| === wgrant is now known as Guest27601 | ||
| === kgunn is now known as Guest52384 | ||
| === Guest27601 is now known as wgrant | ||
| fginther | Saviq, I've switched back to the original unity-phablet-qmluitests-wily and added a fix for the missing PPA. I'll take another look starting next week (I'm off Friday). | 03:44 |
|---|---|---|
| Mirv | I can handle any qtpurchasing builds, yes | 04:37 |
| Mirv | those were probably old instructions, the packaging is simply at https://code.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/qtpurchasing-opensource-src | 04:37 |
| Mirv | ...and yeah Wellark's branch was not based on lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/qtpurchasing-opensource-src but he just continued to push to his own branch | 04:40 |
| robru | Mirv: yeah I had some struggles with that today, builds test7 and test8 are probably garbage. | 05:19 |
| robru | Mirv: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/phablet-tools/trunk/view/300/citrain#L76 lol, those were the days :'-) | 05:25 |
| Mirv | yeah I'll just double check with wellark and push test9 | 06:29 |
| Mirv | I had my Bq flashing in the morning about a system update (that was not there actually), but it seems I was not the only one. | 06:45 |
| * Mirv reads other channels' backlogs | 06:48 | |
| jibel | Mirv, an image has been mistakenly copied and removed immediately | 06:52 |
| jibel | Mirv, you received a notification but no update could be applied right? | 06:52 |
| oSoMoN | jibel, I have a fix for bug #1501330 (which indeed is a regression introduced in OTA7), is that something we can consider sneaking in, or is it way too late? | 07:06 |
| ubot5` | bug 1501330 in webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) "[webapp-container] Crash with open context menu" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1501330 | 07:06 |
| jibel | oSoMoN, no it is too late | 07:08 |
| oSoMoN | too bad, but fair enough | 07:08 |
| oSoMoN | oh well in case of an ota7.1 we’ll be ready :) | 07:09 |
| jibel | oSoMoN, I confirmed with Pat yesterday | 07:09 |
| jibel | oSoMoN, yes | 07:09 |
| jibel | oSoMoN, tagged for hotfix | 07:10 |
| oSoMoN | thanks | 07:10 |
| abeato | Mirv, jibel same happened to me, I saw the notification but no update available | 07:12 |
| Mirv | jibel: exactly like that, I read now that it was the case (mistaken copy) | 07:13 |
| Mirv | jibel: of course our system updater might also check that "update is no longer there" and not blink everyone's phone | 07:13 |
| jibel | Mirv, abeato it's good actually that there was no update, just a notification. | 07:13 |
| jibel | the silo cards bot is back online, landings ready for QA are polled every 10 minutes | 07:37 |
| === taochen is now known as taochen_afk | ||
| === taochen_afk is now known as taochen | ||
| === timp is now known as t1mp | ||
| Laney | sil2100: Mirv: can I only publish some packages in a silo? | 10:15 |
| sil2100 | Laney: you mean, like selective publishing? I guess the train now publishes all packages in a silo, so sadly you can't do that without removing them from the PPA | 10:21 |
| Laney | sil2100: like https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-001-2-publish/118/console | 10:25 |
| Laney | I really just want to upload compiz and unity, the others already went in | 10:25 |
| Laney | we had to rebuild those two | 10:25 |
| Laney | shall I just do a binary copy and force merge later? | 10:25 |
| sil2100 | Laney: you could do that, but also what you could do is for instance remove the other packages that already went in and re-run the publish job, or (if that doesn't break anything) simply re-publish everything, as the already released bits should just get rejected | 10:27 |
| Laney | that log is re-publishing, it bails on a version check | 10:27 |
| Laney | if I remove them won't it forget to merge the branches when we m&c? | 10:27 |
| sil2100 | I think there's a force flag for re-publishing | 10:27 |
| Laney | IGNORE_VERSIONDESTINATION? | 10:28 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, IGNORE_VERSIONDESTINATION | 10:28 |
| sil2100 | Ouch, ugly paste | 10:28 |
| xavigarcia | sil2100: hey! is there any problem on ppc64 for Jenkins? | 10:33 |
| xavigarcia | sil2100: I get dependency errors when building a package, but it builds fine for ARM | 10:34 |
| xavigarcia | sil2100: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/indicator-sound-wily-armhf-ci/45/console https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/indicator-sound-wily-amd64-ci/45/console | 10:34 |
| sil2100 | xavigarcia: hey! You would need to ping the CI team for that | 10:34 |
| sil2100 | xavigarcia: use cihelp :) | 10:35 |
| xavigarcia | sil2100: ok, sorry, and thanks | 10:35 |
| xavigarcia | cihelp: hey! is there any problem on ppc64 for Jenkins? | 10:35 |
| xavigarcia | cihelp: ^ see my previous messages, with the links to the console outputs. Same package builds fine for ARM but not for PPC64 | 10:37 |
| oSoMoN | cihelp: since yesterday I’m seeing all webbrowser-app-vivid-amd64-ci jobs fail, aborting because of build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied, any clue what might be going on there? an example failed job is https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/webbrowser-app-vivid-amd64-ci/1116/console | 10:49 |
| cjwatson | xavigarcia: Um? The dependency errors that you're quoting are on amd64, not ppc64 (which Jenkins doesn't support). | 10:55 |
| xavigarcia | cjwatson: sorry I meant amd64 | 11:01 |
| === xavigarcia is now known as xavigarcia_lunch | ||
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| === xavigarcia_lunch is now known as xavigarcia | ||
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| popey | cihelp can someone help me understand why jenkins is ignoring this? https://code.launchpad.net/~gang65/ubuntu-clock-app/ubuntu-clock-app-disabled-alarm-fix/+merge/274661 | 12:15 |
| oSoMoN | cjwatson, the issue I pinged cihelp about earlier seems to be the same that affects xavigarcia | 12:42 |
| cjwatson | Yeah I can't help with it more than observing the corrected architecture name though | 12:44 |
| nik90 | balloons, popey: Could you check why https://code.launchpad.net/~gang65/ubuntu-clock-app/ubuntu-clock-app-disabled-alarm-fix/+merge/274661 is not being merged by jenkins. It has been top-approved and is the last MP before sending clock to QA | 12:49 |
| * nik90 brb in 30 mins | 12:49 | |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| popey | nik90: i asked in here ~30 mins ago :) | 12:57 |
| jgdx | Mirv, silo 26 failed to build, and I see dbus is involved there | 13:04 |
| jgdx | I also have a build failing on wily amd64 related to dbus | 13:05 |
| jgdx | I'm just throwing that out there | 13:05 |
| Mirv | jgdx: 026 is about arm64 builds though, not amd64 | 13:07 |
| Mirv | but, I don't know about the actual pieces failing there, just the qtpurchasing package | 13:08 |
| jgdx | Mirv, ugh, i have to learn how to read | 13:08 |
| jgdx | okay | 13:08 |
| Mirv | jgdx: I do that very often too :) | 13:08 |
| Mirv | the (aaaa)aarch64 would have been so much better | 13:08 |
| jgdx | Mirv, btw, could you drop ubuntu-push from silo 21? | 13:10 |
| jgdx | I'm unable to | 13:10 |
| Mirv | jgdx: done | 13:11 |
| jgdx | Mirv, ty | 13:12 |
| Mirv | Wellark: so, robru's ~test8 build seems fine but you might want to rebase properly on lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/qtpurchasing-opensource-src before submitting next upload request to someone else than me to avoid confusion | 13:13 |
| Mirv | Wellark: I merged the rev 10 of your branch in and the results matches what got uploaded | 13:13 |
| nik90 | popey: oh ok :) | 13:26 |
| balloons | ping cihelp. I see the clock app jobs are depending on utopic, and have been stuck waiting on a utopic slave for almost 8 hours. ubuntu-clock-app-vivid-amd64-autolanding | 13:46 |
| balloons | They should be running on vivid only, utopic slaves are shut down anyway | 13:46 |
| josepht | balloons, popey, nik90: I'm looking at the clock-app now | 13:47 |
| pstolowski | hello trainguards, i'm not able to mark silo 4 ready for qa for some reason, after hitting 'Ready for QA' i'm back in bileto overview page, and the status of this silo remains unchanged | 13:52 |
| abeato | Mirv, hi, I have created https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/523 to land the mpris changes in vivid | 14:02 |
| abeato | Mirv, we need to upload qtmultimedia | 14:02 |
| abeato | Mirv, I have applied the playlist patch in the source package in http://people.canonical.com/~abeato/qtmultimedia-opensource-src/ | 14:03 |
| abeato | Mirv, would it be possible to upload it to silo 16? | 14:04 |
| abeato | Mirv, to sync vivid changes to wily I meant | 14:06 |
| pstolowski | robru, hey, do you know what's wrong with silo 4/bileto (see my earlier message) | 14:35 |
| josepht | balloons, popey, nik90: it looks like that jenkins slave ('utopic-slave') is dead. | 15:07 |
| josepht | balloons: can you get that job moved to your core-apps jenkaas deployment? | 15:07 |
| josepht | balloons: s/moved/ported/ | 15:08 |
| balloons | josepht, it shouldn't need to depend on the utopic slave. It can use the vivid one yes? | 15:10 |
| josepht | balloons: no, the other slaves all exhibit the llvm issue :( | 15:12 |
| balloons | josepht, ahh right right. | 15:13 |
| balloons | josepht, well, what do you mean by 'dead' then? Is the old service really really telling us to move on | 15:13 |
| josepht | balloons: the canonistack instance is unreachable and unrecoverable | 15:14 |
| balloons | josepht, so this effectively is the end of the old service yes? | 15:19 |
| josepht | balloons: yes | 15:19 |
| josepht | xavigarcia: we've offlined a bad jenkins slave and I've rekicked the CI job for that MP. | 15:23 |
| xavigarcia | josepht: ok... thanks | 15:24 |
| jibel | rvr, something's wrong with the need qa sign off lane, did people stopped reviewing their MPs? | 15:29 |
| rvr | jibel: I just blocked one silo | 15:29 |
| rvr | jibel: But you have blocked many more | 15:30 |
| jibel | rvr, and I blocked everything else | 15:30 |
| rvr | jibel: Must be xmas time | 15:30 |
| rvr | and we haven't noticed ;) | 15:30 |
| rvr | 8 blocked silos | 15:31 |
| jibel | dbarth, pstolowski mzanetti can you make sure all the MPs are reviewed and top approved before marking silos ready for QA | 15:32 |
| pstolowski | jibel, will do, sorry | 15:34 |
| brendand | sil2100, do you think we could squeeze qttestability-autopilot in the image? it's 43K | 15:38 |
| jibel | brendand, file a bug with the rationale against canonical-devices-system-image | 15:41 |
| pstolowski | jibel, alecu we need to put silo 4 (inline playback) on hold unfortunately, qa-ready reverted, we found out that https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtubuntu-media/+bug/1496736 is still not fixed | 15:43 |
| ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1496736 in qtubuntu-media (Ubuntu) "currentSource of Playlist gets set to empty" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 15:43 |
| jhodapp | pstolowski, yeah got that one on the list of things to fix, going through them one-by-one | 15:44 |
| jibel | pstolowski, ack | 15:45 |
| jibel | removed | 15:45 |
| pstolowski | jhodapp, ack, thanks | 15:46 |
| jhodapp | pstolowski, is that silo 4's only blocker? | 15:46 |
| pstolowski | jhodapp, yes | 15:46 |
| jhodapp | ok | 15:47 |
| Saviq | trainguards, drop ubuntu-touch-session from silo 22 please? | 15:52 |
| sil2100 | brendand: 43K sounds nice - no additional deps? | 15:52 |
| sil2100 | Saviq: let me take care of that in a min | 15:52 |
| Saviq | sil2100, tx | 15:52 |
| sil2100 | Saviq: removed | 15:53 |
| sil2100 | (the packages from the PPA) | 15:53 |
| brendand | sil2100, i just checked it seems to pull in autopilot itself but that seems wrong | 15:55 |
| brendand | sil2100, if we can't change that then maybe not, otherwise it would be good | 15:56 |
| dbarth | jibel: ack | 16:31 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!