[06:30] <robru> michi: do you need help with silo 28?
[06:30] <michi> robru: No, I abandoned it, thanks
[06:30] <robru> michi: oh OK
[06:30] <robru> You're welcome
[06:30] <michi> I accidentally pasted the wrong MR URL when I created the request.
[06:30] <michi> I then tried editing it, deleting the original URL and adding the new one.
[06:31] <michi> But that didn’t seem to fix it.
[06:31] <michi> So, I abandoned the silo.
[06:31] <robru> michi: uh
[06:31] <robru> michi: that absolutely should fix it...
[06:31] <michi> The original MR did not have a commit message.
[06:31] <michi> The correct MR did have a commit message.
[06:31] <robru> michi: yeah but you sound be able to edit the MPs
[06:31] <michi> After changing the URLs and rebuilding, it still told me that the commit message was missing.
[06:32] <michi> I edited the URL for the silo MR
[06:32] <michi> Not the MR itself.
[06:32] <michi> I had two MRs, and created the silo with the wrong MR by mistake.
[06:32] <michi> That MR did not have the commit message.
[06:32] <michi> Then I edited the silo.
[06:32] <michi> Replaced the wrong MR URL with the correct one.
[06:33] <michi> The correct one had a commit message all along.
[06:33] <michi> But the rebuild still told me that the commit message was missing.
[06:33] <robru> michi: according to the log you never changed the mp list. I guess you forgot to save?
[06:33] <michi> Hmmm...
[06:33] <michi> I guess that’s possible, yes.
[06:33] <michi> So, if there are pending changes, the rebuild button is still active.
[06:34] <michi> Suggestion: If I hit “edit” and change the contents of a field, the only options at that point should be “cancel” and “save”.
[06:34] <michi> That would avoid the problem.
[06:34] <robru> michi: good point, can you file a bug?
[06:35] <michi> Will do. What’s the project again?
[06:35] <robru> michi: yeah the requests have different MPs listed
[06:35] <robru> michi: it's lp:bileto
[06:35] <michi> Ta!
[06:35] <robru> michi: thanks for reporting, will fix tomorrow
[06:35] <michi> No rush!
[06:35] <michi> thanks for letting me know what I did wrong :)
[06:36] <robru> You're welcome!
[08:03] <robru> Saviq: please check your email, i sent an updated citrain script for you to beta test
[08:03] <Saviq> robru, yup, saw that, will do, just a note that boottest does a similar thing (but just for a single source package instead of scanning a PPA), might be you could share code
[08:04] <Saviq> robru, and. shouldn't. you. sleep?
[08:04] <robru> Saviq: it's only 1am!
[08:04] <Saviq> oh you're fine then, still 4h to go ;P
[08:04] <robru> Haha
[08:08] <Mirv> Saviq: we should stand united in trying to help robru, not make it worse! :)
[08:08] <robru> Saviq: where is the bootest code? Will be hard to share if it's not in the same source tree
[08:09] <Saviq> robru, https://code.launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering/ubuntu-touch-boottest/
[08:15] <robru> Saviq: i don't really see anything relevant in there.
[08:18] <sil2100> jibel, davmor2, rvr
[08:18] <sil2100> jibel, davmor2, rvr: silo 57 is ready for QA (the fix for alarms)
[08:18] <sil2100> I don't see it on the trello board tho
[08:19] <jibel> sil2100, I suppose robru update broke the bot :(
[08:20] <sil2100> Yeah, probably, but he sent out an e-mail about that on Monday!
[08:20] <robru> jibel: i warned you last week
[08:20] <robru> sil2100: well i sent it Friday but you had all Monday to update.
[08:21] <jibel> robru, don't really had time to update the bot this week
[08:21] <robru> jibel: sorry about that. We still have to schedule when to change all the qa statuses too...
[08:23] <Saviq> robru, sure, just saying
[08:23] <jibel> 24h notice on a release week is a bit short to do an update
[08:24] <robru> jibel: you don't work through the weekend? ;-)
[08:24] <jibel> no
[08:25] <robru> jibel: should be easy update, just stop reading merge-proposals field and read sources field instead.
[08:27] <jibel> robru, not that trivial because I still need the detail for the merge_proposals and the comments. So now I've to do it in 2 passes
[08:27] <jibel> load the list then load the detail of each ticket
[08:27] <robru> jibel: why do you need the comments?
[08:28] <jibel> robru, because people write comments sometimes
[08:28] <robru> jibel: but you could just link to the ticket. Not sure why that needs to be in the trello board
[08:31] <jibel> I'll probably remove the comment, too much noise and it became useless
[08:31] <jibel> but still need the merge proposals
[08:31] <jibel> robru, I need the merge proposals at least because it adds the detailed status of each MP that bileto doesn't provide
[08:31] <robru> jibel: why do you need the merge proposals? I thought you were only parsing package names from there, that's obsolete
[08:32] <robru> Oh
[08:32] <jibel> robru, for example https://trello.com/c/NLhBM0OJ/2371-269-ubuntu-landing-055-qtubuntu-media-indicator-sound-media-hub-jhodapp
[08:32] <jibel> for each MP you know it's status adnd the status of the reviews
[08:33] <jibel> much faster than opening bileto, clicking on each merge and manually check its status
[08:33] <robru> jibel: how are you getting the statuses? Are you using lplib in your bot?
[08:33] <jibel> yes
[08:33] <robru> Hmmmmmmm your bot does more than i thought.
[08:34] <oSoMoN> ubuntu-qa: can I have an ETA on when silo 14 will be tested please? I’m hoping to land another silo on top of that one this week
[08:34] <robru> jibel: i don't want you to implement a two-pass thing, is it OK if you wait for me to re-add mp list tomorrow? Can you live with broken bot for a day?
[08:35] <davmor2> oSoMoN: not for ota7 though right?
[08:35] <jibel> robru, that's fine I'll fix it it looks simple enough
[08:35] <jibel> davmor2, no for 8
[08:36] <davmor2> E:TOOMANYSILONUMBERS
[08:36] <oSoMoN_> davmor2, (sorry my connection hung up, dunno if you saw my response) no, that’s not for ota7
[08:37] <davmor2> oSoMoN: so there are a couple of silos that need to land for ota 7 and then we start on the list of silos for ota8
[08:38] <robru> oSoMoN_: hey while I've got you here can you comment on the autoremove? https://code.launchpad.net/~robru/phablet-tools/make-useful-again/+merge/274338
[08:38] <oSoMoN_> davmor2, ok, thanks!
[08:38] <oSoMoN_> robru, sure, lemme check
[08:39] <robru> oSoMoN_: like do you expect the silo to result in the removal of qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-web-plugin-assets?
[08:40] <robru> (Or perhaps was that removed by a recent seed change...)
[08:41] <oSoMoN_> robru, yes that’s correct, that package doesn’t exist anymore, if your device was on stable the removal is expected
[08:41] <robru> oSoMoN_: OK great, thanks
[08:50] <jibel> davmor2, can you take 57? there is no card for it
[08:50] <jibel> davmor2, it is the fire alarm fix
[08:50] <davmor2> jibel: yeap
[08:50] <jibel> davmor2, https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/508
[08:57] <dbarth> hey trainguards, i got silo 006 for a new oxide 1.10 landing https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/511
[08:58] <dbarth> can you help me upload the build 1.10.2 from the phablet ppa onto this silo for vivd testing?
[08:58] <dbarth> (same overlay requirement as usual)
[08:59] <dbarth> note that we will probably have another pre-release before the actual landing, so thanks for your patience with us ;)
[09:01] <oSoMoN_> dbarth, chrome 46 has been declared stable, maybe chris wants to release 1.10.3 and we use that directly?
[09:07] <jibel> oSoMoN, we'll land silo 55, then 2 unity/mir silos, then yours
[09:07] <oSoMoN> jibel, excellent, thanks!
[09:12] <Mirv> dbarth: ok!
[09:13] <Mirv> dbarth: although, answer oSoMoN first I guess
[09:16] <dbarth> oSoMoN: would make sense; chrisccoulson ^^ wdyt?
[09:16] <dbarth> Mirv: ok, then maybe we can wait a bit for that upload indeed
[09:17] <Mirv> dbarth: ok, just ping us again when needed
[10:14] <davmor2> sil2100: can you copy silo 57 to the snapshot
[10:21] <sil2100> davmor2: on it, thanks!
[10:23] <sil2100> ogra_: hey hey! Could you press teh publish buttonz on https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-057-2-publish/12/console ?
[10:24] <Mirv> ogra_: while looking at sil2100's requests, https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-054-2-publish/10/ is also waiting (has packaging changes)
[10:28] <sil2100> jibel, davmor2: do you guys know anything about Ken's progress on the apport problem?
[10:31] <davmor2> sil2100: let me just try and read Ken's mind
[10:33] <sil2100> davmor2: and...?
[10:33] <sil2100> What did you read?
[10:33] <sil2100> Don't tell me you can't do it, pfff
[10:33] <davmor2> sil2100: sorry it's a maze and now I'm lost
[10:34] <sil2100> Quoting popey: so disappoint...
[10:38] <jibel> sil2100, no progress
[12:43] <sil2100> mterry: hey!
[12:43] <sil2100> mterry: you have a moment maybe to publish https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-057-2-publish/build for us? :)
[12:43] <sil2100> It's indicator-datetime
[12:44] <mterry> sil2100, will look
[12:44] <ogra_> sil2100, oops, sorry your ping slipped through
[12:44] <sil2100> Thank you!
[12:44]  * ogra_ only noticed it now
[12:44] <sil2100> ogra_: no worries :)
[12:46] <sil2100> hmm, jibel, davmor2: I'll kick a new image with the indicator-datetime for now, we can have another one once the apport fix is ready
[12:46] <jibel> sil2100, works for me
[12:56] <jhodapp> jibel, any update on silo 55?
[12:56] <jibel> jhodapp, rvr had some question about the controls in the indicator
[12:57] <jibel> questions*
[12:57] <jibel> rvr, ^
[12:57] <rvr> jhodapp: Hi
[12:57] <jhodapp> hey rvr
[12:57] <rvr> jhodapp: The controls seems to be deactivated
[12:57] <rvr> jhodapp: But the silo description says they are re-enabled
[12:57] <jhodapp> rvr, yes that's expected with the stable version of the music-app
[12:57] <rvr> jhodapp: Ok
[12:58] <jhodapp> rvr, the music-app is only adding a single track to the playlist at the moment, because it's not the version fully using a background playlist
[12:58] <rvr> jhodapp: Hmm
[12:58] <jhodapp> so that's correct behavior for the controls since there's nothing to skip to
[12:58] <rvr> jhodapp: But I can't pause the current track
[12:59] <jhodapp> rvr, for that we'd have to ask xavigarcia
[12:59] <jhodapp> rvr, I agree you should be able to
[14:25] <rvr> alf: Silo 16 approved
[14:27] <alf> rvr: Great, thanks
[14:49] <jgdx> trainguards: is it possible to land account-polld using the train?
[14:51] <sil2100> jgdx: let me take a look
[14:51] <jgdx> sil2100, ty
[14:52] <sil2100> jgdx: yes, should be no problem, I see it's been already landed in the train, there are even two silos with it (one ready for QA, but not sure if QA picked it up yet)
[14:53] <kgunn> trainguards so on silo 16 for mir0.17, we dual landed that....we'd also like to have someone copy that over to the wily archive as well
[14:53] <kgunn> there is an update to help fix a break due to a last minute mesa update in wily
[14:54] <kgunn> is there a process? or just ask here ? :)
[14:54] <jibel> sil2100, FYI expect silo 23 to land in one hour or so then you can build the final image
[14:55] <sil2100> kgunn: hah, I just poked on -devel about 0.16 being copied to wily ;)
[14:55] <sil2100> kgunn: since 0.16 already had the fix
[14:55] <sil2100> kgunn: but yeah, seb128 is on it
[14:55] <kgunn> sil2100: ah but aiui, 16 didn't
[14:55] <kgunn> we never landed a 16.2 afaik
[14:56] <sil2100> I tried building 0.16.1+15.10.20150930.1 in a chroot and the bug with headers was gone
[14:56] <sil2100> Anyway, I started looking into the build failure as it had no bug assigned again
[14:57] <seb128> kgunn, you want 0.17 to be copied to wily?
[14:57] <sil2100> Yeah, first I try to publish, wonder if there are packaging changes ;)
[14:58]  * sil2100 publishes
[14:58] <sil2100> Nope
[14:58] <sil2100> seb128: could you do some button pressing/reviewing? :)
[14:58] <sil2100> https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-016-2-publish/
[14:59] <sil2100> (I'm not authorized)
[15:00] <seb128> done
[15:00] <sil2100> \o/
[15:03] <kgunn> alf: camako alan_g ^ and looks like mir17 getting into wily as well, so all done
[15:04] <camako> kgunn, cool
[15:04] <alf> kgunn: ack
[15:49] <jgdx> sil2100, ty!
[16:07] <jibel> kenvandine, sil2100 silo 23 approved
[16:07] <jibel> sil2100, it must go to the snapshot then you can rebuild an image
[16:10] <popey> fginther: we may need some help with the weather app shortly, as we have to implement another API key for OpenWeatherMap (see bug 1505848) which needs injecting as per TWC previously (same file) via tha jenkins magic you made...
[16:10] <ubot5`> bug 1505848 in Ubuntu Weather App "OWM now requires an API key" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1505848
[16:12] <pmcgowan> jibel, did we get the alert sound fix?
[16:13] <jibel> pmcgowan, yes, it's in latest rc-proposed build
[16:15] <pmcgowan> cool
[16:16] <jibel> pmcgowan, now waiting for the publication of the apport fix to the snapshot and next build should be the last for this OTA
[16:23]  * pmcgowan crosses fingers
[16:24] <pmcgowan> jibel, thanks
[16:26] <sil2100> jibel: let me copy it over to the snapshot now
[16:26] <jibel> sil2100, let me know when you start a build then I'll ask for a new round of sanity tests
[16:27] <sil2100> kenvandine: can you publish your apport silo? :)
[16:28]  * sil2100 copied the binaries now
[16:30] <sil2100> Once those get published, I kick the image
[17:37] <sil2100> jibel, davmor2, rvr: the image is still building, should be done in ~0.5-1h
[22:55] <boiko> robru: hi, quick question: I removed an MR from silo 11, and now address-book-service has no changes in that silo, how can I get its packages removed from the PPA?
[22:55] <robru> boiko: step one: ask me
[22:55] <robru> boiko: step two: wait patiently ;-)
[22:56] <boiko> robru: haha, ok, I thought maybe a rebuild or an extra build option in the jenkins job
[22:56] <robru> boiko: that's a wishlist feature, not implemented yet
[22:56] <boiko> robru: so, could you please remove address-book-service packages from silo 11?
[22:57] <robru> boiko: done ;-)
[22:58] <boiko> robru: thanks!
[22:58] <robru> boiko: you're welcome