=== zz_CyberJacob is now known as CyberJacob === CyberJacob is now known as zz_CyberJacob === zz_CyberJacob is now known as CyberJacob === CyberJacob is now known as zz_CyberJacob === gabor_meszaros_ is now known as gmeszaros === gmeszaros is now known as gabor_meszaros === gabor_meszaros is now known as gmeszaros === gmeszaros is now known as gabor_meszaros === gabor_meszaros is now known as gmeszaros === gmeszaros is now known as gabor_meszaros === gabor_meszaros is now known as gmeszaros === gmeszaros is now known as gabor_meszaros === gabor_meszaros is now known as gmeszaros [08:48] gnuoy, https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/charm-helpers/keystone-v3-support/+merge/272355 [08:52] gnuoy, http://www.florentflament.com/blog/setting-keystone-v3-domains.html [10:09] mgz: hey ... could we rung "chicago-cubs" branch against CI please? last run was 2 days ago and it's been there from 9/11 ... now, hm, that date might be a sign by its own :) [10:09] s/rung/run [10:10] urulama: sure [10:10] mgz: ty [10:10] master is being tested at present, I can make cubs happen next [10:11] mgz: np === psivaa is now known as psivaa-afk === psivaa-afk is now known as psivaa === psivaa is now known as psivaa-lunch === psivaa-lunch is now known as psivaa === scuttlemonkey is now known as scuttle|afk [15:16] jamespage, updated n-g tests ready for review/landing @ https://code.launchpad.net/~1chb1n/charms/trusty/neutron-gateway/amulet-update-1508/+merge/271960 plz & thx! [15:54] jamespage, fyi n-ovs tests complete @ https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/charms/trusty/neutron-openvswitch/dkms-12.04/+merge/272390 [16:13] beisner: whats up man!? Any thoughts on the new MR? --> https://code.launchpad.net/~jamesbeedy/charms/trusty/nova-compute/next/+merge/272431 [16:14] hey bdx ! just wrapping up, going eow soon. there are functional tests that are automatically queued up to run and report back with any breakage. once we have lint + unit + amulet results passing, we can turn a human reviewer to it. [16:15] bdx, thanks for retargeting that mp [16:15] sweet. totally. thanks for the heads up! [16:32] np sir! o/ nice weekend, all [16:32] cheers beisner, enjoy your weekend [16:33] ditto lazypower ! [16:33] make sure you feed osci some snacks before you go :D [16:33] !oscisnack [16:35] ha! i've joked before that it sounds like someone's little puppy name. but it's eating everyone's lunch already, and has an unhealthy appetite. #thatqueue [16:35] down, osci, down. [16:35] \o [16:36] * lazypower plays rimshot.wav [17:50] service A has 2 units.. when i add a relation between A and B, which private-address does B see? is it the lowest unit num for A? [17:55] kwmonroe: both private addresses [17:55] kwmonroe: you get a relation-joined on B for each unit of A [17:56] oh - neat! thx marcoceppi [17:56] realtions are per service, but events are modeled per unit [19:15] may I just say [19:15] watch juju status --format=tabular [19:15] is awesome! [19:15] espeicially when the charms have status [19:16] thank you big data folks [19:19] you are welcome arosales [19:20] asanjar, :-) [19:20] asanjar, I'll see you next week [19:21] arosales: definitely .. [19:22] asanjar, excellent. Looking forward to some interesting spark solutions [19:23] how about some sparkling solution === zz_CyberJacob is now known as CyberJacob [21:35] i'm a bit confused how the charm subordinate works [21:36] i declared my charm to be a subordinate of ceph and it says when i add relation that none exists [21:46] i think i got it but i'm not sure it's right [21:51] cholcombe: you need to have an interface and scope defined for the subordinate relation [21:51] is that defined in the super charm or the subordinate? [21:52] cholcombe: subordinate [21:52] ok [21:52] as an example [21:52] is it always a container scope? [21:52] yes [21:52] so it doesn't matter if it's bare metal, vm, etc. [21:53] cholcombe: scope: container is just a thing that made sense when juju was created before the concept of containers was popular [21:53] scope: unit might be a better name for this now [21:53] yeah i agree [21:53] * marcoceppi files bug [21:53] haha [21:55] marcoceppi, if my hook fails to install when i add the subordinate relation can i still do the upgrade force+retry bit to try again? [21:55] cholcombe: I don't see why not [21:56] i think juju is confused then [21:56] upgrade works but retry fails saying it's not in an error state [21:56] cholcombe: what are you retrying? the subordinate or the primary? [21:56] the primary [21:57] cholcombe: what's in error? the subordiante or the primary? [21:57] the primary is saying hook failed 'install' [21:57] so i tried to attach a subordinate to ceph and the install hook failed [21:57] huh, could you pastebin your juju status output and the commands you're running? [21:57] now i'm stuck. i could trash it but reinstalling ceph is quite slow [21:57] yup [21:58] marcoceppi, https://pastebin.canonical.com/140643/ [21:59] cholcombe: ceph-cephdash isn't in error, ceph-metrics-collector/0 is, run resolved --retry on it [22:00] cholcombe: if you run `juju status --format=tabular` it's easier to consume the output [22:00] ah there we go :) [22:00] marcoceppi, thanks :) [22:01] happy friday dude [22:01] cholcombe: cheers, np! === CyberJacob is now known as zz_CyberJacob