| === nudtrobert1 is now known as nudtrobert | ||
| balloons | Oi knome? | 13:43 |
|---|---|---|
| knome | just wanted to brag about the new features at http://tracker.xubuntu.org/#tab-details | 13:47 |
| balloons | I see hehe. You did that with what again? | 13:49 |
| knome | just php, js and jquery | 13:49 |
| knome | no external jquery libs | 13:50 |
| knome | flocculant, now you can also filter by multiple assignees/blueprints | 14:14 |
| flocculant | oh boo | 15:41 |
| flocculant | was expecting something about autotests with a ping in here :p | 15:42 |
| sak | Does ubuntu-unity use the lightdm display manager which is know as the login greeter? | 15:43 |
| flocculant | http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20150915/wily-desktop-amd64.manifest | 15:48 |
| sak | flocculant are you responding to me? | 15:49 |
| flocculant | yea - check the manifest for ubuntu | 15:49 |
| sak | Yup, it is | 15:52 |
| balloons | ping DalekSec | 16:25 |
| balloons | bah, sorry.. | 16:25 |
| balloons | ping DanChapman | 16:25 |
| knome | hahah. | 16:30 |
| DanChapman | balloons: pong | 17:19 |
| sak | Most of the bugs that I have submitted on launchpad have not been looked at yet. These bugs go back to 15.04. I changed their status to incomplete. Yet, how do I know I am submitting bugs correctly if no one comments on them? | 17:21 |
| balloons | you changed there status to incomplete? | 17:22 |
| flocculant | hard to know the answer to that | 17:22 |
| flocculant | why did you change status? | 17:22 |
| balloons | if it's set to incomplete it's not going to be looked at; that incdicates something for the reporter to do | 17:22 |
| flocculant | ninja'd ... should learn to touchtype ... | 17:22 |
| * balloons keeps on with modified hunt and peck | 17:23 | |
| flocculant | sak: well - second one I looked at - talks about a testcase, but is reported against shotwell | 17:25 |
| flocculant | so - is it a bug with shotwell or testcase? | 17:26 |
| flocculant | if it's testcase then the affects needs to change | 17:26 |
| flocculant | That's quite common - people report against testcase when it should be package foo and vice versa :) | 17:28 |
| flocculant | The only way to get further with New bugs is at least get someone to try and confirm it | 17:29 |
| flocculant | and finally - however much any of us would like all bugs to be looked at - it's not likely if only 1 person ever sees it | 17:30 |
| flocculant | sak: also by marking them as incomplete - if nothing happens within 60 days they'll expire :) | 17:31 |
| balloons | right.. marking them anything but new means it's been looked at | 17:34 |
| balloons | so really as the bug submitter, you shouldn't be setting status unless you are also working it | 17:34 |
| sak | I changed their status because they are old and not sure if they constitute as bugs | 17:39 |
| sak | flocculant, that bug is with the testcase | 17:40 |
| sak | understood ballons. If I am clear on this, a bug must be filed against the right package, more than one person must be experiencing the effect, and someone else has to take a look at it. Am I right so far | 17:43 |
| flocculant | it helps | 17:45 |
| flocculant | with testcases - report them with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+filebug | 17:45 |
| sak | Can I change what package the bug effects? | 17:46 |
| flocculant | you can | 17:46 |
| flocculant | though you can't with the shotwell one now - I've done that one :) | 17:46 |
| flocculant | if you go to bug 1493908 | 17:47 |
| ubot5 | bug 1493908 in Ubuntu Manual Tests "ctrl+z key combination does not restore picture to its original setting" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1493908 | 17:47 |
| flocculant | just under the Affects is a solid arrow - click that :) | 17:47 |
| flocculant | I changed that from shotwell package to manual tests project | 17:48 |
| sak | Now, on my lp account, there are a list of bugs that have been submitted, half by me, but I don't see the new bugs pertaining to testcases that were submitted. Who sees that? | 17:48 |
| flocculant | I only see 1 you've reported lately | 17:49 |
| flocculant | the one I changed | 17:49 |
| sak | ok, yes I see the changes | 17:53 |
| flocculant | https://bugs.launchpad.net/~saqman2060/+reportedbugs | 17:55 |
| flocculant | that's bugs you reported - not many testcase ones :) | 17:55 |
| sak | ok, I see it now, and learned how to navigate lp much better. | 17:57 |
| flocculant | :) | 17:57 |
| sak | You guys are very responsive :-) | 17:57 |
| flocculant | people try :) | 17:57 |
| flocculant | vivid bugs are unlikely to get looked at unless they're present still and important | 17:58 |
| flocculant | security for example | 17:58 |
| flocculant | that's why I try and get things reported during a dev cycle - much more chance - though LTS is a bit different | 17:59 |
| sak | why is LTS different? | 18:00 |
| sak | that's what the number grade means. "6" means very low doesn't it? | 18:02 |
| knome | all new bugs start low | 18:03 |
| sak | will be back | 18:06 |
| flocculant | at 6 even :) | 18:07 |
| brendand | https://bugs.launchpad.net/+help-bugs/bug-heat.html | 18:12 |
| brendand | 6 because all bugs have to have at least 1 affected user (4 points) and 1 subscriber (2 points) | 18:13 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!