[01:08] <Strav> he
[01:08] <Strav> anyone else having issues with kubuntu 15.10's kmail systray icon?
[08:01] <lordievader> Good morning.
[08:29] <rejd_> Mornin'
[08:30] <lordievader> o/
[13:22] <ceed> After update to 15.10 beta 2 I am getting this message when doing 'sudo apt-get update':  Sorry, your system lacks support for the snapshot featurel. Is this a problem?
[13:22] <mcphail> ceed: have you installed that apt-btrfs-snapshot package (or whatever it is called)?
[13:24] <mcphail> ceed: that's the one which tends to spawn that error
[13:34] <ceed> mcphail, I do have btrfs partitions and the package you mentions installed. I have several snapshots created without problems like I did on 15.04. What does that have to do with apt-get?
[13:35] <ceed> mcphail, oh I see it now. It creates snapshots every time packages are upgraded/removed. Can that be disabled but simply removing the package?
[13:35] <ceed> by*
[13:39] <mcphail> ceed: yes -that disables it. It doesn't seem to work on wily. I hadn't tried it on previous releases
[13:48] <ceed> mcphail, I am having snapshot created using the 'btrfs-snapshot' script which works fine. So it's only the apt implementation that is broken I guess?
[13:50] <mcphail> ceed: You're probably right. I just stumbled across the package a couple of days ago and thought it sounded neat. Didn't persist when it didn;t work
[13:53] <ceed> mcphail, would be cool to have that work and utilize one of btrfs's strongpoints :)
[13:54] <mcphail> ceed: agreed :)
[13:55] <mcphail> ceed: (although I've dumped btrfs on my wily install as I am experimenting with bcache and thought it might be a step too far...)
[16:01] <ceed> Another btrfs related message when updating: Warning: /sbin/fsck.btrfs doesn't exist, can't install to initramfs, ignoring.
[16:02] <mcphail> ceed: one to be ignored
[16:05] <ceed> mcphail, I now see it's a bug reported on that one.
[16:06] <mcphail> ceed: yes. Ignore it for now. It is just noise
[16:06] <ceed> I do not fully understand how the term 'ignore' is being used. Am I to ignore it, or is Ubuntu ignoring that it can't install it? :)
[16:08] <mcphail> ceed: Ubuntu is ignoring it. But you can ignore it too. AFAIK, there _isn't_ a functioning fsck.btrfs yet, so it isn't going to be installed
[16:09] <ceed> I use scrub for that kind of thing. Better than nothing.
[16:12] <mcphail> yep
[22:38] <quidnunc> Why does gdm no longer start (blank screen) after upgrading to Wiley?
[22:41] <Faux> Normally because the nvidia driver's dkms stuff broke; apt-get install linux-image-generic; dpkg-reconfigure dkms
[22:44] <quidnunc> Faux: Even if I don't have an nvidia gfx card?
[22:44] <Faux> s/nvidia/fglrx/ if you're on ATI.  I only said normally!  /me leaves.
[22:45] <quidnunc> Faux: I'm using intel integrated, but thanks I will try your suggestion