[07:29] <Nairwolf> Hi, I would like to give my help to test Xubuntu before the release of xubuntu 15.10
[07:29] <Nairwolf> Apparently, it's better today to install the latest daily version, right ? 
[07:30] <Nairwolf> If I choose to continue with this daily version, will I have updates ? 
[07:30] <flocculant> Nairwolf: if you install with a daily (or the last if you do so today) then just update it as you would anything 
[07:31] <flocculant> you'll always be current 
[07:31] <Nairwolf> And, do you know how I could do to still have my software installed in my last distribution ? Can I take my software installed from dpkg and install them again on 15.10 ? 
[07:31] <flocculant> if they're available no reason why not 
[07:32] <flocculant> there is a command you can run to grab what you've got currently and then use to reinstall 
[07:32] <flocculant> I'd love to help - but just off to work now 
[07:34] <Nairwolf> okay, I'll search by myself
[14:30] <dkessel> my own support question coming up in #xubuntu :)
[14:32] <dkessel> i wonder if that problem affects other trusty users as well... she doesn't have a too customized install...
[14:33] <dkessel> too bad i cannot even create a screenshot because of the problem
[14:33] <flocculant> this is ringing a bell - not very clearly though - just at the edge of hearing ... 
[14:35] <dkessel> taking an old fashioned camera screenshot
[14:36] <dkessel> i guess some package upgrade might have gone wrong
[14:43] <flocculant> I'm convinced I've seen this before 
[14:57] <flocculant> and seeing that screenie - proved I'd seen it before - but still couldn't find anything :)
[15:09] <dkessel> mhh let's see if !vnc does anything...
[15:10] <dkessel> nope
[18:26] <flocculant> knome: can you not do anything at all with the QA page on site without letting me know please :)
[19:12] <pleia2> publisher flyers post http://xubuntu.org/news/printable-shareable-xubuntu-flyers/
[19:12] <pleia2> social media-ing now
[19:15] <pleia2> except facebook, which is being all wounded platypus
[19:22] <knome> flocculant, huh?
[19:24] <knome> pleia2, huzzah
[19:24] <pleia2> I'll have another Xubuntu At... article up for review in a few days
[19:24] <knome> oh cool
[19:24] <knome> i'm still waiting mine
[19:24] <pleia2> but my work/life is eating me, so /o\
[19:24] <knome> >__<
[19:25] <pleia2> yeah, I still have questions out for another
[19:25] <knome> mhm
[19:25] <pleia2> but I'll wait until November to publish another
[19:25] <knome> yep
[19:25] <knome> we could set up a schedule
[19:25] <flocculant> knome: I'm doing some work with it locally - don't want to live one to change :)
[19:25] <knome> flocculant, oh - righto - won't
[19:25] <flocculant> :)
[19:25]  * Unit193 pokes the QA page.
[19:26]  * flocculant pokes the Unit193 
[19:27] <flocculant> having bunches of fun with nesting lists ... 
[19:27] <knome> flocculant, if you need formatting help, don't hesitate to ask for help
[19:28] <flocculant> yep I will - but trying not to ask :D
[19:28] <flocculant> learning stuff bit by bit 
[19:32] <knome> :)
[21:10] <flocculant> knome: you has mail 
[21:10] <knome> ooh!
[21:10]  * knome checks
[21:10]  * flocculant has headache 
[21:11] <knome> haha
[21:12] <knome> flocculant, we might want to mention that images == ISOs
[21:12] <knome> i mean, in a clearer way
[21:12] <knome> or just talk about the other at all times
[21:12] <flocculant> yea was thinking about that while I was writing 
[21:12] <knome> might be that it was like this in my previous draft, but kind of popped up now
[21:13] <flocculant> I'll probably change image to iso everywhere 
[21:13] <knome> usre
[21:13] <knome> sure too
[21:13] <flocculant> as most other places in *buntu talk of iso
[21:13] <knome> yep
[21:15] <flocculant> mmm
[21:15] <knome> i'm doing some small changes
[21:15] <knome> i'll reply to you with the modded file
[21:15] <knome> like fixing some links to cleaner forms
[21:15] <knome> and i found a strong tag with no content
[21:15] <flocculant> apart from testcases on the trackers - which call them images :|
[21:15] <knome> haha
[21:15] <knome> maybe file a bug against them ;)
[21:16] <flocculant> noooooooooooooooooooooooooo 
[21:16] <knome> D:
[21:17] <flocculant> knome: why some tags em and some strong? 
[21:17] <flocculant> oh nvm 
[21:17] <knome> haha
[21:17] <knome> yeah, em is italic, strong is bold
[21:17] <flocculant> yea 
[21:17] <knome> ok, replied
[21:17] <knome> feel free to run a diff
[21:17] <knome> but i basically only did what i mentioned
[21:17] <flocculant> remembered aas soon as I hit enter ... 
[21:18] <knome> and s/Isos/ISOs/ in one place
[21:18] <knome> some really small things really
[21:18] <knome> good work
[21:18] <flocculant> thanks
[21:19] <knome> and yeah, as you can imagine by the time it took me to reply to that - the content review was super fast only
[21:19] <flocculant> heh 
[21:20] <flocculant> it was mostly just making sure syntax was right - I want to review it in a day or so anyway
[21:20] <knome> yep
[21:20] <knome> that's also why only super fast review for content only
[21:20] <knome> -only
[21:21] <flocculant> apart from anything I got to filing and stopped - want to check that's what I want yet 
[21:21] <knome> mhm
[21:22] <flocculant> pretty sure it is - but words 
[21:22] <knome> words are words
[21:22] <flocculant> yep - and lot of words is that :D
[21:29] <flocculant> ok cheers for those small changes :)
[21:29] <knome> np
[21:30] <flocculant> now that I've seen the tracker calling them images - and that's where we're sending people - probably better if our page matches that - we can note they're the same thing
[21:30] <knome> yep
[21:30] <flocculant> anyway - another day for that :)
[21:30] <knome> yep
[21:33] <knome> ok, look at the status tracker frontpage
[21:34] <flocculant> added this reworking to bp 
[21:34] <knome> :)
[21:35] <flocculant> ok looking - what am I missing that you;ve done? 
[21:35] <knome> the titles are links?
[21:35] <flocculant> oh yea - I thought they were yesterday? 
[21:36] <knome> nope:D
[21:36] <knome> did that change literally minutes ago
[21:37] <flocculant> I got Spec Actions Progress
[21:37] <knome> yeah...
[21:37] <knome> the specification text
[21:37] <knome> is a link...
[21:37] <knome> it wasn't until a while ago
[21:37] <knome> eg. you can click on the QA spec title
[21:37] <knome> to get to the qa spec work items
[21:37] <flocculant> aah - I guess I was mid change :)
[21:38] <knome> :)
[21:38] <flocculant> that looks better than it did just a moment ago :)
[21:38] <knome> hehe
[21:38] <flocculant> suggest you lose Whiteboard 
[21:39] <flocculant> I still miss what I miss though 
[21:39] <knome> i should just make it work
[21:39] <flocculant> or that :D
[21:39] <knome> because it's clearly useful
[21:40] <knome> and it's saved in the database
[21:40] <flocculant> right
[21:44] <knome> done
[21:44] <flocculant> well - time for me to crash - night knome and lurkers
[21:45] <flocculant> oh - well I'll look first :)
[21:45] <knome> nighty flocculant 
[21:46] <flocculant> knome: looks the same to me Edit works, whiteboard links to http://tracker.xubuntu.org/#
[21:46] <knome> do a hard refresh
[21:46] <flocculant> I did 
[21:46] <knome> ctrl+shift+r in firefox
[21:46] <knome> are you sure you have js enabled? :P
[21:47] <knome> the link target *is* totally #
[21:47] <knome> but it still does magic
[21:47] <flocculant> not a clue - everything else works 
[21:47]  * knome shrugs
[21:47] <knome> it'll likely work for you when you'll least expect
[21:47] <flocculant> ohhh
[21:48] <knome> or are we missing elliptical circles again?
[21:48] <flocculant> like then - was expecting to middle click and it open in new tab at b/p whiteboard :)
[21:48] <knome> aha
[21:48] <knome> nope
[21:49] <flocculant> ok - so now - night all :)
[21:49] <flocculant> thanks knome :)
[21:49] <knome> yw
[21:49] <knome> good night