[12:20] <Unit193> bluesabre: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings.git/commit/?id=472ea3cbcf698346bebd9a2c71f17b5921fe956d
[12:24] <Unit193> (IN case you didn't see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790104)
[12:24] <ubottu> Debian bug 790104 in sponsorship-requests "RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.0-1 [ITP] -- Settings Editor for LightDM Gtk+ Greeter" [Wishlist,Open]
[12:26] <knome> Unit193, does SwissBot still do the s/this/that/ output?
[12:27] <Unit193> Noooo.
[12:27] <knome> Unit193, ta
[12:27] <Unit193> ...Yes.
[12:27] <knome> :D
[12:27] <knome> Unit193 is silly.
[12:27] <knome> s/silly/nice/
[12:27] <SwissBot> knome meant: "Unit193 is nice."
[12:27] <knome> nope.
[12:27] <knome> can we turn that off?
[12:27] <flocculant> s/off/on
[12:28] <flocculant> :p
[12:28] <knome> sigh
[12:28] <knome> :)
[12:28] <flocculant> :)
[12:34] <Unit193> a
[12:34] <Unit193> s/a/b/
[12:34] <SwissBot> Unit193 meant: "b"
[12:34] <Unit193> Hrm.
[12:36] <knome> yep.
[12:43] <Unit193> a
[12:43] <Unit193> s/a/b/
[12:43] <SwissBot> Unit193 meant: "b"
[12:43] <knome> great!
[12:43] <knome> now it works!
[12:43] <knome> ;)
[12:43]  * knome slaps SwissBot 
[12:45] <Unit193> a
[12:45] <Unit193> s/a/b/
[12:45] <SwissBot> Unit193 meant: "b"
[12:45] <Unit193> Well it's not supposed to do that now, but oh well.
[12:46] <knome> sigh
[12:46] <knome> fix the code then!
[12:52] <Unit193> It's supposed to blacklist this channel, but it doesn't exactly support blacklisting.
[12:53] <knome> great.
[12:56] <knome> flocculant, from #xfce-dev: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TBzP0baOBM
[12:57] <flocculant> good lord
[12:57] <flocculant> nope - not a chance 
[12:57] <knome> :D
[12:57] <knome> watch it
[12:59] <Unit193> a
[12:59] <Unit193> s/a/b/
[12:59] <SwissBot> Unit193 meant: "b"
[13:14] <flocculant> SwissBot: I think we got what he meant 
[15:02] <flocculant> ochosi bluesabre - not of any great importance (and would propose fix if I knew where and how) bug 1504958
[15:02] <ubottu> bug 1504958 in xfce4-power-manager (Ubuntu) "Minor wording issue" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1504958
[15:02] <flocculant> nor have I upstreamed it as yet - tell me if you want me to do that 
[15:14] <drc> So, something good came out of all that :)
[15:17] <flocculant> :)
[15:35] <flocculant> no idea how to grab the xfce source 
[15:38] <flocculant> yes I do ... 
[15:38] <flocculant> I think :p
[15:41] <knome> lol
[15:41] <knome> don't think, do! 
[15:42] <flocculant> I did 
[15:42] <knome> :)
[15:42] <flocculant> I also found the text string :)
[15:42] <flocculant> what I do next I've no idea :D
[15:43] <knome> hahah
[15:43] <flocculant> especially given I've not even done the buczilla one yet :p
[15:44] <flocculant> really either need to learn to touch type properly or get a kbd that's not worn out in places ... 
[15:50] <knome> hahah
[15:50] <flocculant> meh - trying to compile it and it says I've no glib2
[15:50] <knome> :P
[15:55] <flocculant> mmm 
[15:56] <flocculant> well that's not playing nicely with me :(
[15:56] <flocculant> of course I don't actually know if me changing something then configuring it would even work :D
[15:56] <flocculant> make etc
[15:58] <knome> developers will hate me for this, but if you plan to change a string only, then it should be relatively safe to not even test build...
[16:00] <flocculant> yea - but practice :)
[16:00] <knome> sure
[16:00] <flocculant> fighting gtk now :p
[16:00] <knome> building xfce isn't the easiest one
[16:00] <knome> yep
[16:02] <flocculant> sigh - now can't find gtk3 dev package I assume
[16:03] <knome> ;)
[16:19] <flocculant> \o/ 
[16:19] <flocculant> got to the end of those dependencies :D
[16:20] <knome> huzzah
[16:23] <flocculant> http://i.imgur.com/sO2RU9m.png 
[16:23] <flocculant> wow - I did it :D
[16:23] <knome> ;)
[16:24] <flocculant> whether anyone is interested is of course a different question :p
[16:24] <flocculant> and how to get that from local to not ofc
[16:48] <Unit193> I feel like now would be a bad time to remind you of  apt-get build-dep $pkg  then.
[16:48] <flocculant> not really
[16:49] <flocculant> now would be a good time to remind me - though probably 4 weeks would be better when I forget and this install is xx ... :p
[17:07] <Unit193> foo bar baz
[17:07] <Unit193> s/baz/biz/
[17:08] <flocculant> does that count as \o/ then :p
[17:08] <Unit193> Apathy from me.
[17:09] <flocculant> :)
[17:09] <Unit193> Worst case, I drop SwissBot back into #xubuntu-verbose and merge that channel into this one in Irssi. :P
[17:28] <knome> Unit193, the notifications are okay, the "i'll correct you" stuff not so much
[17:28] <knome> ...or games that are verbose on the channel :P
[17:37] <knome> botsnack
[17:37] <knome> Unit193, nope.
[17:37] <knome> :P
[17:37] <Unit193> SwissBot: botsnack
[17:37] <SwissBot> Unit193: thanks :)
[17:46] <knome> Unit193, related;
[17:47] <knome> Unit193, can some of the -core related work items be closed now?
[17:47] <Unit193> As far as I'm concerned, months ago.
[17:47] <knome> why aren't they? :P
[17:48] <Unit193> Because they're not merged in, just proposed.
[17:48] <knome> but the changes are done
[17:49] <Unit193> Sure, just not effectivly.
[17:49] <knome> so maybe close the current ones and add one for "make sure patches are merged"
[17:49] <knome> i know that we're in the middle of the process, but so does everybody else in the team
[17:49] <knome> however, if you are not in the team, the situation looks like it's not being proposed
[17:49] <knome> or can look like
[17:50] <Unit193> Don't really care one way or another, whatever works and is least messing around.
[17:52] <knome> the whole idea in the tracker is that we... yes, you guessed it, track the progress
[17:53] <Unit193> Progress: Not moving. :P
[17:54] <knome> progress is: something is done, we're waiting for feedback from others
[17:54] <knome> really, you said it yourself:
[17:54] <knome> 20:47  Unit193: As far as I'm concerned, months ago.
[17:54] <knome> then close them
[17:54] <knome> if you feel there needs to be one item open, then create new that describes the situation better than the original ones
[17:55] <Unit193> As I said, I don't really care, whatever works best and is least busy work.  And, already did that, figured you'd see the mail.
[17:55] <knome> :P
[17:55] <knome> re: tracking i think clarity and accuracy is the most important thing
[17:56] <knome> channging items isn't busy work, so
[17:56] <knome> -n
[17:56] <knome> but thanks
[17:56] <Unit193> Proposed by Unit 193 (unit193) on 2015-08-12  Oh, I wasn't overstating then...
[17:56] <knome> sigh, that's not even a long time :)
[17:57] <knome> i was waiting a three-line change on a CSS file for the planet over 6 months
[17:57] <Unit193> No, but does actually fit "months"
[17:57] <knome> and the other side to the thing is that keeping poking people helps
[17:57] <knome> and talking with them about it
[17:58] <knome> we waited for two months and nobody looked, now we actually poked them and they gave feedback that let us progress
[17:58] <knome> i'm not saying that we should instapoke people, but at some point, just stop waiting and do it
[17:59] <krytarik> knome: Unit193 poked infinity three times during that time though.
[17:59] <knome> what was the response to that?
[17:59] <krytarik> "I'll look."
[17:59] <knome> and how long did we wait after that reply before asking again?
[18:01] <knome> Unit193, one more thing: feel free to assign the work item for ubuntu-debian-cd (or whatever team is)
[18:02] <knome> that's also valuable information
[18:02] <Unit193> Talked to him at least twice, and simply poked once.  Just because you don't see it doesn't mean it doesn't happen, more so since you aren't even in that channel.
[18:02] <knome> sure
[18:03] <knome> maybe we should just poke more
[18:03] <knome> i don't know
[18:03] <Unit193> Also, clearly shouldn't have poked slangasek. >_>
[18:03] <Unit193> :P
[18:03] <knome> because?
[18:03] <knome> he totally gave good feedback.
[18:03] <knome> i would be scared if everything we propose would be merged as is
[18:04] <knome> imo, putting the two ISOs under the same product is a good idea
[18:05] <knome> getting that kind of feedback also feels to me that they care
[18:05] <knome> you don't get that every time.
[18:05] <knome> that feeling, that is
[18:07] <knome> Unit193, and sorry if something i said offended you; it was a bit unfair to say that we didn't do poking before because obviously i don't know what happens on "every" channel
[18:09] <knome> if poking doesn't seem to give any results in the future, let's try to take action before to try to fix that situation
[18:10] <knome> s/before/earlier/
[19:41] <flocculant> looks like gvfs fix coming associated with the thunar issues of late
[19:50] <ochosi> flocculant: oh nice! is that in one of the linked reports?
[19:50] <knome> hullo ochosi 
[19:50] <ochosi> hey knome 
[19:50] <flocculant> ochosi: the thunar/gvfs thing? 
[19:50] <ochosi> yeah
[19:51] <flocculant> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756153
[19:51] <ubottu> Gnome bug 756153 in general "Clicking a file-picker dialog in GTK3-enabled Firefox or Epiphany triggers crash and/or GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_dbus_connection_is_closed: assertion 'G_IS_DBUS_CONNECTION (connection)' failed" [Normal,New]
[19:51] <flocculant> and bug 1504542 
[19:51] <ubottu> bug 1504542 in gvfs (Ubuntu) "/usr/bin/thunar:11:g_dbus_connection_is_closed:_g_dbus_connection_get_sync:create_proxy_for_file2:create_proxy_for_file:g_daemon_file_query_info" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1504542
[19:51] <flocculant> I just noticed - cos I check out proposed to see what's coming 
[19:51] <flocculant> and hi ochosi :)
[19:52] <flocculant> hopefully it will also fix what I've been seeing the last few days 
[19:53] <ochosi> that'd be nice
[19:54] <flocculant> it would - drove me nuts the other day :p
[19:57] <flocculant> I was seeing SIGSEGV in g_dbus_connection_is_closed()
[19:57] <flocculant> all started showing up at the same time though