[00:57] is _denis_ a known trouble maker? [00:57] seems to be up to trollworthy antics [01:15] oh well nm [09:58] i dont use c shell, its homework [09:58] can #ubuntu do my math and physics homework too? :) [14:28] knoten i can help you [14:28] seems up to no good [14:28] Hm [14:29] announcing he wants to be 'haxor' [16:48] what is best webmail that may support linux command line? [16:48] web cli? [16:49] you can use mutt with gmail [16:51] !best [16:51] what!! [16:55] I wonder if pine/alpine would work also [16:55] he wants no client at all [16:55] unix makes it easy! [16:56] genii: Yes. [16:56] Interesting [16:57] ( our telnet and ssh login systems use Pine for email) [16:58] gmail and famous webmail servies don't seem text base [16:58] he wants gmail-cli [16:59] Wouldn't any cli imap client work, not necessarily gmail-specific? [17:01] he wants the famous, but sure [17:31] i want to renew it [17:31] from cli [17:32] putting together the puzzle pieces 'hack google' is the output [17:45] * genii slides the old fart some coffee [18:22] Flong> Paul^^, EFI = No Trust [18:25] bazhang, nice [18:26] I don't trust the UEFI and reccomend not trusting it so I get banned. [18:26] Flong, take the fud elsewhere [18:26] How long until my ban is up. One month? [18:26] bazhang, not FUD, proven time after time [18:26] its not remotely welcome in support channels [18:26] I'll stop speaking it in #ubuntu [18:26] you are banned [18:26] bazhang, Discussing how to lock down your distro is. [18:27] so thats correct [18:27] I want to dispute my ban with an operator. [18:27] for spreading nonsense about uefi? [18:28] bazhang, many documents have proven it in the past. [18:28] That is not the point of me being in #ubuntu-ops however [18:28] I'm here to dispute my ban. If you would like me to talk to you about the OT subject feel free to PM me [18:29] no need [18:29] and the ban stays [18:29] How long? [18:29] no time limit determined [18:29] because differing views? [18:30] false info is not a 'differing view' [18:30] its simply false [18:30] bazhang, Again proven time after time. [18:30] Just because you disagree with a fact doesn't make it any less of a fact. [18:31] This discussion of UEFI has no place in #ubuntu regardless if it is true or not. [18:31] Pici, I will stop it then. [18:31] Either way my question belongs in #ubuntu-server more than #ubuntu [18:32] It's not a server related question though, it's more of a desktop related one [22:08] TJ- called the ops in #ubuntu (NANOOK) [22:09] Got it already [22:11] @comment 69366 Rant of Ubuntu "broke their computer", profanity. [22:11] Comment added. [22:15] Mildly amusing. [22:15] * Unit193 runs off to ##windows to see the second half. [22:51] daftykins called the ops in #ubuntu (black) [22:52] NANOOK ended up just resorting to spamming to get kbanned. [22:54] Spamming in ##windows ? [22:54] Aye. [22:55] We'll probably see them again. [22:55] I only removed, no +b [22:56] I imagine they'll find a proxy or such and return inside of a few days [23:09] lol [23:12] bekks called the ops in #ubuntu (Guest42772) [23:13] bekks can't take a joke man [23:13] @comment 69369 Abuse, profanity [23:13] Comment added. [23:14] wow this is how you log trolls [23:14] this is so exciting [23:15] what is beside my number [23:28] @comment 69370 Profanity [23:28] Comment added. [23:43] @comment 69372 Abusive PMs to other users [23:43] Comment added. [23:43] :( [23:43] that's mean [23:45] TJ- called the ops in #ubuntu (abuse from brandon_) [23:46] @comment 69374 Forced to +b [23:46] Comment added.