[01:32] <pmatulis> .
[08:12] <guillaume_alloxr> hi everyone
[08:21] <guillaume_alloxr> i'm about to install ubuntu server on a power5 ibm i 515, i started this 2 weeks ago but couldn't continue as we cound't create a partition. The function had to be ordered, PowerVM and we received it now. I'll come back to you guys if i need some help when i'll be in the install process. Thanks
[11:02] <jak2000> hi all
[11:02] <jak2000> why cant do an update on my server: http://pastie.org/10467885   thanks
[11:02] <jak2000> any advice?
[11:03] <lordievader> jak2000: I get "Sorry, there is no pastie #10467885 or it has been removed. Why not create a new pastie?"
[11:04] <jak2000> http://pastie.org/10467890
[11:04] <jak2000> lordievader now?
[11:14] <jak2000> http://pastebin.com/wUMeNSAw
[11:22] <lordievader> jak2000: Did you read the error message?
[11:26] <jak2000> done, helping me OerHeks
[12:21] <rbasak> cpaelzer: please could you review my comment in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781257 for me? If you agree, then could you take bug 1245604 (the corresponding Ubuntu bug), send a patch to Debian and we can fix it in Ubuntu as well please?
[12:21] <rbasak> No rush.
[12:23] <Ben64> should probably be asking in a debian channel
[12:23] <rbasak> I'm asking wearing my Ubuntu hat and with cpaelzer wearing his Ubuntu hat while working for the Ubuntu server team ;)
[12:42] <cpaelzer> rbasak: yeah I could look into that next
[12:42] <rbasak> OK, thanks!
[12:43] <cpaelzer> rbasak: but I want to properly finish the former issue, have some work where I assist ryan and a performance anaylsis - so no guarantees at the speed of looking into that
[12:43] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I'll assign to me to be notified and add it to my todo list - any known external time dependencies?
[12:43] <rbasak> cpaelzer: yeah that's fine. The bug is two years old so a couple of weeks won't matter.
[12:44] <rbasak> cpaelzer: no real time dependencies. It would be nice to do it before final freeze next Thursday but it's probably the lowest priority if something else needs doing.
[12:44] <cpaelzer> rbasak: then we have to hope jet lag doesn't let me sleep at the sprint next week :-)
[12:48]  * freezevee is trying to sleep
[14:06] <samba35> how do i check all services started @sysetem boot
[14:06] <ianorlin> samba35: which ubuntu version
[14:06] <samba35> 14.04.3
[14:07] <samba35> does it change version to version ?
[14:07] <ianorlin> well 15.04 and later will different because systemd is new init system
[14:07] <samba35> or is it systemd or upstram
[14:08] <samba35> ok
[14:08] <ianorlin> >=15.04 systemd and earlier was upstart
[14:09] <samba35> can i use numa (kvm/libvirt) with single socket cpu ? or do i require two sockets ?
[14:25] <RoyK> samba35: there's no need for numa on a single socket, but it'll probably work
[14:25] <samba35> ok
[14:30] <koheleth> any chance of less kernel updates and reboots required please?
[14:30] <koheleth> seem to be booting once a week
[14:35] <teward> anyone know why I'm getting this, and no IPv6 address, when trying to force a DHCP6 update with dhclient?  http://paste.ubuntu.com/12715333/
[14:37] <jrwren> teward: sounds like some shell script thinks /bin/sh is bash.
[14:37] <teward> jrwren: so you mean the default-installed scripts
[14:37] <teward> so that should be a bug?
[14:37] <jrwren> teward: I'd guess so, but i don't have a shopt on line 55 of my /sbin/dhclient-script on vivid.
[14:38] <jelly> koheleth: you can read the changelogs and decide if the changes are relevant for your systems and workload.  A fix in SCTP is not relevant if you don't use SCTP anywhere and it's not insmoded at all
[14:38] <teward> jrwren: nor do I.
[14:38] <teward> and that's Vivid
[14:39] <teward> jrwren: hence my hunting
[14:39] <teward> lemme finish the apt-get update; apt-get upgrade; reboot
[14:39] <jrwren> teward: to be honest, I didn't know dhclient-script supported ipv6. I run -sf /dev/null and manually call a few scripts to set things up.
[14:39] <teward> see if anything got fixed
[14:39] <jrwren> teward: let me know. I'm very ipv6 curious
[14:39] <teward> jrwren: 'dhclient -6' exists
[14:39] <teward> jrwren: and it works on 14.04
[14:40] <jrwren> teward: right. i use that.  and I specify -sf
[14:40] <jrwren> teward: I'm also using prefix delegation, which I don't think dhclient-script supports.
[14:41] <teward> I don't have prefix delegation, straight DHCP6 server in a private range.
[14:41] <teward> which appears to work xD
[14:41] <teward> (pfSense handles the outbound NATing)
[14:41] <jrwren> cool, good to know.
[14:41] <teward> but even that doesn't work
[14:41] <jrwren> i don't run dhcp6, i just let radvd do its thing
[14:42] <teward> :P
[14:42] <teward> jrwren: i don't run it on this system, an din fact auto v6 via /etc/network/interfaces (dhcp) also doesn't work on this system
[14:42] <teward> but it works *fine* on 14.04
[14:44] <jamespage> coreycb, neutron-vpnaas needs a sponsor?
[14:44] <coreycb> jamespage, yes it does
[14:44] <jamespage> coreycb, done
[14:45] <coreycb> jamespage, thanks.  I have a todo  I haven't gotten to to try and get access to upload those universe packages.
[14:45] <jamespage> coreycb, I wonder whether we can create a openstack-universe seed for them and add that seed to the server ppu upload rights
[14:46] <jrwren> teward: hrm. I think autoconfig works at kernel level or something. afaik, an up interface which recieves an advertisement, configures itself by default.
[14:46] <teward> jrwren: indeed, and it's supposed to, but it doesn't
[14:47] <teward> hence trying to force a dhcp update
[14:47] <teward> which of course doesn't happen with the error
[14:47] <teward> still filing a bug lol
[14:47] <coreycb> jamespage, I'll mention that when I chat with colin or stephane
[14:47] <teward> because it works on Trusty
[14:47] <jrwren> ah, i see.
[14:48] <jamespage> coreycb, i did swift and a few syncs from debian
[14:48] <jamespage> coreycb, adding murano* to the cloud-archive as well
[14:48] <coreycb> jamespage, awesome, thanks
[14:51] <teward> jrwren: apparently it's already filed - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1450116 and the parent https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1448690
[14:52] <teward> jrwren: who manages those
[14:52] <jrwren> teward: i've no idea
[14:53] <teward> meh
[15:20] <guillaume_alloxr> hi
[15:21] <guillaume_alloxr> is there anybody for a little help ? i'm trying to install ubuntu server on a Power5 i series machine
[15:21] <guillaume_alloxr> I need to specifiy in the storage allocation settings where the "ipl" is i guess that's the .iso but then it asks for an ipl parameter, which is VNC=1 for redhat for example, what should it be for ubuntu server 14.04 ?
[15:38] <hallyn> dannf: so for the arm qemu patchset, our package doesn't even have the patch "target-arm: Add the GICv2m to the virt board" yet (no v2 at all).  Do we need that, i.e. should i cherrypick those patches or patch around them?
[15:38] <hallyn> i dont' care either way, just not sure if you need the v2m
[15:39] <dannf> hallyn: 2.4 base?
[15:40] <hallyn> oh, heh, no.  i guess i should merge that first.
[15:40] <hallyn> forgot that was what you were wanting.  nm :)
[15:40] <dannf> np. you might hold off - i did an x86 build and it failed. i think due to lack of disk space, but double checking now
[15:40] <dannf> hallyn: should know within the hour
[15:41] <hallyn> ok, thanks for hte heads up - will wait
[15:41] <dannf> hallyn: but certainly, if you want to backport those to 2.3, that'd be awesome :)
[15:50] <RoyK> hallyn: not all arm CPUs have hwvirt
[15:51] <hallyn> RoyK: of course :)  but those that do would like qemu to use it
[15:52] <hallyn> anyway i was porting onto the wrong tree so nothing to see here :)
[15:53] <RoyK> hallyn: you probably drank too much dihydrogen monoxide
[15:55] <hallyn> or not enough
[15:56] <hallyn> (dinner was salty)
[16:07] <dannf> hallyn: built fine this time
[16:15] <hallyn> k
[17:26] <thebwt> Where can I read up about ubuntu major versions of packages? Like right now in 14.04, the mysql-server metapackage points to mysql-server-5.5. But mysql 5.6 is also in the repos. Is this just the pull from debian sid at the time?
[17:26] <thebwt> in wily, only 5.6 is there (but also percona, and mariadb). Will future versions get added later or are those it?
[18:14] <sarnold> thebwt: it is very very rare for entirely new packages to be added to a release after it's been released. I can't recall it happening, but I may have missed one..
[18:14] <sarnold> thebwt: openjdk-8 seems like the most logical candidate, and that hasn't happened, anyway
[18:18] <thebwt> Roger that
[18:18] <thebwt> Thank you sarnold
[18:21] <thebwt> then the other part of my question, we package mysql 5.5 and 5.6 in 14.04.  Yet only php 5.5, no php5.6 . How are those decisions made?
[18:25] <sarnold> thebwt: I think that's due to debian's decision to have separate mysql packages for each upstream version but only one php5 package for all upstream versions of php
[18:26] <thebwt> Got it, that's what I figured.