[00:19] <Sweet5hark1> hmm, what does setting a target on a git-repo mean? what does it change?
[00:19] <wgrant> Sweet5hark1: The target is the project that the repository is in.
[00:21] <Sweet5hark1> wgrant: "in" meaning what? I mean, if a repo is owned by me but has a target package in ubuntu, what does each of that mean for the repo?
[00:22] <wgrant> Sweet5hark1: The owner can write to the repo.
[00:22] <wgrant> The repo shows up in the target.
[00:25] <Sweet5hark1> wgrant: where in the target? I did set my owned repo to target ubuntu/libreoffice, but cant see any reference to it on either https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+all-branches or https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice
[00:25] <wgrant> Ah, that's a bug with packages that have no branches.
[00:26] <wgrant> Sweet5hark1: Ubuntu's official VCS is bzr, so those pages show bzr branches by default. There's meant to be a "View Git repositories" link if there are git repositories, but it looks like that mightn't show for packages that don't have any bzr branches.
[00:27] <wgrant> Most Ubuntu packages do have bzr branches, due to UDD, but libreoffice is an infamous exception to that rule.
[00:27] <Sweet5hark1> wgrant: ah ok.
[00:27] <Sweet5hark1> "infamous" hrhr
[00:27] <wgrant> So I think you get to file another bug :D
[00:28] <wgrant> https://code.launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen/+git says it's in the right place.
[00:29] <Sweet5hark1> no biggie, just playing around with it for now to get used to it. but yeah, will file a bug.
[00:30] <wgrant> There are only a handful of packages that are sufficiently big to never have imported at all, so not a case we would have found easily in manual testing :(
[00:34] <Sweet5hark1> wgrant: http://vmiklos.hu/blog/so-many-bugs.html "Based on technology proudly breaking your toolchain since 1985"
[00:34] <wgrant> Heh, definitely.
[00:36] <Sweet5hark1> filed as bug 1511573.
[00:45] <Sweet5hark1> hmm, so setting the target on a repo apparently changes the url for it. So I "moved" the repo by setting a target and then duplicated it by pushing to the old url.
[00:46] <wgrant> Right, it is "in" the target in the URL sense.
[00:47] <Sweet5hark1> Yeah, and its unlikely this does any harm.
[00:47] <wgrant> Hm?
[00:48] <Sweet5hark1> wgrant: If I push to a lp:~$owner/ubuntu/+source/package/+git/something url when there is nothing there yet, would that a/ work at all and b/ automagically set the target?
[00:49] <wgrant> Sweet5hark1: Yes, the target and owner are defined by the URL.
[00:49] <Sweet5hark1> wgrant: great
[00:49] <wgrant> lp:~$owner/$target(/+git/name)
[00:49] <wgrant> You only need the /+git/name if you need multiple repos for the same owner and target.
[13:10] <saiarcot895> Hi, is ppc64el supposed to be an unrestricted architecture (for building packages of this architecture in a PPA)?
[15:28] <Sweet5hark> https://code.launchpad.net/~documentfoundation/df-libreoffice/+git/core/+edit <- unchecking "owner default" ooopses here reproducable ....
[17:10] <kroot> Hello, I want to include the list of people that have contributed translations to my project through Launchpad, but I can't find a way to export the list of translators. Is there an API I can call to have it download?
[20:53] <alai> hi can someone please help on filing a bug on launchpad?  https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/odl-controller
[20:53] <alai> it gives error: "odl-controller" does not exist in Juju Charms Collection. Please choose a different package.
[20:53] <alai> i see a bug there using the odl-controller package
[20:54] <alai> cjwatson ^^
[20:56] <cjwatson> that's right, you can't file a bug on a package in a distribution if it doesn't have an official series link, which this doesn't.  you might be able to file it elsewhere and reassign
[20:56] <cjwatson> (but I'm not checking the details at 9pm on Friday)
[20:59] <alai> ah thanks