[02:57] <dobey> george_e: it will build on either amd64 or i386 if it's an arch:all binary package. but arch:all binary packages only get built on a single arch, not on all arches
[07:35] <mvo> hey, I got a code importer question, we want a non-head git branch imported, gustavo wrote a little proxy for that (AIUI launchpad does not support that yet) and when I ran it locally git clone is fine, however https://code.launchpad.net/~mvo/snappy/15.04-github tells me of timeout issues. is there anything in the LP configuration firewall that we need to be aware of?
[11:35] <cjwatson> mvo: the importd firewall only allows ports 22,80,443,2401,3690,4155,8080,9000,9418
[11:35] <cjwatson> mvo: (would be interested to hear why you moved to github rather than git.launchpad.net BTW)
[11:42] <mvo> cjwatson: thanks, I will pass that on. the move was suggested by gustavo, I cant want to answer for him, I suspect better tooling (like travis and coveralls) and more visibility
[11:57] <cjwatson> mvo: sadness
[11:58]  * mvo :(
[11:59] <cjwatson> oh well, we just turned webhooks on for beta testers, hopefully better CI will be on its way
[12:05] <Facu> Hello all!
[12:06] <Facu> question: I'm trying to push a junk branch using git
[12:06] <Facu> this is what I'm doing:  git push --set-upstream git+ssh://facundo@git.launchpad.net/~facundo/+junk/branchname --all
[12:07] <Facu> but it errors on me saying "fatal: remote error: Project '+junk' does not exist."
[12:07] <Facu> any ideas? thanks!!
[12:13] <cjwatson> Facu: +junk is only for bzr
[12:13] <cjwatson> Facu: you want ~facundo/+git/repository-name
[12:13] <cjwatson> Facu: see https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Git for available repository URL schemes
[12:23] <wgrant> mvo: LP can import non-HEAD branches fine; append ",branch=foo" to the URL.
[12:25] <Facu> cjwatson, thank you!
[12:49] <ral> hi there
[12:50] <ral> It looks like someone who previously reported a bug on launchpad has got some malware on their system, and it has posted a link to what looks like a compromised site.
[12:50] <ral> How can I go about getting the bug comment removed so it doesn't pose a danger?
[12:50] <ral> https://bugs.launchpad.net/mosquitto/+bug/1325297
[12:59] <ral> I've got to go away from the computer now, so I've set it to private security for the moment.
[13:59] <mvo> wgrant: oh, thanks. thats good to know, I was not aware of this, that simplifies stuff, my info was (way) outdated then
[14:29] <cjwatson> ral: I don't have permission to see that bug, apparently.
[14:30] <cjwatson> ral: Oh, because it's private security.  Please make it public again and I'll hide the comment.
[14:30] <cjwatson> ral: (It may well not be malware on the user's system at all, but rather a forged From: address in email.)
[15:28] <mvo> hm, I get build failures in the livefs build for https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/wily/ubuntu-core-system-image with "?: keyserver.ubuntu.com: Connection refused". or is that a red herring?
[15:46] <ral> cjwatson: It's now public again. I'd not really noticed the hide link, I've done that myself now thanks for the pointer. Who can still see the comment when it's hidden?
[15:48] <cjwatson> ral: LP admins and the commenter themselves
[15:48] <cjwatson> mvo: it should be back now
[15:48] <cjwatson> a squid upgrade broke things
[15:48] <ral> cjwatson: ok, thanks.
[15:48] <cjwatson> ral: oh, project owners as well I believe.  but not the world at large.
[15:48] <ral> Yes I guessed at that one as I can see it :)
[15:50] <cjwatson> I think you may not be able to if you reload.  There's a to-do comment about that.
[15:51] <ral> Indeed you're right.
[15:51] <cjwatson> and right, that definitely looks like forged From: address on spam, not malware on the user's system
[15:51] <mvo> cjwatson: thanks!
[17:19] <teward> Do PPAs have HTTPS addresses for downloading from a PPA via apt?
[17:19] <teward> (i.e. https://ppa.launchpad.net/...)
[17:21] <dobey> teward: private PPAs do. public ones do not
[17:21] <dobey> as i understand it, anyway
[17:21] <teward> dobey: OK, thanks, that's what I thought
[17:32] <teward> dobey: does that apply to 'ftp' too? Or are PPAs HTTP only?
[17:33] <dobey> http only. ftp is only used for dput to upload source packages
[17:33] <teward> ok, and that applies globally?
[17:33] <teward> (for the ftp part)
[17:33] <teward> trying to answer someone on Ask Ubuntu... :)
[17:33] <dobey> yes, afaik
[17:38] <teward> thanks
[20:04] <Sweet5hark1> a few hours ago I am sure I was able to create new branches/repos on launchpad. However now I do not seem to be able to do so. Any hints?
[20:07] <Sweet5hark1> (on the code tab of my page, I find box titled "branches" with "active reviews" and "source package recipes", and above that a very thin box -- almost a line -- without any content)
[20:07] <Sweet5hark1> IIRC that empty box was where I had controls for new repos earlier.
[20:37] <Sweet5hark1> anyone?
[20:41] <dobey> did you get logged out?
[20:55] <cjwatson> Sweet5hark1: Normally you create branches/repositories simply by pushing to them.  I don't recall there being UI for that for a long time.
[20:56] <Sweet5hark1> dobey: lol, nope, not logged out.
[20:58] <Sweet5hark1> cjwatson: thanks, will try that then. Weird though, I was navigating a UI for creating a repo earlier today somehow -- But I have no idea how I got there.
[20:59] <cjwatson> Sweet5hark1: The ability to register a branch in the UI was removed in 2012, as far as I can see ...
[21:00] <cjwatson> Sweet5hark1: Unless you're thinking of the UI for registering a code import
[21:00] <dobey> Sweet5hark1: there is the "Import a branch" link on project code pages, but not on person code pages
[21:00] <cjwatson> (That empty portlet is a bug, though, and should be filed.)
[21:02] <cjwatson> So yes, you definitely had controls for new branches in that empty box earlier.  Where "earlier" = March 2012. :-)
[21:02] <cjwatson> But not recently.
[21:04] <dobey> unless you had an extremely old cached page that somehow got rendered ;)
[23:24] <Sweet5hark1> cjwatson, dobey: that (cached page) would be surprising as I get the empty box on my users code page an on the code page of ~libreoffice.
[23:28] <wgrant> Sweet5hark1: There's not meant to be a link to create a repo there, except for the code import link.
[23:34] <Sweet5hark1> wgrant, cjwatson: this is how it looks here: http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/lpcodeme.png http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/lpcodelo.png
[23:34] <wgrant> Sweet5hark1: The lack of action links is not a bug, but the empty portlet should not be shown.
[23:39] <Sweet5hark1> wgrant: filed as bug 1511559
[23:39] <wgrant> Thanks.
[23:46]  * Sweet5hark1 fixed his ssh setup, now pushing works.
[23:46] <Sweet5hark1> thx everyone.