[09:29] <cjwatson> robru: ah, excellent, thanks :)
[09:33] <robru> cjwatson: you're welcome! I'm surprised this feature wasn't in there since the beginning...
[09:34] <cjwatson> I see you're listed as "package_creator" on the API for that source_package_publishing_history now too
[09:35] <cjwatson> Which is probably Soyuz-speak for "changed-by"
[09:35] <cjwatson> We'll still have to work out how to cause that to send you at least some notifications, but it's a step
[11:14] <bluesabre> release team, can somebody review https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blueman/+bug/1482626 and potentially ack? :)
[13:06] <flexiondotorg> didrocks, I've been out and about this morning. Just saw your sponsoring. Many thanks!
[13:11] <didrocks> flexiondotorg: yw! thanks for your work on Mate :)
[13:11] <flexiondotorg> :-)
[13:12] <flexiondotorg> bluesabre, I +1 your mention of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blueman/+bug/1482626
[14:51] <coreycb> bdmurray, Hi, we have some openstack SRUs in the queue for trusty and vivid.  any chance you could take a look?
[14:53] <bdmurray> coreycb: yes, I'll have a look in a couple of hours
[14:53] <coreycb> bdmurray, thanks
[17:03] <stgraber> rbasak: wow, it's got to be the first time I do a NEW review of packages and lintian doesn't thing anything interesting to complain about, even when run in pedantic mode :)
[17:04] <stgraber> so at least that part's good, now I need to look at what those packages actually are and see if they do anything wrong from a licensing point of view
[17:15] <flexiondotorg> infinity, Could you update ubuntu-mate-meta for me please?
[17:15] <flexiondotorg> infinity, I'm expecting librsvg-common and several fcitx packages to be added.
[18:33] <bdmurray> coreycb: Do you know if bug 1368545 is fixed in wily?
[18:37] <coreycb> bdmurray, no, and they don't plan to because new development has moved to python-openstackclient
[18:38] <bdmurray> coreycb: oh, comment 13 led me to believe it needed fixing in wily
[18:40] <coreycb> bdmurray, sorry that wasn't a complete answer.  it is fixed in wily in debian which we're in sync with.  but not upstream.
[18:44] <bdmurray> coreycb: "it is fixed in wily in debian"?
[18:46] <coreycb> bdmurray, it's fixed in wily in ubuntu but not upstream
[18:46] <bdmurray> coreycb: okay, got it
[18:48] <bdmurray> coreycb: the branch I linked to in the bug shows it still being a BoolOpt though
[18:52] <coreycb> bdmurray, ugh, we're behind it didn't get uploaded.  sorry about that.
[18:53] <coreycb> bdmurray, it's in the branch but not uploaded.  maybe hold off on that then until we get it uploaded and sync'd?
[18:53] <bdmurray> coreycb: okay, I'll let that sit
[18:53] <coreycb> bdmurray, ok
[18:54] <bdmurray> coreycb: what specific uploads did you want me to look at?
[18:56] <coreycb> bdmurray, other than that one we have software-properties and cinder in trusty
[18:56] <bdmurray> coreycb: okay
[18:58] <bdmurray> utlemming: do you want to wait for the existing cloud-init SRU to complete?
[18:59] <utlemming> bdmurray: no, we'd like to superceed it. The upload fixes a regression that affects performance on Azure. (i.e. users will start to get NTFS formated ephemeral devices)
[18:59] <bdmurray> utlemming: got it
[23:47] <stgraber> ^ that was a mistake, rejected