[04:56] <micahg> utlemming: we're working on getting some more help for backports
[08:09] <flexiondotorg> Laney, if you have a sec I'd like to discuss some package updates that I've been asked to seek UI freeze exceptions for.
[08:13] <sil2100> Quick heads up - I'm disabling the system-image importer for a short moment
[08:30] <sil2100> It's back up if anything
[08:48] <flexiondotorg> Laney, can I request a moment of your time please?
[08:49] <Laney> flexiondotorg: One second please
[08:49] <flexiondotorg> Sure
[09:47] <Riddell> bug 1488843 could do with going into vivid-updates if someone has the powers for that
[09:48] <Laney> flexiondotorg: At your service
[09:48] <flexiondotorg> Cheers
[09:49] <flexiondotorg> I got some updated that require UI exemptions.
[09:49] <flexiondotorg> Can you take a look and potentially sign off?
[09:49] <flexiondotorg> First up is - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-welcome/+bug/1493274
[09:50] <flexiondotorg> Ubuntu MATE Welcome is not currently translated. I'll be opening that up in 16.04.
[09:50] <flexiondotorg> I did submit these before the UI freeze in an effort to dodge UI expemtions.
[09:51] <Laney> flexiondotorg: does the ubuntu docs team do anything with ubuntu mate?
[09:51] <flexiondotorg> No.
[09:56] <Laney> flexiondotorg: OK, I think it's fine then if you're not invalidating the work of anyone else
[09:56] <flexiondotorg> Thanks. Can you ack that bug please?
[09:56] <flexiondotorg> I have one other to discuss as well.
[09:56] <Laney> I did
[09:57] <flexiondotorg> Thanks.
[09:57] <Laney> I just commented on plank if it's that one
[09:57] <flexiondotorg> Well, I want that too. But here is the other.
[09:57] <flexiondotorg> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-artwork/+bug/1493065
[09:57] <flexiondotorg> Minor change.
[09:58] <Laney> k
[09:58] <Laney> You know the release team isn't subscribed to this
[09:58] <Laney> so we wouldn't have seen it
[09:59] <flexiondotorg> Yeah, I wasn't sure when/if I shouild subscribe the release-team.
[09:59] <Laney> It would be preferable to do this that way instead of synchronously on IRC
[09:59] <flexiondotorg> OK, understood. Will do in future.
[09:59] <darkxst> Laney, probably a TB Question, but I have been wondering if UiFe for flavour specific stuff, couldnt be delegated to the relevant flavour team leads
[10:00] <darkxst> s/couldnt/could/
[10:01] <Laney> darkxst: Perhaps. You probably want to keep a way of avoiding messing up the work of people working on documenting and translating things, but maybe the main RT doesn't have to be involved for flavours.
[10:01] <Laney> darkxst: Bring it up on ubuntu-release@ if you want to talk about a change
[10:01] <flexiondotorg> Laney, Can you just cast a quick eye over https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-settings/+bug/1493034
[10:01] <flexiondotorg> I don't think it needs an UI or FF exemption.
[10:05] <darkxst> Laney, ok, will do
[10:05] <Laney> flexiondotorg: It probably does since you're changing the scrollbars
[10:06] <flexiondotorg> Laney, Understood.
[10:06] <flexiondotorg> It is OK?
[10:06] <Laney> Sure
[10:06] <flexiondotorg> Basically, they are alway displayed now.
[10:07] <flexiondotorg> Laney, thanks for helping. I'll sub the RT in future for such exemptions.
[10:07] <flexiondotorg> I'd like those update in the next beta so I can focus on bug hunting after that.
[10:08] <flexiondotorg> Laney, do you require any flavour assistance for the next bet?
[10:08] <flexiondotorg> *beta?
[12:28] <tjaalton> infinity: so, new mesa-lts-vivid adds renamed libosmesa6* packages, but it doesn't solve installability of the libosmesa6 library, because all the reverse deps are versioned, and Provides isn't
[12:33] <sil2100> Hey guys! Is there any archive admin around to help us out with a review of a CI Train landing that introduces new binary packages (soname bump)? The packaging has been already reviewed by kenvandine, but we still need the archive admin approval:
[12:34] <sil2100> https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-010-2-publish/80/artifact/unity-scopes-api_packaging_changes.diff <- the packaging diff
[12:34] <sil2100> Thanks o/
[14:42] <infinity> tjaalton: I don't have any context there.  What was the bug you were trying to fix?
[14:47] <tjaalton> infinity: well it's part of bug 1424466, but an internal request to allow installing libosmesa6's rdeps
[14:48] <tjaalton> there's only one way to fix it in trusty that I can see, which is to build osmesa separately like on precise, and starting from w+1 rely on versioned Provides
[14:48] <tjaalton> mesa upstream no longer has machinery for static builds
[14:53] <tjaalton> uh no, it's bug 1424059
[15:01] <jamespage> doko, ^^ those two :-) pretty please :)
[15:30] <doko> jamespage, python-magnumclient accepted. for a MIR approval please check to run the testsuite for python3 as well
[15:30] <jamespage> doko, ack will do
[15:31] <doko> for debian acceptance, ... there are a lot of copyright holders missing in debian/copyright
[15:37] <doko> jamespage, castellan looks ok, runs the tests for all versions
[15:55] <jamespage> doko, thanks for the NEW processing - much appreciated...
[21:14] <bdmurray> slangasek: I think bug 1258639 mostly covers the same case we were talking about the other day regarding upgrading from T to V.
[21:43] <slangasek> bdmurray: looks like it, yes
[21:44] <bdmurray> I'll see if similar changes work for upgrading from T to V then.