verification of T, V fix for LP: #1485787
[15:12] <bdmurray> review of patch for software-properties LP: #1381050
[15:13] <bdmurray> ✔ done
[15:13] <infinity> (mumble is back)
[15:13] <cyphermox>  - debugging of NM autopkgtests
[15:13] <cyphermox>  - sponsored/reviewed some ubiquity-slideshow MPs
[15:13] <cyphermox>  - updated doxia
[15:13] <cyphermox>  - sponsored golang, dh-golang
[15:13] <cyphermox>  - working on ubiquity update, fixing new PEP8 errors
[15:13] <cyphermox>  - skiboot (opal-prd) update and SRU
[15:13] <cyphermox>  - fixing util-linux 'lscpu -p' bug on ppc64el (bug 1427995)
[15:13] <cyphermox>  - debugging more parted/multipath issues: bug 1473903
[15:13] <cyphermox>  - testing ubiquity timezone map update for Pyonyang time
[15:13] <cyphermox>  - preparing rrdtool FFE for sync.
[15:13] <cyphermox> robru: personally, I'm still more partial to playing Minecraft in my free time, don't know about Mad MAx...
[15:13] <cyphermox> (done)
[15:13] <tdaitx> infinity, slangasek, barry thanks, I will check if the jruby folks can update their test
[15:14] <robru> cyphermox: ;-)
[15:15] <slangasek> any questions over status?
[15:15] <infinity> tdaitx: It's widely considered very poor practice in the free software world for a build to ever leave its build tree, so shouldn't be a hard sell upstream.
[15:16] <tdaitx> infinity, indeed, but right now I'm not sure if the mspec tests is something they own or just got from somewhere else
[15:16] <cyphermox> no questions from me
[15:17] <slangasek> tdaitx: either way, worst case is they should be able to do the same HOME= trick upstream :)
[15:17] <slangasek> [TOPIC] AOB
[15:17] <slangasek> anything else today?
[15:17] <barry> monday is a usa holiday
[15:17] <slangasek> o yes
[15:17] <cyphermox> Monday is a holiday in Canada too
[15:17] <caribou> as surprizing as it may seem, it is *not* a holiday in France
[15:18] <tdaitx> wut? it is a holiday in Brazil as well
[15:18] <infinity> caribou: The French would have to work before it would make sense to observe Labour Day.
[15:18] <doko> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/
[15:19] <slangasek> infinity: they already celebrated it in May, be impressed that they're not taking it twice
[15:19] <doko> at least in main, there is some stuff belonging to foundations ...
[15:19] <barry> so, summer ends in may in france?
[15:19] <cyphermox> doko: I'll fix up curl today.
[15:19] <slangasek> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/#core specifically, I believe?
[15:19] <cyphermox> (not ftbfs, but you know what I mean)
[15:19] <doko> curl isn't on this list ;p
[15:19] <slangasek> doko: or is there something other than those that you wanted to draw attention to?
[15:20] <cyphermox> not yet!
[15:20] <cyphermox> :)
[15:20] <infinity> cyphermox: You mean the curl-udeb thing?
[15:20] <cyphermox> yeah
[15:20] <barry> i'll look in to python-*
[15:20] <infinity> cyphermox: I think fixing maas is the right answer.
[15:20] <doko> plus: http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-ppc64el-20150902-wily.html  (note these are not ppc64el only)
[15:20] <cyphermox> infinity: it is
[15:20] <infinity> cyphermox: Given that curl-udeb was empty before it was dropped, so they can't possibly have been using it. :P
[15:20] <cyphermox> oh, it was?
[15:20] <infinity> Yeah.  That's why it was dropped.
[15:20] <infinity> It was clearly broken for several releases.
[15:20] <cyphermox> heh
[15:20] <infinity> With not a single person complaining.
[15:20] <infinity> Which is a fair sign no one was using it.
[15:21] <barry> hahahaha dep-wait on pypy*
[15:21] <doko> barry, look first at the pypy MIR, then these will clear up ;-P
[15:21] <doko> dh-exec
[15:21] <cyphermox> infinity: it's not a very much used feature, it's mostly just enrolling maas devices via the ISO
[15:21] <doko> rpm
[15:21] <cyphermox> I'll ask harder if we can just drop that altogether...
[15:21] <doko> sssd?
[15:21] <infinity> cyphermox: Oh, the "enlist in MaaS" bootloader option on the server CD?
[15:22] <doko> libpod-readme-perl
[15:22] <infinity> cyphermox: If that actually relied on curl-udeb, they haven't tested it in years...
[15:22] <cyphermox> infinity: well, it's maas-enlist-udeb that requires curl-udeb
[15:22] <slangasek> doko: heh, rpm shows up as part of the ubuntu-desktop package set, not core
[15:22] <infinity> doko: sssd is RAOF's.
[15:22] <cyphermox> the only thing I could think of to use that was the enlist in MAAS option from the CD
[15:22] <doko> and a lot of perl stuff here: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
[15:23] <infinity> cyphermox: Your logic is sound, but they supposedly test that feature.  So, could need more investigating.
[15:23] <cyphermox> easy enough to test anyway
[15:23] <infinity> Oh look, another java/maven explosion.
[15:23] <infinity> Why, java, why?
[15:24] <infinity> doko: The majority of those perl modules can probably get hand-waved in with a minimal review and subscriber, but I guess we should file a big bug and go through the motions.
[15:24] <slangasek> tdaitx, robru: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/#core should be driven to zero for release, can you take a look at these and see which ones you can help with?  (feel free to ask any of the core-devs if you have questions)
[15:25] <robru> slangasek: sure
[15:25] <tdaitx> slangasek, sure
[15:26] <doko> infinity, likely, but maybe check as well if they are maintained by the perl team
[15:26] <cyphermox> infinity: http://paste.ubuntu.com/12263705/ don't think they were testing it, otherwise it magically worked without that for some reason
[15:26] <infinity> doko: Yeah.  Most probably are, they have most of CPAN packaged. :P
[15:26] <cyphermox> (that's from debian-cd)
[15:26] <doko> java is known, and ruby is known too, wanted somebody to look at rails; how we can avoid it
[15:27] <infinity> cyphermox: Well, it may well be that maas-enlist-udeb doesn't actually need curl-udeb.
[15:27] <infinity> I'll pick up the firefox FTBFS, I'm sick of arguing with people about it.
[15:29]  * pitti rentre -- qu'est-ce que j'ai perdu ? :-)
[15:30] <slangasek> pitti: un peu de ceci, un peu de c'là
[15:30] <infinity> in 250
[15:30] <slangasek> pitti: we're just about wrapped here, can you join mumble?
[15:30] <infinity> ...
[15:30] <pitti> I'm in
[15:34] <slangasek> I think we're done here then
[15:34] <slangasek> unless there's anything else
[15:35] <slangasek> #endmeeting
[15:35] <meetingology> Meeting ended Thu Sep  3 15:35:54 2015 UTC.
[15:35] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2015/ubuntu-meeting.2015-09-03-15.04.moin.txt
[17:00] <dholbach> hello hello
[17:00] <czajkowski> Aloha
[17:00] <czajkowski> welcome to this weeks CC
[17:00] <czajkowski> feels like a bit of a game show!
[17:00] <dholbach> #startmeeting
[17:00] <meetingology> Meeting started Thu Sep  3 17:00:47 2015 UTC.  The chair is dholbach. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[17:00] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[17:00] <dholbach> #chair czajkowski mhall119 pleia2
[17:00] <meetingology> Current chairs: czajkowski dholbach mhall119 pleia2
[17:00] <pleia2> o/
[17:01] <dholbach> Do we have folks from the IRC Council and Canonical Community team here?
[17:01] <pleia2> #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CommunityCouncilAgenda
[17:02] <pleia2> ^^ agenda
[17:02] <balloons> o/
[17:03] <pleia2> I don't think anyone sent a reminder to the IRC Council
[17:03] <dholbach> ok, let's start with the community team then and I'll try to ping the IRC Council folks
[17:04] <hggdh> pleia2: a reminder was sent
[17:04] <pleia2> hggdh: oh good :)
[17:04] <czajkowski> dholbach: balloons mhall119 so life on the community team
[17:04] <czajkowski> is dpm around
[17:04] <dholbach> thanks hggdh!
[17:05] <hggdh> btw, hi all, long time and all that
[17:05] <pleia2> hggdh: welcome :)
[17:05] <popey> o/
[17:05] <czajkowski> popey: howdy
[17:05] <dholbach> #topic Catching up with the Canonical Community team
[17:05] <popey> I have some opinions :)
[17:06] <balloons> so, there's some things I wanted to bring up, but they are mostly based on popey's thoughts. I'll let him speak first if he wishes
[17:06] <popey> nah, knock yourself out
[17:06] <czajkowski> balloons: do tell, but please don't injure you're self
[17:06] <czajkowski> :)
[17:06] <dholbach> haha
[17:07] <balloons> :-) Ok, my first thought was bringing up how we deal with contributions. It's the second half of the lifecycle for contributing. We spend time and effort encouraging folks to contribute, but once they do, we sometimes falter
[17:08]  * dholbach has opinions on that subject too :)
[17:08] <balloons> There are both good examples and bad examples of this. For instance, we do wonderfully on the core apps projects, while we have patches sitting waiting in other places
[17:09] <dholbach> yeah... I just raised the subject with the engineering managers for Ubuntu again - sponsoring and patch review for stuff going into the distro sort of went a bit on the backburner for many and patches had been piling up again
[17:09] <balloons> I would be curious how we might be able to close this gap a bit better. Is there something collectively we could do and/or encourage the community to do to insure we are good stewards of people's contributions?
[17:09] <popey> yeah
[17:10] <dholbach> I haven't checked other queues (NEW, SRU, +1 maintenance, MIR, etc.), but I can imagine that these might require more attention too
[17:10] <popey> I had a ranty email from a community contributor recently who was annoyed that his merge proposals took a long time to be reviewed
[17:10] <dholbach> me too
[17:10] <balloons> is it something we can empower the community collectively to do? AKA, are there not enough people to review the work?
[17:10] <czajkowski> popey: how long was long?
[17:11] <popey> could be days to weeks
[17:11] <czajkowski> and is there way we can get more eyeballs on stuff in a more fun way to do it, as I know folks are busy but it's also a necessity
[17:11] <popey> One issue is many canonical people work closely on irc, and are happy to ping eachother
[17:11] <dholbach> the patch pilot programme was supposed to guarantee that everyone within the distro team with upload rights had 4h/month (or one hour per week) to help out
[17:11] <popey> Joe: "Hey, bob, can you review that merge on your project?"
[17:11] <popey> Bob: "Sure, I'll get to it in a bit"
[17:11] <popey> job done
[17:11] <dpm> o/
[17:11] <popey> community person contributes and it looks like it disappears into a black hole
[17:12] <popey> I am guilty of this too, not pointing fingers at others.
[17:12] <dholbach> I hope that we can get more energy into this again
[17:12]  * dpm and mhall119 I were having a really interesting call with the Mycroft folks
[17:12] <czajkowski> popey: aye I think at times the IRC ping often doesnt help folks not on irc
[17:12] <czajkowski> who may be working
[17:12] <dholbach> and some of the engineering managers are discussing the subject right now
[17:12] <czajkowski> and taking things to a public mailing list to show how easy it is to get feedback ina constructive manner
[17:13] <popey> czajkowski: indeed, and not knowing that people are approachable
[17:13] <popey> czajkowski: and some people actually _not_ being approachable
[17:13] <czajkowski> popey: exactly
[17:13] <dholbach> yeah, you can't say on a wiki page "ping popey to get your patch reviewed and included" :)
[17:13] <czajkowski> nail on the head :)
[17:13] <popey> (e.g. berating someone for pinging them which disturbs them, contributors should ask in public so as not to disturb individuals)
[17:13] <dholbach> that's why we had current patch pilots in the topic in #u-devel
[17:13] <popey> exactly!
[17:14] <czajkowski> It may be better to encoureage people when they see people being pinged on irc, to suggest can we move this to the ML so others can see how it's done
[17:15] <czajkowski> popey: balloons dholbach which ml would this go to ?
[17:15] <dholbach> a request for a review of a patch?
[17:15] <czajkowski> devel- devel-discuss, elsewhere?
[17:15] <czajkowski> dholbach: aye
[17:15] <dholbach> both should work
[17:15] <popey> not sure
[17:15] <dholbach> I hope that with support from management we can at least have Canonical engineers help out more regularly again
[17:16] <czajkowski> could we try for the next few weeks to push to -devel-discuss - I know moderation can be an issue ?
[17:16] <dholbach> I'd leave the mailing list as last resort for the urgent cases
[17:16] <popey> yeah
[17:16] <dholbach> we shouldn't ask people to mail the mailing list for everything
[17:16] <popey> irc is way easier / faster
[17:16] <popey> but we shouldn't have to go round poking people
[17:16] <balloons> I would also like to think about a way to monitor this and be proactive on our end a bit. Especially since things are backlogged now
[17:17] <popey> people who are upstream for a project should act like one
[17:17] <czajkowski> popey: hmm but what about the people who want to contribute that aren't on IRC
[17:17] <balloons> I would rather see us gently nudging upstreams to be more receptive. An MP should be enough to get the contact going
[17:17] <dholbach> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/1glance-sponsoring/
[17:17] <dholbach> if you click on "year"
[17:18] <dholbach> you can see that the last call for help seems to have done something
[17:18] <balloons> yea, you can see when you issue the calls :-)
[17:18] <popey> czajkowski: why arent they on irc? everyone is on irc.
[17:18] <czajkowski> popey: that whole work thing :)
[17:18] <czajkowski> dholbach: nods
[17:19] <dholbach> popey, there are upstream developers and debian folks and others who just want to do a drive by contribiution
[17:19]  * hggdh respectully disagrees from popey
[17:19] <popey> it was somewhat tongue in cheek
[17:19]  * hggdh removes disagreement
[17:19] <popey> dholbach: i agree, and we should pick those up and not let them languish
[17:19] <dholbach> yep, agreed
[17:19] <czajkowski> ok
[17:19] <czajkowski> so you mentioned other issues?
[17:19] <czajkowski> what are they ?
[17:20] <dholbach> maybe we can review in a couple of weeks again and see if the recent discussions helped change something
[17:20] <dholbach> balloons, popey: was your point mostly just about sponsoring?
[17:20] <popey> mine wasnt
[17:20] <dholbach> ok, then I'll get out of the way now :)
[17:20] <popey> mine was a cultural change, more of an observation
[17:20] <dpm> I think it's about MPs and upstreams too
[17:21] <czajkowski> popey: do tell
[17:21] <popey> Are we done with the other topic though?
[17:21] <balloons> my point was about us collectively encouraging a better culture in our upstreams as well. But the boots on the ground work from dholbach is part of it
[17:21] <czajkowski> balloons: cool can we try encouraging more people to review over the next few weeks
[17:21] <dholbach> I wonder if most developers in an upstream project are signed up for mails about new MPs...
[17:22] <czajkowski> see if it makes a difference and if not lets come back and see if we need to take to ML or what we need to do
[17:22] <balloons> yes, and given the changes to LP, we should encourage people to review filtering. I'm guiltly of this. I filtered out those mails
[17:22] <balloons> because it was hard to get the right mix without getting overwhelemd
[17:23] <balloons> the lp team just redid this (I for instance often miss important mails, like renewing in a team)
[17:23] <dholbach> maybe it'd be good to write up best-practices "how to be a good upstream" with a few paragraphs on "how to set up your project in LP"?
[17:23] <popey> yeah, me too
[17:23] <popey> my gmail has thousands of mails, this is why i rely on web pages with lists of things to do
[17:23] <balloons> +1, dholbach. That's the action I'd like to see, and I think we could do
[17:23] <popey> rather than email
[17:24] <czajkowski> dholbach: brilliant idea
[17:24] <dholbach> I'm not sure if that'd solve all problems - you still need to do your reviews
[17:24] <czajkowski> dholbach: I see a to do AI for you then :)
[17:24] <dholbach> but it could be a first good step
[17:24] <dholbach> czajkowski, erm....... I'm convinced :)
[17:25] <dholbach> but yeah, I can have a look around and see what the current LP docs offer
[17:25] <dholbach> and bring that up for renewed discussion
[17:25] <czajkowski> nods
[17:25] <dholbach> happy to do that
[17:25] <czajkowski> lovely jubbly thanks
[17:25] <czajkowski> popey: so back over to you.
[17:25] <popey> okay
[17:26] <popey> this is an observation about our team, and not an opinion or conclusion
[17:26] <popey> Since jono left things have been a bit different.
[17:26] <popey> So when things went "wrong" outside canonical jono would typically swoop in wearing a cape and write a blog post
[17:26] <czajkowski> nod
[17:26] <czajkowski> s
[17:27] <popey> we tend not to do that now
[17:27] <popey> we don't have as quite a public figure as jono
[17:27] <popey> the role changed
[17:28] <czajkowski> It did
[17:28] <popey> the result of this (IMO) is that sometimes a long time goes between adverse things happening and us responding
[17:28] <popey> some would say thats actually a good thing
[17:28] <popey> because we're not knee-jerk responding
[17:28] <popey> but taking more time and considering things rather than jumping on the PR train and writing rapid replies
[17:29] <czajkowski> popey: I think the other thing that has happened, in that some on the team are a lot more vocal online and then get picked up as the "canonical community manager said X" but dont add the name to the role and that adds confusion, at least imo
[17:29] <popey> my observation is that this means we (more) often go "silent" on the community about particular topics
[17:29] <popey> I don't know how I feel about this, whether it's good or bad, whether it's seen as good or bad from outside.
[17:29] <czajkowski> so I think taking a step back
[17:29] <balloons> I would agree folks are a bit more gunshy on joining a topic, which leads to the banter being set for the community by others
[17:29] <popey> I just see it more often now than in the past
[17:29] <czajkowski> taking time to respond is a good thing
[17:30] <czajkowski> I'm just worried that being too slow to reply leads to too much fud and not enough clearning things up in a manner I guess we're used to
[17:30] <czajkowski> it can feel cut off and not knowing what's going on  - unless you pop on irc and ask :)
[17:31] <czajkowski> so for me and I've said this , not having one focal main manager had been confusing especially on topics like you've just raised popey .
[17:31] <dholbach> mh, I'm not sure
[17:31] <czajkowski> popey: part of me feels others are waiting for someone else to step in and reply and that leave it down to one or not at all.
[17:31] <balloons> I think it's good in the sense, we are mindful about what we say. However, we are ending up being reactionary in conversations and being dragged into side conversations
[17:31] <dholbach> I mean many of us have been around for ages in the project and their voice should have relevance too
[17:32] <czajkowski> balloons: +1
[17:32] <dholbach> whatever their job title is
[17:32] <hggdh> +1
[17:32] <dholbach> and by that I don't just mean members of our team in Canonical
[17:33] <dholbach> and I don't think that relying on a single person to respond to all online discussions via blog will scale - but I have to admit that I often feel "too busy" to write a long blog post responding to whatever the discussion of the day is
[17:33] <dholbach> and I know I could blog more
[17:33] <balloons> yes, the downside of having a single mouthpiece is all other voices have a tendency to be silent
[17:34] <dpm> I think the takeaway is also that we should all blog more, not only in reaction to a particular topic, and I am to blame on that too
[17:35] <hggdh> jono is one of a kind. But he is not here anymore. You cannot expect to keep on with his style, pretty much only he could. But you can keep on as a group
[17:35] <czajkowski> hggdh: true
[17:35] <czajkowski> and we all have to find our own voice
[17:35] <czajkowski> and our own way of doing things
[17:35] <dholbach> just a quick note: the CC also is meeting the IRC Council today ... can we maybe make a list of subjects we still want to talk about?
[17:36] <dholbach> it looks like we need way more time to get through all of this, or am I wrong?
[17:36] <czajkowski> but as popey pointed out culture changes means what we're used to is not what's happening so it was more of a discussion
[17:36] <hggdh> yes. And be vocal on it. And try to present a coherent, consistent view
[17:36] <czajkowski> I will say that having dpm post the community team updates is brilliant!
[17:36] <czajkowski> please do keep that up :D  I love to read it
[17:36] <dpm> thanks
[17:36] <czajkowski> I would also love to see more blogging of what the Community team is doing as I know I personally idle in the irc channel and can see you guys are busy
[17:36] <dpm> I've not been keeping up after travels and holidays too
[17:36] <hggdh> dpm: BTW, never said it -- thank you for the updates.
[17:37] <czajkowski> but I'm sure others would love to see a day in the life a community team member
[17:37] <balloons> summertime has taken a bit of a toll on things
[17:37] <dpm> so when the next sprint is over expect a new update
[17:37] <dholbach> if we have more to talk about, we could have a hangout on air and take more time to get through the issues together
[17:37] <dholbach> kind of a pre-UOS u-community-team get-together :)
[17:37] <czajkowski> dholbach: blog perhaps ?
[17:37] <dholbach> czajkowski, sorry I meant subjects popey and others wanted to bring up now
[17:37] <czajkowski> dholbach: ahh gotcha
[17:38] <dpm> btw, so we've got ~20 mins left?
[17:38] <czajkowski> dpm: aye
[17:38]  * hggdh warms hands
[17:38] <czajkowski> I know dpm had a topic to bring up
[17:38] <dpm> indeed
[17:38] <dholbach> czajkowski, dpm: right, but we're also still meeting up with the IRC Council
[17:39] <dholbach> but sure... bring it up - it looks like the meeting will run over today anyway
[17:39] <dpm> I think I don't need the whole 20 mins
[17:39] <dpm> I want to introduce the topic and follow up in the next few days anyway
[17:39] <dpm> in any case...
[17:40] <dpm> ... this is a follow-up of a discussion we had at the Community Leadership Summit
[17:40]  * balloons feels anticipation building
[17:40] <dpm> lol
[17:40] <czajkowski> dpm: no pressure
[17:40] <dholbach> the suspense is killing me :)
[17:40] <dpm> ...
[17:40] <dpm> ...
[17:40] <dpm> j/k
[17:41] <dpm> so, we talked about more effective ways for teams/locos/individuals to meet up and get visibility and more attendees to their physical meetings
[17:41] <dpm> While we have the LoCo portal for event organization
[17:42] <dpm> it seems not all teams use it and also that it's a very Ubuntu-specific thing
[17:42] <dpm> so we don't get all the discoverability we could get
[17:42] <czajkowski> nods, it's a nice home for all the info on teams when you're searching about a loco.
[17:42] <czajkowski> dpm: that's also true
[17:43] <dpm> indeed, and to be clear, this is not about changing the LoCo portal
[17:43] <dpm> however, since we created the LP, things have changed
[17:43] <dpm> One of the nice things about CLS was to get feedback from other open source communities
[17:44] <balloons> so really this is about engaging folks where they already are?
[17:44] <dpm> on the infrastructure/tools they use
[17:44] <dpm> for events
[17:44] <dpm> one of the ones that came up was meetup.com
[17:44] <dpm> I know for example czajkowski uses it over at CouchBase
[17:44] <czajkowski> nods this is true I do.
[17:45] <czajkowski> and that was someting that came up at CLS, was more and more groups using meet up.
[17:45] <czajkowski> and how best we could tie it into LTP
[17:45] <dpm> and I got convinced it could be a good thing to try
[17:45]  * dpm nods
[17:46] <czajkowski> so I think it's a good idea, and I'd love to see loco teams embrace it
[17:46] <czajkowski> and if they don't want to also, that's equally fine,
[17:46] <czajkowski> I think opt in would be good, looping in the LC into the discussion and dpm the funds for this will come via the community fund or canonical ?
[17:46] <dpm> The thing that I particularly attracts me to it is that it opens the door to other open source communities that are using it to more easily see the Ubuntu events, so that we'd be no longer in our Ubuntu bubble
[17:46] <dpm> By all means
[17:47] <dpm> I think this is a discussion that needs to happen with the CC
[17:47] <dpm> err LC
[17:47] <czajkowski> nods i think it would open more doors for other groups to learn about ubuntu
[17:47]  * mhall119 is here now
[17:47] <czajkowski> and I think it's a postive step in understanding how our community is changing and adapting to it
[17:48] <czajkowski> dpm: so we do have a lmited CC here :)
[17:48] <dholbach> :)
[17:48] <dpm> :-)
[17:48] <dholbach> I haven't used meetup much yet, but I think it's worth a try
[17:48] <czajkowski> I think the best thing as a stepping stone would be meet with the LC and involve them in this discussion if not done so already
[17:48] <czajkowski> meet wtih meet up and then trial it with some teams
[17:49] <dpm> yeah
[17:49] <czajkowski> and I'd love to see this plan being blogged so others can see how you guys are working with the community and loco teams
[17:49] <balloons> I think opening ourselves up a bit more is a good thing. Things have changed and are changing. It would be best if we could empower those using other platforms to take ownership of them also. In other words, I don't want us to try and be all things to all people
[17:49] <czajkowski> :)
[17:49] <czajkowski> and I think you can play with the API and intergrate it into the LTP
[17:49] <czajkowski> so you could still have visibilty under one location
[17:49] <czajkowski> but that's a dev issue :)
[17:50] <dpm> I will take an action to put together a doc to drive the discussion with the LC
[17:50] <czajkowski> brilliant
[17:51] <dholbach> nice
[17:51] <czajkowski> dpm: will the community team be at CLS  Europe in case folks at ubuntu want to meet up with the team ?
[17:52] <dpm> We're not planning to atm
[17:52] <dpm> But will look into it
[17:52] <czajkowski> dpm: another action item :)
[17:52] <balloons> http://clsxeurope.com/ looks like it's the end of October
[17:52] <dpm> :)
[17:52] <dpm> ah, it's a CLSx event
[17:52] <czajkowski> would be great to see the team at CLS and maybe this is something we could get some of the Ubuntu loco teams to come to and take part in ?
[17:53]  * dholbach is at UbuConDE at the time
[17:53] <dpm> yeah, it's right on that date
[17:53] <balloons> ^^ indeed, that would be the focus
[17:53] <dpm> I'm at UbuConDE as well
[17:53]  * mhall119 will be sitting around here in Florida
[17:53] <dpm> But perhaps we can send others who didn't make it to the last CLS
[17:54] <czajkowski> dpm: guess you need to get the team to Texas next year :)
[17:54] <dpm> :)
[17:54] <czajkowski> right are there any other topics before we wrap up
[17:54] <dholbach> hum........
[17:54] <dholbach> the IRC Council?
[17:54] <czajkowski> popey: dholbach balloons dpm any other issues?
[17:54] <hggdh> yes?
[17:54] <mhall119> yes, sponsoring community leaders to go to CLS Europe would be ieal
[17:54] <Pici> \o
[17:54] <czajkowski> dholbach: you can run that bit of the meeting I need to run for a train :)
[17:54] <dpm> I'm good for today
[17:55] <balloons> same, we've taken enough time for now
[17:55] <dholbach> thanks a lot everyone
[17:55] <dholbach> let's move on then :)
[17:55] <dpm> o/
[17:55] <dholbach> #topic Catching up with the IRC Council
[17:55] <dholbach> sorry for keeping you waiting for so long
[17:55] <dholbach> how are things?
[17:56] <dholbach> how are you doing?
[17:56] <Pici> quiet.
[17:56] <dholbach> oh?
[17:56] <hggdh> too quiet, methinks
[17:56] <dholbach> I wouldn't have expected that answer from the fast-world-of-IRC :)
[17:56] <mhall119> bad quiet or good quiet?
[17:57] <hggdh> since the election we have not had much done. We will be holding a IRC meeting next week, off the schedule to try to catch up
[17:57] <dholbach> but the irc world is as busy as always, right?
[17:58] <Pici> Well, we had some issues with the server that ubottu and co was hosted on, so that was a bit frantic, but we've gotten things back together now.
[17:58] <mhall119> Pici: are there any outstanding issues now that the CC might help with?
[17:58] <Pici> mhall119: I don't think so.
[17:58] <hggdh> I do not think so
[17:58] <dholbach> who is mostly taking care of the bots these days?
[17:59] <hggdh> pici
[17:59] <Pici> I am.
[17:59] <dholbach> just you?
[17:59] <hggdh> he is the only one, I think with the necessary access. Which is good, otherwise we would have lost the bots for a bit longer
[17:59] <mhall119> is there a way to share that access, so it's not all on Pici?
[18:00] <dholbach> oh yeah... I have full trust in Pici - I was just asking if anyone else was helping out :)
[18:00] <hggdh> so do I :-)
[18:01] <mhall119> it's not a question of trust, I trust Pici too, but he should have a backup who can take over for him when he needs it
[18:01] <Pici> No one else is helping at the moment, but I'd need to get something setup so that others could easily admin that part of the server in case I'm away.
[18:01] <Pici> Just a weekend project I should put in my to-do list.
[18:01] <mhall119> Pici: is this server yours or something Canonical-hosted?
[18:01] <dholbach> nice :)
[18:01] <Pici> mhall119: its a small Linode instance I'm running.
[18:02] <dholbach> and speaking of helping out... are there enough folks helping out generally as ops and helpers?
[18:02] <mhall119> Pici: the community donations fund could be used to reimburse you for the cost of running it, just a reminder
[18:03]  * Pici notes
[18:03] <hggdh> the meeting next week should take care of most of the pending applications. -ops, though, probably needs a bit more of coverage
[18:04] <Pici> I think we had one or two applications for that, if not we can just hand it out to folks.
[18:04] <dholbach> brilliant
[18:04] <dholbach> thanks a lot for taking care of that
[18:04] <dholbach> how is morale generally among helpers and ops?
[18:04] <dholbach> I know that was a concern in the past
[18:05] <hggdh> haven't heard of many complaints lately; I would venture it is better than it was before
[18:05] <Pici> *I* think that our operators are a lot better now. Things in general have calmed down a lot, not as many serial-trolls pushing their buttons lately.
[18:06] <hggdh> Pici: good explanation. +1
[18:06] <mhall119> that's good tohear
[18:06] <dholbach> phew
[18:06] <dholbach> I'm super happy to hear that :)
[18:06] <hggdh> so are we :-)
[18:06] <dholbach> it's not just the trolls, but also always a matter of how the atmosphere in the team is
[18:07] <dholbach> so it looks like you're doing something right :)
[18:07]  * hggdh wonders about that...
[18:07] <dholbach> mh?
[18:08] <hggdh> I think the atmosphere got less polluted, not really what we did (for the most part I, for example, did not really do much)
[18:08] <dholbach> oh... I meant you as a whole team
[18:08] <mhall119> hggdh: leadership can do a lot to clean up the atmosphere without doing anything directly, just by setting the example
[18:08] <dholbach> atmosphere is something everyone contributes to :)
[18:09] <hggdh> indeed
[18:09] <mhall119> alright, we've used up our allotted time in this channel
[18:09] <hggdh> but, apart from that things look good.
[18:09] <mhall119> anything else you guys want to bring up?
[18:09] <hggdh> nope, we are good.
[18:09] <dholbach> sorry again for keeping you waiting earlier :)
[18:09]  * dholbach hugs you all
[18:10] <mhall119> thanks hggdh and Pici
[18:10]  * hggdh hugs all
[18:10] <dholbach> thanks a lot for keeping #ubuntu-* so well organised!
[18:10] <mhall119> yes, +1 what dholbach said
[18:10] <mhall119> any other topics for the CC?
[18:10] <mhall119> from anybody
[18:10]  * dholbach doesn't
[18:11]  * mhall119 either
[18:11] <dholbach> have a great rest of your day everyone - dinner is waiting for me :)
[18:11] <mhall119> thanks everyone
[18:11] <dholbach> thanks!
[18:11] <dholbach> #endmeeting
[18:11] <meetingology> Meeting ended Thu Sep  3 18:11:32 2015 UTC.
[18:11] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2015/ubuntu-meeting.2015-09-03-17.00.moin.txt
[19:55] <Kilos> hmm...
[19:55] <elacheche_anis> willcooke, is here.. You're ready?
[19:55] <willcooke> elacheche_anis, hey, yup
[19:55] <wxl> well in that case…
[19:56] <Kilos> hi willcooke
[19:56] <wxl> #startmeeting 20 UTC Membership Board Meeting
[19:56] <meetingology> Meeting started Thu Sep  3 19:56:12 2015 UTC.  The chair is wxl. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[19:56] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[19:56] <willcooke> hi Kilos
[19:56] <wxl> Hello and welcome to the Membership Board meeting!
[19:56] <wxl> The wiki page for the Review Board is available here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership/Boards. We will attempt to get through all of the applicants that have added themselves to that list before today's meeting.
[19:56] <Kilos> hi everyone
[19:56] <wxl> If we are unable to make it through the entire list due to time constraints, then at the next meeting we will pick up where we left off. The format for the meeting is as follows: We will go through the list of applicants one by one, by date of application (FIFO).
[19:56] <wxl> Each applicant should introduce themselves (1-5 sentences) and provide links to their Ubuntu Wiki page. After the introduction the members of the Membership Review Board will review the pages and, if needed, ask the applicant further questions.
[19:57] <wxl> During this time it is encouraged for other members of the community to show their support for the applicant. Do not be alarmed if the members of the Membership Review Board are quiet during this time; they are most likely reading wiki/launchpad/forum/other pages and deciding how they are going to vote.
[19:57] <wxl> #topic willcooke
[19:57] <wxl> willcooke:  please introduce yourself to the board, and share a link to your LP and wiki
[19:58] <toddy> hi everybody
[19:58] <Kilos> hgi toddy
[19:58] <Kilos> hi as well
[19:58] <willcooke> Hello board!  I've been using Ubuntu for about 10 years.  I started out supporting users on the forums and IRC, and then eventually managed to bad myself a job at Canonical.  I've done a few different jobs here but for the last year or so I've been managing the Ubuntu Desktop team.
[19:59] <willcooke> I'm a big supported of Open Source and Open Hardware.  In my spare time I like making electronic gizmos do things they weren't designed to do.
[19:59] <willcooke> LP: https://launchpad.net/~willcooke
[20:00] <willcooke> Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WillCooke
[20:00] <wxl> Excellent! Any questions for willcooke? ? Any supporters here?
[20:00] <elacheche_anis> Welcome willcooke :)
[20:00] <elacheche_anis> Actually I have a question
[20:00] <elacheche_anis> willcooke, I have no comments on you Wiki or LP :) I just love to know why you're applying for the Ubuntu Membership.. :)
[20:01] <Kilos> willcooke  why did you take so long to apply?
[20:02] <willcooke> heh, yeah, I kept meaning to apply, but I assumed that I hadn't really done enough to warrant it.  Most of my Canonical work was kinda behind the scenes
[20:02] <willcooke> but then when I joined the desktop team people were always telling me to get on with it
[20:02] <wxl> interesting. did you discuss that idea with anyone at all, willcooke ?
[20:03] <willcooke> so I finally did get round to it.
[20:03] <willcooke> So popey was quite clear that I should apply and he convinced me that I had actually done enough to warrant it
[20:03] <wxl> excellent
[20:03] <willcooke> plus rickspencer3
[20:03] <wxl> good job popey !
[20:03] <popey> namedropper ;)
[20:04] <willcooke> lolz
[20:04] <Kilos> haha
[20:04] <wxl> hahahahah
[20:04] <Kilos> hi popey
[20:04] <wxl> any other questions or shoall we move on to voting?
[20:04] <wxl> s/oa/a//
[20:04] <toddy> willcooke: do you involve in the loco in London?
[20:04] <hggdh> no questions from me. the testimonials are more than enough
[20:04] <Kilos> agreed
[20:04] <popey> the UK loco is mostly idle
[20:04] <willcooke> toddy, not really.  I dont get down to the office so much.
[20:05] <willcooke> we "organised" a release party for 15.04
[20:05] <willcooke> which was basically "let's go to the pub"
[20:05] <ahoneybun> lol
[20:05] <hggdh> organised enough, I would say
[20:05] <toddy> willcooke: how many people was there?
[20:06] <willcooke> toddy, not including the desktop team, about 8
[20:06] <willcooke> with the desktop team, about 20
[20:06] <toddy> nice
[20:06] <elacheche_anis> loool willcooke x)
[20:06] <doko> willcooke, what do you know about plus1 maintenance?
[20:06] <willcooke> doko, nothing
[20:07] <willcooke> doko, what is it?
[20:08] <wxl> #voters ahoneybun popey hggdh Kilos toddy elacheche_anis wxl
[20:08] <meetingology> Current voters: Kilos ahoneybun elacheche_anis hggdh popey toddy wxl
[20:08] <hggdh> +1 finally, welcome
[20:08] <wxl> so i guess i'm ready to go vote if that's it?
[20:08] <hggdh> bah, jumped the gun
[20:08] <elacheche_anis> Am ready too :)
[20:08] <Kilos> ditto
[20:08] <ahoneybun> I'm good to go
[20:08] <willcooke> doko, ah:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlusOneMaintenanceTeam
[20:08] <elacheche_anis> +1 Keep the good work the the desktop :)
[20:08] <wxl> oops hold on elacheche_anis :)
[20:08] <popey> +1
[20:09] <wxl> #votesrequired 4
[20:09] <meetingology> votes now need 4 to be passed
[20:09] <wxl> ok NOW VOTE
[20:09] <Kilos> +1 keep going
[20:09] <popey> +1
[20:09] <wxl> +1 hardware hackerz unite!
[20:09] <wxl> oh
[20:09] <wxl> derp
[20:09] <wxl> i'm new at this :/
[20:09] <toddy> we need a question
[20:09] <elacheche_anis> :D
[20:09] <wxl> #vote for willcooke's membership
[20:09] <meetingology> Please vote on: for willcooke's membership
[20:09] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)
[20:09] <elacheche_anis> Take your time w:)
[20:09] <hggdh> ah
[20:09] <elacheche_anis> +1 Keep the good work the the desktop :)
[20:09] <meetingology> +1 Keep the good work the the desktop :) received from elacheche_anis
[20:09] <ahoneybun> +1
[20:09] <meetingology> +1 received from ahoneybun
[20:09] <hggdh> bah, jumped the gun
[20:09] <popey> hah
[20:09] <hggdh> +1 finally, welcome
[20:09] <meetingology> +1 finally, welcome received from hggdh
[20:09] <popey> +1
[20:09] <meetingology> +1 received from popey
[20:09] <wxl> +1 hardware hackerz unite!
[20:09] <meetingology> +1 hardware hackerz unite! received from wxl
[20:09] <toddy> +1
[20:09] <meetingology> +1 received from toddy
[20:09] <Kilos> +1
[20:09] <meetingology> +1 received from Kilos
[20:10] <wxl> okey dokey then
[20:10] <wxl> #endvote
[20:10] <meetingology> Voting ended on: for willcooke's membership
[20:10] <meetingology> Votes for:7 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0
[20:10] <meetingology> Motion carried
[20:10] <willcooke> \o/
[20:10] <wxl> jeez you seem to have passed with flying colors willcooke :)
[20:10] <wxl> congrats!
[20:10] <ahoneybun> nice one willcooke
[20:10] <Kilos> welcome onboard willcooke
[20:10] <willcooke> thanks very much everyone!
[20:10] <Kilos> well done
[20:10]  * elacheche_anis need to mention that willcooke already got +2 from 2 board members via the ML :)
[20:10] <wxl> thank you for all the hard work, both whilst getting paid and otherwise willcooke :)
[20:10] <hggdh> willcooke: welcome in. Now you can look popey in the eyes and say "there. Happy?"
[20:10] <wxl> good point elacheche_anis
[20:11] <elacheche_anis> Congrats willcooke :) Welcome aboard :)
[20:11] <Na3iL> congrats willcooke :)
[20:11] <Kilos> hehe
[20:11] <willcooke> thanks everyone
[20:11] <wxl> looks like that's about it
[20:11] <wxl> anyone else have anything else?
[20:11] <popey> not from me
[20:12] <willcooke> I've been encouraging others to apply, so hopefully there will be more next month
[20:12] <Kilos> ty for chairing wxl
[20:12] <Kilos> cool
[20:12] <ahoneybun> thanks wxl
[20:12] <wxl> thank you willcooke ! please let us know if you need further help
[20:12] <willcooke> cheers wxl
[20:12] <wxl> cheers!
[20:12]  * willcooke -> dinner time
[20:12] <wxl> #endmeeting
[20:12] <meetingology> Meeting ended Thu Sep  3 20:12:41 2015 UTC.
[20:12] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2015/ubuntu-meeting.2015-09-03-19.56.moin.txt
[20:12] <wxl> win item move 3
[20:12] <wxl> oops
[20:13] <elacheche_anis> willcooke, just a quick question you can answer later.. Do you LOVE unity?! :D
[20:13] <willcooke> elacheche_anis, yes.  I love it.  It just works for me.
[20:13]  * ahoneybun <3 Plasma
[20:14] <elacheche_anis> :D Happy to know that willcooke :D
[20:14]  * elacheche_anis <3 awesome wm & mate :D
[20:15] <Kilos> thanks everyone