[03:26] <jak2000> offtopic question, anyone know any place or a channel for talk about gps? how to extract it? thanks
[03:27] <genii> jak2000: Extract it from what?
[03:27] <jak2000> from the gps
[03:27] <jak2000> the gps is: http://www.plataformagps.net/manuales/manuales/tk668/
[03:28] <genii> It's serial data
[03:28] <jak2000> yes
[03:28] <jak2000> not know the protocol
[03:28] <jak2000> i am googling
[03:29] <jak2000> genii you know: https://www.traccar.org/
[03:33] <genii> jak2000: Well, gpsd to grab the data, but you need some kind of client as well to make it useful
[03:36] <jak2000> genii, the gps have a SIM card, ok? i can send sms for programming, right? i programmed every 10 minutes send data to a certain ip, but the ip (the opengts or trace car) not understand the data, because the protocol. (i think)
[03:51] <genii> From what I can tell of the TK668 user manual, it just exchanges SMS messages with another phone or computer
[04:11] <jak2000> genii send a sms message to server.... and the server receive it and interpret. :(
[07:54] <lordievader> Good morning.
[08:12] <jill_> hi, i am getting a 'mount.nfs: mount(2): Protocol not supported' while trying to mount an NFS share using version 4
[08:13] <jill_>  mount -v -t nfs -o nfsvers=4 server-ipaddress:/share  /mount-point , this is the command issued
[08:14] <lordievader> jill_: Is nfs-common installed?
[08:14] <jill_> lordievader: yes
[08:15] <lordievader> What does dmesg say?
[08:16] <jill_> [129685.461408] nfs: server server-ip not responding, still trying
[08:16] <jill_> [129697.508047] nfs: server server-ip OK
[08:17] <jill_> lordievader: rpcinfo -p server-ipaddress shows version 4 also
[08:17] <lordievader> jill_: Does 'showmount -e <server-ip>' list the mounts?
[08:19] <jill_> yes lordievader
[08:20] <lordievader> Perhaps http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2182217 helps
[08:21] <lordievader> jill_: Oh, what does 'mount -v <mount-point>' give?
[08:22] <jill_> mount -v -t nfs  gives
[08:22] <jill_> nothing when trying version 4
[08:23] <jill_> but when trying version 2
[08:23] <jill_> it gives
[08:23] <jill_> server-ip:/share on /srv/backup type nfs (rw,nfsvers=2,proto=udp,port=2049,addr=server-ip)
[08:23] <jill_> we can do a ls and cd to the mount point
[08:24] <jill_> but when we issue touch some-file
[08:24] <jill_> touch: cannot touch ‘/srv/backup/somefile’: Input/output error
[08:25] <jill_> by the way my client is a mailserver running on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and server is a windows 2012 with NFS
[08:26] <TJ-> jill_: is portmap running ?
[08:27] <lordievader> Windows supports NFS? (And does it support NFSv4?)
[08:27] <jill_> in NFS server, the admins did a rpcinfo, it show the result, so it is running
[08:28] <TJ-> jill_: maybe it needs 'nolock' in the mount options?
[08:29] <jill_> lordievader: check this link -> https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/324089
[08:30] <jill_> TJ-:  mount -v -t nfs -o nfsvers=4,nolock ip:/share /mount-point ?
[08:31] <lordievader> Now I remember that I once wanted to mount my nfs shares in Windows, it was a disaster.
[08:31] <lordievader> "which includes full support for NFS v3." Guess v4 ain't supported.
[08:32] <jill_> lordievader: I have tried v3 and it gives input/output error
[08:33] <TJ-> jill check the logs at both ends
[08:34] <jill_> v4:- protocol not supported
[08:34] <jill_> v3:- mounts but input/output error on ls command
[08:34] <jill_> v2:- mounts, can ls , but input/output error while trying to write
[08:36] <TJ-> Sounds like a portmapper issue
[08:37] <jill_> TJ-: , i will check that
[08:41] <TJ-> jill_: firewall rules interfering possibly?
[08:45] <jill_> TJ-: , we are checking that also, microsoft says to open 111,1039,1047,1048 and 2049
[08:45] <TJ-> jill_: might be worth running tcpdump on the client side; see if any connection attempts get refused/unanswered
[08:45] <jill_> ok
[09:06] <cooldharma06> hi all
[12:05] <theptr> Hi anybody who knows the command to connect to open-vpn from an ubuntu server ? 14.04
[12:06] <rbasak> You need to install and set up openvpn manually to do it.
[12:06] <rbasak> Unless you want to use Network Manager, but I'd recommend against that on a server.
[12:08] <theptr> rbasak, let me explain :i have an ubuntu server with open-vpn server running . i always use windows as the client but now i want my second ubuntu server as a client .
[12:10] <rbasak> theptr: so install openvpn on your second ubuntu server and configure it as a client.
[12:11] <rbasak> openvpn is almost entirely symmetrical. There's barely any difference between a server and a client apart from which side initiates the connection.
[12:14] <theptr> rbasak, okay i installed it on the second server
[12:14] <theptr> what should i do next ?
[12:17] <rbasak> I'm sorry, I don't have the time to talk you through this. Hopefully someone else will be able to help, or you could try to find a guide on configuring the openvpn client.
[12:17] <rbasak> Well, on just configuring openvpn configured as a client, really.
[12:17] <rbasak> It should be almost identical to configuring the server.
[12:18] <theptr> rbasak, i think i just need an command that says openvpn look in de .ovpn file
[12:19] <theptr> rbasak, anyway thanks for your time
[12:20] <theptr> rbasak, found it sudo openvpn --config YOUR_SELECTED_CONNETION_TYPE.ovpn
[13:03] <coreycb> jamespage,  I'll start on rc3 today and then kilo stable
[14:56] <thebwt> Howdy folks, is there a document out there that details packaging destination directory best practices?  like when to use /sbin vs /usr/sbin ?
[15:01] <genii> thebwt: Possibly useful: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/modify.en.html#destdir
[15:02] <patdk-wk> more exact: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-2.3.html
[15:02] <thebwt> woot thanks guys!
[15:03] <patdk-wk> but normally it comes down to
[15:03] <patdk-wk> if /usr was network mounted
[15:03] <patdk-wk> can the system function without it? use /usr/sbin, no, use /sbin
[15:04] <thebwt> Awesome, thank you for the insight
[18:26] <Guest83578> does ubuntu server kernl has support for tproxy by default?
[18:29] <RoyK> Guest83578: you mean just transparent proxy with a squid thing?
[18:29] <RoyK> (or something else)
[18:29] <Guest83578> Yes,
[18:29] <Guest83578> Completely transparent proxy.
[18:29] <RoyK> http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/TransparentProxy.html
[18:29] <RoyK> I've set it up a few times
[18:29] <RoyK> not related to distro
[18:29] <Guest83578> That still needs the kernel tproxy support.
[18:29] <RoyK> usually a NAT router with forwards to a squid thing in the back
[18:30] <RoyK> this thing? https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/tproxy.txt
[18:30] <Guest83578> That will not do the IP spoofing.
[18:30] <RoyK> it's been supported for years
[18:30] <RoyK> I mean, a decade or two
[18:30] <Guest83578> ok thanjs,
[18:30] <Guest83578> This https://ma.ttias.be/compile-a-centos-kernel-and-iptables-with-tproxy-support/ got me curious.
[18:32] <RoyK> roy@marvin:~$ grep PROX /boot/config-3.2.0-91-generic
[18:32] <RoyK> CONFIG_NETFILTER_TPROXY=m
[18:32] <RoyK> CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TPROXY=m
[18:32] <RoyK> that's from a 12.04 server
[18:32] <RoyK> probably the same on 14.04 and later
[18:35] <rbasak> Also on Vivid.
[19:05] <RoyK> rockstar_: seems CONFIG_NETFILTER_TPROXY is out now
[19:05] <RoyK> rbasak: that is, you
[19:05] <RoyK> rockstar_: sorry
[19:06] <rockstar_> RoyK: not a problem