[00:57] <daftykins> is _denis_ a known trouble maker?
[00:57] <daftykins> seems to be up to trollworthy antics
[01:15] <daftykins> oh well nm
 i dont use c shell, its homework
[09:58] <k1l> can #ubuntu do my math and physics homework too? :)
 knoten i can help you
[14:28] <bazhang> seems up to no good
[14:28] <genii> Hm
[14:29] <bazhang> announcing he wants to be 'haxor'
 what is best webmail that may support linux command line?
[16:48] <bazhang> web cli?
[16:49] <Pici> you can use mutt with gmail
[16:51] <bazhang> !best
[16:51] <bazhang> what!!
[16:55] <genii> I wonder if pine/alpine would work also
[16:55] <bazhang> he wants no client at all
[16:55] <bazhang> unix makes it easy!
[16:56] <Unit193> genii: Yes.
[16:56] <genii> Interesting
[16:57] <genii> ( our telnet and ssh login systems use Pine for email)
 gmail and famous webmail servies don't seem text base
[16:58] <bazhang> he wants gmail-cli
[16:59] <tonyyarusso> Wouldn't any cli imap client work, not necessarily gmail-specific?
[17:01] <bazhang> he wants the famous, but sure
 i want to renew it
[17:31] <bazhang> from cli
[17:32] <bazhang> putting together the puzzle pieces 'hack google' is the output
[17:45]  * genii slides the old fart some coffee
[18:22] <bazhang> Flong> Paul^^, EFI = No Trust
[18:25] <Flong> bazhang, nice
[18:26] <Flong> I don't trust the UEFI and reccomend not trusting it so I get banned.
[18:26] <bazhang> Flong, take the fud elsewhere
[18:26] <Flong> How long until my ban is up. One month?
[18:26] <Flong> bazhang, not FUD, proven time after time
[18:26] <bazhang> its not remotely welcome in support channels
[18:26] <Flong> I'll stop speaking it in #ubuntu
[18:26] <bazhang> you are banned
[18:26] <Flong> bazhang, Discussing how to lock down your distro is.
[18:27] <bazhang> so thats correct
[18:27] <Flong> I want to dispute my ban with an operator.
[18:27] <bazhang> for spreading nonsense about uefi?
[18:28] <Flong> bazhang, many documents have proven it in the past.
[18:28] <Flong> That is not the point of me being in #ubuntu-ops however
[18:28] <Flong> I'm here to dispute my ban. If you would like me to talk to you about the OT subject feel free to PM me
[18:29] <bazhang> no need
[18:29] <bazhang> and the ban stays
[18:29] <Flong> How long?
[18:29] <bazhang> no time limit determined
[18:29] <Flong> because differing views?
[18:30] <bazhang> false info is not a 'differing view'
[18:30] <bazhang> its simply false
[18:30] <Flong> bazhang, Again proven time after time.
[18:30] <Flong> Just because you disagree with a fact doesn't make it any less of a fact.
[18:31] <Pici> This discussion of UEFI has no place in #ubuntu regardless if it is true or not.
[18:31] <Flong> Pici, I will stop it then.
[18:31] <Flong> Either way my question belongs in #ubuntu-server more than #ubuntu
[18:32] <Flong> It's not a server related question though, it's more of a desktop related one
[22:09] <genii> Got it already
[22:11] <genii> @comment 69366 Rant of Ubuntu "broke their computer", profanity.
[22:15] <Unit193> Mildly amusing.
[22:15]  * Unit193 runs off to ##windows to see the second half.
[22:52] <Unit193> NANOOK ended up just resorting to spamming to get kbanned.
[22:54] <genii> Spamming in ##windows ?
[22:54] <Unit193> Aye.
[22:55] <genii> We'll probably see them again.
[22:55] <genii> I only removed, no +b
[22:56] <genii> I imagine they'll find a proxy or such and return inside of a few days
[23:09] <PerfM> lol
[23:13] <PerfM> bekks can't take a joke man
[23:13] <genii> @comment 69369 Abuse, profanity
[23:14] <PerfM> wow this is how you log trolls
[23:14] <PerfM> this is so exciting
[23:15] <PerfM> what is beside my number
[23:28] <genii> @comment 69370 Profanity
[23:43] <genii> @comment 69372 Abusive PMs to other users
[23:43] <PerfM> :(
[23:43] <PerfM> that's mean
[23:46] <genii> @comment 69374 Forced to +b