[01:10] I don't suppose someone could review https://launchpad.net/~unit193/+archive/ubuntu/staging/+sourcepub/5608954/+listing-archive-extra ? [01:12] (xscreensaver for xenial.) [07:35] good morning === ara is now known as Guest43853 [09:38] good morning dholbach :) [11:18] hey dkessel [18:11] I maintain check-mk in debian and it looks like universe is a little out of date with sid. how do I submit a request to update it? [18:12] someone on the upstream mailing list was asking about it today [18:21] taggart: universe where? Multiple releases of Ubuntu after all ;) [18:23] packages says it's currently only in wily [18:23] wait no, did the search wrong [18:23] taggart: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/check-mk [18:23] http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=check-mk [18:23] that's the view you want [18:23] rmadison is your friend ;) [18:23] (also the link tumbleweed sent :)) [18:24] rmadison is slow, though :P [18:24] yeah I don't have ubuntu in my rmadison [18:24] tumbleweed: true [18:24] tumbleweed: even so ;) [18:24] taggart: Xenial == sid version, probably due to autosync, are you referring to the older releases of Ubuntu (precise, trusty, vivid, wily)? [18:24] taggart: you do. -u ubuntu [18:24] oh good xenial has the latest version [18:24] tumbleweed: oh cool [18:25] so maybe what I am asking for is backports then [18:25] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports [18:26] ooo that reminds me... [18:26] the person I am trying to help is running trusty [18:26] micahg: poke [18:27] the backport should build with no changes (and if for some reason it doesn't I can help fix the source package so it does) [18:28] I'll file an issue in launchpad [18:28] last I checked the backports process, though, you also have to check inbetween releases [18:28] meh [18:28] * teward yawns [18:33] taggart: there's a tool for this: requestbackport [18:33] tumbleweed: oh cool ubuntu-dev-tools is in debian, nice [18:34] ooo i learned something new today xD [18:34] didn't know those were in Debian :) [18:39] hmm, I think it might need to be backported in debian though [18:39] requestbackport: Error: Source release xenial does not exist [18:40] taggart: check your distro-info-data version [18:41] tumbleweed: where is that? [18:41] it's a package [18:43] taggart: i can run the requestbackport if you'd like, and give you the link to edit stuff :P [18:43] yep, jessie only has 0.26 which is missing xenial [18:43] besides, i have to redo a backport req anyways for ZNC :) [18:43] I will backport it to jessie [18:43] teward: I can do it, I just have to shave the yaks in the way :) [18:43] :) [18:46] taggart: yeah, sorry, I'm pretty slack at getting distro-info-data SPUs in Debian. We had one difficult one, and they stalled [18:46] yeah SPU would be better, but jessie-backports will work for now [18:47] I guess I could do wheezy-backports too [18:48] (wheezy-backports-sloppy I mean) [18:56] backported and uploaded to jessie-backports [19:01] filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1511079 [19:01] Launchpad bug 1511079 in trusty-backports "Please backport check-mk 1.2.6p12-1 (universe) from xenial" [Undecided,New] [21:01] hi teward [21:02] micahg: was it you who was working with me on the znc backport? If so did we just cancel it or did it not go anywhere? [21:02] * teward forgets :) [21:03] micahg: there it is, you were working on me, can you invalid this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/trusty-backports/+bug/1449248 [21:03] Launchpad bug 1449248 in trusty-backports "Please backport znc 1.6.0-2 (universe) from vivid" [Wishlist,Triaged] [21:04] (I am going to wait for the next point release, which addresses some mem leak issues) [21:04] (that is, the next upstream point release, and that to land in Debian) [21:21] teward: done, thanks [22:01] micahg: you're welcome, thanks for poking at it :)