| pitti | Good morning | 04:49 |
|---|---|---|
| Mirv | is anyone else seeing "/usr/bin/ld.gold: --push-state: unknown option" like bzoltan is? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/218108553/buildlog_ubuntu-wily-amd64.ubuntu-ui-toolkit_1.3.1639%2B15.10.20150916.2-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz | 06:12 |
| Mirv | that's not familiar to me at lesat | 06:13 |
| TJ- | Mirv: yeah; it's an option in ld but not the older ld.gold. Makes it easy to save/restore flags for files | 06:31 |
| dholbach | good morning | 06:51 |
| Mirv | TJ-: right, it's just that bzoltan hasn't changed anything in the project being built and wondering what could have changed to cause that error on what's essentially a no-change rebuild | 06:56 |
| Mirv | bzoltan: right, you haven't changed anything packaging related that would do toolchain changes? | 06:57 |
| bzoltan | Mirv: no, nothing is changed | 06:58 |
| smb | pitti, morning. A question just out of curiosity and since I randomly happened to look. In britney when is a test marked as "in progress"? I randomly was looking at a package and that had amd64 and i386 as in progress over hours and in fact i386 is still. While the actual runtime of the test (as for amd64) is just a couple of minutes | 07:09 |
| pitti | smb: yeah, sorry about that -- queues have been achingly long/slow for several days now, due to the continued downtime of half of scalingstack | 07:09 |
| smb | pitti, ah ok. explains a lot. so basically sent off and then died in some way | 07:10 |
| pitti | smb: i. e. "in progress" both means "running" (8 tests at a time per arch), and "queued" (still ~ 240 items) | 07:10 |
| pitti | smb: well, not died, there's just a long line | 07:10 |
| pitti | smb: the queues aren't currently exposed on a web UI; that's on the TODO list, after I'm done with teaching britney enough about the intricacies of kernel tests :) (working with apw on that one) | 07:11 |
| smb | pitti, ok. I just cannot make a relation between the previous runtimes and any delta between changing into running now and its end. Which I was just wondering. | 07:11 |
| pitti | smb: right, that's entirely dominated by the test request queue lengths | 07:12 |
| pitti | smb: yesterday evening we had 600 queued tests, now 240, but of course every package upload triggers new ones :) | 07:12 |
| smb | pitti, ok, thanks. :) At least I don't have to worry about me having done something that locked the testing up... well half of that worry was gone after amd64 completed at least. :) | 07:13 |
| pitti | smb: I was told that scalingstack lcy01 comes back this week, then we are back to the "normal" under-powered mode :) | 07:14 |
| smb | pitti, Lovely. :D | 07:14 |
| TJ- | Mirv: gc++-5 (5.2.1-17ubuntu4) has had recent changes for PR c++/65913 which add 'push-state' | 07:18 |
| Mirv | TJ-: thanks, that's exactly what I was thinking about, a toolchain change | 07:32 |
| Mirv | hmm, doko is not online though | 07:32 |
| TJ- | Mirv: an amazingly invasive sude-effect :) | 07:32 |
| TJ- | s/sude/side/ | 07:32 |
| Mirv | bzoltan: ^ not-your-fault-can't-do-anything-before-doko-is-online. probably. | 07:34 |
| bzoltan | Mirv: OK, the UITK landing is blocked for now than. | 07:38 |
| TJ- | Mirv: bzoltan: the issue could be in qtbase-opensource-src-5.4.2+dfsg (qmake) which does "mkspecs/common/gcc-base-unix.conf:19:QMAKE_LFLAGS_USE_GOLD = -fuse-ld=gold" irrespective of libraries being linked. | 07:51 |
| caribou | what is the process to produce the mini.iso that we provide in the archives | 08:12 |
| Mirv | TJ-: ouch. it seems this hasn't hit Debian yet so they don't have anything for that yet. thanks for the find! I'm filing a bug. | 08:15 |
| Mirv | bzoltan: depending on schedule needs, you might want to consider vivid-overlay only landing this time and sync up for the next landing after this | 08:15 |
| Mirv | since it's gcc/qtbase, this might take a little while | 08:15 |
| caribou | Laney: how can we get a fix into a package in -backports ? | 08:16 |
| bzoltan | Mirv: OK, thanks | 08:16 |
| Laney | caribou: re-backport it from the place it came from with the fix included | 08:17 |
| caribou | Laney: well, the place it came from works, so a patch needs to be added to the package to backport | 08:17 |
| caribou | Laney: haproxy1.5 uses start-stop-daemon --pid which is only available in Wily | 08:18 |
| Mirv | filed bug #1496743 | 08:18 |
| ubottu | bug 1496743 in qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu) "/usr/bin/ld.gold: --push-state: unknown option" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1496743 | 08:18 |
| Laney | caribou: then whoever said this backport works needs to be spanked | 08:19 |
| caribou | Laney: well it works, it simply doesn't terminate (LP: #1494141) | 08:20 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1494141 in haproxy (Ubuntu) "HAProxy 1.5 init script does not terminate processes" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1494141 | 08:20 |
| Laney | caribou: file bug against backports with a patch | 08:20 |
| caribou | Laney: ok, will do. thanks | 08:21 |
| ginggs | Hi all. How reliable is http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ ? Package deal.ii FTBFS on all archs in Debian since June, but this page only shows the ppc failure, where it has never built. | 08:40 |
| ginggs | I tried a no-change rebuild of deal.ii 8.1.0-4 on the PPA builders this morning, and it failed. | 08:41 |
| Laney | It's not trying to rebuild stuff but reporting the state of the archive as it is now | 08:42 |
| ginggs | I'm about to sync 8.1.0-5, but I'm just curious as to why it didn't show up on http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | 08:42 |
| ginggs | Laney, thanks | 08:46 |
| Laney | @pilot in | 09:05 |
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: feature freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-vivid | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: Laney | ||
| Laney | jamespage: hey, https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.log/+bug/1385295 is in the sponsor queue - should something happen with it? | 11:32 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1385295 in python-oslo.log (Ubuntu) "use_syslog=True does not log to syslog via /dev/log anymore" [High,In progress] | 11:32 |
| jamespage | Laney, let me loot | 11:32 |
| jamespage | k | 11:32 |
| Laney | thanks! | 11:33 |
| seb128 | dpm, pitti, hey, saw my langpack/evolution/wily question yesterday? | 13:04 |
| pitti | seb128: I did, but I thought you approved the -3.16 templates already? | 13:05 |
| seb128 | pitti, right, but do we need to do anything for those to be included in the langpack? | 13:05 |
| seb128 | the templates were approved for a while, I did fix some of the target details on the template page yesterday though | 13:05 |
| seb128 | unsure if that was the issue | 13:05 |
| seb128 | pitti, also https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/wily/+source/evolution-data-server | 13:06 |
| seb128 | that has 2 templates and seems buggy | 13:06 |
| seb128 | but I don't know how to delete the second one | 13:06 |
| pitti | seb128: shoudl be fine -- it's in http://people.canonical.com/~dpm/data/ubuntu-l10n/ubuntu_wily_potemplate-stats.json | 13:06 |
| seb128 | https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/wily/+source/evolution-data-server/+pots/evolution-data-server/+edit seems wrong | 13:06 |
| seb128 | translations domain: evolution-data-server-3.12 | 13:06 |
| seb128 | but I can't fix it/change to 3.16 since that's already used by the buggy other template | 13:06 |
| pitti | wgrant: ^ halp? | 13:09 |
| wgrant | seb128, pitti: Can you explain the situation? | 13:15 |
| wgrant | I don't understand how the second template came about. | 13:15 |
| wgrant | But if it was from an import, then won't further uploads just import into that? | 13:15 |
| seb128 | wgrant, unsure how we ended up in that situation, evolution rename its template every cycle | 13:18 |
| seb128 | evolution-3.xy | 13:18 |
| seb128 | same for eds | 13:18 |
| seb128 | but that seems buggy if you look at https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/wily/+source/evolution-data-server | 13:18 |
| seb128 | the first template points to the 3.12 domain which is outdated | 13:18 |
| wgrant | Right. | 13:18 |
| seb128 | and the second one has no translation | 13:18 |
| wgrant | But fixing this is rather difficult. | 13:18 |
| seb128 | and none is in the langpacks | 13:18 |
| seb128 | can you delete the second one? | 13:19 |
| seb128 | the 3.16 one | 13:19 |
| seb128 | https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/wily/+source/evolution has only one | 13:19 |
| seb128 | I guess somebody (could be me) did some wrong clicking when approving the eds 3.16 one | 13:19 |
| wgrant | I don't think it's possible to delete an entire template. | 13:19 |
| seb128 | hum | 13:20 |
| wgrant | What have you done in the past? | 13:20 |
| wgrant | You must have manually approved the new pot and its pos into the existing template. | 13:20 |
| seb128 | accepting the new template | 13:20 |
| seb128 | right, that | 13:20 |
| seb128 | like evo | 13:20 |
| seb128 | https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/wily/+source/evolution/+pots/evolution/+edit | 13:20 |
| seb128 | "evolution" template, domain "evolution-3.16" | 13:21 |
| seb128 | I guess somebody accepted the new eds one as "eds-3.16" instead of "eds" | 13:21 |
| wgrant | Right. | 13:22 |
| ginggs | tjaalton: any chance of LP: #1412441 still happening for wily? | 13:23 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1412441 in libclc (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libclc" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1412441 | 13:23 |
| wgrant | So I think what needs to happen is that the -3.16 POTemplate and its POFiles need to have their paths adjusted to something that doesn't match reality, so future uploads won't autoimport into the bad template. | 13:23 |
| wgrant | Then we can deactivate the bad template, and perform a fresh upload to update the right template. | 13:24 |
| seb128 | wgrant, k, thanks | 13:24 |
| tjaalton | ginggs: dunno | 13:25 |
| tjaalton | it's being updated in debian | 13:26 |
| seb128 | wgrant, pitti, done, https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/wily/+source/evolution-data-server ... first points to 3.16 | 13:26 |
| seb128 | do we need anything to have the .mo included in the next langpack now? | 13:26 |
| wgrant | I'm surprised it's not there already. | 13:26 |
| wgrant | There's no reason it wouldn't be. | 13:26 |
| seb128 | wgrant, I guess that part is more for pitti? | 13:28 |
| seb128 | or is the export coming from launchpad? | 13:28 |
| seb128 | note that evo/eds has their "domain" set to "-3.12" until yesterday | 13:28 |
| seb128 | so maybe that confused things | 13:29 |
| xclaesse | mardy, is it known bug that evolution can't connect to google account anymore and UOA won't let you renew you auth token? | 13:29 |
| xclaesse | mardy, I have to delete and re-create my google account like once a month | 13:29 |
| smb | rbasak, Did you succeed in getting infinity to give feedback on dpdk (and feedback from upstream about abi version 0)? | 13:29 |
| ginggs | tjaalton: yes, i saw your name in the changelog :) | 13:30 |
| mardy | xclaesse: well, I'd say it's unexpected, google gives us a refresh token which AFAIK has long validity time | 13:32 |
| mardy | xclaesse: do you happen to have "signond" lines in your syslog? | 13:32 |
| xclaesse | mardy, hm, empathy can't connect neither... wondering if the problem is that uoa never actually give the token to the app | 13:33 |
| xclaesse | a quick look at gabble logs and it seems to never receive a token to try connecting | 13:34 |
| xclaesse | Sep 17 09:28:07 xclaesse-X230 signond[1715]: QObject::disconnect: Unexpected null parameter | 13:37 |
| xclaesse | mardy, ^ | 13:37 |
| mardy | xclaesse: try this: echo "LoggingLevel=2" > ~/.config/signond.conf | 13:40 |
| mardy | xclaesse: then delete the account and re-create it | 13:41 |
| mardy | xclaesse: (kill signond, if it's running) | 13:41 |
| mardy | xclaesse: and paste the syslog somewhere, but obscure the AccessToken and RefreshToken | 13:41 |
| xclaesse | mardy, restarted my session and now it works | 13:46 |
| xclaesse | mardy, with empathy-auth-client logs, I can confirm that what's going on is that UOA doesn't give the token | 13:47 |
| xclaesse | signond probably deadlocked or something | 13:47 |
| xclaesse | I have no idea how to reproduce, it just happens randomly like once a month | 13:48 |
| mardy | xclaesse: what's the lifetime of the AccessToken (ExpiresIn field)? | 13:49 |
| mardy | xclaesse: also, did you get a RefreshToken, or is that empty? | 13:49 |
| xclaesse | oh I see that: | 13:50 |
| xclaesse | Sep 17 09:43:14 xclaesse-X230 signond[1715]: message repeated 2 times: [ ../../../../src/signond/signonsessioncore.cpp 369 startProcess Error occurred while getting data from credentials database.] | 13:50 |
| xclaesse | Sep 17 09:43:14 xclaesse-X230 signond[1715]: Challenge produces CRASH! | 13:50 |
| xclaesse | mardy, I see no mention to AccessToken in syslog | 13:52 |
| xclaesse | great now spamassassin is going to take 100% CPU for hours while evolution re-fetch all my emails | 13:53 |
| mardy | xclaesse: weird, never saw that. Could you please paste the full logs somewhere? | 13:53 |
| Odd_Bloke | infinity: cjwatson: So we take the ext4 filesystem that live-build creates, and we create tarballs etc. from it. One thing we need is a disk image with a single partition that is the ext4 filesystem. I've tried using kpartx (which is what we currently do), but things weren't appearing in /dev/mapper. | 14:28 |
| Odd_Bloke | infinity: cjwatson: I've been trying to replicate lb_binary_hdd but been running in to all sorts of problems using live-build's losetup stuff. | 14:28 |
| Odd_Bloke | Do you have any thoughts as to the best way of achieving this, or why kpartx might not be putting stuff in /dev/mapper? | 14:28 |
| Odd_Bloke | It's particularly weird that it isn't happening because it _reports_ stuff has been mapped, it just isn't there. | 14:30 |
| cjwatson | Odd_Bloke: Is this in a Launchpad build context? The whole thing runs in a chroot, I don't know if that matters | 14:39 |
| Odd_Bloke | cjwatson: It is in a LP build context, yeah. | 14:41 |
| cjwatson | Odd_Bloke: If you give me an existing build then I can possibly feed it to my local setup and see if I can reproduce it there (though it will likely be tomorrow at this point rather than today) | 14:42 |
| cjwatson | Odd_Bloke: unrelatedly, do you know anyone who could get https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/charms/trusty/ubuntu-repository-cache/inline-release/+merge/271107 merged for me? | 14:42 |
| Odd_Bloke | cjwatson: Sure, I'll feed one using kpartx through (I'm going to try a `udevadm settle` as well, to see if that changes anything) and point you at it. | 14:43 |
| Odd_Bloke | cjwatson: Someone in ~charmers needs to pull the trigger; I'm bugging them about another merge ATM so I'll bug about both at the same time. :) | 14:43 |
| cjwatson | thanks :) | 14:43 |
| cjwatson | udevadm settle might not hurt indeed, I'm not sure if losetup et al make sure to wait for async rules | 14:44 |
| Laney | @pilot out | 15:10 |
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: feature freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-vivid | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: | ||
| seb128 | Laney, good piloting round, nice to see some of the changes reviewed/uploaded ;-) | 15:11 |
| dpm | seb128, sorry, I was in calls/preparing for calls yesterday. You cannot delete templates in LP, the invalid templates can be "moved out of the way", but it is a bit cumbersome | 15:50 |
| * dpm looks for the documentation on doing that | 15:50 | |
| tdaitx | slangasek, should I: 1) add linux-libc-dev and libc6-dev to the bug I have open for squid3 FTBFS, 2) create new bug and add both packages to it, or 3) create a new bug for each? | 15:54 |
| rbasak | infinity: ping | 15:58 |
| dpm | seb128, it's under "Moving templates out of the way" -> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuTranslationsCoordinators/Actions/LpTemplateAdministration | 16:00 |
| seb128 | dpm, thanks, can you do that for me? ;-) I close the tabs since and I think I workarounded it by renaming templates | 16:02 |
| dpm | seb128, sure. I might have to leave it until tomorrow morning, but happy to | 16:03 |
| seb128 | dpm, thanks | 16:03 |
| infinity | tdaitx: New tasks on the same bug is fine. I have a 2.22 building in one of my PPAs right now, do you have reason to believe it's fixed upstream? | 16:03 |
| infinity | tdaitx: PS: bug number? | 16:03 |
| infinity | rbasak: *grunt* | 16:03 |
| tdaitx | infinity, I have seem some updates to netinet/in.h in glibc, but it is not clear if it is fixed, I did build glibc 2.22 yesterday but I couldn't get the ppa to use it for the squid3 build (didn't look much into it) | 16:04 |
| tdaitx | infinity, I believe I would need to bootstrap and rebuild a lot of stuff to get it to use a new glibc, right? | 16:06 |
| infinity | tdaitx: Just having glibc in a PPA and then building squid in same PPA will do the trick. I can just copy squid3 into mine when glibc is done. | 16:07 |
| tdaitx | infinity, weird, that didn't work for me, I wonder why... | 16:07 |
| infinity | tdaitx: Which PPA? | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | infinity, https://launchpad.net/~tdaitx/+archive/ubuntu/testing | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | infinity, for some reason squid3 build still fetches 2.21 instead of 2.22 | 16:09 |
| infinity | tdaitx: You probably just jumped the gun, retrying those builds. :P | 16:09 |
| rbasak | infinity: otp atm, but mumble when I'm done please? Within half an hour I imagine. | 16:09 |
| rbasak | (about dpdk as you can probably guess) | 16:09 |
| infinity | rbasak: I have an interview in 50m, if we can clear up your call before then, sure. | 16:09 |
| rbasak | infinity: OK, thanks. | 16:09 |
| rbasak | Almost done here I thin. | 16:10 |
| rbasak | think | 16:10 |
| tdaitx | infinity, well, I did wait for the glibc build to be done and retried later... how much time should I wait usually? | 16:10 |
| cjwatson | tdaitx: until the +packages page for that archive shows a green tick beside glibc; usually order of 10-15 minutes | 16:11 |
| cjwatson | there's a publication step in there which takes a while because there are a gazillion PPAs | 16:12 |
| tdaitx | cjwatson, hmm, ok, I _think_ the green tick was there, but I am not sure... if the build succeeds I will have my answer | 16:13 |
| infinity | Well, even if it fails, you'll have your answer in the logs about which libc6-dev it used. :P | 16:13 |
| tdaitx | heh, sure, my bad, that's what I meant =) | 16:15 |
| tdaitx | I was being over optimistic... | 16:15 |
| infinity | Erm. Wat. | 16:17 |
| infinity | Yeah, it didn't upgrade. I wonder what voodoo is at work here. | 16:17 |
| tdaitx | yeah, yesterday I assumed it was because whatever dependency is fetching libc6-dev is asking for a specific version of it and then I would need to rebuild from scratch with the new glibc | 16:18 |
| tdaitx | but as I said I didn't look much into that | 16:19 |
| infinity | Oh, or you just didn't update the package correctly. ;) | 16:20 |
| infinity | Mine will work. | 16:20 |
| infinity | You created a libc6 that's uninstallible. | 16:20 |
| infinity | (Though, in general, good job on the patch rebasing and such) | 16:20 |
| tdaitx | hmm, that bad uh? | 16:20 |
| tdaitx | =) | 16:20 |
| tdaitx | infinity, where did I go wrong? | 16:21 |
| tdaitx | I mean on the glibc, not in general =P | 16:21 |
| infinity | Oh, wait, mine won't work because it's intentionally FTBFS. Perhaps I should fix that. | 16:21 |
| infinity | tdaitx: At the very least, you didn't upate symbols.wildcards, and hilariously managed to create a libc6_2.22 that depends on libc6 (<< 2.22) | 16:22 |
| tdaitx | ouch | 16:23 |
| infinity | Although, now I'm monumentally puzzled as to why your build passes the elf/tst-protected1* tests and mine doesn't. Whee. | 16:24 |
| infinity | Oh, I wonder if I "fixed" that in an Ubuntu-specific patch, and my build is pure Debian. | 16:25 |
| * infinity will quickly merge all that and test again. | 16:25 | |
| infinity | (massive jazz hands flailing around "fixed") | 16:26 |
| rbasak | infinity: done. Still avialable? | 16:26 |
| infinity | rbasak: Give me 3m, and I'll meet you on teh mumblez. | 16:26 |
| rbasak | ack | 16:27 |
| infinity | tdaitx: Toss that squid/glibc bug at me and I'll investigate when my 2.22 is done and fix it upstream if it's not fixed. | 16:29 |
| tdaitx | infinity, LP: #1496223 | 16:30 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1496223 in squid3 (Ubuntu) "squid3 FTBFS due to linux-libc-dev and libc6-dev headers mismatch" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1496223 | 16:30 |
| infinity | tdaitx: . | 16:30 |
| infinity | Ta... | 16:30 |
| rbasak | infinity: https://launchpad.net/~smb/+archive/ubuntu/dpdk/+packages | 16:36 |
| infinity | 0x000000000000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libdpdk.so.0] | 16:37 |
| tdaitx | infinity, grab this patch for squid3: LP: #1496924 (will fix the build-dep and the error on warning during the build) | 16:43 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1496924 in squid3 (Ubuntu) "squid3 FTBFS due to bad libecap3 dependency and logical-not-parentheses warning" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1496924 | 16:43 |
| rbasak | infinity: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FunctionMultiVersioning | 16:44 |
| slangasek | tdaitx: to answer your earlier question, it's all a single bug so multiple bug tasks for the related packages is preferred | 16:46 |
| slangasek | tdaitx: (but not worth fussing over) | 16:46 |
| tdaitx | slangasek, I have moved the current patch to LP: #1496924, with that fix applied the build fails due to header mismatch LP: #1496223 | 16:49 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1496924 in squid3 (Ubuntu) "squid3 FTBFS due to bad libecap3 dependency and logical-not-parentheses warning" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1496924 | 16:49 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1496223 in squid3 (Ubuntu) "squid3 FTBFS due to linux-libc-dev and libc6-dev headers mismatch" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1496223 | 16:49 |
| === timrc_ is now known as timrc | ||
| Odd_Bloke | cjwatson: That charm merge has happened (as you will no doubt be aware once you check your email :p) and I'm building a package which should produce a build which you can play with. | 17:30 |
| === gammax90 is now known as gammax | ||
| tkamppeter | hi, I have a problem with bug 1449875. I could fix it by adding a dependency to Ghostscript but the new dependency recommends tons of unneeded packages. Do all these get installed then, too? | 17:46 |
| ubottu | bug 1449875 in ghostscript (Ubuntu) "ghostscript fails on some EPS files" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1449875 | 17:46 |
| Odd_Bloke | cjwatson: Right, got that build: https://launchpad.net/~daniel-thewatkins/+livefs/ubuntu/wily/cpc/+build/38142 | 17:58 |
| Odd_Bloke | cjwatson: The problem is where we echo "/dev/mapper/loop0p1 is not a block device"; we would expect that to be a block device. I have taken out the 'udevadm settle', because it didn't make any difference. | 17:59 |
| bdmurray | dannf: Could you add some SRU info to bug 1472650? | 18:00 |
| ubottu | bug 1472650 in gccgo-5 (Ubuntu Vivid) "[arm64] gccgo runtime crashes with CONFIG_ARM64_PGTABLE_LEVELS=4" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1472650 | 18:00 |
| dannf | bdmurray: oh, sure - my bad | 18:00 |
| dannf | bdmurray: done | 19:05 |
| tdaitx | infinity, what ppa are you building glibc 2.22? I would like to check the diff to see exactly what I missed | 19:14 |
| infinity | tdaitx: You could check the commit on the tip of http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-glibc/glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.22/ | 19:19 |
| infinity | tdaitx: Though, while it's interestingly educational, it might be a slight waste of time having two people do the same thing in paralle. ;) | 19:20 |
| tdaitx | infinity, don't worry, it is educational for me, I'm not going to work on that =) | 19:20 |
| tdaitx | I only did it yesterday because I wanted to check if it would solve the ftbfs, I was not willing to waste too many hours on it anyway (that why I didn't look too deep into why squid was not fetching the update I created) | 19:21 |
| infinity | tdaitx: There would have been a lot of places where you missed 's/2.21/2.22/' since we only just fixed that in Debian to mostly use GLIBC_VERSION and substitute all over. | 19:24 |
| infinity | tdaitx: And then a few places that still have to be handled manually, which you'll see in that commit. | 19:24 |
| dobey | does anyone know of a way to process debian/copyright files in a meaningful way, to only be shown the copyright/license info relevant to the actual libfoo.so binaries in packages, rather than having to manually correlate binaries to source code paths? | 19:54 |
| slangasek | it used to be that there was a place on the desktop where one could adjust font preferences (basically, fontconfig settings). I can't seem to find that in unity anymore; does anyone know if this still exists somewhere in the UI? (Debian bug #798805) | 21:29 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 798805 in libfreetype6 "libfreetype6 2.6-1 makes Cantarell blurry (CFF?)" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/798805 | 21:29 |
| hallyn | pitti: hey, just noticed that systemd in debian sid doesn't work in containers. the previous version (same as in wily) does work. assuem it's a regression in journald | 21:54 |
| hallyn | ("regressioN" from lxc pov anyway) | 21:54 |
| hallyn | haven't looked at debdiff | 21:54 |
| dobey | slangasek: i think it went away when gnome got rid of it upstream, a long while ago. the settings can be tweaked in dconf-editor though (i know, not a good UI for that). maybe ubuntu-tweak or one of those things has some UI for it | 22:08 |
| slangasek | dobey: right, turns out unity-tweak-tool does it | 22:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!