[00:06] <ali12341> i think a lot of people may not have noticed the flyer is two pages, because all the serious problems i found are on page 2!
[00:21] <ali12341> https://bugs.launchpad.net/xubuntu-marketing/+bug/1501113
[03:23] <Unit193> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tumbler/+bug/1168558 I believe I see this a decent amount.
[07:34] <flocculant> bluesabre: new file now appears to be unknown, but does open with mousepad 
[07:34] <flocculant> bbl
[11:37] <flocculant> knome: you has moarmail :)
[11:40] <knome> aha
[11:41] <flocculant> not looking anymore - have to stop sometime :D
[11:41] <flocculant> bbl
[11:42] <knome> :D
[12:58] <krytarik> slickymaster: Updated my list of issues I've spotted in the RU translation of the docs: http://paste.openstack.org/show/JfIUJfjIt0DabJlzr4ot/
[17:42] <two_jays> i have a question regarding the qa testing case of the live session. When i choose my language the text in the installer and the os changes, but in apps like firefox and LO it doesnt. Is that the normal behaviour?
[17:48] <knome> language packs are installed later, so normal i guess
[19:09] <morf> hi
[19:10] <morf> could you guys recommend me some tool for xubuntu remastering? 
[19:10] <morf> i don't want to create new distro, just to make my life easier with reinstalls 
[19:11] <flocculant> morf: #xubuntu is the support channel - though with that #ubuntu will be just as useful
[19:11] <morf> well i don't think it's entirely offtopic it somehow fits in xubuntu development category ;) 
[19:12] <flocculant> really - can't say I've noticed remastering something on the processes 
[19:14] <morf> ok then
[20:25] <ochosi> evening
[20:25] <knome> hello ochosi 
[20:27] <flocculant> evening ochosi 
[20:28] <ochosi> flocculant: did you get to pinging someone about that gvfs bug?
[20:28] <flocculant> ish
[20:28] <flocculant> which one? 
[20:29] <flocculant> the file not opening properly appears to be on the way to being fixed - desrt was doing something, and an update today has the file actually opening, but unknown to start with
[20:29] <flocculant> the trash one I lost track of amongst other things - though I believe it's been linked upstream
[20:31] <flocculant> trash one - desrt assigned, upstream bug linked
[20:32] <flocculant> ochosi: both glib issues seemingly
[20:32] <ochosi> ah
[20:32] <ochosi> i think the first one i wasn't even aware of
[20:33] <ochosi> knome: have we ever discussed shipping file templates btw?
[20:33] <knome> ochosi, i think briefly
[20:33] <flocculant> ochosi: right - they were both being talked about at the same time - easy to get mixed up I expect :)
[20:43] <ochosi> knome: i really would like to improve that for 16.04: that the file > create doc submenu in thunar isn't empty anymore
[20:43] <ochosi> bbiab
[20:43] <knome> ochosi, what would we have there?
[20:43] <knome> ochosi, just totally empty files?
[20:45] <flocculant> yep - seems to be 
[20:46] <flocculant> what would we want - templates for things we supply - text, calc and writer? 
[20:47] <knome> i would assume so
[20:52] <flocculant> can't imagine needing more 
[21:36] <ochosi> knome, flocculant: yeah, empty files for our default apps would be nice
[21:36] <ochosi> guess this shouldn't be too hard to set up, once you know where to put those files
[21:36] <flocculant> yea 
[21:37] <flocculant> certainly easy enough to do locally
[21:37] <bluesabre> only issue is translations for the template names
[21:37] <ochosi> i'm not saying this is the most useful feature in the world, but it sucks a bit to have an empty menu
[21:37] <flocculant> hi bluesabre :)
[21:37] <ochosi> oh hey
[21:37] <ochosi> sneaking up on us like this...
[21:37]  * ochosi rolls his eyes
[21:37] <bluesabre> only here briefly
[21:37] <bluesabre> whats up
[21:38] <ochosi> oh, not much
[21:38] <flocculant> bluesabre: I guess the easiest would be to have really simple names - I'd LO Calc would be LO still :p
[21:38] <ochosi> i was just checking in briefly to see what the status of that bug was
[21:38] <ochosi> and then i remembered that template thing
[21:39] <ochosi> so what was the translations problem again? i mean are those not very generic types - practically mimetypes - which should be translated somewhere already?
[21:39] <bluesabre> not sure how populating the templates folder works
[21:40] <bluesabre> but they are files, and the templates just presents the file names
[21:40] <bluesabre> (just a thought)
[21:40] <flocculant> shall I add it to bp for x now so it doesn't get forgotten? 
[21:41] <bluesabre> good idea
[21:41] <ochosi> yeah, please do so
[21:42] <bluesabre> as for gmb, no update yet... it doesn't crash every time for me, and never with valgrind, so some sort of race condition
[21:42] <bluesabre> still digging though :)
[21:42] <flocculant> bluesabre: :)
[21:44] <ochosi> great, thanks bluesabre 
[21:44] <flocculant> bluesabre: ok - added that to dev bp
[21:47] <bluesabre> flocculant: great, thanks
[21:47] <flocculant> np
[21:47] <ochosi> i wonder, if we add these files to x-d-s, couldn't we translate them somehow?
[21:48] <ochosi> at least via a script or something that then just creates those files via touch or something (well yeah, maybe that's a bit hacky...)
[21:51] <bluesabre> running out, bbabl
[21:52] <flocculant> cya bluesabre 
[22:00] <ochosi> btw, not sure you read the reports about the "new ubiquity" or "ubiquity replacement" within ubuntu
[22:01] <ochosi> i mean yeah, it was only a matter of time before they would throw the current installer under the bus for something that works on phones too
[22:01] <flocculant> I did see something that was just lots of purple 
[22:04] <flocculant> ochosi: not sure that's going to be much fun if we spend the whole of x dealing with broken installers because phone :(
[22:05] <knome> are there facts on the table that they are landing it for X?
[22:07] <flocculant> not that I've seen 
[22:07] <flocculant> but forearmed is forewarned
[22:08] <flocculant> knome: all that I've seen is post from design
[22:09] <ochosi> yeah, i wouldn't freak out about it either
[22:09] <flocculant> nope 
[22:09] <ochosi> haven't read anywhere that the old ubiquity is going anywhere
[22:09] <knome> yeah
[22:09] <ochosi> so i would presume we can continue to use that
[22:09] <knome> of course
[22:09] <knome> why not?
[22:10] <knome> it's not closed source or anything
[22:10] <flocculant> I'd not expect to see changes land for that half way through an LTS dev cycle
[22:10] <ochosi> also who knows, maybe the new installer will be totally stable and easily customizable >:D
[22:10] <ochosi> be that as it may, i need some sleep
[22:10] <ochosi> nighty everyone!
[22:10] <knome> nighty ochosi 
[22:10] <flocculant> night ochosi :)
[22:24] <flocculant> and night from me as well now :)
[22:33] <knome> nightY flocculant 
[23:58] <bluesabre> back now
[23:59] <bluesabre> ochosi: if it could be stable, that would only be like the old ubiquity we haven't seen in quite some time
[23:59] <bluesabre> ;)