[09:38] <sil2100> o/
[09:38] <sil2100> Hey guys, I seem to have noticed a slight problem with LP and old source binaries
[09:40] <sil2100> I wanted to get the binaries of apport 2.17.2-0ubuntu1.3 from vivid-updates (so 2 versions behind)
[09:41] <sil2100> It seems that when doing getPublishedBinaries() on the source_package_publishing_history of that package version, I get 0 binaries
[09:41] <sil2100> But it seems LP has the binaries as per: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.17.2-0ubuntu1.3/+build/7791083
[09:41] <sil2100> Does anyone know the reasons?
[09:59] <sil2100> I would need to perform a copy-package of that version's binary somewhere, but I can't because of this
[10:53] <cjwatson> sil2100 asked me the same question in /query, and I answered there
[10:53] <cjwatson> 11:49 <cjwatson> It'll copy the binaries, it's just that the client isn't smart enough to know how to tell you what they are
[10:53] <cjwatson> 11:49 <cjwatson> Those binaries aren't published any more because they've been superseded
[10:53] <cjwatson> 11:49 <cjwatson> But that shouldn't stop the actual server-side copy code dealing with them, and copy-package will pass the right parameter for that anyway
[10:53] <cjwatson> 11:50 <cjwatson> So just go ahead and use --include-binaries there and don't worry about the inconsistent output
[10:54] <sil2100> \o/
[10:55] <sil2100> cjwatson: it you say so, then I suppose I believe you - I was a bit worried as I didn't want the sources being re-built
[10:55] <sil2100> Thanks :)
[10:56] <cjwatson> Yeah, it was certainly worth checking.
[11:07] <cjwatson> wgrant: bmp-webhooks fixed even harder.