[08:44] <morphis> hey!
[08:44] <morphis> I am wondering if it is possible to change the architecture of a single package (bluez-test-scripts) from "all" to "linux-any" without causing any problems
[12:05] <xnox> morphis: why whould you do this? what the bug/problem you are trying to solve?
[12:06] <morphis> xnox: already solved my problem, but what I am solving here is that I need to include further test excutable in that package which are present in binary form
[12:06] <morphis> which doesn't fit into an "all" package
[12:07] <xnox> right.
[17:38] <rsalveti> infinity: where you able to review rtl8812au?
[18:07] <flexiondotorg> infinity, Please can you update the ubuntumate-meta package please?
[18:08] <flexiondotorg> infinity, I've move fcitx-bin to the live seed to reflect how Ubuntu does things, in order to support CJKV users.
[18:12] <cyphermox> rsalveti: flexiondotorg: today is a national holiday in Canada and US, many of us are away from computers
[18:12] <flexiondotorg> cyphermox, Ah, OK.
[18:12] <cyphermox> flexiondotorg: do you know how to do the metapackage update? if you want to send me a diff I could sponsor it
[18:13] <flexiondotorg> cyphermox, OK.
[18:13] <flocculant> good job RC freeze is tomorrow then :)
[18:13] <rsalveti> cyphermox: just hard to know if holidays really applies for infinity :P
[18:13] <flexiondotorg> Just in the middle of some other stuff.
[18:13] <cyphermox> rsalveti: I know, right? ;)
[18:13] <flexiondotorg> rsalveti, lol
[18:15] <cyphermox> flexiondotorg: ok, I'll do the metapackage update in a bit, just syncing my laptop right now (and preparing a local archive mirror)
[18:15] <flexiondotorg> cyphermox, Thanks.
[18:16] <cyphermox> rsalveti: sorry, I can't help you w/ rtl8812au.
[18:16] <rsalveti> no worries
[18:34] <slangasek> bdmurray, doko: why did bug #1500768 get redirected to python-urllib3?  I thought it was agreed that the python3.4 behavior needed to be rolled back because it could impact other code
[18:53] <teward> is anyone around to process an SRU that retroactively 'dummy's a package?
[19:32] <bdmurray> Could somebody reject ubuntu-release-upgrader?
[19:48] <doko> slangasek, well, that would mean disabling the whole certificate verification
[21:31] <cyphermox> superm1: ^ fwupdate can't really be synced, since we're waiting for it to be signed; it would invalidate the signature to have a new binary built
[21:31] <cyphermox> anyone reviewing the queue:  ^
[21:32] <cyphermox> slangasek: infinity: ^
[21:38] <infinity> cyphermox: Oh, is this a binary that needs to go to Microsoft for signing?
[21:38] <cyphermox> yep
[21:38] <cyphermox> fwiw, i'm looking at flexiondotorg's metapackage update right now
[21:38] <infinity> cyphermox: So, I guess you have fwupdate-signed packaging ready for when that comes back?
[21:39] <cyphermox> it will be rady for then
[21:39] <cyphermox> it's no ready yet.
[21:39] <infinity> cyphermox: Kay.  If it's already been submitted and wheels are in motion, I'll reject the sync.
[21:39] <cyphermox> it is, there's a ticket number.
[21:40] <infinity> cyphermox: Alright.  Rejected.  And now off to vote before the polls close.
[21:40] <cyphermox> !!
[21:40] <cyphermox> yeah
[21:40] <cyphermox> careful, there's *lots* of people.
[21:41] <infinity> cyphermox: So I've heard.
[21:42] <infinity> cyphermox: I have four hours, I think I should be okay.  I hope.
[22:23] <cjwatson> w/wg 53
[22:23] <cjwatson> sigh, sorry
[22:24] <bdmurray> infinity: Could you have a look at bug 1504761?