/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/10/26/#ubuntu-meeting.txt

=== balloons is now known as Guest90681
=== nudtrobert1 is now known as nudtrobert
=== nudtrobert1 is now known as nudtrobert
=== nudtrobert1 is now known as nudtrobert
=== smoser` is now known as smoser
=== zeusbin is now known as binair
=== Guest90681 is now known as balloons
xnoxhello15:13
xnoxcyphermox: hello, how are you? =)15:13
cyphermoxhey15:14
xnoxcyphermox: are we meant to have a meeting or some such?15:14
xnoxcyphermox: do we have any agenda items?15:14
cyphermoxheh, woops. it's not actually my turn to chair, but whatever15:15
cyphermoxI had chaired in place of Laney last time :)15:15
xnoxcyphermox: did you do it last time? in that case it would be micahg turn15:15
cyphermoxyeah15:15
xnoxNext DMB meetings (Chair: Mathieu): is not helpful then on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/Agenda15:16
cyphermoxbut still, I think we just have the agenda item for membership to uploaders15:16
cyphermoxxnox: indeed, but it's because I thought it not good to change the order for one case of switching15:16
cyphermoxI can chair again, don't mind :)15:16
xnoxwell we don't have any applicants.15:17
xnoxand I'm not sure how many people are around.15:17
cyphermoxinfinity is probably away on vacation this week15:18
cyphermoxah, Laney is on holiday too15:18
cyphermoxbdmurray: hey15:18
cyphermoxmicahg will be back in a few minutes and we can start the meeting then, I suppose.15:19
cyphermox#startmeeting DMB 2015-10-2615:31
meetingologyMeeting started Mon Oct 26 15:31:05 2015 UTC.  The chair is cyphermox. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.15:31
meetingologyAvailable commands: action commands idea info link nick15:31
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2015-10-26 Meeting | Current topic:
cyphermox#voters micahg cyphermox xnox bdmurray15:31
meetingologyCurrent voters: bdmurray cyphermox micahg xnox15:31
cyphermox#votesrequired 415:31
meetingologyvotes now need 4 to be passed15:31
cyphermox#topic Review of the previous action items15:31
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2015-10-26 Meeting | Current topic: Review of the previous action items
cyphermoxLaney isn't around, so we'll just skip to the main topic, I guess15:32
cyphermox#subtopic Granting membership for PPU/packageset uploaders by default15:32
xnox+115:32
cyphermoxdo we want to discuss this before we vote?15:32
micahgso, my position is that some should have membership and some shouldn't15:32
cyphermoxThis is about the default process for PPU/packageset uploaders, whether they should ask to have membership too when they apply for upload rights15:33
micahgPPU doesn't, flavor packagesets should, other packagesets were not decided from what I remember15:33
xnoxmicahg: the question, whether it's opt-in, or opt-out.15:33
micahgright, so, it's a mix15:34
cyphermoxwhy shouldn't PPU? and under which conditions do you feel packagesets might or might not?15:34
micahgso, the whole goal was to lower the bar for PPU so that more people can apply when they have the technical skills, but not the significant and sustained part15:34
cyphermoxfair enough15:35
cyphermoxstill though, doesn't the significant and sustained part get implicitly verified in the way that we account for whether they have the technical skills?15:35
micahgso, ,if we're doing that, I would think it should be like any other membership where the applicant needs to apply for it15:35
micahgit could15:36
cyphermoxok15:36
xnoxwell.15:36
xnoxif one wants upload rights apply for PPU for a package and/or packagest.15:36
cyphermoxI feel it might be a little counterproductive to get them to ask for it, etc when they go for upload rights -- if we're to do that, we might as well have them apply to the RMB simply15:36
xnoxif one wants membership apply for contributing member, MOTU, or core.15:37
xnoxcyphermox: we have developer path to membership only - contributing developer.15:37
micahgI think it should be made abundantly clear to applicants that if they're just going for PPU or a packageset where there isn't a requirement for significant & sustained contribution that they have the option to apply to dev membership as well if they feel they've fulfilled the significant and sustained piece as well15:37
cyphermoxoh, true15:37
cyphermoxso, should we vote then?15:38
micahgit's basically was it 1 upload every 6 months or something a bit more significant15:38
cyphermoxfwiw, Laney's vote was +1, but he didn't take part of the discussion here now15:38
micahgbut as xnox said, the DMB is still the best place to grant that membership15:39
micahg* evaluate and grant15:39
micahgmy problem with opt-out is that it increases the risk we'll reject applicants, if it's opt-in, worst case is they have to come back in 2 weeks15:42
bdmurrayHow does that work?15:43
bdmurray"> Individuals, when they apply to the DMB for packageset or PPU rights,15:44
bdmurray> will be considered separately for their upload access and for Ubuntu15:44
bdmurray> membership (the latter being optional, and usually not explicitly15:44
bdmurray> requested)."15:44
cyphermoxshould we make it explicitly clear with the applicant then whether they expect to be considered for membership at the meeting?15:45
bdmurrayNo, "we didn't expect people to have to say they want membership too"15:47
micahgthat was not my understanding15:47
cyphermoxno, we didn't expect, but we can ask15:47
micahgI thought for the PPU/packagesets where it wasn't coupled, they would have to ask explicitly15:47
bdmurrayOkay, and the way I read Laney's email is that we will asume they want to be considered for membership.15:48
micahgright, that seems to be his position15:49
cyphermoxthat's the way I read it too15:49
bdmurrayBut the two things aren't coupled together.15:50
micahgwell, for some they were (flavor & kernel packagesets, MOTU/core-dev)15:50
cyphermoxso, voting?15:53
cyphermox#vote Should uploaders be granted Ubuntu membership by default15:54
meetingologyPlease vote on: Should uploaders be granted Ubuntu membership by default15:54
meetingologyPublic votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)15:54
micahg-115:54
meetingology-1 received from micahg15:54
micahgwait15:54
micahgthat should be a little more narrow, no?15:54
micahgShould PPU/certain packagesets be granted Ubuntu membership by default?15:54
cyphermoxno, we should reject Laney's proposition explicitly, I think15:55
micahgok15:55
cyphermoxor I can close the voting, reject, and we reconvene and further specify it?15:55
cyphermoxI'm +0, btw, because it should be more specific; this depends on packagesets/packages15:56
bdmurrayAre we saying the vote subject is about what is in the iki page?15:56
micahgyou're right, we should vote on what was proposed since the proponent isn't here15:56
micahgwe can then vote on follow up pieces if we want15:56
cyphermoxbdmurray: the vote subject probably should be the specific thing Laney added as a topic?15:57
bdmurraythe email he links to says "it's about whether we15:57
bdmurrayshould give these applicants membership implicitly and only use our15:57
bdmurrayright to not give membership when it is needed."15:57
cyphermoxit's super unclear, that's the problem15:57
bdmurrayalright15:58
cyphermoxit's a case-by-case basis and we're trying to codify that15:58
cyphermox+015:58
meetingology+0 received from cyphermox15:58
cyphermoxxnox: ?15:58
bdmurrayI feel like this has been outstanding for quite some time.15:58
cyphermoxbdmurray: yes15:58
cyphermoxbdmurray: I'm not against voting on the specific cases now15:59
cyphermoxor if everyone agrees that Laney meant what we were saying before15:59
cyphermox(basically, that we give it by default, unless we have a reason not to (ie. not sustained)15:59
bdmurrayI don't want to make that assumption.15:59
* bdmurray spoke too soon16:00
cyphermoxbdmurray: I understand what you mean16:00
cyphermoxxnox: bdmurray: are you voting or do you think we should refine it first?16:02
xnoxi'm for: contributing, motu, core -> implies membership. the rest do not.16:04
cyphermoxxnox: that's a strong -1 then, and PPU/packageset requesters should apply for contributing explicitly?16:05
xnoxyeah.16:05
bdmurrayI guess it needs some refining.16:05
cyphermoxok, let's see if we can convey this properly in the logs16:05
cyphermox#endvote16:05
meetingologyVoting ended on: Should uploaders be granted Ubuntu membership by default16:05
meetingologyVotes for:0 Votes against:1 Abstentions:116:05
meetingologyMotion denied16:05
cyphermox#rejected16:05
cyphermoxshould we refine this now? have we already done so and vote on a different, more specific topic?16:06
bdmurrayI think Laney should be involved in the refinement.16:09
cyphermoxok, then16:11
cyphermox#action cyphermox to update wiki for refinement of Laney's proposition16:11
meetingologyACTION: cyphermox to update wiki for refinement of Laney's proposition16:11
cyphermox#topic AOB?16:11
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2015-10-26 Meeting | Current topic: AOB?
cyphermoxanyone has something else to discuss today?16:12
bdmurraynope16:13
cyphermoxok16:13
cyphermox#topic Chair selection for the next meeting16:13
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2015-10-26 Meeting | Current topic: Chair selection for the next meeting
cyphermoxmicahg: your turn according to the wiki list16:13
cyphermoxunless you know you won't be there16:13
micahgok :)16:13
micahgno, I should be there16:14
cyphermox#action micahg to chair next meeting16:14
meetingologyACTION: micahg to chair next meeting16:14
micahgwhich reminds me, I need to send the doodle poll for meeting times16:14
micahgmight as well action that..16:14
cyphermox#action micahg to send doodle poll for meeting times16:14
meetingologyACTION: micahg to send doodle poll for meeting times16:14
micahgthanks :)16:14
cyphermox#endmeeting16:14
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
meetingologyMeeting ended Mon Oct 26 16:14:39 2015 UTC.16:14
meetingologyMinutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2015/ubuntu-meeting.2015-10-26-15.31.moin.txt16:14
cyphermoxthanks everyone :)16:14
mdeslaur\o16:33
tyhickshello16:33
jjohanseno/16:33
tyhicks#startmeeting16:33
meetingologyMeeting started Mon Oct 26 16:33:48 2015 UTC.  The chair is tyhicks. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.16:33
meetingologyAvailable commands: action commands idea info link nick16:33
tyhicksThe meeting agenda can be found at:16:33
tyhicks[LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Meeting16:34
jdstrandhello16:34
tyhicks[TOPIC] Weekly stand-up report16:34
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Weekly stand-up report
tyhicksjdstrand: you're up16:34
jdstrandI'm working on the various tasks for click-apparmor and policy for xenial16:34
jdstrandI'm then going to be working on cleaning up snappy policy generation16:35
jdstrandand some review tools updates16:35
jdstrandthat's it for me16:35
jdstrandmdeslaur: you're up16:35
mdeslaurI'm on bug triage this week16:36
mdeslaurI just released mysql updates16:36
mdeslaurand I have an embargoed issue to test16:36
mdeslaurafter that, I have some ntp updates to test properly and release16:36
mdeslaurand will go down the list after that16:36
mdeslaurthat's pretty much it16:36
mdeslaursbeattie: , you're up16:36
sbeattieI'm on cve triage this week16:36
sbeattieI'm finishig testing the openjdk-7 update16:37
sbeattieI'm also working on the gcc pie patches16:38
sbeattieI have some yak shaving to finish up for xenial opening and to prep for the sprint16:38
sbeattiethat's pretty much it for my week, though I'm hoping to pick up another update as well16:39
sbeattietyhicks: you're it16:39
tyhicksI'm in the happy place this week16:39
tyhicksI need to do some sprint prep16:39
tyhicksI'm in the middle of the Mir attestable timestamps and mapplauncherd reviews16:40
tyhicksand still hoping to get to AppArmor kernel fix reviews16:40
tyhickshelping out with the update backlog would be good, too16:40
tyhicksjjohansen: you're up16:40
jjohansenI still working on the kernel patches for apparmor stacking16:41
jjohansenI will also have some sprint prep this week16:41
jjohansenand I should get the 4.3 apparmor patch tree in order so its ready for 4.3 when in lands16:42
jjohansenthats it for me sarnold you're up16:42
sarnoldI'm on community this week; there's a few xenial-open tasks held over fro mlast week, perhaps embargoed updates to work on, and a long list of apparmor kernel patches to review16:43
sarnoldalso of course some sprint preperation16:44
sarnoldI think that's it for me, chrisccoulson?16:44
tyhickshe had to step away16:45
tyhickswe'll move on16:45
tyhicks[TOPIC] Highlighted packages16:45
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Highlighted packages
tyhicksThe Ubuntu Security team will highlight some community-supported packages that might be good candidates for updating and or triaging. If you would like to help Ubuntu and not sure where to start, this is a great way to do so.16:45
tyhicksSee https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures for details and if you have any questions, feel free to ask in #ubuntu-security. To find out other ways of helping out, please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/GettingInvolved.16:45
tyhickshttp://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/radare2.html16:45
tyhickshttp://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/ruby-jquery-rails.html16:45
tyhickshttp://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/async-http-client.html16:45
tyhickshttp://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/php-mail.html16:45
tyhickshttp://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/k4dirstat.html16:45
tyhicks[TOPIC] Miscellaneous and Questions16:45
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Miscellaneous and Questions
tyhicksDoes anyone have any other questions or items to discuss?16:46
tyhicksjdstrand, mdeslaur, sbeattie, jjohansen, sarnold: Thanks!16:48
tyhicks#endmeeting.16:48
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
meetingologyMeeting ended Mon Oct 26 16:48:14 2015 UTC.16:48
meetingologyMinutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2015/ubuntu-meeting.2015-10-26-16.33.moin.txt16:48
jjohansenthanks tyhicks16:48
sbeattietyhicks: thanks!16:48
mdeslaurthanks tyhicks16:49
sarnoldthanks tyhicks16:49
jdstrandthanks tyhicks :)16:49

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!