[03:44] <fginther> Saviq, I've switched back to the original unity-phablet-qmluitests-wily and added a fix for the missing PPA. I'll take another look starting next week (I'm off Friday).
[04:37] <Mirv> I can handle any qtpurchasing builds, yes
[04:37] <Mirv> those were probably old instructions, the packaging is simply at https://code.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/qtpurchasing-opensource-src
[04:40] <Mirv> ...and yeah Wellark's branch was not based on  lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/qtpurchasing-opensource-src but he just continued to push to his own branch
[05:19] <robru> Mirv: yeah I had some struggles with that today, builds test7 and test8 are probably garbage.
[05:25] <robru> Mirv: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/phablet-tools/trunk/view/300/citrain#L76 lol, those were the days :'-)
[06:29] <Mirv> yeah I'll just double check with wellark and push test9
[06:45] <Mirv> I had my Bq flashing in the morning about a system update (that was not there actually), but it seems I was not the only one.
[06:48]  * Mirv reads other channels' backlogs
[06:52] <jibel> Mirv, an image has been mistakenly copied and removed immediately
[06:52] <jibel> Mirv, you received a notification but no update could be applied right?
[07:06] <oSoMoN> jibel, I have a fix for bug #1501330 (which indeed is a regression introduced in OTA7), is that something we can consider sneaking in, or is it way too late?
[07:06] <ubot5`> bug 1501330 in webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) "[webapp-container] Crash with open context menu" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1501330
[07:08] <jibel> oSoMoN, no it is too late
[07:08] <oSoMoN> too bad, but fair enough
[07:09] <oSoMoN> oh well in case of an ota7.1 we’ll be ready :)
[07:09] <jibel> oSoMoN, I confirmed with Pat yesterday
[07:09] <jibel> oSoMoN, yes
[07:10] <jibel> oSoMoN, tagged for hotfix
[07:10] <oSoMoN> thanks
[07:12] <abeato> Mirv, jibel same happened to me, I saw the notification but no update available
[07:13] <Mirv> jibel: exactly like that, I read now that it was the case (mistaken copy)
[07:13] <Mirv> jibel: of course our system updater might also check that "update is no longer there" and not blink everyone's phone
[07:13] <jibel> Mirv, abeato it's good actually that there was no update, just a notification.
[07:37] <jibel> the silo cards bot is back online, landings ready for QA  are polled every 10 minutes
[10:15] <Laney> sil2100: Mirv: can I only publish some packages in a silo?
[10:21] <sil2100> Laney: you mean, like selective publishing? I guess the train now publishes all packages in a silo, so sadly you can't do that without removing them from the PPA
[10:25] <Laney> sil2100: like https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-001-2-publish/118/console
[10:25] <Laney> I really just want to upload compiz and unity, the others already went in
[10:25] <Laney> we had to rebuild those two
[10:25] <Laney> shall I just do a binary copy and force merge later?
[10:27] <sil2100> Laney: you could do that, but also what you could do is for instance remove the other packages that already went in and re-run the publish job, or (if that doesn't break anything) simply re-publish everything, as the already released bits should just get rejected
[10:27] <Laney> that log is re-publishing, it bails on a version check
[10:27] <Laney> if I remove them won't it forget to merge the branches when we m&c?
[10:27] <sil2100> I think there's a force flag for re-publishing
[10:28] <Laney> IGNORE_VERSIONDESTINATION?
[10:28] <sil2100> Yeah,  	IGNORE_VERSIONDESTINATION	
[10:28] <sil2100> Ouch, ugly paste
[10:33] <xavigarcia> sil2100: hey! is there any problem on ppc64 for Jenkins?
[10:34] <xavigarcia> sil2100: I get dependency errors when building a package, but it builds fine for ARM
[10:34] <xavigarcia> sil2100: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/indicator-sound-wily-armhf-ci/45/console https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/indicator-sound-wily-amd64-ci/45/console
[10:34] <sil2100> xavigarcia: hey! You would need to ping the CI team for that
[10:35] <sil2100> xavigarcia: use cihelp :)
[10:35] <xavigarcia> sil2100: ok, sorry, and thanks
[10:35] <xavigarcia> cihelp:  hey! is there any problem on ppc64 for Jenkins?
[10:37] <xavigarcia> cihelp: ^ see my previous messages, with the links to the console outputs. Same package builds fine for ARM but not for PPC64
[10:49] <oSoMoN> cihelp: since yesterday I’m seeing all webbrowser-app-vivid-amd64-ci jobs fail, aborting because of build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied, any clue what might be going on there? an example failed job is https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/webbrowser-app-vivid-amd64-ci/1116/console
[10:55] <cjwatson> xavigarcia: Um?  The dependency errors that you're quoting are on amd64, not ppc64 (which Jenkins doesn't support).
[11:01] <xavigarcia> cjwatson: sorry I meant amd64
[12:15] <popey> cihelp can someone help me understand why jenkins is ignoring this? https://code.launchpad.net/~gang65/ubuntu-clock-app/ubuntu-clock-app-disabled-alarm-fix/+merge/274661
[12:42] <oSoMoN> cjwatson, the issue I pinged cihelp about earlier seems to be the same that affects xavigarcia
[12:44] <cjwatson> Yeah I can't help with it more than observing the corrected architecture name though
[12:49] <nik90> balloons, popey: Could you check why https://code.launchpad.net/~gang65/ubuntu-clock-app/ubuntu-clock-app-disabled-alarm-fix/+merge/274661 is not being merged by jenkins. It has been top-approved and is the last MP before sending clock to QA
[12:49]  * nik90 brb in 30 mins
[12:57] <popey> nik90: i asked in here ~30 mins ago :)
[13:04] <jgdx> Mirv, silo 26 failed to build, and I see dbus is involved there
[13:05] <jgdx> I also have a build failing on wily amd64 related to dbus
[13:05] <jgdx> I'm just throwing that out there
[13:07] <Mirv> jgdx: 026 is about arm64 builds though, not amd64
[13:08] <Mirv> but, I don't know about the actual pieces failing there, just the qtpurchasing package
[13:08] <jgdx> Mirv, ugh, i have to learn how to read
[13:08] <jgdx> okay
[13:08] <Mirv> jgdx: I do that very often too :)
[13:08] <Mirv> the (aaaa)aarch64 would have been so much better
[13:10] <jgdx> Mirv, btw, could you drop ubuntu-push from silo 21?
[13:10] <jgdx> I'm unable to
[13:11] <Mirv> jgdx: done
[13:12] <jgdx> Mirv, ty
[13:13] <Mirv> Wellark: so, robru's ~test8 build seems fine but you might want to rebase properly on lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/qtpurchasing-opensource-src before submitting next upload request to someone else than me to avoid confusion
[13:13] <Mirv> Wellark: I merged the rev 10 of your branch in and the results matches what got uploaded
[13:26] <nik90> popey: oh ok :)
[13:46] <balloons> ping cihelp. I see the clock app jobs are depending on utopic, and have been stuck waiting on a utopic slave for almost 8 hours. ubuntu-clock-app-vivid-amd64-autolanding
[13:46] <balloons> They should be running on vivid only, utopic slaves are shut down anyway
[13:47] <josepht> balloons, popey, nik90: I'm looking at the clock-app now
[13:52] <pstolowski> hello trainguards, i'm not able to mark silo 4 ready for qa for some reason, after hitting 'Ready for QA' i'm back in bileto overview page, and the status of this silo remains unchanged
[14:02] <abeato> Mirv, hi, I have created  https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/523 to land the mpris changes in vivid
[14:02] <abeato> Mirv, we need to upload qtmultimedia
[14:03] <abeato> Mirv, I have applied the playlist patch in the source package in http://people.canonical.com/~abeato/qtmultimedia-opensource-src/
[14:04] <abeato> Mirv, would it be possible to upload it to silo 16?
[14:06] <abeato> Mirv, to sync vivid changes to wily I meant
[14:35] <pstolowski> robru, hey, do you know what's wrong with silo 4/bileto (see my earlier message)
[15:07] <josepht> balloons, popey, nik90: it looks like that jenkins slave ('utopic-slave') is dead.
[15:07] <josepht> balloons: can you get that job moved to your core-apps jenkaas deployment?
[15:08] <josepht> balloons: s/moved/ported/
[15:10] <balloons> josepht, it shouldn't need to depend on the utopic slave. It can use the vivid one yes?
[15:12] <josepht> balloons: no, the other slaves all exhibit the llvm issue :(
[15:13] <balloons> josepht, ahh right right.
[15:13] <balloons> josepht, well, what do you mean by 'dead' then? Is the old service really really telling us to move on
[15:14] <josepht> balloons: the canonistack instance is unreachable and unrecoverable
[15:19] <balloons> josepht, so this effectively is the end of the old service yes?
[15:19] <josepht> balloons: yes
[15:23] <josepht> xavigarcia: we've offlined a bad jenkins slave and I've rekicked the CI job for that MP.
[15:24] <xavigarcia> josepht: ok... thanks
[15:29] <jibel> rvr, something's wrong with the need qa sign off lane, did people stopped reviewing their MPs?
[15:29] <rvr> jibel: I just blocked one silo
[15:30] <rvr> jibel: But you have blocked many more
[15:30] <jibel> rvr, and I blocked everything else
[15:30] <rvr> jibel: Must be xmas time
[15:30] <rvr> and we haven't noticed ;)
[15:31] <rvr> 8 blocked silos
[15:32] <jibel> dbarth, pstolowski mzanetti can you make sure all the MPs are reviewed and top approved before marking silos ready for QA
[15:34] <pstolowski> jibel, will do, sorry
[15:38] <brendand> sil2100, do you think we could squeeze qttestability-autopilot in the image? it's 43K
[15:41] <jibel> brendand, file a bug with the rationale against canonical-devices-system-image
[15:43] <pstolowski> jibel, alecu we need to put silo 4 (inline playback) on hold unfortunately, qa-ready reverted, we found out that https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtubuntu-media/+bug/1496736 is still not fixed
[15:43] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1496736 in qtubuntu-media (Ubuntu) "currentSource of Playlist gets set to empty" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[15:44] <jhodapp> pstolowski, yeah got that one on the list of things to fix, going through them one-by-one
[15:45] <jibel> pstolowski, ack
[15:45] <jibel> removed
[15:46] <pstolowski> jhodapp, ack, thanks
[15:46] <jhodapp> pstolowski, is that silo 4's only blocker?
[15:46] <pstolowski> jhodapp, yes
[15:47] <jhodapp> ok
[15:52] <Saviq> trainguards, drop ubuntu-touch-session from silo 22 please?
[15:52] <sil2100> brendand: 43K sounds nice - no additional deps?
[15:52] <sil2100> Saviq: let me take care of that in a min
[15:52] <Saviq> sil2100, tx
[15:53] <sil2100> Saviq: removed
[15:53] <sil2100> (the packages from the PPA)
[15:55] <brendand> sil2100, i just checked it seems to pull in autopilot itself but that seems wrong
[15:56] <brendand> sil2100, if we can't change that then maybe not, otherwise it would be good
[16:31] <dbarth> jibel: ack