[06:35] <Mirv> ogra_: sorry, one more time please with ACK, the MP wasn't top-approved so it failed https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-021-2-publish/build
[07:07] <ogra_> Mirv, done
[07:11] <Mirv> ogra_: thank you!
[07:12] <ogra_> i wont make the meeting btw (dentist appt.)
[07:56]  * Mirv just found about 'adb hell' :D
[08:08] <pete-woods> trainguards: hi guys. I just upgraded a vmware machine that had the stable overlay PPA enabled, and the version of X there killed the X drivers
[08:08] <pete-woods> I see you guys have uploaded updated versions of ati, intel, and noveau in there
[08:08] <pete-woods> any chance you could do the same for the vmware package?
[08:09] <pete-woods> as otherwise this is going to catch me out at some point
[08:27] <Mirv> pete-woods: I'm not very familiar with the issue, but this thread discussed it https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-phone/msg14715.html - if someone tells me exactly which vmware package to upload, I can do it but I'd rather have someone who uses vmware test/select it
[08:28] <Mirv> jibel: ogra_ popey: hangout or no hangout? I don't have any pressing matters, but I'm writing a weekly landing e-mail so if you have anything... I'm interested if there's other OTA-6 feedback besides the today scope on Meizu thread
[08:28] <pete-woods> Mirv: xserver-xorg-video-vmware
[08:29] <Mirv> pete-woods: more like "this .dsc, mangle the version number like this, upload" :)
[08:29] <pete-woods> Mirv: okay, that's fair enough. I don't even know where to grab the versions from
[08:30] <pete-woods> I've pinned my xorg-* versions for now
[08:30] <Mirv> pete-woods: yeah, I'm not sure exactly where to fetch a version that fixes the issue but is suitable for a backport
[08:31] <pete-woods> Mirv: it could even be a rebuild that would fix it
[08:33] <pete-woods> same as you, I don't know any of the technical details
[08:33] <Mirv> ogra_: you're wanted :)
[08:50] <popey> Mirv: fyi, just landed new shorts in the store - its not in the retail images, only nexus ones.
[08:52] <Mirv> popey: ok. which remind me I should install it on my Bq.
[08:57] <nerochiaro> cihelp: anyone knows why this build failed ? https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-deb-autopilot-runner-vivid-mako/3269/console
[09:02] <psivaa> nerochiaro: looking
[09:06] <psivaa> nerochiaro: looks like a temporary network hiccup, i've re-triggered the job and keeping an eye on it
[09:06] <nerochiaro> psivaa: thanks
[09:15] <Mirv> jibel: I'd like to warn I'd be about to publish a ubuntu-keyboard update without QA team - it only moves a couple of #include statements around so that it will continue to build with Qt 5.5's stricter requirements, so no functional changes. + translation updates https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-038-1-build/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/ubuntu-keyboard_content.diff
[09:16] <Mirv> the only reason it'd be going to vivid too is to not split the trunk into too branches unnecessarily
[09:25] <Mirv> mandel: will you have time for bug #1462664 at some point? I'm not personally affected (probably because I rarely have WiFi enabled), but faenil is if you need debug help.
[09:39] <oSoMoN> ubuntu-qa: any chance silo 41 can be validated today?
[09:40] <rvr> oSoMoN: It's the next one in the queue
[09:41] <rvr> So there is a chance
[09:47] <oSoMoN> cool
[09:49] <morphis> Mirv: does a silo pull from wily proposed or just wily?
[09:52] <Mirv> morphis: proposed
[09:53] <morphis> Mirv: great!
[10:16] <ogra_> Mirv, ah, sorry ... was at the dentist (as i said above btw ;) )
[10:17] <ogra_> popey, my calendar issue seems to have fixed itself with tonights image update ...
[10:21] <popey> ogra_: and a reboot?
[10:21] <ogra_> i did a few reboots before the upgrade ... didnt help
[10:21] <Mirv> ogra_: oh, right! jibel was just interested if you had heard more of that hang-on-sms bug
[10:22] <ogra_> Mirv, not beyond what was discussed on the ML
[10:22] <Mirv> ok
[10:47] <psivaa> nerochiaro: http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/generic-deb-autopilot-runner-vivid-mako/3279/console has now run fine
[11:06] <nerochiaro> psivaa: excellent, thanks
[12:44] <anpok> trainguards: some time ago we landed 0.14 in wily and the synced it to vivid, somehow one package got lost in the sync: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/210429342/gtk%2B3.0_3.14.13-0ubuntu2_source.changes an updated gtk-3.14
[12:44] <anpok> it never reached vivid+overlay
[12:49] <anpok> trainguards: is there an easy way to get that package uploaded again, do we need anoher silo?
[12:58] <Mirv> anpok: why would the GTK package be needed on vivid+overlay, we don't use GTK? (yes, it's included on the image but we're trying to drop it...) that said, I wonder why I can't see the mir vivid+overlay 0.14.1 landing, built 2015-08-24, at https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/tickets?status=Landed
[13:00] <Mirv> anpok: I think this is the last Mir overlay landing https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/226
[13:00] <anpok> Mirv: hm it happened with 0.14.0.  still we should update it because the old gtk pulls in libmirclient8
[13:03] <Mirv> anpok: oh, makes sense. and 0.14.0 was before the bileto. let's do that then.
[13:03] <anpok> sure also the old platform-api for the ABI v2 pulls it in.. but maybe we can sort that out too.. and get rid of the old mirclient
[13:03] <anpok> Mirv: cool, how can we solve that?
[13:04] <Mirv> anpok: where did you get that changes link from? 3.14.13-0ubuntu2 was never release to archives at least
[13:04] <anpok> browser history
[13:05] <Mirv> :D
[13:05] <anpok> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/gtk/ubuntugtk3vivid-overlay/revision/432 thats the revsion..
[13:05] <anpok> or the one before.. but thats the we released it commit (not)
[13:06] <Mirv> anpok: since the .changes is still there, I'm trying to hunt for hints about which silo it was in
[13:06] <Mirv> hah, google to the rescue
[13:07] <anpok> yeah google adds infinite and free traceability to all sorts of open source development and release processes
[13:09] <Mirv> anpok: argh, it's there but auto-cleaned already https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-004/+sourcepub/5179279/+listing-archive-extra .. a week or two before it would still have been there
[13:09] <Mirv> getting from bzr then
[13:16] <Mirv> anpok: ok it's building in 021 now. I'll be gone by the time it's ready, but you should be able to check it and mark it as ready for publishing by robert when he wakes up
[13:18] <alf_> cihelp: Hi! We having been having problems with the mir-clang-ts-vivid-amd64-build job. Please disable it from the mir-ci and mir-autolanding upstream jobs, until we figure out what's wrong.
[13:20] <Saviq> Mirv, robru, Q: why are source packages not allowed in dual silos? couldn't you create and upload two source packages... really just like the train does normally?
[13:22] <anpok> Mirv: thx
[13:31] <psivaa> alf_:  just done that
[13:35] <alf_> psivaa: thanks
[13:37] <alf_> psivaa: wait, sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear... we don't want mir-ci and mir-autolanding disabled, we want mir-clang-ts-vivid-amd64-build disabled (i.e. not run from mir-ci/autolanding)
[13:40] <anpok> Mirv: odd .. it complains that there is already a newer version 3.14.15 published last week.. but thats not available
[13:40] <anpok> hm still in proposed pocket
[13:41] <anpok> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/3.14.15-0ubuntu1
[13:46] <psivaa> alf_: ack, Should i leave  'mir-clang-vivid-amd64-build' enabled?
[13:49] <alf_> psivaa: yes, leave it enabled, thanks
[14:06] <anpok> meh the one in proposed is built again libmirclient8
[14:07] <anpok> Mirv: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/3.14.15-0ubuntu1 <- could you upload that version to the silo instead?
[14:07] <anpok> trainguard:  ^ silo-021
[14:13] <fginther> alf_, psivaa, mir-clang-ts-vivid-amd64-build has been disabled
[14:16] <alf_> fginther: ack
[15:01] <rvr> abeato: ping
[15:02] <abeato> rvr, pong
[15:02] <rvr> abeato: Video scope doesn't show the divx file
[15:03] <abeato> rvr, right, that's a bug in the video scope
[15:03] <rvr> abeato: So I have to load the divx in mediaplayer on the command line, right?
[15:03] <abeato> rvr, hmm, but are you sure of that? I remember having seen it
[15:03] <rvr> abeato: How do you play it?
[15:04] <rvr> abeato: Yeah, I copied the file via MTP on the Videos folder, and it doesn't show
[15:04] <abeato> mediaplayer-app <video> --desktop_file_hint=/usr/share/applications/mediaplayer-app.desktop
[15:05] <abeato> rvr, maybe rebooting the phone will help to show it in the scope nonetheless
[15:06] <rvr> abeato: Checking...
[15:16] <rvr> abeato: It's there now :-/
[15:17] <abeato> rvr, you do not need to reboot for other file types, do you?
[15:17] <rvr> abeato: Nope
[15:17] <abeato> rvr, definetely some bug in the scope I think
[15:20] <rvr> abeato: Also, when seeking back and forward, the audio is not synchronized
[15:21] <abeato> rvr, hmm, don't remember to have seen that
[15:22] <rvr> And at some point, the audio is missing
[15:22] <rvr> abeato: I'm testing in krillin
[15:22] <abeato> rvr, yeah, that happens
[15:22] <abeato> rvr, it is kind of a special file
[15:22] <abeato> rvr, first, it has 2 audio streams
[15:23] <abeato> rvr, and also it looks like parts of the audio are missing as you have noticed
[15:25] <rvr> abeato: So... it is failing or not? :D
[15:25] <rvr> Do you want me to test another file?
[15:25] <abeato> rvr, well, now it is playing, thing which was not doing before :p
[15:26] <rvr> "Playing" ... ;)
[15:26] <abeato> rvr, no, that's fine, maybe another of the usual video files to make sure everything is fine
[15:26] <abeato> hehe, ok, nearer to "playing"
[15:43] <rvr> abeato: A regular mp4 plays fine
[15:44] <abeato> rvr, great
[17:44] <robru> Saviq: yeah it's possible but right now train dual silos are programmed to take all wily packages and mangle them for vivid. so special consideration needs to be given not to mangle "manual" sources in a dual silo, which isn't something I ever bothered to do and not too many people have been bothered about missing.
[17:50] <robru> anpok: sorry for the delay, uploading now
[18:10] <robru> kenvandine: mterry: can somebody ACK this one-line diff please? https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-041-2-publish/10/artifact/webbrowser-app_packaging_changes.diff/*view*/
[18:11] <kenvandine> robru, sure
[18:11] <robru> kenvandine: thanks. I also need you to run the publish job with ACK checked, new rules.
[18:12] <kenvandine> sure
[18:18] <robru> kenvandine: sweeet, thanks
[18:24] <anpok> robru: thank you!
[18:25] <robru> anpok: you're welcome
[18:29] <kenvandine> robru, np
[18:29] <robru> anpok: oh, it failed to build. fun
[18:34] <robru> uh
[18:34] <robru> jhodapp: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-060-2-publish/1/artifact/media-hub_packaging_changes.diff/*view*/ wat
[18:35] <jhodapp> robru, abeato is leading that silo
[18:35] <robru> jhodapp: yeah but he's not here.
[18:35] <robru> jhodapp: that changelog is really wrong
[18:35] <jhodapp> robru, oh, a permission issue on the branch?
[18:36] <robru> jhodapp: permissions? no that's not what I'm complaining about. look at the changelog in that diff, it's weird.
[18:36] <robru> jhodapp: which is really weird because the MP doesn't look unreasonable
[18:37] <jhodapp> robru, oh yeah indeed, the UNRELEASED line isn't first
[18:37] <robru> jhodapp: but it is first in the MP though
[18:37] <jhodapp> robru, not sure how that happens
[18:38] <robru> jhodapp: apparently the merge target is a right mess: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/media-hub/stable/view/head:/debian/changelog
[18:38] <jhodapp> wouldn't it apply the MP first and see the UNRELEASED version and modify that?
[18:38] <robru> I have no idea how that even merged instead of giving a merge conflict
[18:39] <robru> jhodapp: yes, it does, except somehow during merging the UNRELEASED one got pushed down from the top, and the top is all that matters.
[18:39] <jhodapp> ugg, yeah that is a mess
[18:39] <jhodapp> somehow different dates got in for the top line, that's why it didn't conflict
[18:41] <robru> kenvandine: need help with another ack: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-060-2-publish/1/artifact/media-hub_packaging_changes.diff/*view*/ the changelog is really broken, but it's only being published to overlay ppa, not archive. not sure if it's better to fix first and rebuild or just publish it and then fix trunk later.
[18:42] <jhodapp> robru, thanks man
[18:42] <robru> jhodapp: you're welcome
[18:42] <kenvandine> i think the changelog should be fixed
[18:43] <robru> kenvandine: ok
[18:43] <kenvandine> robru, jhodapp ^^
[18:43] <kenvandine> then i'll ack it :)
[18:43] <robru> kenvandine: ok it'll be a while, I have to rebase the merge and rebuild
[18:44] <jhodapp> robru, so this silo was already in motion for landing?
[18:44] <robru> jhodapp: yeah it's QA approved and everything
[18:44] <robru> kenvandine: we really need the packaging ack to happen before things go to QA
[18:45] <robru> I don't think the train can enforce that though
[18:45] <jhodapp> robru, so it'll need a fix and a new silo?
[18:45] <robru> jhodapp: not a new silo, I'm just going to push a new MP with a fixed changelog and then I'll put that MP in the same silo and rebuild.
[18:45] <jhodapp> ah ok
[18:46] <kenvandine> no need for another qa round or anything
[18:47] <jhodapp> sounds good to me :)
[18:51] <Saviq> robru, understood, it will be an issue when someone wants to land something that's train+MP-driven along with something that isn't because of a dependency, you'll have to split the landing in three at that point, potentially rely on proposed migration to wait for a sane state (and for PPA there could be a time when it's broken)
[18:52] <robru> Saviq: I agree it's a feature that should be supported, there's even a bug for it, just hasn't been a priority and you're maybe the second person to notice ;-)
[18:52] <Saviq> robru, as long as there's a bug for it!
[18:53] <robru> Saviq: bugs? we got all kinds of bugs ;-)
[19:29] <robru> kenvandine: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-060-1-build/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/media-hub_packaging_changes.diff/*view*/ it's something?
[19:30] <robru> kenvandine: diff looks weird but actual changelog seems good to me: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-060/+sourcepub/5370326/+listing-archive-extra
[19:30] <robru> kenvandine: please publish if you get a sec
[20:03] <kenvandine> robru, looking
[20:03] <robru> kenvandine: thanks
[20:04] <kenvandine> looks good, publishing
[20:05] <kenvandine> grr
[20:05] <kenvandine> unapproved merges
[20:05] <kenvandine> https://code.launchpad.net/~robru/media-hub/get-selected-streams/+merge/270210
[20:05] <robru> kenvandine: oh oops
[20:06] <robru> kenvandine: try again, sorry
[20:08] <robru> kenvandine: great, thanks
[20:09] <kenvandine> robru, np
[20:22] <robru> bzoltan: y u do dis?
[20:24] <robru> bzoltan: I recommend bookmarking https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/user/bzoltan
[20:32] <jhodapp> robru, kenvandine awesome, thanks guys
[20:32] <kenvandine> jhodapp, np
[20:33] <robru> jhodapp: you're welcome