[03:56] <robert_ancell> bye all
[04:24] <hikiko> hello!
[05:04] <didrocks> good morning
[06:31] <pitti> Good morning
[06:32] <didrocks> hey pitti!
[06:35] <seb128> hey pitti didrocks desktopers
[06:36] <seb128> pitti, how are you?
[06:36] <didrocks> re seb128
[06:36] <pitti> good, thanks! (presentatoin going on)
[06:37] <seb128> pitti, that seems a common theme this week ;-)
[06:51] <didrocks> \o/ SNI server side implementation done
[06:51] <didrocks> that was something to do that in python…
[06:51] <didrocks> (for ubuntu make medium tests)
[06:56] <larsu> bonjour!
[06:57] <seb128> hey larsu, feeling better?
[06:58] <didrocks> morning larsu
[06:58] <larsu> seb128: thanks, but not really :/
[06:58] <larsu> hi seb128 & didrocks  :)
[06:58] <Sweet5hark1> larsu, seb128, didrocks: bonjour et moin!
[06:58] <seb128> hey Sweet5hark1
[06:58] <larsu> moin moin Sweet5hark1
[07:02] <didrocks> hey Sweet5hark1!
[07:12] <didrocks> Ran 52 tests in 1060.444s
[07:13] <didrocks> medium tests passing \o/
[07:13] <didrocks> time to commit all those changes in a meaningful way now
[07:13] <larsu> "stuff that makes tests pass"
[07:15] <didrocks> larsu: for git diff | wc -l : ~900, yeah, sounds like a good commit message ratio/changes :)
[07:16] <larsu> hehe
[08:00] <willcooke> morning morning
[08:01] <Laney> morning!
[08:02] <seb128> hey willcooke Laney
[08:02] <didrocks> good morning willcooke, Laney
[08:02] <seb128> how is the u.k today?
[08:02] <willcooke> sunny!
[08:03] <seb128> that's a bug, right?
[08:03] <willcooke> XD
[08:04] <Laney> ERM
[08:05] <Laney> check telegram
[08:05] <Laney> no sun here
[08:06] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/wily/5.0.2/libreoffice-l10n_5.0.2-0ubuntu1_source.changes and http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/wily/5.0.2/libreoffice_5.0.2-0ubuntu1_source.changes
[08:07] <seb128> Sweet5hark1, looking
[08:07] <seb128> Sweet5hark1, how is the DMB application going btw?
[08:07] <larsu> hi Laney & willcooke
[08:07] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: DMB not yet.
[08:08] <seb128> Sweet5hark1, did you have a FFE for that update?
[08:08] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: also, please wait for bug 1495512 to get green light from ubuntu-release I guess.
[08:08] <ubot5`> bug 1495512 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "[FFE] LibreOffice 5.0.2" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1495512
[08:08] <seb128> Sweet5hark1, you should mention that ffe in the changelog...
[08:09] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: eh, true. Will bump that.
[08:09] <willcooke> morning larsu
[08:10] <Laney> 30/09 18:43:50 <doko> seb128, Laney: could you tell SweetShark that he has to subscribe the release team to his FFE reports?
[08:10] <Laney> also bugfix -> no ffe
[08:10] <seb128> Sweet5hark1, no need to bump, just edit/rebuild the source
[08:10] <Laney> that's what the first f means
[08:10] <seb128> right
[08:10] <seb128> I assume that was not bugfix only
[08:10] <seb128> Sweet5hark1, is that update bugfix only?
[08:11] <Sweet5hark1> seb128, Laney: yeah, upstream bugfixes and very minor packaging bugfix tweaks ...
[08:11] <seb128> Sweet5hark1, k, so no ffe needed, I can just upload what is currently on your p.c.c
[08:12] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: yeah, thanks.
[08:12] <seb128> yw
[08:20] <larsu> wow, I can't believe we have still bugs like #1484589
[08:21] <seb128> shrug
[08:22] <seb128> speaking of indicators bugs, the datetime one qengho mentioned yesterday seems fun
[08:23] <seb128> clicking on days from the previous/next month make the calendar go in a change loop and eat cpu
[08:23] <Laney> I filed a bug about that
[08:23] <Laney> few weeks ago
[08:23] <seb128> oh?
[08:23] <seb128> did you try to ping charles?
[08:23] <Laney> probably
[08:23] <seb128> or maybe that's something larsu could have a look to...
[08:23] <seb128> larsu, ^ interested?
[08:24] <Laney> but generally this aspect of having to ping (possibly many times) as well as file a bug isn't the best
[08:24] <Laney> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1480387
[08:24] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1480387 in indicator-datetime (Ubuntu) "Clicking a date to go back or forward a month causes repeated jumps between two dates" [Undecided,New]
[08:24] <seb128> right, but too much going, people don't read all the bug emails
[08:24] <seb128> unsure how differently we could do
[08:25] <Laney> it means that bugs that people in CAnonical (or those with IRC) find get fixed and others don't
[08:25] <Laney> no particular reason they are more important bugs
[08:25] <seb128> that's not really true
[08:25] <seb128> most of the bugs I ping people about are not bugs from Canonicalers
[08:25] <Laney> this one is
[08:25] <seb128> like that can't restore from trash was user filed
[08:26] <seb128> right
[08:26] <seb128> but the criterious is not who filed it
[08:26] <seb128> just bugs that should be fixed for the release
[08:26] <Laney> you're saying that I should have pinged charles because I found the bug
[08:26] <larsu> I agree. People stopped reading bug mail at some point
[08:26] <larsu> it's ridiculous
[08:26] <larsu> we should have a 0-bug policy
[08:26] <seb128> Laney, I didn't say you should, I asked if you did
[08:26] <larsu> but I think people just gave up
[08:26] <larsu> too much noise
[08:26] <Laney> alright :-)
[08:26] <seb128> larsu, yeah, and we are as much responsible for that than others
[08:27] <larsu> of course
[08:27] <seb128> there is no magical solution
[08:27] <willcooke> larsu, yeah agreed - too much noise
[08:27] <seb128> it's not really the noise imho
[08:27] <seb128> it's just too much to do
[08:27] <larsu> the constant tagging and reassigning doesn't help much :/
[08:27] <seb128> and some projects have no active owner
[08:27] <larsu> seb128: yeah, maybe that's a big factor as well - noone feels responsible
[08:28] <seb128> Laney, speaking about IRC ping, I guess https://git.gnome.org/browse/gvfs/commit/?id=7373acf9b15f40f1c01bd2a325b380ba9bc17d19 is on your list? ;-)
[08:28] <Laney> didn't you say you were updating gvfs?
[08:28] <seb128> Laney, I did update, that was commited yesterday
[08:29] <seb128> but that's linked to the trash/monitoring bugs you reported
[08:29] <seb128> so I though maybe you were on it
[08:29] <Laney> I have the commit open in a tab so it is on some kind of list, yeah
[08:29] <Laney> but not one which means I haveto do it if you want to :)
[08:29] <seb128> I just want to make sure we land it in wily
[08:29] <seb128> I was not going to do another gvfs upload, but I can
[08:30] <Laney> for the glib ones I wasn't going to cherry-pick since we will get .1 soon enough
[08:30] <Laney> but for gvfs it makes sense
[08:30] <seb128> k
[08:30] <Laney> well lemme know
[08:30] <Laney> me or you
[08:30] <Laney> YOU CHOOSE!
[08:30] <seb128> ok, I do it
[08:30] <seb128> ;-)
[08:30] <Laney> ♥
[08:30] <larsu> damn it. I can reproduce :/
[08:30] <seb128> :-)
[08:30] <larsu> I hate this codebase since the rewrite though
[08:30] <seb128> larsu, the calendar?
[08:30] <seb128> or the sound?
[08:30] <larsu> calendar
[08:31] <seb128> cool
[08:31] <seb128> feel free to bounce to charles though
[08:31] <larsu> let me see if it's something obvious
[08:31] <seb128> but I think that is going to require some nagging, I don't think he's looking at desktop bugs much nowadays
[08:31] <seb128> danke
[08:31] <Laney> reproduce it on the phone :)
[08:31] <seb128> :-)
[08:31] <Laney> do they have the calendar widget there?
[08:31] <seb128> no
[08:31]  * Laney forgot
[08:32] <Laney> DAMN!
[08:32] <seb128> they do have it in unity8 desktop for a week though
[08:32] <seb128> so they are going to have it in vivid-overlay for pocket desktop I guess
[08:32] <seb128> so they probably care ;-)
[08:33]  * larsu thinks it's time to unconverge indicators
[08:41] <Laney> xclaesse: any chance https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800348 or https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242157 ring any bells?
[08:41] <ubot5`> Debian bug 800348 in empathy "empathy crash at startup (segmentation violation)" [Serious,Open]
[08:41] <ubot5`> bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1242157 in empathy "empathy segfaults with GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_task_propagate_boolean: assertion 'task->result_set == TRUE' failed" [Unspecified,New]
[08:41] <Laney> same bug
[08:55] <Laney> tedg: can you review https://code.launchpad.net/~larsu/dbus-test-runner/fix-test-race/+merge/270488 today please maybe?
[09:47] <Laney> didrocks: ...you want a cool task? :)
[09:48] <Laney> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webaccounts-browser-extension/+bug/1498682
[09:48] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1498682 in webapps-greasemonkey (Ubuntu) "Remove xul-ext-unity, -webaccounts, -websites-integration from archive" [Undecided,New]
[09:48]  * didrocks smells a trap
[09:48] <Laney> zap zap zap
[09:48] <didrocks> oh that
[09:48] <didrocks> of course!
[09:48] <Laney> :D
[09:48] <Laney> told you it was cool
[09:48] <didrocks> finishing up current PR review
[09:49] <didrocks> and then, on that
[09:49] <Laney> you are the best
[09:49] <didrocks> |m|
[09:59] <didrocks> Laney: hum, no mention of libufe-xidgetter0 coming from unity-firefox-extension
[09:59] <didrocks> I guess it needs as well (not used afterwards…)
[09:59] <Laney> it would be source and all binaries
[09:59] <didrocks> webaccounts-browser-extension still ships webaccounts-chromium-extension
[10:00] <didrocks> the bug only mention firefox things?
[10:00] <didrocks> (I know chromium doesn't have the same issue yet, but I'm not sure if the API isn't broken already)
[10:00] <didrocks> Laney: I would do a full cleanswap, thoughts?
[10:03] <Laney> didrocks: I forgot about the chromium version tbh
[10:03] <didrocks> hum, no dbarth
[10:03] <didrocks> Laney: let me copy/paste that on the bug report
[10:05] <Laney> he's on other channels
[10:06] <didrocks> pinged and bug referenced, let's see
[10:06] <Laney> thx
[10:18] <Laney> didrocks: this only affects browser-extension and not the other two, yes?
[10:19] <didrocks> Laney: yeah, but let's see once we get the answer, so that I handle the whole batch :)
[10:20] <Laney> good luck
[10:28] <didrocks> Laney: and flushed \o/
[10:29] <Laney> awesome
[10:30] <Laney> want to care for nvidia-graphics-drivers-346 and nvidia-graphics-drivers-346-updates too? :)
[10:30] <Laney> tseliot said they are all taken over by a new version
[10:30]  * Laney is purging https://udd.debian.org/~laney/less.txt
[10:32] <didrocks> Laney: is there any bug ref for it?
[10:32] <Laney> bug:ubuntu-devel-irc-on-2015-10-01-please-trust-me
[10:32] <didrocks> ;)
[10:33] <didrocks> ok, will be your fault then!
[10:33] <Laney> 01/10 10:57:45 <tseliot> Laney: ok, I can file that request
[10:33] <Laney> you can wait if you want :)
[10:33] <tseliot> :)
[10:33] <didrocks> well, let's do on IRC
[10:34] <didrocks> cleaned
[10:34] <Laney> today is a good day
[10:35] <didrocks> spring cleaning :)
[10:35] <tseliot> hehe
[10:35] <Laney> NO
[10:35] <Laney> panda has crashed again
[10:35] <Laney> it's now an average day
[10:35] <didrocks> :p
[10:36] <Laney> I want to replace it
[10:36] <Laney> what's a similar low power and cheap server?
[10:36] <Laney> pi?
[10:37] <willcooke> pi is good
[10:37] <willcooke> pi 2 is, I think, about 2 x the "power"
[10:37] <Laney> actually it would be good to have a little more go
[10:37] <Laney> it runs a Debian/Ubuntu mirror which is pretty shit on the panda
[10:37] <willcooke> pi 2 has 4 cores at about 1 GHz vs 2 @ 1.2 for Panda
[10:38] <Laney> BBB?
[10:39] <willcooke> hum, the e14 website is awful, but I think BBB is single core at 1 Ghz
[10:39] <Laney> seems so
[10:39] <willcooke> pi is ubiquitous - safe bet
[10:40] <seb128> new pi is better, you can use Ubuntu on it
[10:41] <Laney> that's proper armhf isn't it?
[10:41] <willcooke> yeah
[10:41] <Laney> cool
[10:41] <Laney> arm64 one would be fun too..
[10:42] <willcooke> you can get arm64 servers in the CLOUD!!!!!11one
[10:42] <Laney> not so useful for a local package mirror or to graph my currentcost :P
[10:42] <willcooke> ha
[10:42] <willcooke> no
[10:44] <willcooke> I found that when my Pi2 was in a cheapo case I got off ebay and very busy it would hang, taking it out the case fixed that - so if you are going to be working it hard you might want to bear that in mind
[10:46] <Laney> oh yeah, the panda is just in its box which is open :)
[10:47]  * Laney buys a naked pi
[10:47] <willcooke> I bought from the Pi Hut - they seem good
[10:48] <willcooke> The "starter kit" for 50 quid is decent
[10:50] <Laney> got all of that stuff minus the case
[10:51] <willcooke> the psu is supposed to be better quality than a generic
[10:51] <willcooke> but I dunno
[10:51] <willcooke> I have one, and it works well, but I expect they are much of a muchness
[10:51] <Laney> fair cop, we'll see I guess
[10:51] <willcooke> larsu, so yeah, made lots of changes but couldn't get it to work....
[10:51] <Laney> sure I can pick one up in maplin or somewhere
[10:52] <willcooke> larsu, then I realised I have a .themes dir in my home dir
[10:52] <larsu> uh oh :/
[10:52] <willcooke> Laney, yeah, certainly
[10:52] <larsu> willcooke: now it does work thoug?
[10:52] <willcooke> larsu, Its taken me 15 mins to work that out :D
[10:52] <willcooke> larsu, yeah gettting there now
[10:52] <larsu> cool :)
[10:53] <larsu> meanwhlie, I found the root cause of that datetime bug (which is in gtk)
[10:53] <larsu> but we only see it because datetime is a bit chatty
[10:53] <larsu> panel: hey datetime, set the date to 8/30/2015 please
[10:54] <larsu> datetime: ok
[10:54] <larsu> datetime: hey panel, set the date to 8/30/2015 please
[10:54] <larsu> just to make sure and all
[10:55] <seb128> larsu, I though it could be in GTK, datetime didn't change much this cycle
[10:55] <seb128> thanks for debugging it!
[10:55] <larsu> no worries
[10:55] <Laney> what is panel?
[10:56] <larsu> unity-panel-service
[10:56] <Laney> oh right
[11:33] <larsu> bah, GtkCalendar is a mess :/
[11:33]  * larsu goes to eat something to think about this
[11:34] <qengho> Good morning.
[11:34] <willcooke> morning qengho
[11:38] <qengho> larsu: this is  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1501476 ?
[11:38] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1501476 in indicator-datetime (Ubuntu) "datetime indicator spins out of control when clicking neighbor-month day" [Undecided,New]
[12:17] <pesari> mvo: hi, would you happen to have an estimate when bug 1267059 would be fixed in trusty?
[12:17] <ubot5`> bug 1267059 in unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) ""Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work " [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1267059
[12:18] <mvo> pesari: sure
[12:18] <mvo> pesari: later
[12:22] <Laney> haha
[12:30] <andyrock> good "morning"
[12:31] <Trevinho> ehehe :)
[12:33] <Sweet5hark> (re)
[12:41] <larsu> qengho: yes
[12:44] <seb128> hey andyrock Trevinho
[12:44] <seb128> Sweet5hark, hey, while you were offline doko rejected the libreoffice upload saying you discarded the changes from the 0ubuntu2 upload he did in the archive
[12:47] <Sweet5hark> seb128: urgh, ok. updating. great to see major changes being done sidetracking the CVS of the package ...
[12:48] <Laney> woah
[12:49] <seb128> Sweet5hark, talk to doko if you don't like the changes
[12:49] <seb128> nothing force us to take those
[12:49] <seb128> we can resolve the issue differently
[12:49] <Laney> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/wily/2015-10-01/12:45:36.log
[12:50] <seb128> urg
[12:50] <seb128> Laney, what did you do?!
[12:50] <seb128> tricked didrocks in crashing britney!
[12:51] <didrocks> \o/
[12:51] <didrocks> weird that KeyError in the python script
[12:51]  * didrocks wonders where it's getting it from, it's $killed$
[12:51] <Sweet5hark> seb128: no the changes see to be ok in principle (at least from changelog) -- I wouldnt have done some of that this late in the cycle. Just slightly annoyed not to have them in git ...
[12:57] <seb128> Sweet5hark, you should said that to doko on #ubuntu-devel
[12:59] <Laney> didrocks:
[12:59] <Laney> laney@wily> rmadison -S -swily,wily-proposed webaccounts-browser-extension                                                            ~ webaccounts-chromium-extension | 0.5-0ubuntu2 | wily/universe | arm64
[13:02] <didrocks> weird, you saw as I did the output (removing binaries and source
[13:02]  * didrocks opened the bug again
[13:03] <Laney> it doesn't list arm64 for that pkg
[13:03] <didrocks> oh
[13:03] <didrocks> yeah
[13:03] <Laney> don't know why that is though
[13:03] <didrocks> weird?
[13:03] <didrocks> I can remove it manually if needed
[13:03] <Laney> probably...
[13:03] <didrocks> but weird that this was wasn't picked
[13:03] <Laney> wait
[13:03] <Laney> it has an old version
[13:03] <didrocks> yeah
[13:04] <didrocks>   webaccounts-chromium-extension 0.5-0ubuntu4 in wily armhf
[13:04] <didrocks> was the last one
[13:04] <didrocks> pb why it wasn't picked
[13:04] <didrocks> I guess newer version never built
[13:04] <didrocks> (checking)
[13:04] <didrocks> hum https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webaccounts-browser-extension/0.5-0ubuntu4
[13:04]  * didrocks puzzled
[13:05] <didrocks> anyway, let's kill explicitely the old version
[13:05] <Laney> thought britney would have noticed that
[13:05] <didrocks> yeah…
[13:05] <didrocks> I'm remove 0.5-0ubuntu2 in wily
[13:05] <didrocks> removing*
[13:06] <didrocks> Removing packages from wily:
[13:06] <didrocks> webaccounts-chromium-extension 0.5-0ubuntu2 in wily arm64
[13:06] <didrocks> done
[13:06] <didrocks> Laney: keep me posted about britney's state
[13:06] <Laney> thanks!
[13:06] <didrocks> yw
[13:06] <qengho> Good riddance.
[13:06] <Laney> going to lunch
[13:07] <didrocks> ;)
[13:07] <Laney> keen an eye on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html
[13:07] <didrocks> enjoy Laney
[13:07] <didrocks> yep
[13:07] <Laney> if you remember
[13:07] <didrocks> tab opened
[13:42] <ahayzen> Hi, I think this is the right place to ask, please direct me otherwise ... I used the standard Qt Quick Controls 1.1 template in QtCreator which created this QML http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/12631723/ to start off with. However I have noticed that the menubar doesn't function (no LIM/Global Menu or inline one). If you change the QT_QPA_PLATFORMTHEME to something other than appmenu-qt5 then you get a non LIM/Global menu which is slightly
[13:42] <ahayzen> glitchy (is sometimes white).
[13:42] <ahayzen> When investigating I have also found bug 1302084 and bug 1323853 which are both a 1 year+ old, critical and assigned, however this is still present in Vivid. Is there any progress on this bug? Or anything I can do to help fix it? As I feel it could be potentially important when app want to use a menubar in the convergent world.
[13:42] <ubot5`> bug 1302084 in appmenu-qt5 (Ubuntu) "Menu in the global title bar is missing after a window child in Qt5 applications" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1302084
[13:42] <ubot5`> bug 1323853 in appmenu-qt5 (Ubuntu) "No menubar for QtQuick.Controls based applications" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1323853
[13:56] <didrocks> Laney: refreshed successfully now
[13:57] <larsu> sorry for the mr spam
[13:57]  * larsu couldn't figure out the correct gtk branch again
[13:58] <seb128> larsu, no worry ;-)
[13:59] <larsu> seb128: thanks :) I'm not on 100% because of this sickness anyway
[14:04] <seb128> larsu, you changed the gtk dialogs to not have linked buttons on unity right? what does it check for?
[14:06] <larsu> seb128: don't remember what I settled on - I think it's simply a css rule that doesn't style linked buttons in dialogs as linked
[14:06] <larsu> but could be app-specific patches as well
[14:06] <larsu> which would check for !GNOME in XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP
[14:06] <charles> larsu, looking at bug #1480387 and looking at scrollback
[14:06] <ubot5`> bug 1480387 in gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) "Clicking a date to go back or forward a month causes repeated jumps between two dates" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1480387
[14:07] <charles> is this something you and Laney have figured out already?
[14:07] <seb128> larsu, k, no biggy, I was wondering by the apport dialogs look different under sudo (e.g "ubuntu-bug unity" vs "sudo ubuntu-bug unity")
[14:07] <charles> ah, moved to gtk+ 3.0... a GtkCalendar issue?
[14:08] <hikiko> Trevinho, andyrock  https://code.launchpad.net/~hikiko/compiz/compiz.matrix-additions/+merge/273072 present for you :) Just added 2 matrix functions (I use them in my future MPs)
[14:09] <andyrock> hikiko: approved
[14:09] <hikiko> thanks andyrock !
[14:09] <andyrock> I'll give a look to your "put" branch today
[14:11] <larsu> charles: yes
[14:11] <larsu> charles: it reports a new day twice when clicking on days of the next or previous month
[14:11] <Trevinho> hikiko: you also need to update the ABI I think
[14:12] <Trevinho> andyrock: ^
[14:12] <larsu> charles: which sends two activate message to indicator-datetime
[14:12] <larsu> charles: which then sends two state changes
[14:12] <hikiko> Trevinho, sure, how do I update the ABI?
[14:12] <hikiko> (sorry I ve never updated it)
[14:12] <larsu> charles: and then the two bounce back and forth between two dates
[14:13] <Trevinho> hikiko: change the #define COMPIZ_OPENGL_ABI 7 value to  8 I guess
[14:13] <Trevinho> hikiko: as for the COMPIZ_CORE ABI don't worry as i'll merge this only when wily is ready (otherwise we'd need a FF)
[14:14] <Trevinho> and I've another branch that does it
[14:15] <charles> larsu, ok. sounds good
[14:15] <charles> larsu, at least from my pov ;)
[14:16] <larsu> cool :)
[14:16] <didrocks> ok, time to sign off, (started early), see you guys!
[14:17] <larsu> charles: actually it would be even more robust if we only called activate on an actual user interaction
[14:17] <larsu> charles: but there's no way to find that out with GtkCalendar
[14:18] <Trevinho> hikiko: added a couple of comments
[14:39] <hikiko> thanks Trevinho, I am leaving I'll look at them when I be back! bb
[15:32] <Pharmasolin> Hello, i'm from Big Bug Bonanza Ubuntu 16.04 LTS article, do i need test bugs on 15.10 (Beta2) or wait release and then start to triage bugs from Launchpad? Thanks for answer.
[15:33] <willcooke> Pharmasolin, hi - thank you for dropping by!  You can use the beta
[15:34] <willcooke> Pharmasolin, if you have a lot of problems with it, then 15.04 would be the next best choice
[15:36] <Pharmasolin> i'm currently on 15.04
[15:36] <Pharmasolin> but i have PPA connected i will install on virtualbox 15.10
[15:37] <willcooke> Pharmasolin, good plan
[16:43] <Pharmasolin> willcooke: is there already list of bugs that needed to be tested on 15.10?
[16:43] <Pharmasolin> "We will create a list of bugs which need to be checked and then ask people to spend a few minutes trying to reproduce a chosen bug on 15.10."
[16:43] <Pharmasolin> >http://www.whizzy.org/2015/09/big-bug-bonanza-16-04-lts/
[16:50] <willcooke> Pharmasolin, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BigDesktopBugScrub
[16:50] <willcooke> Pharmasolin, Step # 3
[16:50] <Pharmasolin> Yes sorry, i'm checking already.
[16:51] <willcooke> :)
[17:07]  * Laney waves
[17:08] <larsu> bye Laney!
[17:18] <seb128> Laney, have a nice evening
[17:22] <Trevinho> Futsal time, back later.
[17:24] <seb128> Trevinho, have fun!
[18:00] <andyrock> I call this a day
[18:00] <andyrock> have a good night guys
[18:07] <seb128> night
[18:28] <doko> Sweet5hark, some issues with your lo upload ... did you generate the control file in a wily chroot?
[18:28] <doko> looking at the diff ...
[18:28] <Sweet5hark> doko: yes.
[18:28] <doko> -               g++-5 [hppa ia64 s390 sparc kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386],
[18:28] <doko> -               gcc-5 [hppa ia64 s390 sparc kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386],
[18:28] <doko> +               g++- [hppa ia64 s390 sparc kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386],
[18:28] <doko> +               gcc- [hppa ia64 s390 sparc kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386],
[18:29] <doko> -               libboost-program-options-dev (>= 1.58),
[18:29] <doko> -               libboost-system-dev (>= 1.58),
[18:29] <doko> the first is odd, but doesn't do any harm.
[18:29] <Sweet5hark> doko: will have a look
[18:29] <doko> looks like the boost stuff then uses the internal copy
[18:29] <doko> this doesn't sound right
[18:31] <doko> Sweet5hark, so please figure out the boost issue at least
[18:32] <Sweet5hark> doko: sure, already checking ...
[18:34] <Sweet5hark> doko: "checking which boost to use... external" -- so at least its not using internal boost. still looking why it changed at all ...
[18:44] <Sweet5hark> doko: seems boost-program-options is only needed for orcus? did you forget to regen control after using system orcus?
[18:44] <doko> let me look
[19:10] <Laney> glad I came back online
[19:10] <Laney> mail server ran out of disk :(
[19:11] <Sweet5hark> Laney: /o\
[19:11] <Laney> need to stop running this myself
[19:15] <davmor2> Laney: or run on a bigger disk
[19:25] <Sweet5hark> Laney: recommending posteo.de even if they cost a euro per month.
[19:33] <doko> Sweet5hark, ok, accepted lo. I found my note that I re-added these boost packages manually not to cause a regression
[19:33] <doko> did you find the gcc issue?
[19:36] <Sweet5hark> doko: I would need to look in my chroot but its still blocked by building libreoffice. likely an stale /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/gcj link (via SYSTEM_GCJ_VERSION)
[19:37] <doko> huh?
[19:38] <Sweet5hark> doko: "BUILD_DEPS += , gcc-$(SYSTEM_GCJ_VERSION) [$(OOO_GCJ_JDK_ARCHS)] ,g++-$(SYSTEM_GCJ_VERSION) [$(OOO_GCJ_JDK_ARCHS)]" and before that "SYSTEM_GCJ_VERSION = $(shell basename `readlink /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/gcj` | sed -e s/gcj-//)"
[19:39]  * doko looks if he still has commit rights to the debian vcs ...
[19:58] <hikiko-m> Helllo
[19:59] <hikiko-m> could anyone join #ubuntu-meeting and give me some testimonials to become ubuntu-member?
[20:00] <hikiko-m> thanx in advance...
[20:00] <hikiko--> back
[20:01] <robert_ancell> hi all
[20:03] <hikiko--> robert_ancell: could you give me some testimonials to become ubuntu member? :p
[20:03] <hikiko--> desrt: ?
[20:03] <robert_ancell> hikiko--, sure
[20:03] <hikiko--> thanks so much robert_ancell
[20:03] <hikiko--> #ubuntu-meeting!
[20:03] <robert_ancell> hikiko--, what's the link?
[20:09] <hikiko--> #ubuntu-meeting on irc robert_ancell
[20:09] <hikiko--> there’s a meeting right now
[20:10] <hikiko--> (freenode)
[20:10] <robert_ancell> oh
[20:11] <robert_ancell> hikiko--, where is your wiki link?
[20:16] <hikiko--> wiki.ubuntu.com/hikiko robert_ancell