| dobey | george_e: it will build on either amd64 or i386 if it's an arch:all binary package. but arch:all binary packages only get built on a single arch, not on all arches | 02:57 |
|---|---|---|
| === caraka_ is now known as caraka | ||
| mvo | hey, I got a code importer question, we want a non-head git branch imported, gustavo wrote a little proxy for that (AIUI launchpad does not support that yet) and when I ran it locally git clone is fine, however https://code.launchpad.net/~mvo/snappy/15.04-github tells me of timeout issues. is there anything in the LP configuration firewall that we need to be aware of? | 07:35 |
| cjwatson | mvo: the importd firewall only allows ports 22,80,443,2401,3690,4155,8080,9000,9418 | 11:35 |
| cjwatson | mvo: (would be interested to hear why you moved to github rather than git.launchpad.net BTW) | 11:35 |
| mvo | cjwatson: thanks, I will pass that on. the move was suggested by gustavo, I cant want to answer for him, I suspect better tooling (like travis and coveralls) and more visibility | 11:42 |
| cjwatson | mvo: sadness | 11:57 |
| * mvo :( | 11:58 | |
| cjwatson | oh well, we just turned webhooks on for beta testers, hopefully better CI will be on its way | 11:59 |
| Facu | Hello all! | 12:05 |
| Facu | question: I'm trying to push a junk branch using git | 12:06 |
| Facu | this is what I'm doing: git push --set-upstream git+ssh://facundo@git.launchpad.net/~facundo/+junk/branchname --all | 12:06 |
| Facu | but it errors on me saying "fatal: remote error: Project '+junk' does not exist." | 12:07 |
| Facu | any ideas? thanks!! | 12:07 |
| cjwatson | Facu: +junk is only for bzr | 12:13 |
| cjwatson | Facu: you want ~facundo/+git/repository-name | 12:13 |
| cjwatson | Facu: see https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Git for available repository URL schemes | 12:13 |
| wgrant | mvo: LP can import non-HEAD branches fine; append ",branch=foo" to the URL. | 12:23 |
| Facu | cjwatson, thank you! | 12:25 |
| ral | hi there | 12:49 |
| ral | It looks like someone who previously reported a bug on launchpad has got some malware on their system, and it has posted a link to what looks like a compromised site. | 12:50 |
| ral | How can I go about getting the bug comment removed so it doesn't pose a danger? | 12:50 |
| ral | https://bugs.launchpad.net/mosquitto/+bug/1325297 | 12:50 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1325297 in mosquitto "Compilation warnings in 1.3.1" [Undecided,New] | 12:50 |
| ral | I've got to go away from the computer now, so I've set it to private security for the moment. | 12:59 |
| === [HeOS] is now known as HeOS | ||
| mvo | wgrant: oh, thanks. thats good to know, I was not aware of this, that simplifies stuff, my info was (way) outdated then | 13:59 |
| cjwatson | ral: I don't have permission to see that bug, apparently. | 14:29 |
| cjwatson | ral: Oh, because it's private security. Please make it public again and I'll hide the comment. | 14:30 |
| cjwatson | ral: (It may well not be malware on the user's system at all, but rather a forged From: address in email.) | 14:30 |
| mvo | hm, I get build failures in the livefs build for https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/wily/ubuntu-core-system-image with "?: keyserver.ubuntu.com: Connection refused". or is that a red herring? | 15:28 |
| ral | cjwatson: It's now public again. I'd not really noticed the hide link, I've done that myself now thanks for the pointer. Who can still see the comment when it's hidden? | 15:46 |
| cjwatson | ral: LP admins and the commenter themselves | 15:48 |
| cjwatson | mvo: it should be back now | 15:48 |
| cjwatson | a squid upgrade broke things | 15:48 |
| ral | cjwatson: ok, thanks. | 15:48 |
| cjwatson | ral: oh, project owners as well I believe. but not the world at large. | 15:48 |
| ral | Yes I guessed at that one as I can see it :) | 15:48 |
| cjwatson | I think you may not be able to if you reload. There's a to-do comment about that. | 15:50 |
| ral | Indeed you're right. | 15:51 |
| cjwatson | and right, that definitely looks like forged From: address on spam, not malware on the user's system | 15:51 |
| mvo | cjwatson: thanks! | 15:51 |
| teward | Do PPAs have HTTPS addresses for downloading from a PPA via apt? | 17:19 |
| teward | (i.e. https://ppa.launchpad.net/...) | 17:19 |
| dobey | teward: private PPAs do. public ones do not | 17:21 |
| dobey | as i understand it, anyway | 17:21 |
| teward | dobey: OK, thanks, that's what I thought | 17:21 |
| teward | dobey: does that apply to 'ftp' too? Or are PPAs HTTP only? | 17:32 |
| dobey | http only. ftp is only used for dput to upload source packages | 17:33 |
| teward | ok, and that applies globally? | 17:33 |
| teward | (for the ftp part) | 17:33 |
| teward | trying to answer someone on Ask Ubuntu... :) | 17:33 |
| dobey | yes, afaik | 17:33 |
| teward | thanks | 17:38 |
| Sweet5hark1 | a few hours ago I am sure I was able to create new branches/repos on launchpad. However now I do not seem to be able to do so. Any hints? | 20:04 |
| Sweet5hark1 | (on the code tab of my page, I find box titled "branches" with "active reviews" and "source package recipes", and above that a very thin box -- almost a line -- without any content) | 20:07 |
| Sweet5hark1 | IIRC that empty box was where I had controls for new repos earlier. | 20:07 |
| Sweet5hark1 | anyone? | 20:37 |
| dobey | did you get logged out? | 20:41 |
| cjwatson | Sweet5hark1: Normally you create branches/repositories simply by pushing to them. I don't recall there being UI for that for a long time. | 20:55 |
| Sweet5hark1 | dobey: lol, nope, not logged out. | 20:56 |
| Sweet5hark1 | cjwatson: thanks, will try that then. Weird though, I was navigating a UI for creating a repo earlier today somehow -- But I have no idea how I got there. | 20:58 |
| cjwatson | Sweet5hark1: The ability to register a branch in the UI was removed in 2012, as far as I can see ... | 20:59 |
| cjwatson | Sweet5hark1: Unless you're thinking of the UI for registering a code import | 21:00 |
| dobey | Sweet5hark1: there is the "Import a branch" link on project code pages, but not on person code pages | 21:00 |
| cjwatson | (That empty portlet is a bug, though, and should be filed.) | 21:00 |
| cjwatson | So yes, you definitely had controls for new branches in that empty box earlier. Where "earlier" = March 2012. :-) | 21:02 |
| cjwatson | But not recently. | 21:02 |
| dobey | unless you had an extremely old cached page that somehow got rendered ;) | 21:04 |
| Sweet5hark1 | cjwatson, dobey: that (cached page) would be surprising as I get the empty box on my users code page an on the code page of ~libreoffice. | 23:24 |
| wgrant | Sweet5hark1: There's not meant to be a link to create a repo there, except for the code import link. | 23:28 |
| Sweet5hark1 | wgrant, cjwatson: this is how it looks here: http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/lpcodeme.png http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/lpcodelo.png | 23:34 |
| wgrant | Sweet5hark1: The lack of action links is not a bug, but the empty portlet should not be shown. | 23:34 |
| Sweet5hark1 | wgrant: filed as bug 1511559 | 23:39 |
| ubot5 | bug 1511559 in Launchpad itself "I see empty portlets ..." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1511559 | 23:39 |
| wgrant | Thanks. | 23:39 |
| * Sweet5hark1 fixed his ssh setup, now pushing works. | 23:46 | |
| Sweet5hark1 | thx everyone. | 23:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
