=== markthomas is now known as markthomas|away [01:32] . === NegativeFlare_ is now known as NegativeFlare === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte [08:12] hi everyone [08:21] i'm about to install ubuntu server on a power5 ibm i 515, i started this 2 weeks ago but couldn't continue as we cound't create a partition. The function had to be ordered, PowerVM and we received it now. I'll come back to you guys if i need some help when i'll be in the install process. Thanks [11:02] hi all [11:02] why cant do an update on my server: http://pastie.org/10467885 thanks [11:02] any advice? [11:03] jak2000: I get "Sorry, there is no pastie #10467885 or it has been removed. Why not create a new pastie?" [11:04] http://pastie.org/10467890 [11:04] lordievader now? [11:14] http://pastebin.com/wUMeNSAw [11:22] jak2000: Did you read the error message? [11:26] done, helping me OerHeks [12:21] cpaelzer: please could you review my comment in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781257 for me? If you agree, then could you take bug 1245604 (the corresponding Ubuntu bug), send a patch to Debian and we can fix it in Ubuntu as well please? [12:21] Debian bug 781257 in snmp "snmp: preinst kills all processes of user snmp" [Important,Open] [12:21] bug 1245604 in net-snmp (Ubuntu) ""killall -u snmp" in a pre-install step kills any running snmpd" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1245604 [12:21] No rush. [12:23] should probably be asking in a debian channel [12:23] I'm asking wearing my Ubuntu hat and with cpaelzer wearing his Ubuntu hat while working for the Ubuntu server team ;) [12:42] rbasak: yeah I could look into that next [12:42] OK, thanks! [12:43] rbasak: but I want to properly finish the former issue, have some work where I assist ryan and a performance anaylsis - so no guarantees at the speed of looking into that [12:43] rbasak: I'll assign to me to be notified and add it to my todo list - any known external time dependencies? [12:43] cpaelzer: yeah that's fine. The bug is two years old so a couple of weeks won't matter. [12:44] cpaelzer: no real time dependencies. It would be nice to do it before final freeze next Thursday but it's probably the lowest priority if something else needs doing. [12:44] rbasak: then we have to hope jet lag doesn't let me sleep at the sprint next week :-) [12:48] * freezevee is trying to sleep === alai` is now known as alai8 [14:06] how do i check all services started @sysetem boot [14:06] samba35: which ubuntu version [14:06] 14.04.3 [14:07] does it change version to version ? [14:07] well 15.04 and later will different because systemd is new init system [14:07] or is it systemd or upstram [14:08] ok [14:08] >=15.04 systemd and earlier was upstart [14:09] can i use numa (kvm/libvirt) with single socket cpu ? or do i require two sockets ? [14:25] samba35: there's no need for numa on a single socket, but it'll probably work [14:25] ok [14:30] any chance of less kernel updates and reboots required please? [14:30] seem to be booting once a week [14:35] anyone know why I'm getting this, and no IPv6 address, when trying to force a DHCP6 update with dhclient? http://paste.ubuntu.com/12715333/ [14:37] teward: sounds like some shell script thinks /bin/sh is bash. [14:37] jrwren: so you mean the default-installed scripts [14:37] so that should be a bug? [14:37] teward: I'd guess so, but i don't have a shopt on line 55 of my /sbin/dhclient-script on vivid. [14:38] koheleth: you can read the changelogs and decide if the changes are relevant for your systems and workload. A fix in SCTP is not relevant if you don't use SCTP anywhere and it's not insmoded at all [14:38] jrwren: nor do I. [14:38] and that's Vivid [14:39] jrwren: hence my hunting [14:39] lemme finish the apt-get update; apt-get upgrade; reboot [14:39] teward: to be honest, I didn't know dhclient-script supported ipv6. I run -sf /dev/null and manually call a few scripts to set things up. [14:39] see if anything got fixed [14:39] teward: let me know. I'm very ipv6 curious [14:39] jrwren: 'dhclient -6' exists [14:39] jrwren: and it works on 14.04 [14:40] teward: right. i use that. and I specify -sf [14:40] teward: I'm also using prefix delegation, which I don't think dhclient-script supports. [14:41] I don't have prefix delegation, straight DHCP6 server in a private range. [14:41] which appears to work xD [14:41] (pfSense handles the outbound NATing) [14:41] cool, good to know. [14:41] but even that doesn't work [14:41] i don't run dhcp6, i just let radvd do its thing [14:42] :P [14:42] jrwren: i don't run it on this system, an din fact auto v6 via /etc/network/interfaces (dhcp) also doesn't work on this system [14:42] but it works *fine* on 14.04 [14:44] coreycb, neutron-vpnaas needs a sponsor? [14:44] jamespage, yes it does [14:44] coreycb, done [14:45] jamespage, thanks. I have a todo I haven't gotten to to try and get access to upload those universe packages. [14:45] coreycb, I wonder whether we can create a openstack-universe seed for them and add that seed to the server ppu upload rights [14:46] teward: hrm. I think autoconfig works at kernel level or something. afaik, an up interface which recieves an advertisement, configures itself by default. [14:46] jrwren: indeed, and it's supposed to, but it doesn't [14:47] hence trying to force a dhcp update [14:47] which of course doesn't happen with the error [14:47] still filing a bug lol [14:47] jamespage, I'll mention that when I chat with colin or stephane [14:47] because it works on Trusty [14:47] ah, i see. [14:48] coreycb, i did swift and a few syncs from debian [14:48] coreycb, adding murano* to the cloud-archive as well [14:48] jamespage, awesome, thanks [14:51] jrwren: apparently it's already filed - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1450116 and the parent https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1448690 [14:51] Launchpad bug 1448690 in isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) "duplicate for #1450116 /sbin/dhclient-script has bashisms" [Low,Confirmed] [14:52] Launchpad bug 1448690 in isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) "/sbin/dhclient-script has bashisms" [Low,Confirmed] [14:52] jrwren: who manages those [14:52] teward: i've no idea [14:53] meh [15:20] hi [15:21] is there anybody for a little help ? i'm trying to install ubuntu server on a Power5 i series machine [15:21] I need to specifiy in the storage allocation settings where the "ipl" is i guess that's the .iso but then it asks for an ipl parameter, which is VNC=1 for redhat for example, what should it be for ubuntu server 14.04 ? [15:38] dannf: so for the arm qemu patchset, our package doesn't even have the patch "target-arm: Add the GICv2m to the virt board" yet (no v2 at all). Do we need that, i.e. should i cherrypick those patches or patch around them? [15:38] i dont' care either way, just not sure if you need the v2m [15:39] hallyn: 2.4 base? [15:40] oh, heh, no. i guess i should merge that first. [15:40] forgot that was what you were wanting. nm :) [15:40] np. you might hold off - i did an x86 build and it failed. i think due to lack of disk space, but double checking now [15:40] hallyn: should know within the hour [15:41] ok, thanks for hte heads up - will wait [15:41] hallyn: but certainly, if you want to backport those to 2.3, that'd be awesome :) [15:50] hallyn: not all arm CPUs have hwvirt [15:51] RoyK: of course :) but those that do would like qemu to use it [15:52] anyway i was porting onto the wrong tree so nothing to see here :) [15:53] hallyn: you probably drank too much dihydrogen monoxide [15:55] or not enough [15:56] (dinner was salty) === markthomas|away is now known as markthomas [16:07] hallyn: built fine this time [16:15] k [17:26] Where can I read up about ubuntu major versions of packages? Like right now in 14.04, the mysql-server metapackage points to mysql-server-5.5. But mysql 5.6 is also in the repos. Is this just the pull from debian sid at the time? [17:26] in wily, only 5.6 is there (but also percona, and mariadb). Will future versions get added later or are those it? === larsi_ is now known as larsi [18:14] thebwt: it is very very rare for entirely new packages to be added to a release after it's been released. I can't recall it happening, but I may have missed one.. [18:14] thebwt: openjdk-8 seems like the most logical candidate, and that hasn't happened, anyway [18:18] Roger that [18:18] Thank you sarnold [18:21] then the other part of my question, we package mysql 5.5 and 5.6 in 14.04. Yet only php 5.5, no php5.6 . How are those decisions made? [18:25] thebwt: I think that's due to debian's decision to have separate mysql packages for each upstream version but only one php5 package for all upstream versions of php [18:26] Got it, that's what I figured. === Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away === CiPi is now known as cipi