[09:25] <ara> willcooke, hey! do you know when we are going to have Xenial dailies?
[09:25] <willcooke> ara, sorry, not sure.  seb128 any ideas?
[09:35] <seb128> willcooke, ara, dunno, up to the release team but I think infinity and Laney are off this week
[09:35] <seb128> unsure who is going to handle those things meanwhile
[09:36] <willcooke> thanks seb128.  ara I'll speak to Laney when he's back next week
[09:36] <ara> willcooke, thanks
[11:09] <cjwatson> ara_,willcooke,seb128: They should be set up now, running from cron on the usual schedule
[11:12] <willcooke> thanks cjwatson
[12:08] <apw> cjwatson, is that the dailies, if so, have they run once yet, as eveyrthing is still called wily to my eye
[12:09] <ara_> cjwatson, thanks!
[12:14] <cjwatson> apw: I doubt they'll have run yet
[12:14] <cjwatson> I didn't touch anything manually, just updated crontab
[12:14] <apw> cjwatson, ack thanks
[12:14] <cjwatson> and yes, the dailies
[13:33] <teward> are the archives open for uploads?
[13:33] <teward> (for Xenial)
[13:38] <cjwatson> yes
[13:41] <teward> cool, thanks.
[18:30] <cyphermox> ah, crap
[18:31] <cyphermox> slangasek: can you reject fwupdate?
[18:39] <slangasek> cyphermox: done
[18:42] <cyphermox> thanks.
[22:43] <robru> Can somebody take a look at qtmir-gles? Excuses page says i386 regression  but if you click through there are passes that are more recent but seemingly ignored
[22:43] <robru> In xenial-proposed i mean
[23:01] <cyphermox> robru: looking
[23:02] <robru> cyphermox: thanks
[23:12] <cyphermox> robru: I'm not sure. I would have expected britney to notice the results by now, I guess
[23:13] <cyphermox> oh wait
[23:13] <cyphermox> perhaps we're waiting for test results to finish
[23:13] <robru> cyphermox: did I misread the timestamps? seemed to me like it'd be done for hours already (but I am timezonally challenged)
[23:16] <cyphermox> robru: it was run once for qtmir-gles, yes, but it's now running for ust too, so there will be new results
[23:17] <wxl> excuse me for not keeping track of this, but when do we usually turn dailies on after a release?
[23:19] <tsimonq2> +1
[23:20] <cyphermox> wxl: it could have just been an oversight, but I think we're not done will all the steps for new release yet, from a quick look at documentation I've never looked at before ;)
[23:21] <cyphermox> wxl: I'll start going through stuff that I can take care of
[23:21] <wxl> cyphermox: man, it would be rad to have a wiki page with a list of general timelines.  i know the whole release process is kind of manual, so it might help the community back the release team up without harassing :)
[23:22] <cyphermox> wxl: some of it is documented here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NewReleaseCycleProcess
[23:23] <cyphermox> that's the todo basically, I can pick some of the things there that I can deal with now
[23:24] <wxl> "first weeks" sounds about right XD
[23:26] <cyphermox> yep
[23:26] <wxl> although it contradicts with https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MilestoneProcess cyphermox
[23:26] <wxl> it says release
[23:27] <cyphermox> that's different, no?
[23:27] <cyphermox> I'm looking at just the "first weeks" thing post-release; I only glanced at it quickly
[23:27] <wxl> should i take milestone to refer to non-release images?
[23:27] <cyphermox> devscripts is something that definitely should be done
[23:27] <wxl> yes that's what it is
[23:28] <wxl> ok makes sense now
[23:28] <wxl> so immediate flipping of dailies with milestones, but when we have a release, it takes several weeks to get dailies back
[23:28] <cyphermox> I don't remember it taking very long last time
[23:28] <wxl> yeah me either
[23:29] <wxl> the addendum here might be the take home message "after toolchain complete"
[23:38] <cyphermox> wxl: still could use a little updating