=== bjf_ is now known as bjf | ||
=== slangase` is now known as slangasek | ||
=== infinity1 is now known as infinity | ||
=== rcj` is now known as rcj | ||
micahg | utlemming: we're working on getting some more help for backports | 04:56 |
---|---|---|
flexiondotorg | Laney, if you have a sec I'd like to discuss some package updates that I've been asked to seek UI freeze exceptions for. | 08:09 |
sil2100 | Quick heads up - I'm disabling the system-image importer for a short moment | 08:13 |
sil2100 | It's back up if anything | 08:30 |
flexiondotorg | Laney, can I request a moment of your time please? | 08:48 |
Laney | flexiondotorg: One second please | 08:49 |
flexiondotorg | Sure | 08:49 |
Riddell | bug 1488843 could do with going into vivid-updates if someone has the powers for that | 09:47 |
ubot93 | bug 1488843 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Vivid) "SRU: upgrader kde frontend fails to start" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1488843 | 09:47 |
Laney | flexiondotorg: At your service | 09:48 |
flexiondotorg | Cheers | 09:48 |
flexiondotorg | I got some updated that require UI exemptions. | 09:49 |
flexiondotorg | Can you take a look and potentially sign off? | 09:49 |
flexiondotorg | First up is - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-welcome/+bug/1493274 | 09:49 |
ubot93 | Launchpad bug 1493274 in ubuntu-mate-welcome (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-mate-welcome 1.0.3.2 update [debdiff attached]" [Undecided,New] | 09:49 |
flexiondotorg | Ubuntu MATE Welcome is not currently translated. I'll be opening that up in 16.04. | 09:50 |
flexiondotorg | I did submit these before the UI freeze in an effort to dodge UI expemtions. | 09:50 |
Laney | flexiondotorg: does the ubuntu docs team do anything with ubuntu mate? | 09:51 |
flexiondotorg | No. | 09:51 |
Laney | flexiondotorg: OK, I think it's fine then if you're not invalidating the work of anyone else | 09:56 |
flexiondotorg | Thanks. Can you ack that bug please? | 09:56 |
flexiondotorg | I have one other to discuss as well. | 09:56 |
Laney | I did | 09:56 |
flexiondotorg | Thanks. | 09:57 |
Laney | I just commented on plank if it's that one | 09:57 |
flexiondotorg | Well, I want that too. But here is the other. | 09:57 |
flexiondotorg | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-artwork/+bug/1493065 | 09:57 |
ubot93 | Launchpad bug 1493065 in ubuntu-mate-artwork (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-mate-artwork 15.10.3 new release [debdiff attached]" [Undecided,New] | 09:57 |
flexiondotorg | Minor change. | 09:57 |
Laney | k | 09:58 |
Laney | You know the release team isn't subscribed to this | 09:58 |
Laney | so we wouldn't have seen it | 09:58 |
flexiondotorg | Yeah, I wasn't sure when/if I shouild subscribe the release-team. | 09:59 |
Laney | It would be preferable to do this that way instead of synchronously on IRC | 09:59 |
flexiondotorg | OK, understood. Will do in future. | 09:59 |
darkxst | Laney, probably a TB Question, but I have been wondering if UiFe for flavour specific stuff, couldnt be delegated to the relevant flavour team leads | 09:59 |
darkxst | s/couldnt/could/ | 10:00 |
Laney | darkxst: Perhaps. You probably want to keep a way of avoiding messing up the work of people working on documenting and translating things, but maybe the main RT doesn't have to be involved for flavours. | 10:01 |
Laney | darkxst: Bring it up on ubuntu-release@ if you want to talk about a change | 10:01 |
flexiondotorg | Laney, Can you just cast a quick eye over https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-settings/+bug/1493034 | 10:01 |
ubot93 | Launchpad bug 1493034 in ubuntu-mate-settings (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-mate-settings 15.10.2 bugfix release [debdiff attached]" [Undecided,New] | 10:01 |
flexiondotorg | I don't think it needs an UI or FF exemption. | 10:01 |
darkxst | Laney, ok, will do | 10:05 |
Laney | flexiondotorg: It probably does since you're changing the scrollbars | 10:05 |
flexiondotorg | Laney, Understood. | 10:06 |
flexiondotorg | It is OK? | 10:06 |
Laney | Sure | 10:06 |
flexiondotorg | Basically, they are alway displayed now. | 10:06 |
flexiondotorg | Laney, thanks for helping. I'll sub the RT in future for such exemptions. | 10:07 |
flexiondotorg | I'd like those update in the next beta so I can focus on bug hunting after that. | 10:07 |
flexiondotorg | Laney, do you require any flavour assistance for the next bet? | 10:08 |
flexiondotorg | *beta? | 10:08 |
=== zbenjamin_ is now known as zbenjamin | ||
tjaalton | infinity: so, new mesa-lts-vivid adds renamed libosmesa6* packages, but it doesn't solve installability of the libosmesa6 library, because all the reverse deps are versioned, and Provides isn't | 12:28 |
sil2100 | Hey guys! Is there any archive admin around to help us out with a review of a CI Train landing that introduces new binary packages (soname bump)? The packaging has been already reviewed by kenvandine, but we still need the archive admin approval: | 12:33 |
sil2100 | https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-010-2-publish/80/artifact/unity-scopes-api_packaging_changes.diff <- the packaging diff | 12:34 |
sil2100 | Thanks o/ | 12:34 |
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens | ||
=== sil2100_ is now known as sil2100 | ||
infinity | tjaalton: I don't have any context there. What was the bug you were trying to fix? | 14:42 |
tjaalton | infinity: well it's part of bug 1424466, but an internal request to allow installing libosmesa6's rdeps | 14:47 |
ubot93 | bug 1424466 in apt (Ubuntu Trusty) "Devel package not installable in 14.04.2 (mesa-lts-utopic" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1424466 | 14:47 |
tjaalton | there's only one way to fix it in trusty that I can see, which is to build osmesa separately like on precise, and starting from w+1 rely on versioned Provides | 14:48 |
tjaalton | mesa upstream no longer has machinery for static builds | 14:48 |
tjaalton | uh no, it's bug 1424059 | 14:53 |
ubot93 | bug 1424059 in mesa-lts-utopic (Ubuntu) "libosmesa6 conflicts with libglapi-mesa-lts-utopic" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1424059 | 14:53 |
jamespage | doko, ^^ those two :-) pretty please :) | 15:01 |
doko | jamespage, python-magnumclient accepted. for a MIR approval please check to run the testsuite for python3 as well | 15:30 |
jamespage | doko, ack will do | 15:30 |
doko | for debian acceptance, ... there are a lot of copyright holders missing in debian/copyright | 15:31 |
doko | jamespage, castellan looks ok, runs the tests for all versions | 15:37 |
jamespage | doko, thanks for the NEW processing - much appreciated... | 15:55 |
bdmurray | slangasek: I think bug 1258639 mostly covers the same case we were talking about the other day regarding upgrading from T to V. | 21:14 |
ubot93 | bug 1258639 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Saucy) "need to support upgrades from 12.10 to 13.10" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1258639 | 21:14 |
slangasek | bdmurray: looks like it, yes | 21:43 |
bdmurray | I'll see if similar changes work for upgrading from T to V then. | 21:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!