[02:30] <trippeh> I'm having some crashes with vanilla 4.2(.1-rc) as well, but havent taken the time to capture any eventual kernel output
[02:59] <apw> jtaylor, a new bug ... with the crashes if you can get them ... we have one patch we are tracking which might cause network related crashes
[03:02] <trippeh> apw: got a link? my crashing machine is a router.
[03:02] <trippeh> looked briefly in netdev but didnt find anything
[03:06] <apw> trippeh, this issue wouldn't affect 4.2 as far as i know ...
[03:06] <apw> jtaylor, LP #1497184
[03:06] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1497184 in linux (Ubuntu Vivid) "Kernel-panic with 3.13.0-64.104 generic kernel (BUG at net/core/skbuff:1290)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1497184
[03:07] <trippeh> oh, ok
[03:07] <trippeh> I dont even have kernel output yet so who knows ;)
[03:08] <apw> trippeh, it was in 4.1* but is in 4.2-rc7 and later
[03:09] <apw> (thats not at all clear, the fix was in 4.2-rc7 and later, before that 4.1 etc was affected)
[03:09] <trippeh> yeah probably not related then
[03:11] <apw> trippeh, get a stack if you can and get it reported in a bug
[03:18] <trippeh> was just a shot in the dark :) have to dig up some hw for a serial console methinks
[05:26] <UNIm95> apw: henrix I got panic again. As predicted it was while router updated my IP address. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1497184/comments/5
[05:26] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1497184 in linux (Ubuntu Vivid) "Kernel-panic with 3.13.0-64.104 generic kernel (BUG at net/core/skbuff:1290)" [High,Confirmed]
[08:11] <apw> UNIm95, was that with the original kernel or with the test kernel from henrix ?
[08:11] <UNIm95> apw it was with original kernel
[08:12] <apw> UNIm95, ok great, i assume you will switch over to the test kernel now
[08:12] <apw> ?
[08:12] <apw> (and can you indicate that that comment relates to the old kernel in the bug, esle its position with the request to test feels like the fix was tested)
[08:12] <UNIm95> apw yes. I waited till some one you, or henrix came here
[08:14] <UNIm95> apw:  but i haven't build test network with dhcp renewal of some minutes. 
[08:20] <UNIm951> apw:  Damn.  My router has minimum lease time 60 min =(
[08:21] <UNIm951> apw: do you know how we can simulate short lease time?
=== UNIm951 is now known as UNIm95
[08:25] <TJ-> UNIm95: via dhclient config
[08:25] <UNIm95> TJ-: can network-manger do this? i dont want to kill nm.
[08:26] <UNIm95> and then restore it
[08:28] <TJ-> UNIm95: NM runs a 'private' instance of dhclient. It might be possible to configure a predefined/override for te lease 'expire'
[08:35] <UNIm95> TJ-: Ok. i hope changes that i made are right. 
[08:35] <UNIm95> apw Now I going to install  henrix kernel and test it
[08:49] <jtaylor> apw: looks like my issue, I get stacktraces from skb stuff
[08:58] <UNIm95> apw:  henrix Now i with henrix kernel. 
[09:19] <UNIm95> henrix:  Is it ok that internet now works very slov?
[09:19] <UNIm95> slow*
[09:19] <UNIm95> henrix:  with your suggested kernel?
[09:49] <UNIm95> apw: First dhcp renewal. All works
[15:03] <apw> UNIm95, that is encouraging, we have others testing this kernle too
[16:48] <UNIm95> apw all ok. router has mistake in config. internet works ok
[18:41] <apw> UNIm95, thanks for the update
[18:42] <UNIm95> apw Pls. Uptime 9:47. No bugs.
[18:42] <apw> UNIm95, nice ... let us know tommorow where you are at, if no issues i think we have things identified
[18:43] <UNIm95> apw: Ok. But from  Friday till Saturday  a had only one pamic
[18:43] <UNIm95> So i think we must wait
[18:47] <apw> UNIm95, yep, we hope but not cirtainty indeed
[18:48] <UNIm95> apw this patch will came with *-64-105 or *-65?
[18:50] <apw> UNIm95, though it is not my direct decision, I would expect us to respin to just add that single patch
[18:50] <UNIm95> apw:  Thanks.