=== nudtrobert1 is now known as nudtrobert === tsdgeos_ is now known as tsdgeos === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === nudtrobert1 is now known as nudtrobert === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [16:24] balloons: just a thought here - we've picked up autologin bugs - none of the install tests use autologin - so tracker would normally miss these. Should there be an 'install with autologin' test do you think? [16:35] flocculant, in theory we should have coverage for every combination. In practice, I wonder how many tests that would be, heh. I usually test using autologin at some point. It's an interesting discussion to have [16:36] Ideally, I'd like to find a way to make the tests themselves a bit easier to do; especially when you are talking about redoing the same test with only minor option changes [16:36] well [16:36] in other words, I'm not quick to want another testcase we have to admin and run [16:37] yea - I can understand that for sure [16:37] also - do we want people to autologin :) [16:37] could always make it optional [16:40] personally it's not something I'd be too worried about, but given that it's come up - just as we B2 - thought I should at least mention it [16:41] balloons: just so you're aware of what's gone on - wily - autologin fails (but waiting fix release) vivid with autologin working fails on upgrade to wily [16:42] * balloons should reboot and see if autologin is working [16:47] balloons should let me know how that goes :p [18:15] erm, what is this o_O [18:15] WARNING **: Could not open X display [18:15] Maximum number of clients reachedgdk_mir_display_open [19:55] ugh how does this happen [19:59] um someone added a testcase for unencrypted home for lubuntu's alternates but it seems to be a copy of the encrypted one! wtf! https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/revision/313 [19:59] i can't believe i would have let that through [20:09] just remove the file and push a new revision if it's not on the tracker yet [20:10] it is [20:15] if anyone does that - there's a pending merge from me kicking around [20:16] or I can mp that as well - got the branch here atm [20:36] alright.. nano segfaults for me now [20:36] and pidgin... but someone else has already reported the nano segfault as a bug [20:37] does nano work for anyone else? [20:37] and now it works.. /me runs away [20:38] gQuigs: were you trying to run like nano and then a file that did not exist [20:51] I was trying to open configure.ac in the libreoffice source code, not sure if that's what I actally did or not [21:29] balloons, I'd like to file some test results for "Upgrade Ubuntu Mate" but can't. [21:29] balloons, Can you tweak my access? [21:29] flexiondotorg, what are you hitting? [21:30] balloons, There are no test cases for "Upgrade Ubuntu Mate" [21:30] And I've found a bug and posted a bug with fix attached :-) [21:34] flexiondotorg, you have permissions now for the upgrade tests [21:34] I'll let you add them as desired [21:34] balloons, How do I added them? [21:38] flexiondotorg, I added the tests. You should be able to link testsuites to the upgrade products, just like the ubuntu mate product [21:39] did you not setup ubuntu mate originally? [22:05] balloons, No, I didn't setup Ubuntu MATE. elfy did it. [22:05] flexiondotorg, ahh. Go into the admin section and you should see how it works