[00:24] <bluesabre> welcome back everyone :)
[00:33] <bluesabre> Please let me know if there is anything that needs to be done for parole to be approved. The hide-menubar setting that was discussed earlier only makes the existing hide-menubar functionality persistent across sessions. That setting is non-default.
[00:33] <bluesabre> and now with a few hightable pings...
[00:33] <bluesabre> doko, infinity, Laney: Please let me know if there is anything that needs to be done for parole to be approved. The hide-menubar setting that was discussed earlier only makes the existing hide-menubar functionality persistent across sessions. That setting is non-default.
[00:34] <bluesabre> I'll be around throughout the evening if there are any questions or if I need to create an last-minute FFe report to move it along
[00:34] <bluesabre> :)
[01:52] <lamont> infinity: yo up?>
[01:52] <lamont> you up, rather?
[01:52] <lamont> or who is my favorite release team person today?
[01:54] <infinity> lamont: I'm sort of here.  What's up?
[01:56] <Ukikie> I thought infinity was our favorite every day.
[01:57] <infinity> Aww.
[02:01] <infinity> lamont: --^
[02:01] <lamont> woot
[02:01] <lamont> thank you kind sir.  I shall sleep in peace tonight
[02:01] <infinity> That makes one of us.
[02:02] <Ukikie> Yeeep.
[02:02] <lamont> infinity: it's entirely possible that I was speaking in hopes, rather than certainty
[02:02] <lamont> I'll make it home and to sleep in about 90 min, and the alarm goes off about 6 hours after that. :9
[05:00] <Logan> is it okay to upload a new version of zimlib that fixes an FTBFS on rebuild? it introduces a rename of the library package for GCC 5, but there are no rdeps, and it's unseeded
[05:01] <Logan> infinity: you around still? ^
[05:02] <infinity> Logan: Just a sync, I assume?
[05:02] <Logan> yep
[05:02] <infinity> Logan: Sounds reasonable to me.
[05:02] <Logan> awesome, thanks!
[08:04] <flexiondotorg> infinity, Laney, cyphermox - Please can someone process this upload request?
[08:04] <flexiondotorg> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-welcome/+bug/1506530
[08:04] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1506530 in ubuntu-mate-welcome "ubuntu-mate-welcome 1.0.3.4a bug fix release [debdiff attached]" [Undecided,New]
[08:05] <flexiondotorg> I discussed it with cyphermox yesterday in here.
[08:40] <jamespage> morning release team - there is an upload of openvswitch in the unapproved queue which should resolve bug 1314887
[08:40] <ubot2> bug 1314887 in openvswitch "ifupdown hook is missing in upstart script" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1314887
[08:40] <jamespage> appreciate that's not directly impacting wily, but it is blocking any testing in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive right now
[09:15] <gilir> hi, is it possible to accept lxappearance-obconf upload ? It should unblock all openbox/obconf packages blocked by proposed-migration, and fix a crash on Lubuntu ISO
[09:33] <Laney> pitti: can you review glib2.0 maybe?
[09:33] <pitti> Laney: argh no diff :)
[09:34] <pitti> ah, the upstream point release
[09:34] <pitti> Laney: did that get any pre-testing?
[09:34] <pitti> it
[09:34] <pitti> 'll trigger a lot of autopkgtests, but they don't cover all the desktop-y aspects
[09:34] <pitti> Laney: i. e. did you run ubuntu with this version for a day or so?
[09:34] <Laney> been running it for a couple of days
[09:34] <Laney> I uploaded it to sid already too
[09:35] <Laney> thanks pitti!
[09:36] <pitti> no worries!
[09:36] <Laney> ah, and that one too, I didn't understand it
[11:59] <pitti> infinity, Laney: uploading langpack spew now
[11:59] <pitti> shall I mass-accept?
[11:59] <pitti> well, what do I ask, we do want them
[11:59] <Laney> :)
[11:59] <Laney> go for it
[12:00] <pitti> Laney: you still have a migration block, right?
[12:00] <Laney> for?
[12:00] <Laney> I had one for compiz and unity which I just killed
[12:00] <pitti> desktop packages?
[12:00] <pitti> Laney: ah, just for those? I was looking at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#unity
[12:00] <pitti> and assumed this would be the generic "final freeze" block
[12:01] <Laney> no, there isn't one of those (yet?)
[12:02] <Laney> I would guess next week once respins happen if we do that
[12:04] <pitti> Laney: my connection is a bit shaky right now; do you mind running this several times in the next 15 mins or so: queue -s wily-proposed -Q unapproved -E accept language-pack-
[12:05] <pitti> I accepted the first hundred or so
[12:06] <Laney> sure, wilco
[12:06] <pitti> thanks
[12:29] <pitti> Laney: uploads finished a while ago, I'm accepting the last batch
[13:32] <Laney> +1
[14:25] <Trevinho> bdmurray: hey, I have this compiz SRU (https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/compiz/vivid-rebuild-ddebs/+merge/271931) that is waiting for some time (it's just a no-change rebuild, because of missing ddebs)... So I've been told that the reason of that is that the bug didn't get attached to the ubuntu changelog
[14:25] <Trevinho> what should I do?
[14:35] <bdmurray> Trevinho: it's in -proposed and looks like it is ready to be released, however we don't release on Friday, so ping someone on Monday.
[14:35] <Trevinho> bdmurray: ok, that's fine. thanks for the info
[15:19] <bdmurray> Trevinho: Thinking about it more does it need to move away from -proposed?
[15:19] <Trevinho> bdmurray: I don't think there's rush at this point
[15:20] <Trevinho> indeed it's a blocked silo, but.. not sure
[15:20] <Trevinho> how are the resources atm
[15:20] <bdmurray> Trevinho: I mean regular users don't need the ddebs
[15:21] <Trevinho> bdmurray: ah, yeah... I mostly done it to get e.u.c to work properly and since we had to debug some issues with some users
[15:21] <bdmurray> Trevinho: right and e.u.c will work fine with the packages from -proposed
[15:21] <Trevinho> fair enough
[15:22] <Trevinho> bdmurray: what about ddebs repo?
[15:22] <bdmurray> Trevinho: they should be there too
[15:23] <Trevinho> fine... So that's just enough for me
[15:23] <Trevinho> all I want is to free the silo then
[15:37] <bdmurray> infinity, slangasek: there is a language-pack-ja in T, V -proposed that isn't showing up on the SRU report...
[15:54] <infinity> bdmurray: The sru-report intentionally filters langpacks.
[15:58] <bdmurray> infinity: How / when does the releasing happen then?
[15:59] <infinity> bdmurray: pitti usually takes care of the langpack magic, not sure his criteria.
[17:32] <superm1> cyphermox: just want to make sure you know i uploaded fwupd against yesterday in case you didn't see it.  it's been accepted already
[17:32] <doko> slangasek, infinity: could somebody of you look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1502178 ?
[17:32] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1502178 in squid3 "update squid from 3.3.8 to 3.3.14" [Undecided,New]
[17:33] <cyphermox>  superm1: hmm?
[17:33] <superm1> fixes an issue with files nestled in a directory
[17:34] <cyphermox> ok
[17:36] <cyphermox> sounds good
[17:38] <superm1> cyphermox: i'm not aware of any other issues (and wasn't aware of this until it got mentioned to me yesterday), do you know of anything else that needs fixing with regards to it?
[17:38] <cyphermox> superm1: nothing I can think of right now
[17:39] <cyphermox> if anything they should be filed as bugs already
[17:39] <superm1> cyphermox: okay.  any luck with the fwupdate dup thing and making sure that patching it doesn't change the EFI binary?
[17:39] <cyphermox> superm1: I haven't been able to get to that yet; there are some bugs I need to fix before I get to it
[17:39] <superm1> okay
[17:40] <cyphermox> I guess I could look tomorrow at the airport
[19:57] <superm1> cyphermox: unfortunately it seems that patch will need some more work, in was working on parsing the file now, but it is causing some other problems that i couldn't identify until i tried it on a real system
[21:47] <superm1> cyphermox: okay that fixes the secondary issue, verified on live hardware ^