| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| Mirv | robru: ok | 04:52 |
|---|---|---|
| abeato | Mirv, good morning, I need some help to upload http://people.canonical.com/~abeato/qtmultimedia-opensource-src/ in silo 16 | 06:47 |
| Mirv | abeato: ok, looking! | 07:00 |
| abeato | Mirv, thanks, should be the same you did for silo 55 (jhodapp told me you handled that), this is the wily sync | 07:01 |
| Mirv | abeato: right, this adds the backported playlist support also to wily. | 07:03 |
| abeato | yep | 07:04 |
| Mirv | abeato: ok it has soon built for all archs but it'll take up to 20 mins still before it's fully published in the PPA for other packages to use | 07:27 |
| abeato | Mirv, thanks | 07:27 |
| abeato | Mirv, was not also needed a -qtmultimedia-opensource-src-gles package? | 07:28 |
| Mirv | abeato: yes, I'll upload it soon too | 07:29 |
| abeato | Mirv, great | 07:29 |
| sil2100 | jibel, davmor2, Mirv, ogra_: cancelled our morning meeting since I need to drive to the car mechanic in a moment | 07:48 |
| sil2100 | And probably wouldn't be able to make it on time | 07:48 |
| jibel | sil2100, okay | 07:57 |
| Mirv | sil2100: aha, ok then | 08:12 |
| dholbach | cihelp: how can we get help-app landings moved to vivid (https://code.launchpad.net/~torsten.franz/help-app/help-app/+merge/274746)? | 10:08 |
| psivaa | dholbach: you basically want to get rid of the utopic runs, right? | 10:10 |
| dholbach | psivaa, yep - just use whatever is current :) | 10:12 |
| psivaa | dholbach: ok, some projects are built on wily as well as vivid. but for now, i'll just disable utopic. | 10:13 |
| dholbach | ok cool | 10:14 |
| dholbach | psivaa, what will I need to do once it's all done? just re-approve the branch? | 10:17 |
| psivaa | dholbach: no, just rebuid the failued jenkins job would be enough | 10:18 |
| dholbach | hum... I don't quite know which buttons to press - can you help me? :) | 10:20 |
| dholbach | thanks | 10:23 |
| psivaa | dholbach: that requires, re-approve :) | 10:26 |
| dholbach | yep, just saw it - thanks :) | 10:26 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| Saviq | elopio, ping | 11:52 |
| Saviq | or anyone else who could help me with an autopilot issue ↑ :| | 11:53 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| Saviq | jibel, hey, can you recommend someone to help debug an autopilot issue? | 12:15 |
| brendand | Saviq, ask ubuntu-qa in general, but i can help you right now | 12:47 |
| Saviq | brendand, gimme 5min please | 12:48 |
| Saviq | brendand, ok back | 13:02 |
| Saviq | brendand, we've silo 22 that somehow completely broke autopilot tests, they just bail out almost straight away | 13:03 |
| Saviq | brendand, the only suspect log line is AP trying to start the X11 input method instead of UInput | 13:04 |
| Saviq | but I'm not sure the difference is actually meaningful | 13:05 |
| Saviq | brendand, here's an example -vvv log from a working and broken test run http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/12860476/ | 13:07 |
| brendand | Saviq, that reads like a problem with unity8 to me | 13:13 |
| brendand | it is initctl start unity8 that's failing (although maybe only because of testability being on).. | 13:13 |
| Saviq | brendand, I'm just getting a clearer log, this one was a result of previous failures | 13:14 |
| Saviq | brendand, I think I'm starting to get what's going on http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/12860568/ | 13:16 |
| Saviq | that log is much more clear | 13:16 |
| Saviq | brendand, we changed the internal structure of unity8 to support external monitors, so this check is wrong now | 13:17 |
| Saviq | brendand, sorry for the noise, back to the drawing board | 13:17 |
| brendand | Saviq, no problem, i just served as your duck :) | 13:18 |
| Saviq | :) | 13:18 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| === balloons is now known as Guest77565 | ||
| === Guest77565 is now known as balloons_ | ||
| === mhall119_ is now known as mhall119 | ||
| === balloons_ is now known as balloons | ||
| Saviq | trainguards, hey, are silo branches available somewhere before they are published? | 14:19 |
| oSoMoN | ubuntu-qa: any chance silo 10 can be validated soon-ish? | 14:22 |
| sil2100 | Saviq: they're pushed to a special remote place only after publish (and before m&c) | 14:23 |
| sil2100 | Saviq: after building those are only available on jenkins | 14:23 |
| sil2100 | (before publish happens) | 14:24 |
| Saviq | sil2100, FWIW, could sometimes use them for testing | 14:24 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, I guess that would be a valid feature request, sometimes I also want to see how it looks from the inside | 14:25 |
| abeato | Laney, we need somebody with super-powers to publish silo 16, which contains the qtubuntu-media changes we talked about... mind landing it? | 14:28 |
| rvr | sil2100: It's in the queue | 14:28 |
| rvr | Oops | 14:28 |
| rvr | oSoMoN: It's in the queue | 14:28 |
| sil2100 | rvr: good good good... what's in the queue? ;) | 14:29 |
| rvr | sil2100: Lots of silos :D | 14:29 |
| rvr | Sorry, I was answering to oSoMoN | 14:29 |
| rvr | oSoMoN: Usually the Ready to QA lane in trello is sorted by priority | 14:29 |
| davmor2 | sil2100: you are in the queue | 14:30 |
| oSoMoN | rvr, thanks, I do monitor that board, but I was wondering whether there was some sort of ETA ? is it just you currently validating silos, or are there more people on it? | 14:31 |
| rvr | oSoMoN: I'm alone during the mornings, so maybe alesage will pick it | 14:31 |
| rvr | If not, probably tomorrow | 14:31 |
| oSoMoN | okay, thanks | 14:32 |
| davmor2 | rvr: only for the next 2 weeks ;) | 14:32 |
| rvr | davmor2: Quitter! | 14:32 |
| Laney | abeato: I queued it... but what are the indicator-sound changes? :-/ | 14:35 |
| * Laney is scared of changing things on the desktop in release week | 14:36 | |
| abeato | Laney, support for mpris controls I think... xavigarcia knows more | 14:36 |
| jhodapp | Laney, yes just MPRIS controls for phone only | 14:39 |
| jhodapp | it should be a very isolated change | 14:40 |
| abeato | xavigarcia, Laney is worried about breaking something in desktop if indicator-sound lands | 14:44 |
| abeato | xavigarcia, are the changes dangerous? | 14:45 |
| xavigarcia | abeato: you mean in silos 55 and 16? | 14:47 |
| abeato | xavigarcia, 16 (wily) | 14:47 |
| xavigarcia | abeato: I don't think there's anything dangerous... | 14:48 |
| xavigarcia | abeato: I tested it on the desktop before testing it on the phone | 14:48 |
| xavigarcia | abeato: But to be 100% we could maybe move to QA | 14:48 |
| Mirv | sil2100: can you maybe review this https://code.launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu-touch.wily_add_qt5-image-formats-plugins/+merge/274882 ? (so that QA can process the silo) | 14:50 |
| Laney | xavigarcia: It's release on Thursday so I am worried about breaking anything with no time to fix it | 14:50 |
| Laney | is it crucial or could it wait for X? | 14:51 |
| xavigarcia | Laney: I see... I don't think it is crucial for the desktop, TBH | 14:51 |
| sil2100 | Mirv: how much do the deps + the actual package weight? | 14:51 |
| xavigarcia | Laney: Although the indicator disables the actions for the next and previous buttons when it's told by MPRIS the UI does not show anything different | 14:52 |
| xavigarcia | Laney: so the difference it's not really notable. It's different on the phone, though | 14:53 |
| Laney | xavigarcia: I think we run out of time really, trying to produce final candidate images right now | 15:00 |
| Mirv | sil2100: as per the bug report, 960kB. the package itself is ~70kB | 15:01 |
| Mirv | s/960kB/869kB/ | 15:01 |
| xavigarcia | Laney: ok, let's hold it then.... As I said, the user won't notice any difference on the desktop. | 15:01 |
| Mirv | so messaging app and telegram will need it for sticker support | 15:02 |
| sil2100 | Mirv: hm, webp you say? I guess ~1MB more should be fineish... | 15:02 |
| Mirv | sil2100: webp, yes | 15:02 |
| sil2100 | Mirv: hm, I think this would need a framework bump then | 15:02 |
| xavigarcia | Laney: until the UI changes the icons when the action are not defined the user won't see any difference | 15:03 |
| Mirv | sil2100: I'm not sure, the Qt part is just plugins and existing API is used | 15:03 |
| pmcgowan | sil2100, yeah no fw bump I think | 15:04 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: Hi | 15:05 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: hello | 15:05 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: I see lots of failures in this log http://people.canonical.com/~bzoltan/ap-2015_10_18-VIVID-SILO55-KRILLIN/MAIN-ap-2015_10_18-vivid-055 | 15:05 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: Much more than in the previous run http://people.canonical.com/~bzoltan/ap-2015_10_02-VIVID-SILO31-KRILLIN/MAIN-ap-2015_10_03-vivid-031 | 15:05 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: yes, but UITK has nothing to do with them | 15:06 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: as you see those are not introduced by the silo055 | 15:06 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: There are some failures in messaging and sudoku, those are not new | 15:07 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: But there are many failures for ubuntuuitoolkit.tests | 15:07 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: if the logs say that "Same on archive" then it means that the failures are not new | 15:07 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: ahh, I see | 15:08 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: flakiness | 15:08 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: not fun | 15:08 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: So, what's up with these? | 15:08 |
| rvr | Ah | 15:08 |
| rvr | Hmm | 15:08 |
| rvr | But if "same on archive" means they can be reproduced | 15:08 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: If rhe archive tests fail without the silo then I do not care | 15:08 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: NO, the "same on archiv" means that the same test has failed on the stock image... so it is not a regression. Regression is when a test is OK on the stock image but fails with the silo | 15:09 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: But there is a chance that a regression was introduced in the archive | 15:09 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: and the possible regressions are marked as real regressions if they fail twice with the silo | 15:10 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: if the regression was introduced in the archive then it is a problem of whoever it introduced | 15:10 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: people should do the same testing as I do .. | 15:10 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: I'm talking about ubuntuuitoolkit.tests :-/ | 15:11 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: But I can not do much about regressions introduced between two UITK landings | 15:11 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: There are 32 failures... it worrying | 15:11 |
| rvr | it is | 15:11 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: there is nothing new about those failures... | 15:12 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: see the previous landing -> http://people.canonical.com/~bzoltan/ap-2015_10_08-VIVID-SILO23-KRILLIN/MAIN-ap-2015_10_09-vivid-023 | 15:12 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: I see | 15:13 |
| rvr | Someone should take a look and fix them, if they are consistent failures | 15:13 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: before that the UITK AP tests were broken, but the logs are here http://people.canonical.com/~bzoltan/ap-2015_10_02-VIVID-SILO31-KRILLIN/uitk_test.logs - rev1658 | 15:13 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: I do not mean that those 32 failures are not problem... but for sure they are not new problems. | 15:14 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: Agreed on that | 15:15 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: those are failures since longtime... we are working on to make them pass, but they are broken tests and not broken functionality | 15:15 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: with the UITK test plan I look for regression | 15:15 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: By the way, I found something weird this morning on Today scope in rc-proposed | 15:15 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: tell me | 15:16 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: The ">" sign becomes big when scrolling | 15:16 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: wow | 15:16 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: is that intentional | 15:16 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: When it is near the title bar | 15:16 |
| rvr | I don't know | 15:16 |
| rvr | Hmm | 15:17 |
| rvr | Cannot see it now in latest rc-proposed | 15:18 |
| rvr | Well, then nevermind, I will open a bug if I can reproduce it | 15:18 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: OK | 15:18 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: and about those 32 failures... i am pushing to fix them buy the next landing | 15:19 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: Ok, thanks | 15:19 |
| davmor2 | bzoltan_: you have money to burn buying the next release | 15:19 |
| rvr | Proceeding to test silo 55 | 15:21 |
| abeato | Laney, could not it land in the ppa overlay, for wily? | 15:36 |
| Laney | abeato: does that exist? | 15:37 |
| Laney | I don't know, that's not my decision :) | 15:37 |
| abeato | Laney, the stable phone overlay has a wily pocket: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/stable-phone-overlay | 15:38 |
| abeato | Laney, I guess the packages there will be copied over when X starts | 15:39 |
| bzoltan_ | davmor2: :D do you have something interesting there what you are waiting for? | 15:50 |
| rvr | dbarth: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1507667 | 15:55 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1507667 in webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) "HERE conditions cannot be loaded" [Undecided,New] | 15:55 |
| ogra_ | lol | 15:57 |
| ogra_ | thats fallout of disabling the file:// protocol | 15:57 |
| ogra_ | rvr, can you check if the url actually starts with file:// ? | 15:58 |
| ogra_ | oh, it says so in the error page, heh | 15:58 |
| ogra_ | jdstrand, ^^^ can we add an exception to the browser apparmor profile for /custom/vendor/here/location-rpovider/ to make file:// work for the pages in there ? | 15:59 |
| ogra_ | quite an oversight :) | 15:59 |
| rvr | Yup | 16:00 |
| jdstrand | ogra_: sure. ask oSoMoN to add it | 16:01 |
| rvr | bzoltan_: Silo 55 approved | 16:05 |
| sil2100 | jibel, davmor2, ogra_: I'm semi-off today, so no meeting in case you guys are on it | 16:05 |
| ogra_ | jdstrand, ah, i thought it is in apparmor-easyprof | 16:05 |
| bzoltan_ | rvr: \o/ | 16:05 |
| ogra_ | sil2100, yeah | 16:05 |
| davmor2 | sil2100: cancellor | 16:05 |
| jdstrand | ogra_: the webbrowser app ships a profile based on easyprof, but it is a deb so ships its own policy | 16:06 |
| ogra_ | ah | 16:06 |
| dbarth | rvr: ack | 16:12 |
| jhodapp | sil2100, any issues with landing https://code.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/qtubuntu-media/mediascanner-dependency-removal/+merge/274914 for wily right now? | 16:41 |
| popey | jibel: I realise you are all super busy, created https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/534 for clock app. contains a DST fix which we'd love to land in the store before the weekend (when DST happens in Europe) | 17:03 |
| * popey sends hugs and kisses and cake and beer | 17:03 | |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| jibel | popey, okay | 17:04 |
| jhodapp | jibel, do you know if there's any issues if I land https://code.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/qtubuntu-media/mediascanner-dependency-removal/+merge/274914 in wily right now? | 17:40 |
| jhodapp | jibel, the mediascanner team needs this to get mediascanner from being stuck in proposed | 17:41 |
| jibel | jhodapp, it is in universe, I don't think there is a problem to upload it to wily. | 17:47 |
| jhodapp | ok great thanks | 17:47 |
| robru | sil2100: slangasek: we doing the meeting today? | 17:59 |
| jhodapp | robru, can you publish silo 18 please? | 18:11 |
| robru | jhodapp: I can't if you can't | 18:12 |
| jhodapp | oh ok | 18:12 |
| robru | jhodapp: need a core dev nowadays | 18:12 |
| jhodapp | kenvandine, I know you can, care to publish silo 18 for me please? | 18:12 |
| jhodapp | robru, here I thought you had special access ;) | 18:12 |
| robru | jhodapp: I used to but not any longer :-( | 18:12 |
| jhodapp | bummer | 18:13 |
| jhodapp | cyphermox, ping | 18:32 |
| cyphermox | jhodapp: hello | 18:32 |
| jhodapp | cyphermox, hey man, you still have core dev status, right? | 18:32 |
| cyphermox | yes | 18:32 |
| jhodapp | cyphermox, perfect, would you mind publishing silo 18 for me please then | 18:33 |
| cyphermox | lemme look | 18:33 |
| cyphermox | this is marked as landing to wily, is it absolutely critical? | 18:34 |
| cyphermox | because I can publish but it doesn't mean it will be allowed through (not my call) | 18:34 |
| jhodapp | cyphermox, it is, it will unblock mediascanner which is stuck in proposed | 18:35 |
| robru | jhodapp: the thing is that wily is being released on thursday so people are hesitant to land stuff this close to the end if it's not some super-critical bugfix. | 18:37 |
| jhodapp | robru, yeah this is super critical | 18:38 |
| robru | jhodapp: is mediascanner used in the desktop in any way? | 18:38 |
| jhodapp | it is | 18:38 |
| robru | jhodapp: oh ok well if it's an important bugfix that affects the desktop then it should probably go in | 18:38 |
| robru | cyphermox: ^ | 18:38 |
| jhodapp | robru, it's a low risk change anyway, just removes a dependency on a specific mediascanner version from qtubuntu-media | 18:39 |
| robru | diff looks legit I guess | 18:43 |
| robru | jhodapp: you should ask nicely in #ubuntu-release I guess, even if cyphermox does publish it's up to them whether it actually gets accepted or not | 18:44 |
| jhodapp | robru, anyone to ping specifically? | 18:44 |
| robru | jhodapp: I wouldn't ping anybody in there ;-) whoevers around tends to watch the IRC fairly closely. | 18:45 |
| jhodapp | ok | 18:46 |
| jhodapp | robru, if release doesn't accept it, where does that package live then? | 18:51 |
| jhodapp | robru, some overlay? | 18:51 |
| robru | jhodapp: yeah we can copy it to the stable overlay PPA where it'll be held until wily+1 opens and it'll get copied there | 18:59 |
| jhodapp | robru, ok great | 18:59 |
| jhodapp | cyphermox, let's at least do that now, publish so that it lands in the overlay PPA for wily | 18:59 |
| robru | cyphermox: you have to edit the dest PPA in the request in order to do that | 19:00 |
| robru | or I could just do it, heh | 19:00 |
| robru | jhodapp: cyphermox ok I copied it to overlay ppa | 19:01 |
| jhodapp | robru, ok so that's not automatic for wily, good to know | 19:02 |
| robru | jhodapp: it's automatic for dual silos, but this isn't a dual silo. | 19:02 |
| jhodapp | right | 19:03 |
| jhodapp | robru, hope to fix that soon too by syncing gstreamer versions across vivid and wily | 19:04 |
| robru | jhodapp: yeah the more we can do with dual silos the easier it is to manage everything | 19:04 |
| jhodapp | robru, exactly | 19:04 |
| jhodapp | robru, normally we don't have any code that relies on a specific version of gstreamer, but in this case that's not true | 19:05 |
| robru | jhodapp: oh you wanna backport wily's gstreamer into vivid? | 19:06 |
| jhodapp | robru, yep | 19:06 |
| robru | that sounds like a big job ;-) | 19:06 |
| jhodapp | held off on that for a bit because it was a dev version | 19:06 |
| jhodapp | but now it's a new 1.6.x stable series in wily | 19:06 |
| jhodapp | robru, shouldn't be too bad | 19:06 |
| robru | cool | 19:07 |
| Saviq | robru, thanks :) | 19:28 |
| robru | Saviq: you're welcome! | 19:30 |
| dobey | trainguards: can somoene please retry these builds? thanks. https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-026/+build/8133720 https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-026/+build/8133724 | 20:32 |
| robru | dobey: one sec | 20:44 |
| dobey | robru: thanks | 20:54 |
| robru | dobey: you're welcome | 20:54 |
| alesage | robru, I've just passed 19 but noticed something fishy upon further examination--can I un-approve? | 21:21 |
| robru | alesage: yeah | 21:22 |
| alesage | robru ok, I'll edit the card/silo | 21:23 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| cyphermox | robru: jhodapp: I got from Laney that the fix for mediascanner got uploaded by Laney earlier, so the ci train upload wasn't necessary | 21:39 |
| cyphermox | the change should get merged though | 21:40 |
| cyphermox | (I have not verified any of this yet) | 21:40 |
| robru | cyphermox: oh indeed, there's an upload from 4hrs ago and it's no longer in proposed | 21:41 |
| robru | cyphermox: ok I'll merge | 21:41 |
| Laney | I just removed the package dependency as the stuff wasn't built anyway, can land this more complete removal in X | 21:43 |
| robru | Laney: sure thing, the silo is now merged to trunk so it'll be included in whatever the next release is, when X opens | 21:45 |
| Laney | nod | 21:45 |
| jhodapp | cyphermox, Laney, robru cool thanks guys | 21:50 |
| robru | jhodapp: you're welcome | 21:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!