[02:58] <edher57> Hello, this is my first time on irc, is this a support channel or can we talk about anything related to ubuntu-touch?
[03:02] <Dragonkeeper> hello
[03:06] <Dragonkeeper> anyone have any info in sending push notifications to a ubuntu device from a server running ubuntu
[05:48] <nhaines> edher: It's mostly a developer channel but anything about Ubuntu on phones or tablets is sort of on-topic as long as it doesn't interrupt active developer conversation, so most of the time it's welcome.  :)
[06:03] <messenjah> good morning :-) has anyone encountered problems with the Hotspot function after the last update? i am on Ubuntu 15.04 (r26) now and Hotspot worked fine until this build.
[06:03] <messenjah> i have a Aquaris E4.5 Ubuntu Edition
[06:08] <Dragonkeeper> what sort of problems?
[06:10] <messenjah> oh sorry -.-
[06:10] <messenjah> it seems to not open a hotspot wi-fi network. i cannot find one on any of my devices
[06:11] <Dragonkeeper> hmm
[06:13] <Dragonkeeper> messenjah: working here   got a phone access point show up on laptop
[06:13] <messenjah> on what devices?
[06:13] <messenjah> device*
[06:14] <Dragonkeeper> e4.5 r26
[06:14] <messenjah> oh same, cool
[06:14] <Dragonkeeper> yh  lucky.. only flashed r26 an hr ago :p
[06:14] <messenjah> :-D
[06:14] <messenjah> did it some days ago
[06:15] <Dragonkeeper> i was on the devel branches for a long time  but stable seems to be caught up for my daily use
[06:17] <messenjah> oh okay. i haven't used this phone often. the lack of apps and possibilities is a bit disappointing in my opinion.
[06:19] <Dragonkeeper> i use it as my only device. lack of apps isnt an issue, but more are needed.   i dont know what u mean by lack of possibilities though
[06:23] <messenjah> i did a phone reset and now it's working again :-)
[06:25] <messenjah> before getting this phone i was thinking about running ubuntu/debian apps or packages or scripts on the device
[06:30] <Dragonkeeper> messenjah: u can do that
[06:30] <nhaines> Dragonkeeper: https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/start/platform/guides/push-notifications-server-guide/ https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/start/platform/guides/push-notifications-client-guide/
[06:33] <Dragonkeeper> nhaines thanks   gonna need to go through it all at some point   atm tho im just using caxton
[07:53] <dholbach> good morning
[08:39] <ghast_> hei, i have LG Optimus L70 Dual D325 Black i want to install ubuntu touch on it. i am new on this.
[08:40] <ghast_> i dont know how to do it. please help me :D
[11:16] <abeato> tsdgeos, ping
[11:17] <tsdgeos> abeato: hi
[11:17] <abeato> tsdgeos, hi, I think I know what is happening in bug #1511029
[11:18] <tsdgeos> cool :)
[11:18] <tsdgeos> anything i can help with?
[11:18] <abeato> tsdgeos, looks like qtubuntu-media gets confused when initially a single song, and then a playlist are played
[11:19] <abeato> so if you play a single song from an album
[11:19] <abeato> sorry, if you play first a single song not in an album
[11:19] <abeato> and then a song that belongs to an album
[11:19] <abeato> you get the issue
[11:20] <abeato> tsdgeos, how are you using QMediaPlayer::setMedia() ?
[11:20] <tsdgeos> yes, exactly what the bug is saying, isn't it?
[11:20] <abeato> that function gets a QMediaContent
[11:20] <abeato> do you build it differently when you have just one song instead of an album?
[11:21] <tsdgeos> yes
[11:21] <tsdgeos> i thoguth that was clear by the text of the bug
[11:21] <tsdgeos> maybe i'm just awful at bug reporting :D
[11:21] <abeato> tsdgeos, could you try to build it always with a playlist even when you only have one song?
[11:22] <abeato> well, I did not see it that clear in the description tbh :)
[11:23] <tsdgeos> well the bug itself says "play from 'source' after playing from 'playlist'"
[11:23] <tsdgeos> i guess the problem is that the qtmultimedia naming is different from the  qtubuntu-media naming
[11:23] <abeato> tsdgeos, yep maybe a bit different
[11:24] <tsdgeos> abeato: i could do that, but that would just hide the bug and honestly it seems like it should be a supported use case
[11:24] <abeato> tsdgeos, anyway, please try using QMediaContent(QMediaPlaylist *playlist, const QUrl &contentUrl = QUrl(), bool takeOwnership = false); constructor and see it that works, as a workaroung for the moment
[11:24] <abeato> tsdgeos, agreed
[11:24] <tsdgeos> abeato: i can't use that
[11:25] <abeato> tsdgeos, I just want to confirm the hypothesis :)
[11:25] <tsdgeos> abeato: i'm using qml
[11:25] <tsdgeos> anything you mention about QMediaContent doesn't exist for me
[11:25] <jhodapp> tsdgeos, actually what's different is the declarative API vs the C++ API in QtMultimedia
[11:25] <tsdgeos> but yes i can try only using a playlist and see if that workarounds the problem
[11:25] <abeato> tsdgeos, great, thanks
[11:44] <tsdgeos> abeato: yes, if i don't do what the bug describes i don't get the bug
[11:44] <tsdgeos> abeato: jhodapp: i guess i can workaround it if that's what you want
[12:13] <abeato> tsdgeos, working on the bug atm
[13:20] <kenvandine> oSoMoN, i assume you're pretty familiar with QNetworkRequest and QNetworkAccessManager?
[13:21] <kenvandine> we have a problem in system-settings, if the network changes after we start a check for updates it never seems to finish
[13:21] <kenvandine> like switching from cellular data to wifi, etc
[13:23] <kenvandine> i'd expect it to fail with an error, but i guess under the covers it still thinks it's a valid network... dunno
[13:26] <dobey> kenvandine: does it time out after 10 minutes? :)
[13:27] <kenvandine> dobey, maybe... certainly not a reasonable amount of time :)
[13:28] <kenvandine> dobey, hopefully you're kidding... and there isn't seriously a 10 minute timeout :)
[13:28] <dobey> kenvandine: the default tcp timeout is 600 seconds
[13:29] <kenvandine> dobey, so you're thinking that QNetworkRequest just follows that?
[13:31] <dobey> kenvandine: i think QNAM does. i think you can specify a shorter timeout
[13:31] <kenvandine> that could help a bit...
[13:31] <kenvandine> but really i'd like to just handle it
[13:32] <dobey> kenvandine: i know we've had similar problems in the click scpoe, where we use qtnetwork, but i don't recall if we did anything to "fix" it. the scope machinery has a much shorter timeout at least
[13:32] <dobey> yeah, would be nice if stuff just worked when switching networks
[13:32] <kenvandine> ah... so maybe i can look at unity-click-scope?
[13:40] <dobey> kenvandine: unity-scope-click, sure. i don't recall if we did anything special there. we do have a bit of abstraction on top of qtnetwork though, so we can test it with gmock
[13:41] <tsdgeos> jhodapp: abeato: i've updated the descirption in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/media-hub/+bug/1511029 to make it not dependant on any unity8 or scopes code
[13:42] <abeato> tsdgeos, awesome, the qml code will be helpful
[13:44] <oSoMoN> kenvandine, I’ve used them, but I wouldn’t say I’m super familiar with them, I don’t know more than what the doc advertises
[13:45] <kenvandine> oSoMoN, thx, i think we have some ideas now
[13:57] <tsdgeos> abeato: jhodapp: i opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/media-hub/+bug/1511738 for the playlist clera bug
[13:57] <guest123124> anyone knows how to restart unity?
[13:57] <tsdgeos> clera -> clear
[13:57] <guest123124> i can kill the process but that's rude
[13:58] <abeato> tsdgeos, thanks
[13:58] <abeato> guest123124, "restart unity8" ?
[13:58] <guest123124> abeato, thanks
[13:58] <abeato> np
[14:01]  * guest123124 unity8 start/running, process 4010
[14:02] <guest123124> abeato, 595.7  0.6  66:29.94 history-daemon
[14:03] <guest123124> 595% cpu
[14:03] <guest123124> this can't be good
[14:03] <guest123124> is it safe to kill the process?
[14:04] <abeato> probably, but not sure :)
[14:04] <jgdx> bfiller, ^
[14:05] <jgdx> history-daemon
[14:05] <pmcgowan> that logs all the calls and texts afaik
[14:05] <kenvandine> seb128, can you review https://code.launchpad.net/~ken-vandine/ubuntu-system-settings/lp1505663/+merge/276182
[14:06] <guest123124> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/history-service/+bug/1511564
[14:06] <kenvandine> seb128, it's a resubmit with a prereq on the remove retry button branch
[14:07]  * guest123124 history-daemon killed 
[14:07] <guest123124> my poor battery :(
[14:08] <seb128> kenvandine, approved
[14:08] <kenvandine> seb128, thx
[14:08] <seb128> yw!
[14:14] <elopio> zbenjamin: if I want qtdeclarative5-qtmir-plugin on trusty, should I get it from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-team/+archive/ubuntu/testing ?
[14:38] <mhall119> oSoMoN: bfiller: can one of your propose the app convergence session to summit so I can get it on the schedule?
[14:38] <zbenjamin> elopio: the qtmir plugin?
[14:39] <zbenjamin> elopio: i do not know about that, greyback_ should know
[14:39] <elopio> zbenjamin: yes, it says you were the last to upload it to trusty.
[14:39] <bfiller> mhall119: yeah will do it in a few
[14:39] <mhall119> thanks bfiller
[14:40] <greyback_> elopio: qtmir didn't exist in trusty days, so you'll need a backport, which I guess was in that ppa
[14:44] <zbenjamin> elopio: wut?
[14:46] <bfiller> mhall119: http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1511/meeting/22630/app-convergence/
[14:49] <mhall119> thanks bfiller
[15:03] <oSoMoN> mhall119, is the time displayed on http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1511/meeting/22630/app-convergence/ (14:00 - 14:55) expressed in UTC ?
[15:03] <mhall119> oSoMoN: yes, let me know if you need a different time
[15:03] <mhall119> or different day
[15:03] <oSoMoN> mhall119, that’s fine by me, just wanted to confirm
[15:35] <mhall119> oSoMoN: would 1500 UTC work for you too?
[15:36] <elopio> zbenjamin: yes, take a look at the Uploaded by column.
[15:37] <elopio> but well, greyback_, where can I get qtmir for trusty?
[15:38] <greyback_> elopio: you build it yourself, or get that PPA updated for you
[15:38] <greyback_> why do you want qtmir on trusty? I don't even think mir works on trusty without a huge amount of work
[15:38] <oSoMoN> mhall119, sure
[15:38] <oSoMoN> mhall119, actually that’s even better for me, less rush for the lunch break
[15:38] <elopio> greyback_: there is a snapcraft example that requires qtmir, and we are building it on travis that is trusty.
[15:39] <elopio> so I want to check that the snap builds correctly. But if the qt snaps are >trusty only, I can skip it.
[15:40] <greyback_> elopio: you'd better skip one needing qtmir
[15:41] <elopio> sergiusens: ^
[15:44] <sergiusens> elopio, greyback_ building, not running; or is this due to the gcc5 issue?
[15:44] <sergiusens> elopio, we've been talking with tedg to remove the qml plugin all together and have it be a wiki part
[15:45] <sergiusens> building and/or assembling, but not running
[15:45] <greyback_> sergiusens: I've zero idea. mir uses c++14, so needs relative new compiler. And it's mesa side *might* require new-ish kernel. But if you have mir working, qtmir should build ok
[15:46] <tedg> sergiusens: We should add an issue for that! /me is playing with issues still
[15:49] <sergiusens> tedg, done
[19:47] <rainman> is my nexus 6 supported by motorola
[19:53] <rainman> is my nexus 6 by motorola supported with ubuntu touch
[19:54] <kylian> i wana instal linux on my phone is that posible???
[19:55] <dobey> !devices | rainman
[21:42] <shann> Hi, i have problem with my BQ E5 Ubuntu Edition, i wrong add group for user phablet. I try to reset my phone. but now i can't connect to wifi.
[21:42] <shann> I think reset not work properly.
[21:44] <shann> http://pastebin.com/SHMybX7T
[22:03] <shann> i resolv recovery flash, i launch command after phone in recovery menu instead of launch command when boot phone in recovery mode.
[22:13] <ogra_> shann, try to not run it as root but with sudo as a user
[22:14] <ogra_> (like all the docs tell you)
[22:15] <shann> i run ubuntu-device-flash in simple user and work, i wrong procedure run command after device in boot menu instead of launch command before boot device in recovery.
[22:15] <ogra_> (and yes, the phone needs to be in bootloader, not in recovery mode)
[22:16] <ogra_> ... like the line: 2015/10/30 22:43:43 Expecting the device to be in the bootloader... waiting tells you
[22:16] <shann> Now i reconfigure my phone, webdav sync (owncloud) and davfs2 for files
[22:16] <ogra_> just dont break it again :)
[22:19] <shann> yes of course :)
[22:57] <shann> strange, calendar sync perfectly, but in today scope when click on task i view task. but then click on open calendar not open them.