[10:40] <Saviq> mzanetti, https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/unity-phablet-qmluitests-vivid/1270/ is panel-button-fixes, look like regressions
[10:40] <Saviq> @unity: _vivid_ CI should be all SUCCESS today, wily is broken, we'll move to xenial soon
[10:40] <Saviq> so if your vivid CI isn't green, needs investigation
[10:41] <mzanetti> ack
[10:41] <mzanetti> Saviq, actually those are the new tests added with that branch :D
[10:41] <mzanetti> will investigate
[10:41] <Saviq> kk
[10:49] <guest123124> in xenial the mouse pointer is off or the mouse is not working in unity8
[10:49] <guest123124> i can't login
[10:50] <guest123124> are there any keyboard shortcuts to log-in?
[10:50] <greyback> guest123124: nothing at all responding to mouse? You see a cursor & can move it around?
[10:52] <guest123124> after login into lightdm the mouse pointer is not shown anymore, and even if i blind click on the indicators it does nothing
[10:52] <guest123124> the mouse seems off
[10:52] <Saviq> guest123124, xenial does not have the latest things yet, unity8 didn't migrate yet
[10:52] <guest123124> ah, ok then :D
[10:52] <Saviq> soon
[10:52] <guest123124> testing again later, thanks Saviq
[10:53] <Saviq> guest123124, might wanna /nick
[10:53] <nick1235> Saviq, done
[10:53] <nick1235> :P
[10:53] <Saviq> nick1235, you can monitor the migration in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8 (or enable proposed if you want)
[10:54] <nick1235> yep i was thinking of enabling proposed
[10:54] <nick1235> but later, i'm not that brave in the morning
[10:55] <Saviq> being on xenial is brave enough still ;)
[10:55] <nick1235> :))
[11:18] <mzanetti> Saviq, pushed a fix
[11:18] <Saviq> tx
[11:51] <Saviq> cimi, please merge lp:~cimi/unity8/sdk1.3_newUbuntuShape into lp:~cimi/unity8/wide-preview-zoomable-videoplayback as it's a prerequisite, but isn't in the branch - that's where the apparent conflict comes from
[11:51] <cimi> Saviq, I think I did :/
[11:51] <Saviq> cimi, you did merge something, but not that
[11:51] <cimi> oh no I did in preview-sharing
[11:52] <Saviq> cimi, whatever you did merge in preview-sharing, you should've merged wide-preview in it, after having merged shape in it first
[11:52] <cimi> pushed
[11:52] <cimi> let's see preview-sharing
[11:52] <Saviq> cimi, also, please don't paste the changelog entry into commit msg, better say which branch is this a merge from
[11:53] <cimi> Saviq, oki for next time
[11:53] <cimi> ok they should both be fine now
[11:54] <Saviq> k, kicked ci for them
[11:54] <Saviq> tsdgeos, can you please merge Cimi's wide preview into lp:~aacid/unity8/scope_settings_keyboard_scroll
[11:56] <tsdgeos> didn't i do that already?
[11:56]  * tsdgeos has a dejavu
[11:56] <tsdgeos> ah maybe do it again
[11:56] <Saviq> tsdgeos, yeah, but cimi didn't merge his branches properly before
[11:56] <Saviq> tsdgeos, yes, remerge
[11:57] <tsdgeos> Saviq: done
[11:57] <Saviq> tx
[11:58] <cimi> Saviq, what was the silo you built?
[11:58] <Saviq> cimi, 21
[11:58] <Saviq> https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/564
[11:58] <cimi> cool, testing
[11:59] <cimi> (when is built)
[12:00] <Saviq> cimi, I'll rebuild it now so give it an hour or so
[12:09] <Saviq> @unity: unity8 migrated to xenial, so we're in sync between vivid+overlay and xenial again (note wily is done'n'dusted, we don't care for it any more)
[12:10] <mzanetti> nice!
[12:16] <nick1235> r.i.p wily
[12:25] <tsdgeos> ubuntu::connectivity::NetworkingStatus thinks i'm offline
[12:25]  * tsdgeos shakes fist
[12:26] <ltinkl> tsdgeos, ye that thing is unreliable lately; my router went offline and back online yesterday and unity8 didn't notice at all, had to disable and re-enable networking
[12:27] <tsdgeos> it's very bad that this thing doesn't work
[12:27] <tsdgeos> since if it thinks we're offiline we don't do any qnam request
[12:29] <ltinkl> tsdgeos, yup, on the phone, the dash fails to refresh the nearby and today scopes
[12:29] <Saviq> I wonder if tg2 not sending msgs for me is the same issue
[12:29] <ltinkl> tsdgeos, it won't even reconnect to my router when it comes back online
[12:35] <tsdgeos> qdbus com.ubuntu.connectivity1 /com/ubuntu/connectivity1/NetworkingStatus com.ubuntu.connectivity1.NetworkingStatus.Status
[12:35] <tsdgeos> ltinkl: Saviq: on the phone ↑
[12:35] <tsdgeos> food!
[12:36] <ltinkl> tsdgeos, will do once that happens again
[13:11] <nick12340> ok, so now the mouse is working on unity8/xenial
[13:11] <nick12340> but i get a black window with xmir, am i doing something wrong? Xmir :0 --desktop_file_hint=geany.desktop
[13:11] <nick12340> tried -sw -damage still nothing
[13:12] <mhall119> Saviq: now that silo 22 has landed, are you going to keep using it for new Mir/Unity work?
[13:12] <mhall119> I'm wondering if I should keep using it or removeit from my apt sources
[13:18] <greyback_> mhall119: you can remove, we won't hold on to that silo
[13:18] <kgunn> which reminds me...
[13:20] <mhall119> thanks greyback_
[13:20] <greyback_> kgunn: killing silo0?
[13:21] <kgunn> greyback_: yep, abandoned
[13:21] <greyback_> yay
[13:21] <greyback_> kill the undead
[13:23] <ltinkl> :)
[13:57] <kgunn> ltinkl: so @mouse scroll...yep, works for browser, i was actually testing things like dash or u-s-s
[13:57] <kgunn> so you can grab and drag the window up, but you can't wheel-scroll
[13:57] <kgunn> kind of a small issue...
[13:57] <kgunn> since user can at least grab now
[14:05] <dandrader> AlbertA, ping
[14:08] <ltinkl> kgunn, hmm weird, that also works fine here
[14:09] <Saviq> kgunn, ltinkl I think there's a state when wheel doesn't work in the dash, for example, but not sure why that is... I initially thought the dash doesn't scroll (because well, it didn't...) but then some time later it did work...
[14:09] <Saviq> so we need to do some investigation there
[14:09] <ltinkl> Saviq, ye it looks like a focus issue
[14:10] <ltinkl> Saviq, sometimes it (dash) doesn't respond to the wheel until I grab it and flick it manually
[14:11] <Saviq> ltinkl, right
[14:11] <Saviq> tsdgeos, qdbus isn't available on the phone by default is it?
[14:11] <tsdgeos> Saviq: no
[14:11] <ltinkl> tsdgeos, it isn't
[14:11] <ltinkl> had to manually install it as well
[14:12] <tsdgeos> gbdus is but its syntax is awful
[14:12] <tsdgeos> -b+d
[14:13] <ltinkl> apt-get install qdbus-qt5
[14:15] <Saviq> ltinkl, yeah, not when people have their phones ro
[14:15] <Saviq> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1507769/comments/14 works
[14:15] <AlbertA> dandrader: pong
[14:15] <ltinkl> ah right
[14:16] <ltinkl> Saviq, so why do we use com.ubuntu.connectivity1.NetworkingStatus and not the same thing provided by NM itself?
[14:19] <Saviq> ltinkl, no idea, maybe NM doesn't have enough info or something, I know Qt has API for that, too, but again - maybe not extensive enough
[14:19] <Saviq> those would be my guesses
[14:19] <Saviq> or no QML API
[14:21] <tsdgeos> Saviq: mzanetti: what about this? https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/warn_using_only_cache/+merge/275851
[14:21] <tsdgeos> ltinkl: it used to fail so we switched to our thing
[14:22] <mzanetti> tsdgeos, looks ok I guess. shouldn't it be a qWarning() tho?
[14:23] <mzanetti> (assuming eventially we'll add message filters this seems it should still be printed even if random debug stuff is filtered)
[14:24] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: no big opinion on debug/warning, in Qt qWarinng are usually yhings you're doing wrong and can fix, but we're not Qt so we can do whatever we want for warning :D
[14:24] <mzanetti> right...
[14:24] <ltinkl> tsdgeos, looks like ours fails the same :)
[14:24] <mzanetti> actually atm it mostly doesn't matter indeed
[14:24] <mzanetti> we should eventually move to QMessageLogger tho
[14:25] <tsdgeos> ltinkl: well it was a false alarm, it is just that the thing doesn't run on the desktop so i was getting all the things to fail
[14:25] <mzanetti> so that we can enable DDA prints without recompiling etc
[14:25] <tsdgeos> nice way to spend the morning
[14:27] <ltinkl> qCDebug()/qCWarning()?
[14:30] <tsdgeos> we don't use those at the momnet, we probably should, but don't think it's fair to ask this MR to add them
[14:30] <ltinkl> tsdgeos, sure, for later
[14:47] <Saviq> mterry, hey, can you please merge trunk in https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/unity8/shutdown-dialog-on-resume/+merge/275240 so we can see some CI greenness?
[14:53] <mterry> Saviq, oh ok
[14:54] <mterry> Saviq, no conflicts.  Does CI not merge trunk first anyway?
[14:54] <Saviq> mterry, I agree, CI should always take trunk, merge branch, only then test
[14:54] <Saviq> mterry, yeah, unfortunately it doesn't
[14:54] <mterry> huh
[14:54] <Saviq> it tests the branch directly
[14:54] <mterry> I feel like I keep forgetting that  :)
[14:54] <mterry> Saviq, updated
[14:55] <Saviq> tx
[15:48] <mterry> Saviq, OK, updated my three no-touch-no-lifecycle branches.  No conflicts, but I did bump unity-api version again
[15:50] <Saviq> mzanetti, ↑
[15:51] <Saviq> mterry, you might need to bump it even more after silo 21 lands, as dednick's occlusion branches bump it, too, unless we land the two together
[15:51] <mterry> Saviq, got it.  Easy to bump.  But also...  let's just land no-touch-no-lifecycle...
[16:01] <Saviq> mterry, sure, if it's ready to go
[16:02] <mterry> Saviq, well it needs final reviews.  But I think it's ready to go
[16:03] <mterry> greyback_, do you like teh qtmir no-touch-no-lifecycle branch now?
[16:04] <greyback_> mterry: I do now, yes. CI still unhappy tho
[16:05] <mterry> greyback_, that's because unity-api is bumped.  It can't compile
[16:05] <greyback_> ah yes
[16:05] <greyback_> mterry: can you please add the checklist with the required unity-api MR listed there
[16:05] <mterry> greyback_, I thought I linked the MR
[16:05] <mterry> let me see
[16:06] <greyback_> mterry: ah you did, wrong tab
[16:06] <mterry> greyback_, didn't do the formal checklist though.  I'll add that
[16:07] <mterry> done
[16:08] <greyback_> mterry: ack. Will give it all a test today/tomorrow
[16:09] <mterry> greyback_, great thanks!
[16:09]  * greyback_ wishes CI was smart enough to read checklist, and compile all packages ready for testing
[16:20] <Saviq> dednick, mterry, greyback_, I added occlusion and lifecycle to silo 21
[16:21] <Saviq> dednick, mterry, it's building now, please monitor for conflicts if you can see and fix any https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-021-1-build/216/console
[16:21] <dednick> ah. i was just doing that :)
[16:21] <greyback_> Saviq: could this be added too? https://code.launchpad.net/~alan-griffiths/qtmir/test-harness-for-MirWindowManager/+merge/274221
[16:21] <Saviq> greyback_, doing
[16:21] <greyback_> thans
[16:22] <greyback_> thanks ants.... thants
[16:22] <dednick> yay. i'm conflicting!
[16:22] <Saviq> dednick, you need to merge trunk / bump to .102
[16:22] <dednick> hm. i did yesterday
[16:22] <dednick> oh, maybe i didnt push
[16:24] <dednick> rebuilding
[16:28] <dednick> eh.
[16:33] <Saviq> dednick, you might wanna just not modify changelog
[16:34] <Saviq> dednick, otherwise you'd need to make it same as mterry's
[16:34]  * Saviq gone for a while, biab
[16:34] <dednick> Saviq: i've resubmitted and pre-reqed mterrys branch
[16:35] <mterry> dednick, ah thanks
[17:10] <pstolowski> Saviq, mzanetti hey, question - shell plugin has a single translatable string and ships translations for it; i guess it cannot just set text domain with unity-plugin-scopes package name?
[17:16] <mzanetti> hmm... that might work...
[17:17] <mzanetti> but would need to try. albert is probably able to tell you from the top of his head tomorrow morning
[17:17] <mzanetti> pstolowski, ^
[17:24] <pstolowski> mzanetti, my only concern is since it's a plugin, doing this would affect other plugins which may do the same?
[18:00] <mterry> mzanetti, hrm ~unity-team/unity8/new_fix_upsidedown conflicts with my refactoring in no-touch-no-lifecycle
[18:00] <mterry> I'll rock-paper-scissors you for who deps on who  :)
[18:01] <mzanetti> haha
[18:01] <mzanetti> mterry, seems new_fix_upstream is easier to rebase
[18:03] <mzanetti> mterry, since I have you here, did you test your no-touch-no-lifecycle on the -pd image?
[18:03] <mzanetti> I can't seem to be able to run legacy apps
[18:03] <mterry> mzanetti, I tested it by manually tweaking desktop files of touch apps and noting that they were were no longer lifecycled
[18:04] <mzanetti> ah ok
[18:04] <mterry> mzanetti, so I don't know why legacy apps wouldn't run, but I didn't try that code path
[18:04] <mterry> mzanetti, do you only have that problem with my branch or in general?
[18:04] <mzanetti> no, in general... just trying to find evidence that it *should* work before I spend too much time figuring things
[18:05] <mterry> ok  :-/
[18:05]  * mterry hasn't tried full blown PD yet
[18:40] <mzanetti> mterry, I've rebased the fix_upsidedown branch. but you had a great idea... we need a rock-paper-scissors app :D
[18:40] <mzanetti> so we actually do that next time
[18:41] <mterry> mzanetti, hah  :)
[18:41] <mterry> mzanetti, a plugin for ubot would be good
[18:41] <mterry> mzanetti, thanks for rebase.  Will try to build silo 21...
[19:21] <Saviq> mterry, fix-upsidedown is actually josharenson's, and it already depends on panel-button-fixes, so rebasing yours on top would be easier IMO
[19:22] <mterry> hmph ok...  mzanetti how far are you on rebasing?
[19:22] <mzanetti> mterry, I merged, but I have some issues with tests
[19:23] <mzanetti> mterry, seems the tests you added are breaking. so probably I messed up with the merge
[19:23] <mterry> mzanetti, maybe my tests broke in the past and I didn't notice because CI is broken for my branches (depends on newer unity-api)
[19:23] <mterry> mzanetti, let me test in my pristine branch
[19:25] <mzanetti> mterry, nope. I ran your branch alone already. passing there
[19:26] <mterry> mzanetti, and this is why you should never add tests  ;)
[19:28] <mterry> mzanetti, well was the merge hard?  I'm realizing that it might be better to have my MP as the leaf, since it breaks CI (with the unity-api bump).  The fewer branches we have with uncheckable CI, the better
[19:28] <mzanetti> mterry, no. the merge should be really easy if you know your branch
[19:28] <mterry> alright, let me try
[19:29] <mzanetti> mterry, re-merge panel-button-fixes to the other first
[19:29] <mzanetti> mterry, it'll fix the two failing tests there
[19:29] <mzanetti> applies without conflict
[19:29] <mterry> mzanetti, doesn't lp:~unity-team/unity8/new_fix_upsidedown include that already?
[19:30] <mterry> or you're just saying for easier merge of that
[19:30] <mterry> to clear tests first
[19:30]  * mterry is picking up what you're putting down
[19:51] <kgunn> silo 21 seems to add a new oddity to windowed mode, the phone app is forcing rotation to portrait on the n7
[19:52] <Saviq> josharenson, can you comment, sounds related to your orientation work ↑?
[19:54] <SturmFlut> Dear Unity8 team, I just connected my Ubuntu Nexus 4 to a projector, coupled keyboard and mouse via Bluetooth and the phone turned into a desktop. You guys are my personal heroes and this message is good for a beer if we ever meet in person ;)
[19:55] <Saviq> kgunn, otoh:
[19:55] <Saviq> $ grep Orientation /usr/share/applications/dialer-app.desktop
[19:55] <Saviq> X-Ubuntu-Supported-Orientations=portrait
[19:55] <Saviq> SturmFlut, glad it's working for you
[19:56] <Saviq> kgunn, ah but also:
[19:56] <Saviq> $ grep Stage /usr/share/applications/dialer-app.desktop
[19:56] <Saviq> X-Ubuntu-StageHint=SideStage
[19:56] <Saviq> so it should end up in sidestage
[19:57] <kgunn> SturmFlut: :) thanks for the kind words
[19:57] <kgunn> Saviq: there's no sidestage in windowed mode tho
[19:57] <kgunn> (i thot)
[19:57] <Saviq> kgunn, ah now I know what you mean
[19:58] <Saviq> kgunn, you sure it wasn't the case before silo 21?
[19:58] <kgunn> add video to bug 1510360
[19:58] <kgunn> Saviq: wrt rotation...i _think_ but i can't promise
[19:58] <Saviq> kgunn, but yeah, I think josharenson's branch might have broken that https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/new_fix_upsidedown/+merge/275683
[19:58] <kgunn> i was testing phone late last night (w/o silo21) and didn't see it
[19:59] <josharenson> it probably did. that branch touches a lot of rotation stuff
[19:59] <kgunn> but i might have only been on nexus4
[20:00] <kgunn> ok...i have to run one more freakin' errand bbiab
[20:01] <Saviq> josharenson, sounds like we're missing a test then
[20:04] <Saviq> josharenson, it might be as simple as supportedOrientations: root.useNativeOrientation
[20:04] <Saviq> which the previous implementation had for desktop, and it doesn't now
[20:04] <josharenson> Saviq: ill take a look
[20:16] <attente> kgunn: hi, do you know if multiple surface apps are working or not on the phone?
[20:26] <Saviq> attente, not yet
[20:26] <Saviq> mterry, I merged panel-button-fixes to new-fix-upsidedown, you will rebase yours on top of the latter?
[20:26] <attente> Saviq: ok, thanks
[20:26] <mterry> Saviq, uh yeah.  whoops, I got distracted by something else, will get back on that...  :-/
[20:45] <kgunn> so if i'm in windowed mode and hold down the power key....shouldn't the power off prompt still come up ? (not connected to monitor either)
[20:46] <Saviq> kgunn, no, the phone is still a phone
[20:46] <Saviq> kgunn, at least that's the current thinking - you don't reboot, shut down your phone, regardless what peripherals it has connected
[20:48]  * kgunn thinks you mean yes
[20:48] <Saviq> truth be told you barely do that with your laptop these days
[20:48] <Saviq> kgunn, ah, hold, yes
[20:48] <Saviq> not on press
[20:48] <kgunn> right...power dialog never appeared
[20:48] <kgunn> just shut off
[20:49] <Saviq> ltinkl, ↑
[20:49] <kgunn> ok, it seems inconsistent....
[20:50] <kgunn> actually seems like dialog just takes too long to appear (so it powered off one time)
[20:50] <kgunn> i think i saw mterry talking to pat about it ^
[20:50] <mterry> kgunn, I've seen dialog take too long if system is loaded and unity8 doesn't get around to it
[20:51] <kgunn> hmmm...no load per se
[20:51] <mterry> kgunn, but pat says his system wasn't loaded
[20:51] <mterry> yeah...  hm
[20:51] <kgunn> in fact just booted
[20:51] <kgunn> i'm on n7 ubunt-pd+silo21 fwiw
[20:51] <kgunn> also...if i doublt tap the power button, i get the power dialog
[20:51] <mterry> kgunn, silo21 was built?  i thought it had problems
[20:52] <kgunn> did it? i heard my morning to give it a shot
[20:53] <Saviq> kgunn, mterry it did built, but we've added more since
[20:53] <Saviq> *build
[20:53] <mterry> Saviq, just tried rebuilding with my rebased branch
[20:54] <Saviq> and that's what we're having confilcts with
[20:54]  * mterry crosses fingers
[20:54] <Saviq> mterry, ack
[20:57] <Saviq> mterry, halt
[20:57] <mterry> .. already started it
[20:57] <mterry> oh it failed
[20:57] <Saviq> mterry, well, it conflicted still, but regardless, bump Ubuntu.Components import to 1.3
[20:58] <mterry> ah yes
[20:59] <mterry> wonder why it conflicted on same files...  what else touches those...
[21:00] <Saviq> mterry, there's like 4 branches in total that touch it
[21:00] <Saviq> sdk_13, quick_24, that might be where it's conflicting
[21:00] <Saviq> not sure we'll manage to land it all together, there's too many branches touching the same bits
[21:01] <Saviq> let me try and reproduce the conflict
[21:02] <mterry> not sdk_13...
[21:03] <Saviq> mterry, more than likely it's bzr being a bitch again
[21:06] <Saviq> mterry, yeah, criss-cross
[21:07] <mterry> Saviq, I've seen that message before, but it never caused a problem for me, usually bzr figures it out.  What do we do here?
[21:08] <Saviq> mterry, don't think we can do much, basically your branch would need two prerequisites
[21:08] <Saviq> bug #1313697 fwiw
[21:08] <Saviq> but afaict weave is dangerous
[21:08] <Saviq> the result might not be what you think it'd be
[21:09] <mterry> Saviq, alright.  so delay my branch?  Bugger
[21:10] <Saviq> mterry, but yeah, that's a conflict in bzr's mind http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/12983110/
[21:10] <mterry> Saviq, I wonder if moving that block elsewhere in the file would help
[21:11] <Saviq> mterry, there's other conflicts that are not as simple
[21:11] <mterry> hm
[21:11] <Saviq> mterry, but yeah, it's dumb
[21:12] <mterry> Saviq, we could do two landings right after each other?
[21:12] <Saviq> mterry, sure, just trying to understand this first
[21:14] <Saviq> mterry, that's the extent of the conflicts http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/12983218/
[21:14] <Saviq> so it's really stupid
[21:15] <mterry> Saviq, yup.  Those are the results of me merging in the other pre-req branch
[21:17] <Saviq> mterry, there's only one way I can think of, and that's actually replaying the commits from your branch on top of the prerequisite
[21:17]  * Saviq tries
[21:18] <Saviq> owait
[21:18] <mterry> Saviq, hrm, would mean renumbering commits, but ok.  I think mzanetti might have had a branch depending on mine, but as long as he knows...
[21:21] <kgunn> Saviq: fwiw, also seeing absolutely random reboots with silo 21...more than once, i'm not even interacting with the device, haven't connected with monitor even
[21:21] <kgunn> and it just reboots on it's own
[21:21] <Saviq> mterry, ok got it
[21:21] <Saviq> mterry, you need to undo the trunk merge
[21:22] <mterry> Saviq, hah.  dang it bzr
[21:22] <Saviq> mterry, so uncommit until you go past the trunk merge
[21:22] <Saviq> mterry, re-commit the 1.3 bit
[21:22] <Saviq> mterry, merge (conflicts) new-fix-upsidedown
[21:22] <Saviq> mterry, then it will work
[21:22] <mterry> yup
[21:22] <mterry> will try
[21:22] <Saviq> mterry, checked, it does
[21:22] <Saviq> only didn't fix the conflict proper
[21:23] <Saviq> mterry, bzr hates it when you have interleaved merges from the same branch into two consecutive branches
[21:24] <Saviq> kgunn, ouch, care to try clearing /var/log (sudo find /var/log /var/crash -type f -exec rm {} +)
[21:24] <Saviq> kgunn, and check stuff out the next time it happens
[21:24] <kgunn> sure
[21:26] <mterry> Saviq, my understanding is that the silo will handle --overwrite.   Correct?
[21:26] <Saviq> mterry, yeah, no problem
[21:27] <Saviq> mterry, it starts from scratch every time
[21:27] <Saviq> kgunn, could also be useful to look at logcat... not sure how to find the reboot point there though
[21:28] <Saviq> also I remember seeing something about a... foo.last log file that gets rotated on reboot, not sure where to find that, or maybe it was a flash-related thing
[21:28] <Saviq> so recovery
[21:30] <mterry> Saviq, alright building again
[21:31] <Saviq> mterry, tx
[21:34] <Saviq> lookin' good
[21:35] <mterry> Saviq, :(
[21:35] <Saviq> aaand it conflicted
[21:35] <Saviq> but that we can probably solve
[21:35] <Saviq> since that branch doesn't prereq anything yet
[21:35]  * Saviq steals from dednick
[21:36] <mterry> :)
[21:37] <mterry> Saviq, might be easier if we had a policy of pushing to ~unity-team
[21:37] <Saviq> mterry, well, have to resubmit in this case anyway, not a huge gain
[21:38] <Saviq> mterry, but yeah, I've been pondering that
[21:40] <Saviq> hmm not a trivial conflict
[21:46] <Saviq> ok thanks mzanetti, conflict more trivial than I thought
[21:46] <Saviq> mterry, one more try https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-021-1-build/221/console
[21:47] <Saviq> I kicked with force to rebuild all packages
[21:48] <Saviq> it wouldn't have built unity-api, qtmir or qtubuntu otherwise, bug in train wrt failed builds
[21:52] <Saviq> huuh there's more conflicts now instead of less... wtf
[21:52] <Saviq> ah criss cross again, /me resolves
[21:55] <Saviq> let's see if I have to go back all the way...
[21:59] <Saviq> in your face, bzr!
[22:09] <josharenson> greyback__: if you have a chance, can you take a look at ShellApplication.cpp in https://code.launchpad.net/~josharenson/unity8/slim_greeter_real_lightdm/+merge/271614  I merged a hack that I had before, and wanted to make sure it won't break multi-monitor (I plan to test it on another monitor in a bit)
[22:16] <Saviq> kgunn, silo 21 is rebuilding whole, should be done in an hour or so https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-021-1-build/223/console if you want to have a look