[01:57] <micahg> bluesabre: yep, about to take a look
[03:47] <micahg> bluesabre: since we're past feature freeze, does xfpanel-switch need an FFe?
[03:52] <micahg> bluesabre: honestly, I think both packages need an FFe, they're new "features" for that class of package
[03:56] <micahg> bluesabre: there are also quite a few lintian warnings for shimmer-themes, none fatal, but they should probably be fixed at some point (especially the SVGs with executable bit set)
[03:57] <micahg> otherwise, packages are good to upload once approved by the release team
[06:24] <flocculant> bluesabre ochosi - just so you're aware, updates is bring LO 1.5 in - also installing the galaxy style
[10:37] <bluesabre> micahg: I wouldn't have imagined that either package had new features. xfpanel-switch added default layouts and shimmer-themes included a new theme... both artwork (but they did come up to UIF)
[10:39] <bluesabre> flocculant: yeah... wouldn't be an issue if the libreoffce packaging team would accept our patch... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1483914
[10:39] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1483914 in LibreOffice Productivity Suite "libreoffice-style-elementary as alternate to libreoffice-style-human" [Medium,Confirmed]
[10:39] <bluesabre> see comments 8 and 9
[10:40] <bluesabre> suppose we'll need to push for that again
[10:41] <flocculant> bluesabre: yep - I'd read that a while back 
[11:03] <bluesabre> micahg: created a pull request to fix Numix, https://github.com/shimmerproject/Numix/pull/249 so the executable bits should be resolved next Numix release
[11:22] <bluesabre> flocculant: all the extra icons themes seem to be a present from evince-gtk
[11:23] <bluesabre> it depends on adwaita-icon-theme, which depends on ubuntu-mono, which depends on humanity-icon-theme
[11:25] <bluesabre> whyyyyy does a gui application depend on a specific icon theme D:
[11:25] <knome> heh
[11:29] <bluesabre> I guess it might even be more than that... trying to remove adwaita-icon-theme cripples xubuntu by removing most of our apps
[11:30] <bluesabre> maybe we could make a xubuntu-icon-theme-adwaita-shim package of some sort... say it provides adwaita-icon-theme (since xubuntu-icon-theme can stand on its own)
[11:31] <bluesabre> just a thought
[11:31] <bluesabre> gotta run, bbl
[11:34] <bluesabre> micahg, is that (what I mentioned above) unheard of or frowned upon? My proposed xubuntu-icon-theme-adwaita-shim package would be an empty package that our icon theme recommends, provides and conflicts with adwaita-icon-theme so that we only require the one
[11:35] <bluesabre> the shim package would depend on xubuntu-icon-theme so that the system could not be left in an icon-less state
[11:39] <bluesabre> actually, thats dumb... pretty sure that's what provides is for, we could potentially just add that to the icon-theme
[11:39] <bluesabre> :D
[11:39] <bluesabre> I'll probably take this offline and to the side
[11:39] <bluesabre> gotta run
[11:40] <knome> hf bluesabre 
[11:40] <flocculant> cya bluesabre 
[19:38] <flocculant> just so people are up to date - the efforts by others to get the image auto testing back are bearing fruit - there's hope it'll be running before the next beta
[19:40] <pleia2> that's wonderful news :)
[19:40] <flocculant> it surely is :)
[19:41] <flocculant> knome is confident we can get the daily result on the tracker too - so it'll be easy for anyone to see where we stand 
[19:46] <knome> of course i'm confident... especially if they provided us rss feeds :)
[19:48] <flocculant> :)
[19:49] <knome> with the rss feeds, it's almost a trivial task
[19:49] <flocculant> I made that assumption :D
[21:37] <knome> bluesabre, so... what kind of contributions can we expect from you this weekend? :)
[21:39] <knome> bluesabre, shouldn't bug 1388922 be just landed from upstream?
[21:39] <ubottu> bug 1388922 in xdg-utils (Ubuntu) "xdg-open doesn't properly detect Xfce/Xubuntu" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1388922
[21:39] <knome> bluesabre, or to be exact, its fix :P
[21:43] <knome> jjfrv8_, what kind of review are you expecting for the thunar docs, btw? just making sure they are correct, or something else?
[21:44] <knome> because if only the former, we can delegate that stuff to somebody else than the project lead :)
[21:45] <knome> for anybody interested, one article for the FAQ on the website could be about settings
[21:46] <knome> particularly, many people seem to be wondering about theme rendering in qt apps
[21:47] <bluesabre> knome: bug fixes
[21:47] <bluesabre> I'll take a look at that xdg-open bug.. and folks have been poking me endlessly to fix magnet links in exo
[21:48] <bluesabre> so new exo release
[21:48] <bluesabre> going to see what I can do about iso size as well
[21:49] <knome> can't see anything about exo in the blueprints :P
[21:51] <knome> Unit193, did you ping people about the core MP's already?
[21:54] <bluesabre> knome: will add later
[21:54] <bluesabre> gotta run
[21:54] <knome> hf
[23:50] <knome> bluesabre, ergh, in catfish, what am i supposed to do with the translatable string "document-open-recent-symbolic" ?
[23:54] <knome> but anyway, translations done for everything mentioned at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/Processes/Documentation
[23:59] <Unit193> Psst, docs still don't validate.
[23:59] <knome> i don't know what i should do to them