/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/09/16/#ubuntu-release.txt

=== bjf_ is now known as bjf
=== slangase` is now known as slangasek
=== infinity1 is now known as infinity
=== rcj` is now known as rcj
micahgutlemming: we're working on getting some more help for backports04:56
flexiondotorgLaney, if you have a sec I'd like to discuss some package updates that I've been asked to seek UI freeze exceptions for.08:09
sil2100Quick heads up - I'm disabling the system-image importer for a short moment08:13
sil2100It's back up if anything08:30
flexiondotorgLaney, can I request a moment of your time please?08:48
Laneyflexiondotorg: One second please08:49
flexiondotorgSure08:49
Riddellbug 1488843 could do with going into vivid-updates if someone has the powers for that09:47
ubot93bug 1488843 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Vivid) "SRU: upgrader kde frontend fails to start" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/148884309:47
Laneyflexiondotorg: At your service09:48
flexiondotorgCheers09:48
flexiondotorgI got some updated that require UI exemptions.09:49
flexiondotorgCan you take a look and potentially sign off?09:49
flexiondotorgFirst up is - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-welcome/+bug/149327409:49
ubot93Launchpad bug 1493274 in ubuntu-mate-welcome (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-mate-welcome 1.0.3.2 update [debdiff attached]" [Undecided,New]09:49
flexiondotorgUbuntu MATE Welcome is not currently translated. I'll be opening that up in 16.04.09:50
flexiondotorgI did submit these before the UI freeze in an effort to dodge UI expemtions.09:50
Laneyflexiondotorg: does the ubuntu docs team do anything with ubuntu mate?09:51
flexiondotorgNo.09:51
Laneyflexiondotorg: OK, I think it's fine then if you're not invalidating the work of anyone else09:56
flexiondotorgThanks. Can you ack that bug please?09:56
flexiondotorgI have one other to discuss as well.09:56
LaneyI did09:56
flexiondotorgThanks.09:57
LaneyI just commented on plank if it's that one09:57
flexiondotorgWell, I want that too. But here is the other.09:57
flexiondotorghttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-artwork/+bug/149306509:57
ubot93Launchpad bug 1493065 in ubuntu-mate-artwork (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-mate-artwork 15.10.3 new release [debdiff attached]" [Undecided,New]09:57
flexiondotorgMinor change.09:57
Laneyk09:58
LaneyYou know the release team isn't subscribed to this09:58
Laneyso we wouldn't have seen it09:58
flexiondotorgYeah, I wasn't sure when/if I shouild subscribe the release-team.09:59
LaneyIt would be preferable to do this that way instead of synchronously on IRC09:59
flexiondotorgOK, understood. Will do in future.09:59
darkxstLaney, probably a TB Question, but I have been wondering if UiFe for flavour specific stuff, couldnt be delegated to the relevant flavour team leads09:59
darkxsts/couldnt/could/10:00
Laneydarkxst: Perhaps. You probably want to keep a way of avoiding messing up the work of people working on documenting and translating things, but maybe the main RT doesn't have to be involved for flavours.10:01
Laneydarkxst: Bring it up on ubuntu-release@ if you want to talk about a change10:01
flexiondotorgLaney, Can you just cast a quick eye over https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-settings/+bug/149303410:01
ubot93Launchpad bug 1493034 in ubuntu-mate-settings (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-mate-settings 15.10.2 bugfix release [debdiff attached]" [Undecided,New]10:01
flexiondotorgI don't think it needs an UI or FF exemption.10:01
darkxstLaney, ok, will do10:05
Laneyflexiondotorg: It probably does since you're changing the scrollbars10:05
flexiondotorgLaney, Understood.10:06
flexiondotorgIt is OK?10:06
LaneySure10:06
flexiondotorgBasically, they are alway displayed now.10:06
flexiondotorgLaney, thanks for helping. I'll sub the RT in future for such exemptions.10:07
flexiondotorgI'd like those update in the next beta so I can focus on bug hunting after that.10:07
flexiondotorgLaney, do you require any flavour assistance for the next bet?10:08
flexiondotorg*beta?10:08
=== zbenjamin_ is now known as zbenjamin
tjaaltoninfinity: so, new mesa-lts-vivid adds renamed libosmesa6* packages, but it doesn't solve installability of the libosmesa6 library, because all the reverse deps are versioned, and Provides isn't12:28
sil2100Hey guys! Is there any archive admin around to help us out with a review of a CI Train landing that introduces new binary packages (soname bump)? The packaging has been already reviewed by kenvandine, but we still need the archive admin approval:12:33
sil2100https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-010-2-publish/80/artifact/unity-scopes-api_packaging_changes.diff <- the packaging diff12:34
sil2100Thanks o/12:34
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
=== sil2100_ is now known as sil2100
infinitytjaalton: I don't have any context there.  What was the bug you were trying to fix?14:42
tjaaltoninfinity: well it's part of bug 1424466, but an internal request to allow installing libosmesa6's rdeps14:47
ubot93bug 1424466 in apt (Ubuntu Trusty) "Devel package not installable in 14.04.2 (mesa-lts-utopic" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/142446614:47
tjaaltonthere's only one way to fix it in trusty that I can see, which is to build osmesa separately like on precise, and starting from w+1 rely on versioned Provides14:48
tjaaltonmesa upstream no longer has machinery for static builds14:48
tjaaltonuh no, it's bug 142405914:53
ubot93bug 1424059 in mesa-lts-utopic (Ubuntu) "libosmesa6 conflicts with libglapi-mesa-lts-utopic" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/142405914:53
jamespagedoko, ^^ those two :-) pretty please :)15:01
dokojamespage, python-magnumclient accepted. for a MIR approval please check to run the testsuite for python3 as well15:30
jamespagedoko, ack will do15:30
dokofor debian acceptance, ... there are a lot of copyright holders missing in debian/copyright15:31
dokojamespage, castellan looks ok, runs the tests for all versions15:37
jamespagedoko, thanks for the NEW processing - much appreciated...15:55
bdmurrayslangasek: I think bug 1258639 mostly covers the same case we were talking about the other day regarding upgrading from T to V.21:14
ubot93bug 1258639 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Saucy) "need to support upgrades from 12.10 to 13.10" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/125863921:14
slangasekbdmurray: looks like it, yes21:43
bdmurrayI'll see if similar changes work for upgrading from T to V then.21:44

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!