| beisner | jamespage, gnuoy, wolsen - even with happy a/ptr records, Precise-Icehouse n-c-c/next is broken when ssh migration auth is set. if i substitute the n-c-c stable charm into next.yaml, the problem goes away. break is at or after n-c-c/next rev188. | 03:52 |
|---|---|---|
| beisner | https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/nova-cloud-controller/+bug/1480677 | 03:52 |
| mup | Bug #1480677: oslo.messaging.rpc.dispatcher AttributeError: 'Connection' object has no attribute 'connection_errors' <amulet> <openstack> <uosci> <nova-cloud-controller (Juju Charms Collection):New for gnuoy> <nova-compute (Juju Charms Collection):New for gnuoy> <rabbitmq-server (Juju Charms | 03:52 |
| mup | Collection):New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1480677> | 03:52 |
| beisner | bahh wrong link. | 03:53 |
| beisner | jamespage, gnuoy, wolsen - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/nova-compute/+bug/1500589 | 03:53 |
| mup | Bug #1500589: n-c-c/next fails cloud-compute-relation-changed when migration-auth-type set for Precise-Icehouse <openstack> <uosci> <nova-cloud-controller (Juju Charms Collection):New> <nova-compute (Juju Charms Collection):New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1500589> | 03:53 |
| gnuoy | beisner, https://code.launchpad.net/~gnuoy/charms/trusty/nova-cloud-controller/lp1500589/+merge/273508 should fix Bug #1500589 | 09:12 |
| mup | Bug #1500589: n-c-c/next fails cloud-compute-relation-changed when migration-auth-type set for Precise-Icehouse <openstack> <uosci> <nova-cloud-controller (Juju Charms Collection):Confirmed for gnuoy> <nova-compute (Juju Charms Collection):Invalid by gnuoy> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1500589> | 09:12 |
| jamespage | thedac, https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/charms/trusty/ceph/status - will work on osd and radosgw as well | 10:16 |
| jamespage | that one works OK - needs unit tests | 10:17 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, beisner: I fixed up my crappy failing unit tests - apologies for that | 10:17 |
| jamespage | insufficient patching | 10:17 |
| jamespage | thedac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/12696040/ | 10:17 |
| jamespage | 'Unit is active' has become policy .... | 10:18 |
| jamespage | thedac, and - http://paste.ubuntu.com/12696048/ | 10:19 |
| === IceyEC is now known as Icey | ||
| === lukasa is now known as lukasa_away | ||
| === lukasa_away is now known as lukasa | ||
| === lukasa is now known as lukasa_away | ||
| beisner | hi jamespage, gnuoy, thedac - http://paste.ubuntu.com/12696720/ i'm noticing that with next.yaml deploys, glance status stays in blocked 'Missing relations: messaging' - although the deploy completes successfully otherwise. indeed there's no amqp relation. do we need one? | 12:51 |
| beisner | jamespage, ty for the quick n-c fix btw | 12:52 |
| jamespage | beisner, we should probably just add that | 12:52 |
| jamespage | its used for ceilometer notifications | 12:52 |
| gnuoy | jamespage, I'm not sure I agree | 12:52 |
| gnuoy | IS for one, don't use ceilometer | 12:53 |
| beisner | jamespage, right, but i think 'blocked' will eventually really block us when we do more clever 'my thing is really deployed' logic. i imagine deployer, amulet and juju itself will start watching that soon. | 12:53 |
| gnuoy | jamespage, I think we should move it to an optional relation | 12:53 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, beisner: ok so maybe the glance messaging relation should be optional | 12:53 |
| jamespage | I'm easy either way | 12:53 |
| beisner | so, optional relation then. | 12:53 |
| beisner | ;-) yeah that | 12:53 |
| jamespage | but +1 on it being optional | 12:53 |
| beisner | jamespage, gnuoy - either way, since defauly/next yamls include ceilo, should we relate it to glance in those bundles? | 12:55 |
| gnuoy | I would think so | 12:56 |
| beisner | i haven't dug into the code. is glance aware of whether/not ceilo is present | 12:56 |
| beisner | ? | 12:56 |
| jamespage | beisner, nope | 13:01 |
| jamespage | beisner, +1 to adding it to the bundle tho | 13:01 |
| jamespage | thedac, gnuoy: how does this look - http://paste.ubuntu.com/12696803/ ? | 13:03 |
| jamespage | that's ceph-osd | 13:03 |
| gnuoy | jamespage, it looks wonderful, I'd like to hug it | 13:04 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, unit tests of the atlantic and mps by the end of today | 13:05 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, its basic but I think its all fairly sound | 13:05 |
| gnuoy | kk, thanks | 13:05 |
| beisner | ok, i'll adjust o-c-t bundles. | 13:06 |
| beisner | fyi, raised for tracking: bug 1503272 | 13:09 |
| mup | Bug #1503272: workload status: amqp relation should be optional <openstack> <uosci> <glance (Juju Charms Collection):New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1503272> | 13:09 |
| === lukasa_away is now known as lukasa | ||
| apuimedo | jamespage: is it possible to limit the amount of units of a charm? | 14:02 |
| === lukasa is now known as lukasa_away | ||
| === lukasa_away is now known as lukasa | ||
| thedac | jamespage: wrt, ceph, fantastic. | 14:28 |
| thedac | wrt glance +1 to moving messaging to optional. In fact if no one has done it already I will | 14:28 |
| beisner | ha! /me just saw gnuoy hug a pastebin | 14:31 |
| mhall119 | jcastro: jose: is there an official way to request a charm be written? | 14:51 |
| mhall119 | the developer portal could really benefit from using Haystack, but I don't see a charm for it in the charm store | 14:52 |
| thedac | gnuoy: care to review? https://code.launchpad.net/~thedac/charms/trusty/glance/optional-amqp/+merge/273542 | 14:57 |
| gnuoy | thedac, approved, would you mind doing the landing? | 15:00 |
| thedac | will do | 15:00 |
| gnuoy | ta | 15:00 |
| thedac | I'll wait on osci amulet before doing so | 15:01 |
| beisner | gnuoy, fyi, you'll be getting 2 amulet tests for kicking the bot while he/she/it was already running an amulet test on behalf of n-c-c ;-) | 15:14 |
| gnuoy | Can I kick it ? It seems I can | 15:15 |
| beisner | new commit = retest | 15:15 |
| beisner | so the amulet result that is there, was for rev 199 | 15:15 |
| beisner | there will be a new set for rev 200 | 15:16 |
| gnuoy | beisner, so I think it fixes the bug you found either way | 15:16 |
| beisner | lol | 15:16 |
| beisner | yes thanks! | 15:16 |
| gnuoy | np | 15:16 |
| beisner | coreycb, thedac - i'm on a normalize-makefiles mission for *os-charms. noticing that some charms aren't lint checking the actions/ dir. when i enable that, some of them have unused uuid import in actions/openstack_upgrade.py | 15:29 |
| beisner | and when i remove that import, unit tests start to fail with 'actions/openstack_upgrade.py'> does not have the attribute 'uuid' | 15:30 |
| coreycb | beisner, I'd mark that low priority for now | 15:30 |
| thedac | agreed | 15:30 |
| beisner | coreycb, thedac - if i move forward, we'll either have failing lint checks or failing unit checks. | 15:31 |
| beisner | i can just ignore the actions dir for now ? | 15:31 |
| coreycb | beisner, yeah I'd vote for that and a bug | 15:31 |
| thedac | Yes, I would not make the change (yet) that checks the actions directory | 15:32 |
| beisner | fwiw, some do have it enabled, though for the pause/resume actions | 15:32 |
| beisner | be aware ^ | 15:32 |
| beisner | so that'll force the next guy to make it right ;-) | 15:32 |
| beisner | on those ones | 15:32 |
| beisner | ok, squashing actions/ dir normalization wrt lint checks for now, will add affected charms to bug/1503340 | 15:37 |
| mup | Bug #1503340: actions dir not checked for lint; unused import when checked; unit test fails when lint is resolved. <openstack> <uosci> <ceilometer (Juju Charms Collection):New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1503340> | 15:37 |
| beisner | ie. if it's already checking actions/, it will keep checking, but i won't force it to just yet. | 15:38 |
| coreycb | beisner, sounds good, thanks | 15:48 |
| beisner | coreycb, yw | 15:48 |
| beisner | jamespage, gnuoy, thedac, coreycb - while i'm batch-updating, any input on changing maintainers in metadata.yaml to something generic? it'd be an easy change now. atm, we have a mix of yolanda, adam g, jamespage. | 15:51 |
| thedac | Do we have an openstack-charmers@ mail alias? or something like it? | 15:52 |
| thedac | ls | 15:52 |
| thedac | :) | 15:52 |
| beisner | thedac, | 15:53 |
| beisner | -rw-rw-r-- 1 ubuntu ubuntu 467 Oct 6 14:09 metadata.yaml | 15:53 |
| beisner | ;-) | 15:53 |
| thedac | wow, my system is lagging | 15:53 |
| beisner | not sure re: mail alias. that's what we should probably do i think | 15:54 |
| beisner | coreycb, can you check if you just rcvd a test email from my gmail acct to the openstack charmers list? | 16:00 |
| coreycb | beisner, I'm not seeing anything | 16:05 |
| ddellav | beisner, coreycb thedac i can take a look at that uuid and lint issues with the upgrade actions just as soon as im done with what im working on here. | 16:09 |
| beisner | coreycb, hrm. no reject or awaiting-moderation reply on my end. i wonder if the public can send to that? | 16:12 |
| beisner | https://launchpad.net/~openstack-charmers | 16:12 |
| beisner | jamespage, gnuoy, thedac, coreycb - i'm going to ignore the maintainers field for this batch. but let's figure that out before release and i can push another batch to update all of the oscharms. | 16:13 |
| mattyw | lazypower, ping? | 16:31 |
| lazypower | mattyw, pong | 16:34 |
| mattyw | lazypower, hey hey - I'm not sure who else to ping - but if you're busy feel free to move me along... | 16:34 |
| mattyw | lazypower, wondering why my merge request isn't appearing the queue https://code.launchpad.net/~mattyw/charms/trusty/mongodb/mongodb-backup/+merge/273544 | 16:35 |
| lazypower | mattyw, its only an hour old, its likely to be pending an intgest into review.juju.solutions | 16:37 |
| mattyw | lazypower, ok cool, so be patient grasshopper is the message :) | 16:37 |
| beisner | o/ lazypower, mattyw - our openstack testing bot cares about mongodb (because of ceilometer) and it does some automated testing on proposals there. i've added a pre-review review ;-) | 16:47 |
| beisner | https://code.launchpad.net/~mattyw/charms/trusty/mongodb/mongodb-backup/+merge/273544 | 16:47 |
| mattyw | beisner, thanks very much - I've just seen it, I'll make those changes | 16:48 |
| beisner | mattyw, cool, thanks! | 16:48 |
| mattyw | beisner, there was already an action - who's implementation I basically followed, would you like me to fix that up as well? | 16:48 |
| lazypower | beisner, <3 :) | 16:48 |
| beisner | mattyw, /me looks back... | 16:48 |
| beisner | mattyw, lazypower - indeed, there was 1 existing action, outside the coverage of lint checks. | 16:51 |
| beisner | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~charmers/charms/trusty/mongodb/trunk/annotate/head:/actions/perf | 16:52 |
| mattyw | beisner, I'm eoding now, anything you'd like me to do just shove a message on the pr | 16:54 |
| mattyw | beisner, if I don't see anything new I'll go ahead with the linting fixes | 16:54 |
| beisner | mattyw, thanks. i'll pull a few heads together and one of us will advise there. | 16:54 |
| mattyw | beisner, perfect | 16:55 |
| mattyw | night all | 16:55 |
| beisner | o/ coreycb - look out! here's that batch to normalize makefiles and amulet test dependencies @ http://paste.ubuntu.com/12698366/ as discussed, did not address upgrade actions lint or maintainer bits yet. | 17:47 |
| coreycb | beisner, ok | 18:12 |
| cholcombe | is charmhelpers build for python 2.x? | 18:24 |
| cholcombe | coreycb, i believe you set pulls are welcome? :) https://code.launchpad.net/~xfactor973/charm-helpers/status_set-enum | 18:40 |
| cholcombe | coreycb, oh wait that has some junk from another branch in there. i need to clean it up | 18:40 |
| coreycb | cholcombe, hmm dunno if I said that or not, but they are! | 18:41 |
| cholcombe | :) | 18:42 |
| coreycb | cholcombe, actually I can't land to charm-helpers though | 18:42 |
| cholcombe | coreycb, who lands that stuff? | 18:42 |
| coreycb | cholcombe, for openstack, typically gnuoy, jamespage or dosaboy | 18:42 |
| cholcombe | coreycb, oh i meant for charm-helpers | 18:43 |
| coreycb | cholcombe, right I was referring to openstack related charm-helpers code | 18:43 |
| cholcombe | gotcha | 18:43 |
| cholcombe | coreycb, alright i'll add one of them to the review. thanks! | 18:44 |
| marcoceppi | cholcombe: there's a group of charm-helper maintainers that currate that | 18:44 |
| cholcombe | marcoceppi, even better | 18:44 |
| === lukasa is now known as lukasa_away | ||
| === lukasa_away is now known as lukasa | ||
| bdx | core, dev: hey whats going on everyone? I'm wondering which part of cinder (api, volume, scheduler) provides the image-service interface? | 21:53 |
| bdx | core, dev: I'm thinking it must be cinder-api.. | 21:54 |
| bdx | or scheduler, or both... | 21:54 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: not sure I understand your question | 22:01 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: the cinder charm provides image-servce which connects to glance | 22:02 |
| bdx | marcoceppi: In the case you deploy cinder in a decoupled fashion, with separate volume units ..... you end up with different units running different cinder services... | 22:04 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: right, but we don't have a decouple charm (this is where my knowledge of the openstack charm ecosystem begins to fade) | 22:04 |
| bdx | marcoceppi: https://jujucharms.com/cinder/trusty/29 | 22:04 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: beisner coreycb or ddellav might be able to help more | 22:05 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: OIC | 22:05 |
| marcoceppi | it's probably api | 22:05 |
| marcoceppi | but that's a guess | 22:05 |
| bdx | marcoceppi: how could I preform introspection into this?...there are a few different relations made to cinder that I have questionabout | 22:06 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: well, a better readme would be my guess | 22:06 |
| bdx | beisner, coreycb, ddellav, marcoceppi: so .... I have 3 availibility zones ....in order to use cinder across all 3 | 22:08 |
| bdx | I need to run cinder volume service in the 3 separate locations | 22:08 |
| bdx | in which I configure each of the 3 cinder volume services to include a config-flag that specifies each zone | 22:09 |
| bdx | such that "cinder availibility-zone-list" shows all three zones are enabled | 22:10 |
| bdx | what I am trying to figure out is what relations should be made from the cinder component's interfaces to what other charms | 22:12 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: well it probably wouldn't hurt to connect them all to glance, tbh | 22:13 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: let me see if I can find a bundle with cinder spun off | 22:13 |
| bdx | marcoceppi: here's a small script of what I'm doing to give an idea https://gist.github.com/jamesbeedy/6429af503c3581ba9e7e | 22:18 |
| bdx | I have most of the relations dialed...I feel like I should just test the last few to see what happens | 22:19 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: whoa that is, whoa | 22:21 |
| bdx | ha | 22:21 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: I may be able to help make that script a little more managable | 22:21 |
| bdx | oh...do tell | 22:21 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: what does charmconf.yaml have in it? | 22:21 |
| bdx | marcoceppi: http://paste.ubuntu.com/12699829/ | 22:23 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: yeah, you basically want a bundle | 22:23 |
| JerryK_ | Hi! Please is there anyone able & willing to help me with maas & juju networking? Trying to figure out how to expose juju openstack services to public network | 22:24 |
| marcoceppi | JerryK_: I can certainly try | 22:25 |
| JerryK_ | thanks! The thing is I have maas controller connected to internet + private network. Nodes are connected to private network + public. Everything I install through juju is exposed on the private network but I would like to move some of those services to the public one ... | 22:31 |
| marcoceppi | JerryK_: what maas version do you have? | 22:32 |
| JerryK_ | Or maybe I just misunderstood how to make "the right" network layout ... | 22:32 |
| JerryK_ | 1.8.2 | 22:32 |
| JerryK_ | and juju 1.24.6 | 22:33 |
| JerryK_ | e.g. can't find any doc on how to work with networks in juju. I see the networks section with cird as provided from maas in juju status, but that's all | 22:35 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: okay, took forever, https://gist.github.com/marcoceppi/1029c03170a35ca48a10 I got lazy and didn't add all the relations, but we have a way to model large scale deployments without having to write scripts and waits | 22:58 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: doesn't asnwer your question about relations, but it should be something that's easier to maintain over time | 22:58 |
| marcoceppi | JerryK_: so networking in maas is still a bit lite, do you have multiple interfaces in the services deployed with juju? or is it just a single private network? | 22:59 |
| marcoceppi | JerryK_: fwiw, 1.9 of MAAS makes networking and storage a first class tennant, it'll be so much easier in the next release | 22:59 |
| bdx | marcoceppi: that is awesome. thanks! | 23:02 |
| JerryK_ | marcoceppi: yeah, heard about that. Code "1.9.alpha" still feels a little bit unstable but I'll give it a try | 23:03 |
| JerryK_ | marcoceppi: juju goes directly for the network managed by maas. The node has two nic - one for private(maas managed) and second public network | 23:05 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!