[01:49] <robert_ancell_> duflu, did you see the resizing issues that Chris and bregma have been getting?
[01:50] <duflu> robert_ancell_: I know there are still resizing bugs and it's a bit hackish. But I'm not aware of the conversation in question
[01:51] <duflu> robert_ancell_: Oh I see. Yes I know what that is
[01:52] <robert_ancell_> duflu, bug 1501039
[01:52] <ubot5`> bug 1501039 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) "Xmir from overlay PPA no longer tells client about resize events in non-rootless" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1501039
[01:53] <duflu> robert_ancell_: Yeah I half expected that. Although non-rootless is almost dead I know what it is
[01:53] <robert_ancell_> Non-rootless should not be dead...
[03:21] <duflu> Woo, Mir 0.16 in vivid+overlay too
[08:39] <duflu> anpok_: Do we ever bypass android InputReceiver?
[09:14] <anpok_> duflu: not soon
[09:15] <anpok_> hm i think replacing it isnt complex at all... apart from the ugly resampling bits
[09:16] <anpok_> i try to remove the input reading bits today
[09:16] <anpok_> I still havent looked how good or bad the actual encoding is.. but the times that we measure dont look problematic..
[09:19] <duflu> anpok_: I'd love to be rid of the resampling bits but even today finding they're very beneficial
[09:20] <anpok_> well i meant replacing them with something easier to consume
[09:41] <tsdgeos> alan_g: so it's nullptr what mir expects there?
[09:41] <tsdgeos> makes much more sense :D
[09:44] <alan_g> tsdgeos: '0' like 0 and nullptr is a null pointer constant
[09:44] <alan_g> But the code was confusing
[09:44] <tsdgeos> agreed, i wasn't thinking and just did a "let's fix the code to compile"
[10:08] <alan_g> duflu: did you get a chance to try lp:~alan-griffiths/mir/fix-1308133 with your xmir WIP?
[10:09] <duflu> alan_g: No, sorry. Thought about it then forgot
[10:09] <duflu> And was busy anyway
[10:12] <alan_g> np