[04:30] <pitti> Good morning
[04:51] <hikiko> good morning pitti and everyone
[04:52] <pitti> hey hikiko, how are you?
[05:04] <hikiko> I'm fine :) you pitti ?
[05:04] <hikiko> I was making coffee
[05:04] <pitti> mostly well again, thank!
[05:05] <hikiko> :D
[05:19] <didrocks> good morning
[05:26] <pitti> bonjour didrocks
[05:27] <didrocks> hey pitti, feeling better?
[05:27] <pitti> didrocks: much, thanks! how are you?
[05:28] <didrocks> pitti: I'm ok, thanks
[05:31] <didrocks> I guess I defeated the flackyness due to s-jenkins infra: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/udtc-trusty-tests/ \o/
[05:36] <pitti> didrocks: spotless!
[05:43] <didrocks> pitti: still waiting for the old yellow/red tests runs to be replaced by nice and joyful green :)
[06:06] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[06:09] <didrocks> re seb128
[06:10] <seb128> re didrocks
[06:11] <pitti> bonjour seb128 !
[06:11] <seb128> salut pitti, ça va ? happy friday !
[06:12] <pitti> seb128: hereux vendredi aussi !
[06:12] <pitti> seb128: je vais très mieux, merci ! j'ai dormi bien
[06:12] <seb128> super :-)
[06:42] <Sweet5hark1> seb128, didrocks, pitti: bonjour et moin!
[06:42] <pitti> moni moin Sweet5hark1, wie gehts?
[06:45] <didrocks> hey hey Sweet5hark1
[06:49] <seb128> hey Sweet5hark1
[06:55] <Sweet5hark1> pitti: Dont get any coding done this week which is slightly annoying, but otherwise Im good. ;)
[07:06] <willcooke> morning
[07:07] <didrocks> morning early willcooke
[07:07] <hikiko> morning willcooke
[07:07] <hikiko> https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/815996 willcooke do you know if someone fixed that bug?
[07:07] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 815996 in compiz-plugins-main (Ubuntu) "Desktop occasionally freezes/locks up when switching workspaces" [High,Fix committed]
[07:07] <hikiko> I still get it
[07:08] <hikiko> someone changed the status to fix commited
[07:17] <seb128> hey willcooke hikiko
[07:18] <hikiko> hi seb128 and didrocks
[07:21] <didrocks> hey hikiko
[07:22] <Trevinho> morning
[07:22] <larsu> good morning all!
[07:22] <didrocks> hey Trevinho, larsu
[07:23] <hikiko> hi larsu Trevinho
[07:23] <Trevinho> hey, hey! :)
[07:23] <Sweet5hark1> hikiko, larsu, willcooke, Trevinho: g'morn.
[07:23] <hikiko> lol
[07:23] <hikiko> good morning Sweet5hark1
[07:23] <Trevinho> an infinite  loop could start
[07:23] <hikiko> hahahaha
[07:28] <seb128> hey Trevinho larsu
[07:54] <willcooke> hikiko, dunno.  Looks like someone who doesn't know what they are doing changed that bug status.  Safe to set back I think
[07:58] <willcooke> didrocks, yeah quick early email check, then feed, dress and school boy #1, then tea, then back at it
[07:58] <willcooke> :)
[08:06] <seb128> is formatting or usb key + creating a partition working for others?
[08:08] <willcooke> seb128, testing
[08:09] <willcooke> seb128, using disks?
[08:09] <seb128> yes
[08:09] <seb128> gnome-disks
[08:09] <pitti> seb128: I just did that two days ago on my brand new usb stick, worked without a hitch
[08:09] <pitti> what is it doing for you?
[08:09] <willcooke> oops - very nearly formatted the wrong drive :)
[08:10] <seb128> pitti,
[08:10] <seb128> "Error wiping newly created partition /dev/sdb1: Command-line `wipefs -a "/dev/sdb1"' exited with non-zero exit status 1: wipefs: erreur : /dev/sdb1 : échec d'initialisation de l'analyse: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type"
[08:10] <seb128> but there is a /dev/sdb1
[08:11] <willcooke> seb128, gnome-disks just crashed on me
[08:11] <seb128> and calling that manually works
[08:11] <seb128> willcooke, that's probably https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479710
[08:11] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1479710 in gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu) "/usr/bin/gnome-disks:11:g_dbus_object_get_interface:udisks_object_peek_drive:gdu_window_select_object:create_partition_cb:g_task_return_now" [High,Triaged]
[08:11] <seb128> which is where I started from
[08:11] <seb128> trying to get a valgrind log for that
[08:13] <willcooke> ha, yes
[08:13] <Trevinho> hikiko: set it to triaged...
[08:13] <Trevinho> hikiko: also can you get a stacktrace of that situation?
[08:14] <Trevinho> I've never got that (but I don't use workspaces much), so when it happens please attach to gdb and try to get something
[08:16] <willcooke> seb128, when it doesn't crash, I was able to create a new FAT partition and format it
[08:16] <seb128> k
[08:16] <seb128> I wonder if that's a 32 bits issue
[08:19] <hikiko> Trevinho, there's no crash, just the screen is grabbed
[08:19] <Trevinho> hikiko: yeah, of course... but you can get where it happens
[08:20] <Trevinho> hikiko: if you "sudo gdb -p$(pidof compiz)" you can attach to the process and get the backtrace of where the thing happens
[08:20] <hikiko> yes i kno
[08:20] <hikiko> :)
[08:20] <Trevinho> so... it's 99% due to a sync X call...
[08:20] <hikiko> I had tried that
[08:21] <hikiko> but as far as i remember
[08:21] <hikiko> I couldn't catch it
[08:21] <Trevinho> so, in case it's a really a trouble, you can try to change that by using xcb (async) if possible
[08:21] <hikiko> yes
[08:21] <hikiko> there's a compiz option
[08:21] <hikiko> I think I had tried all that
[08:22] <hikiko> but I will look at it again at some point
[08:22] <hikiko> (too many bugs :/)
[08:24] <Trevinho> hikiko: yeah, let's focus on main stuff, affecting unity as well for now
[08:24] <Trevinho> that does it, but unless you can't reproduce it, it's hard to figure out details
[08:38] <seb128> pitti, http://askubuntu.com/questions/642286/error-whilst-creating-partition ... I'm not the only one, but it doesn't seem common, I wonder if udisks does thing in an async way and try to wipefs before the partition is created
[09:06] <seb128> larsu, Trevinho, didrocks, does anyone feel like giving a look to those (should be easy, they are backport of small upstream g-s-d bugfix commits to u-s-d), I would like to do a landing
[09:06] <seb128> https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/unity-settings-daemon/xrandr_init_order/+merge/273728
[09:06] <seb128> https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/unity-settings-daemon/sound_delay_init/+merge/273729
[09:06] <seb128> https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/unity-settings-daemon/housekeeping_dont_follow_symlink/+merge/273731
[09:07] <Trevinho> ok
[09:07] <seb128> thanks
[09:07] <larsu> thanks Trevinho :)
[09:08] <seb128> bah, shotwell upload rejected
[09:09] <seb128> there was an upload to the archive not commited to the vcs
[09:09]  * seb128 fixes
[09:12] <Trevinho> seb128: I can't top-approve :/
[09:13] <seb128> Trevinho, added you to the team, that should work now
[09:13] <Trevinho> thanks
[09:15] <seb128> yw!
[09:15] <seb128> thanks for the reviews ;-)
[09:16] <Trevinho> np
[10:26] <qengho> good morning.
[10:27] <willcooke> morning qengho
[10:30] <didrocks> hey qengho
[10:30] <larsu> morning!
[10:35] <pitti> larsu: gosh, where are you? :)
[10:37] <larsu> pitti: at work since 9:22. Just saying good morning to qengho
[10:37] <pitti> larsu: oh, right :) (thought you went to a conference or so)
[10:37] <pitti> hey qengho!
[10:37] <larsu> pitti: no, that's next week (and only -1 from here)
[13:49] <willcooke> lolz:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/unity7-1510
[13:50] <willcooke> guess we can mark a lot of those as done next week, or delete it and move the not done to a new BO
[13:50] <willcooke> BP
[13:51] <seb128> oh, right
[13:51] <larsu> oh oh
[13:51] <larsu> really good we did that back then :)
[13:51] <willcooke> :D
[14:02]  * Trevinho got decorations o_O https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mate-dev/compiz/marco-decoration
[14:03] <willcooke> :)
[14:05] <didrocks> [larsu] black notifications in the unity greeter: TODO
[14:05] <didrocks> :p
[14:05] <didrocks> still accurate
[14:05] <didrocks> *hem*
[14:28] <qengho> http://rkuska.github.io/2015/10/08/Fedora-and-Python3.html
[14:54] <larsu> didrocks: oops :)
[14:54] <larsu> well I am fixing it
[14:56] <didrocks> larsu: I did update some of the status (the obviously ones that are done)
[14:56] <larsu> thanks :)
[14:56] <didrocks> yw
[15:26] <Trevinho> Mh, as you guys might remember (didrocks?) We're currently shipping some compiz patches as distro-patch, instead of having them in trunk.... I'm not sure this is still the best thing to do.
[15:26] <Trevinho> As I don't see much reason for doing that anymore (a part from non CLA approved patches, maybe - but I guess we've not them)
[15:27] <seb128> Trevinho, compiz is not under our copyright anyway no?
[15:27] <didrocks> Trevinho: the reason was mostly that "this wasn't good for compiz's upstream"
[15:27] <Trevinho> seb128: I think it is right now
[15:27] <didrocks> that's what sam was telling
[15:27] <didrocks> (having his upstream hat)
[15:27] <Trevinho> yeah, didrocks
[15:27] <seb128> k
[15:27] <didrocks> that was it
[15:27] <didrocks> there is no CLA on compiz
[15:28] <didrocks> as most of the code wasn't done under Canonical's area
[15:28] <didrocks> and it's copy/paste/adapt in C++
[15:28] <seb128> Trevinho, your call as new maintainer to consider them good for upstream then ;-)
[15:28] <didrocks> AFAIK
[15:28] <didrocks> yeah, I've always argued that this difference, being the only one shipping compiz, was ridiculous
[15:28] <didrocks> so I'm all in favor of merging :)
[15:28] <seb128> +1
[15:28] <Trevinho> Ah, even? Nice to hear... since bregma had to discuss with legal team a lot to get some nvidia code on it... :o
[15:29] <didrocks> Trevinho: interesting, that wasn't the case before and I doubt we chased all contributors on compiz
[15:29] <didrocks> (of course, Unity is another story…)
[15:29] <Trevinho> yeah, indeed... but we had some compiz fixes coming from nvidia, and ChrisTownsend also had to wait a lot for the "ok merge" signal...
[15:30] <didrocks> doesn't sound legit to me, but I might have missed one episod
[15:30] <didrocks> and there was no "previously on…" summary ;)
[15:31] <Trevinho> anyway... Well I think we can now safely merge most of the debian/patches/* content, as it makes just no sense right now
[15:31] <didrocks> yeeppppppp!
[15:31] <ChrisTownsend> Trevinho: Canonical lawyers certainly think Compiz is under the CLA, so tread lightly.
[15:31] <bregma> yep, I didn;t just make stuff up
[15:31] <Trevinho> ChrisTownsend: yeah, I was thinking the same...
[15:32] <Trevinho> at least, I didn't study the thing a lot, but maybe we could have saved some time :D
[15:32] <bregma> but as far as I know there are no patches in the Compiz packaging that need the CLA
[15:32] <bregma> I think they can all be merged into the sources
[15:32] <Trevinho> right
[15:33] <bregma> or in some cases, maybe dropped
[15:34] <bregma> BTW, Compiz ships with Mint and Arch, although you could consider them derivatives I suppose
[15:34] <Trevinho> bregma: yes, but for mint I think they're using the debian/patches anyway
[15:34] <bregma> and we're still trying to get it back into Debian, but I got busy....
[15:35] <Trevinho> bregma: Arch, might not, but they can still apply reverse-patch downstream
[15:35] <bregma> either way, I think as the only legit upstream we can just merge them all
[16:05]  * didrocks waves good evening and good week-end! See you on Sunday/Monday for some of you! :)
[16:31] <willcooke> right, I'm taking off.  Safe travels all, see you next week
[17:17] <andyrock> \o/
[17:18] <andyrock> Trevinho: at least we can merge all the patches that comes from us
[17:18] <Trevinho> andyrock: yeah, I'm merging evrything
[17:18] <andyrock> yeah
[17:18] <andyrock> in case you'll take all the fault
[17:19] <andyrock> :D
[23:27] <sandeep_> Anyone on-line now...
[23:29] <sarnold> sandeep_: irc works best if you ask questions into the ether.. the person with an answer may not come around for twenty minutes but they stand a chance of seeing yourr question that way