=== bjf_ is now known as bjf === slangase` is now known as slangasek === infinity1 is now known as infinity === rcj` is now known as rcj [04:56] utlemming: we're working on getting some more help for backports [08:09] Laney, if you have a sec I'd like to discuss some package updates that I've been asked to seek UI freeze exceptions for. [08:13] Quick heads up - I'm disabling the system-image importer for a short moment [08:30] It's back up if anything [08:48] Laney, can I request a moment of your time please? [08:49] flexiondotorg: One second please [08:49] Sure [09:47] bug 1488843 could do with going into vivid-updates if someone has the powers for that [09:47] bug 1488843 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Vivid) "SRU: upgrader kde frontend fails to start" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1488843 [09:48] flexiondotorg: At your service [09:48] Cheers [09:49] I got some updated that require UI exemptions. [09:49] Can you take a look and potentially sign off? [09:49] First up is - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-welcome/+bug/1493274 [09:49] Launchpad bug 1493274 in ubuntu-mate-welcome (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-mate-welcome 1.0.3.2 update [debdiff attached]" [Undecided,New] [09:50] Ubuntu MATE Welcome is not currently translated. I'll be opening that up in 16.04. [09:50] I did submit these before the UI freeze in an effort to dodge UI expemtions. [09:51] flexiondotorg: does the ubuntu docs team do anything with ubuntu mate? [09:51] No. [09:56] flexiondotorg: OK, I think it's fine then if you're not invalidating the work of anyone else [09:56] Thanks. Can you ack that bug please? [09:56] I have one other to discuss as well. [09:56] I did [09:57] Thanks. [09:57] I just commented on plank if it's that one [09:57] Well, I want that too. But here is the other. [09:57] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-artwork/+bug/1493065 [09:57] Launchpad bug 1493065 in ubuntu-mate-artwork (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-mate-artwork 15.10.3 new release [debdiff attached]" [Undecided,New] [09:57] Minor change. [09:58] k [09:58] You know the release team isn't subscribed to this [09:58] so we wouldn't have seen it [09:59] Yeah, I wasn't sure when/if I shouild subscribe the release-team. [09:59] It would be preferable to do this that way instead of synchronously on IRC [09:59] OK, understood. Will do in future. [09:59] Laney, probably a TB Question, but I have been wondering if UiFe for flavour specific stuff, couldnt be delegated to the relevant flavour team leads [10:00] s/couldnt/could/ [10:01] darkxst: Perhaps. You probably want to keep a way of avoiding messing up the work of people working on documenting and translating things, but maybe the main RT doesn't have to be involved for flavours. [10:01] darkxst: Bring it up on ubuntu-release@ if you want to talk about a change [10:01] Laney, Can you just cast a quick eye over https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-settings/+bug/1493034 [10:01] Launchpad bug 1493034 in ubuntu-mate-settings (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-mate-settings 15.10.2 bugfix release [debdiff attached]" [Undecided,New] [10:01] I don't think it needs an UI or FF exemption. [10:05] Laney, ok, will do [10:05] flexiondotorg: It probably does since you're changing the scrollbars [10:06] Laney, Understood. [10:06] It is OK? [10:06] Sure [10:06] Basically, they are alway displayed now. [10:07] Laney, thanks for helping. I'll sub the RT in future for such exemptions. [10:07] I'd like those update in the next beta so I can focus on bug hunting after that. [10:08] Laney, do you require any flavour assistance for the next bet? [10:08] *beta? === zbenjamin_ is now known as zbenjamin [12:28] infinity: so, new mesa-lts-vivid adds renamed libosmesa6* packages, but it doesn't solve installability of the libosmesa6 library, because all the reverse deps are versioned, and Provides isn't [12:33] Hey guys! Is there any archive admin around to help us out with a review of a CI Train landing that introduces new binary packages (soname bump)? The packaging has been already reviewed by kenvandine, but we still need the archive admin approval: [12:34] https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-010-2-publish/80/artifact/unity-scopes-api_packaging_changes.diff <- the packaging diff [12:34] Thanks o/ === sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens === sil2100_ is now known as sil2100 [14:42] tjaalton: I don't have any context there. What was the bug you were trying to fix? [14:47] infinity: well it's part of bug 1424466, but an internal request to allow installing libosmesa6's rdeps [14:47] bug 1424466 in apt (Ubuntu Trusty) "Devel package not installable in 14.04.2 (mesa-lts-utopic" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1424466 [14:48] there's only one way to fix it in trusty that I can see, which is to build osmesa separately like on precise, and starting from w+1 rely on versioned Provides [14:48] mesa upstream no longer has machinery for static builds [14:53] uh no, it's bug 1424059 [14:53] bug 1424059 in mesa-lts-utopic (Ubuntu) "libosmesa6 conflicts with libglapi-mesa-lts-utopic" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1424059 [15:01] doko, ^^ those two :-) pretty please :) [15:30] jamespage, python-magnumclient accepted. for a MIR approval please check to run the testsuite for python3 as well [15:30] doko, ack will do [15:31] for debian acceptance, ... there are a lot of copyright holders missing in debian/copyright [15:37] jamespage, castellan looks ok, runs the tests for all versions [15:55] doko, thanks for the NEW processing - much appreciated... [21:14] slangasek: I think bug 1258639 mostly covers the same case we were talking about the other day regarding upgrading from T to V. [21:14] bug 1258639 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Saucy) "need to support upgrades from 12.10 to 13.10" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1258639 [21:43] bdmurray: looks like it, yes [21:44] I'll see if similar changes work for upgrading from T to V then.