[00:22] <mhall119> hggdh: it's not uncommon, and it doesn't have to be a negative thing, it all depends on what is shaken and how
[00:32] <hggdh> mhall119: indeed. The only thing that bothers me on his behaviour is that he *always* has the first and last word.
[00:47] <hggdh> he has already gon to debian-dev to complain about Ubuntu, and others
[01:22] <mhall119> I'm sure they're thrilled
[01:23] <belkinsa> Who are we reffering to?
[01:25] <nigelb> czajkowski: an ansible sript! that *is* nerdy!
[01:25] <nigelb> pleia2: so are you <3
[01:25] <nigelb> belkinsa: the thread on ubuntu-community-team about lp team.
[01:25] <belkinsa> I know, but which one?  Randal or the other?
[01:29] <nigelb> Oh. the other guy.
[01:29] <belkinsa> I figured it had to be him.
[01:32] <hggdh> Alberto. He is extremely interested, but does not seem to accept he might not be always correct.
[01:46] <pleia2> czajkowski: no, I even had to look up where it is (+2 hrs from here)
[07:31] <dholbach> good morning
[07:39] <nigelb> Morning dholbach, did you have a good weekend?
[07:40] <dholbach> yes, very much so - how was yours?
[07:40] <czajkowski> nigelb: aye Jon is ansibling loving atm, and that was his co worker who replied with the script
[07:41] <nigelb> dholbach: Pretty good!
[07:41] <dholbach> :-)
[07:41] <nigelb> czajkowski: It's the new awesomness :)
[07:41]  * nigelb is also a huge fan
[07:42] <czajkowski> nigelb: also what gave it away that it was ansible?
[07:42] <czajkowski> that bit wasnt clear to me
[07:43] <nigelb> czajkowski: I write and read ansible quite a lot. It looked exactly like one of my scripts!
[07:44] <czajkowski> ah ok
[07:44] <nigelb> I mean, the general structure
[07:44] <czajkowski> :)
[07:47] <popey> dholbach: hope you don't mind me mailing out about UOS, pleia2 needed it for UWN
[07:47] <dholbach> not at all
[07:48] <dholbach> thanks for taking care of it
[07:48] <dholbach> I'll mail the -announce lists in a bit
[07:48] <popey> it was forwarded by lyz I think
[07:49] <dholbach> ok, I'll mail u-d-a too
[10:05] <popey> czajkowski: http://hoffice.nu/en/what-is-hoffice/ looks cool
[10:07] <czajkowski> popey: ohhhh :D
[10:07] <czajkowski> popey: actually we have a co working day tomorrow if you fancy ?
[10:07] <czajkowski> bah not tomrorow
[10:07] <czajkowski> wednesday
[10:08] <czajkowski> also wrong channel for this part of the conversation :)
[12:31] <dholbach> davidcalle, how is the deployment coming along or should I ask a different question? :)
[12:33] <dholbach> nevermind, just checked the ticket
[12:39] <davidcalle> dholbach, it's coming, one day, maybe, probably ;) Looks like it's almost there (tm)
[12:40] <dholbach> davidcalle, so the only known issue right now is that some JS can't be loaded?
[12:41] <davidcalle> dholbach, afaict, yes. It should be a matter of setting a new variable.
[12:42]  * dholbach crosses fingers then
[13:08] <balloons> good morning!
[13:14] <popey> hello balloons
[13:21] <jose> ohai
[13:21] <belkinsa> o/ akk
[13:21] <belkinsa> all*
[15:30] <popey> hangout time!
[16:12] <dholbach> have a great rest of your day everyone - see you all tomorrow!
[16:34] <balloons> one little email on a friday afternoon turned into pages of drama. As they say, a river begins with a single drop of water
[16:40] <czajkowski> balloons: yes utter joy for peoples weekend :( ruined for many
[16:42] <balloons> I was too busy to read emails this past weekend, so I suppose I was spared until this morning
[16:42] <balloons> on the positive side, it's nice to see discussions happening on the list!
[16:44] <czajkowski> balloons: hmm interesting postive view :)
[16:45] <czajkowski> balloons: unfortunately to some it was demotivating and frustrating
[16:46] <balloons> I'm a realist, but I can recognize positives. Lots of people contributed to the discussion, I'll take that as a good thing. Perhaps it helps
[16:47] <czajkowski> :)